戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 y complicates the study of opiate drugs like morphine.
2 at directly opposes the analgesic effects of morphine.
3  to receive either a weak opioid or low-dose morphine.
4 mice to psychomotor and rewarding effects of morphine.
5 odents by treatment with escalating doses of morphine.
6 tribute to the sexually dimorphic effects of morphine.
7 pioid that is over 80 times more potent than morphine.
8 ing agonist activity 3-fold more potent than morphine.
9 g an effect equal to or greater than that of morphine.
10  contrast to an equipotent analgesic dose of morphine.
11    Ethanol did not alter the brain levels of morphine.
12 ollowing a single exposure to a high dose of morphine.
13 lp to improve the pharmacological effects of morphine.
14 most notably the opiates such as codeine and morphine.
15 gesia, tolerance, and physical dependence to morphine.
16 mmatory response to prolonged treatment with morphine.
17 cus mediating the antinociceptive effects of morphine.
18 rrestin clusters significantly compared with morphine.
19 both EM2 and the clinically relevant agonist morphine.
20 eive either sublingual buprenorphine or oral morphine.
21 d neither was physical dependence to chronic morphine.
22 ed two 120-min infusions of either saline or morphine (0.1 mug/kg/min), separated by a 120-min break
23 easuring the response to a challenge dose of morphine (10 mg/kg i.p.).
24                                              Morphine (10 mg/kg per day i.p. x 12 days) tolerance dev
25 d in WT mice previously rendered tolerant to morphine (10 mg/kg per day i.p. x 12 days), but it was a
26 8360 (0.1 mg/kg per day i.p. x 12 days) with morphine (10 mg/kg per day x 12 days) blocked morphine t
27 icantly shorter with buprenorphine than with morphine (15 days vs. 28 days), as was the median length
28 requently used sedatives; fentanyl (44%) and morphine (20%) the most frequent opioids.
29 ioral changes due to TLR4 active metabolite, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) exposure in vivo.
30  Participants' treatment was stabilized with morphine, 30 mg, administered subcutaneously 4 times dai
31         In addition, the morphine metabolite morphine-3beta-D-glucuronide (M3G) elicited hyperalgesia
32 lular uptake concentrations for morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were observed in stable exp
33 e development of SEFL, we show that systemic morphine, a treatment which is known to reduce both PTSD
34                      Treatment with systemic morphine abolished CPP to saphenous nerve block, demonst
35 l genetic analyses of physical dependence on morphine across 23 mouse strains yielded significant cor
36                                              Morphine action at TLR4 initiates a neuroinflammatory re
37 importance of C-terminal variants in complex morphine actions.
38                   It is also unclear whether morphine acts exclusively through MOPs, or involves delt
39  simian immunodeficiency virus infections in morphine-addicted macaques.
40 genetic risk identified the enrichment terms morphine addiction and retrograde endocannabinoid signal
41                       We found that repeated morphine administration led to analgesic tolerance and h
42                  We evaluated the effects of morphine administration on the circulating proteolytic p
43              This novel mechanism may enable morphine administration to promote an environment that i
44                  We find that, after chronic morphine administration, an increase in arachidonic acid
45 y decreased in the spinal cord after chronic morphine administration.
46 ce, and heightened withdrawal in response to morphine administration.
47 nd increases neurotransmission after chronic morphine administration.
48 f physiological responses induced by chronic morphine administration.
49                               The model with morphine affecting co-receptor expression agrees well wi
50 ting in a large number of total syntheses of morphine alkaloids.
51                                              Morphine alters the circulating proteolytic profile in m
52 port, effectively preserving the efficacy of morphine analgesia and eliminating tolerance.
53                                     Although morphine analgesia is independent of these 6TM mu recept
54                                              Morphine analgesia was not altered, and neither was phys
55 wed that RGS9-2 complexes negatively control morphine analgesia, and promote the development of morph
56 vo; it significantly increased and prolonged morphine analgesia.
57  can be targeted to blunt the development of morphine analgesic tolerance, without affecting normal P
58 that critically underlies the development of morphine analgesic tolerance.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Cont
59 40 patients with cancer (118 in the low-dose morphine and 122 in the weak-opioid group) were included
60 evealed an inverse correlation between blood morphine and ethanol levels.
61 umulations with IC50 = 3.90 +/- 0.50 muM for morphine and IC50 = 6.04 +/- 0.86 muM for M6G, respectiv
62 ry outcome occurred in 88.2% of the low-dose morphine and in 57.7% of the weak-opioid group (odds ris
63  involved in hyperalgesia induced by chronic morphine and its metabolite M3G.
64 t review is to present published evidence on morphine and its potential interactions with P2Y12 recep
65 tion and blocks acute analgesic tolerance to morphine and kappa opioid receptor inactivation in vivo.
66 se brain can suppress tolerance via blocking morphine and M6G brain transport.
67 gher intracellular uptake concentrations for morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were observed
68                                        While morphine and other narcotics are the most widely prescri
69                                     Although morphine and other opioids offer dramatic and impressive
70       The potentially lethal side effects of morphine and related opioids-which include fatal respira
71 either nlp-3 or nlp-24 overexpression mimics morphine and suppresses withdrawal.
72        Here, we compared effects of cocaine, morphine, and heroin self-administration on two forms of
73 e morphine-induced CNS neuroinflammation and morphine- and endotoxin-induced changes in glutamate tra
74                           DS2 did not affect morphine antinociception in naive or CFA-treated male ra
75 ng to PAG TLR4 with (+)-naloxone potentiated morphine antinociception significantly in females such t
76 nkeys developed acute physical dependence on morphine, as manifested by precipitated withdrawal signs
77 ings uncover novel mechanisms in response to morphine-associated environmental cues and the underlyin
78                                  Blockade of morphine binding to PAG TLR4 with (+)-naloxone potentiat
79  binding to the neuronal mu-opioid receptor, morphine binds to the innate immune receptor toll-like r
80 o further investigate the role of OATP2B1 in morphine brain transport and tolerance, the novel nanopa
81 oped to the respiratory depressant effect of morphine but at a slower rate than tolerance to its anti
82 symptoms could be elicited in the absence of morphine by administering naloxone with an alpha2 antago
83 e and safe doses of opiate painkillers, like morphine, can be limited by respiratory depression.
84 n ethanol was co-administered along with the morphine challenge.
85 ed when ethanol was co-administered with the morphine challenge.
86                                              Morphine, cocaine, and methamphetamine were chosen as te
87 etermination of four representative opioids (morphine, codeine, oxycodone, hydrocodone) and five stim
88 mples did not comply with the limits set for morphine, codeine, thebaine and noscapine by Hungarian l
89 etermine the content of six opium alkaloids (morphine, codeine, thebaine, noscapine, papaverine and n
90 tral subregions of the VS and trained to the morphine conditioned place preference.
91 t synaptic expression of RhoA increased with morphine conditioning and blocking RhoA signaling preven
92                                    Moreover, morphine conditioning may pose extra obstacles to contro
93  promotes enriched maternal care) attenuates morphine conditioning, reduces morphine-induced glial ac
94 her susceptibility remains extremely high in morphine conditioning.
95 A1 region of the hippocampus are affected by morphine-conditioning training.
96 tatistically significant association between morphine consumption and plasma N-glycome.
97 that PS and ES similarly increased voluntary morphine consumption immediately following stress, despi
98 in (BTP) that is observed in the presence of morphine controlling ongoing pain.
99  closing metathesis to forge the tetracyclic morphine core.
100 nd analgesic efficacy of the standard opioid morphine covalently attached to hyperbranched polyglycer
101 nse when mice were trained using an unpaired morphine CPP design and was absent when morphine was adm
102             We compared the effects of acute morphine dependence and social isolation in non-anxious
103                                              Morphine dependence and withdrawal result in profound ne
104 chemical methods in NAc tissue, we show that morphine dependence increases cell surface expression of
105                        We use a rat model of morphine dependence to show that GluA1 subunits of AMPA
106 e facilitated morphine tolerance and reduced morphine dependence without affecting morphine reward.
107                           This serotonin- or morphine-dependent modulation can be rescued in npr-17-n
108 e (TST) rise representing hot flushes in the morphine-dependent ovariectomized rat model and results
109  AMPAR antagonist NBQX into the NAc shell of morphine-dependent rats prevented naloxone-induced condi
110 synaptosomal membrane levels of NAc GluA1 in morphine-dependent rats, suggesting a compensatory remov
111 eta and a significant rightward shift in the morphine dose-response curve.
112                                    Continued morphine dosing beyond 3 wk revealed stabilization of th
113 ssion in the injured DRG and potentiated the morphine effect on pain hypersensitivity induced by nerv
114  reduce the expression level of MORs and the morphine effect.
115 a total daily dose averaging at least 30 mg (morphine equivalent) for at least 1 month before screeni
116                The primary outcome was daily morphine-equivalent dosage (MED) of opioids dispensed fr
117  prescribers, prescriptions yielding a daily morphine-equivalent dose (MED) of more than 120 mg, and
118 ted that a maximum of 7 days, or 200 mg oral morphine equivalents (OME), should be prescribed at disc
119 oid use, route of opioid administration, and morphine equivalents at baseline.
120 an difference, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.01 morphine equivalents in milligrams per kilogram per 48 h
121 an difference, -3.50; 95% CI, -5.90 to -1.10 morphine equivalents in milligrams per kilogram per 48 h
122  years; 95 males and 6 females; [intravenous morphine equivalents, 12.50 vs 22.50 mg; P = .001]).
123 iotic, ceftriaxone, blocked reinstatement of morphine-evoked conditioned place preference.
124                                   This links morphine-evoked pathway- and cell-type-specific plastici
125                                              Morphine exerts its rewarding actions, at least in part,
126  that received LY2828360 coadministered with morphine exhibited a trend (P = 0.055) toward fewer nalo
127 eal-time catecholamine overflow during acute morphine exposure and naloxone-precipitated withdrawal i
128                                      Chronic morphine exposure selectively potentiates excitatory tra
129  underwent an in-patient detoxification with morphine, followed by maintenance on placebo (0 mg b.i.d
130 um from mice that were treated with 10 mg/kg morphine for 3 d displayed reduced chemotactic potential
131 esensitization induced by exposure to ME and morphine for 5 minutes at 37 degrees C.
132    However, a reduction in the inhibition by morphine for DOP-/- c.f. WT neurons and a DPDPE-induced
133     Buprenorphine may be more effective than morphine for this indication.
134 xcitatory inputs to D1-type neurons, whereas morphine-generated silent synapses were likely eliminate
135 ine was significantly higher in the low-dose morphine group (P < .001).
136 ne group and in 7 of 30 infants (23%) in the morphine group (P=0.36).
137 esponder patients was higher in the low-dose morphine group, as early as at 1 week.
138 tem overall symptom score, was better in the morphine group.
139 ree of activation a significant predictor of morphine half-maximal antinociceptive dose (ED50) values
140                                              Morphine has been a target for synthetic chemists since
141 les a short and stereoselective synthesis of morphine in an overall yield of 6.6 %.
142 ment of antinociceptive tolerance to chronic morphine in both the tail-immersion and acetic acid stre
143          Application of sub-optimal doses of morphine in electroacupuncture-treated moderate-responde
144 conjugate is designed to selectively release morphine in injured tissue and to prevent blood-brain ba
145 and preserved the antinociceptive effects of morphine in male rats.
146                    As heroin is converted to morphine in man, selective reversal of morphine toleranc
147 ed the pharmacodynamic properties of chronic morphine in mice following bacterial depletion with oral
148                            Concentrations of morphine in the brain, blood, paw tissue, and in vitro c
149  in vitro confirmed the selective release of morphine in the inflamed milieu.
150 tribute to the sexually dimorphic effects of morphine in the rat.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We demonstrat
151 on with self-administration of postoperative morphine in two cohorts of patients that underwent major
152 ivo) but not upon direct exposure of glia to morphine (in vitro).
153                                              Morphine increased dopamine transients in the NAc, but d
154 gether, these findings indicate that chronic morphine increases synaptic availability of GluA1-contai
155                                              Morphine induced an approximately 30% reduction in plasm
156         In vivo behavior studies showed that morphine induced greater antinociception in CFA-treated
157 y reduced gut bacteria and prevented chronic morphine induced increases in gut permeability, colonic
158 likely via a synaptogenesis process, whereas morphine induced silent synapses in D2-type neurons via
159   By using quantitative RT-PCR, we confirmed morphine-induced alterations in MMP-9 and TIMP expressio
160 applied to investigate the impact of RGS7 on morphine-induced alterations in neuronal excitability an
161 found that Hsp90 inhibition strongly blocked morphine-induced anti-nociception in models of post-surg
162 evealed divergent roles for the C termini in morphine-induced behaviors, highlighting the importance
163      RGS7 exerted its effects by controlling morphine-induced changes in excitability of medium spiny
164 Pro1595, injected systemically, to normalize morphine-induced CNS neuroinflammation and morphine- and
165 of the VS could facilitate the extinction of morphine-induced conditioned place preference in rats.
166 ut wall disruption and significantly reduced morphine-induced constipation.
167 g RhoA signaling prevented the expression of morphine-induced CPP.
168             Furthermore, SB 334867 blocked a morphine-induced decrease in presynaptic GABA release, a
169 ted C-terminal tails with beta-arrestin 2 in morphine-induced desensitization and tolerance.
170 e) attenuates morphine conditioning, reduces morphine-induced glial activation, and increases microgl
171 ssociated with serious side effects, such as morphine-induced hyperalgesia (MIH) and anti-nociceptive
172 xamined MOR contribution to OIH by comparing morphine-induced hyperalgesia in wild type (WT) and MOR
173 administration of ABX prevented tolerance to morphine-induced hypoexcitability.
174 rons in adult mice did not affect general or morphine-induced locomotor activity, but markedly increa
175 orresponding to the Y382-384 site suppressed morphine-induced microglial reactivity and preserved the
176 tor type 1 (OxR1) in the VTA is required for morphine-induced plasticity of dopamine neurons.
177                                       Such a morphine-induced population switch not only has adverse
178 in a naive tail-flick model, while enhancing morphine-induced precipitated withdrawal.
179                     mE7M-B6 mutant mice lost morphine-induced receptor desensitization in the brain s
180  decrease in presynaptic GABA release, and a morphine-induced shift in the balance of excitatory and
181    Prior work has characterized cocaine- and morphine-induced upregulation of silent synapses in the
182  to cross the blood-brain barrier to reverse morphine-induced, centrally mediated analgesia when give
183                 We show that withdrawal from morphine induces long-term synaptic facilitation in lami
184                                              Morphine inhibited spontaneous IPSC frequency, mainly th
185  when cells were transplanted after repeated morphine injections.
186 circuit activation, VTA gene expression, and morphine intake.
187                  In contrast to conventional morphine, intravenous PG-M exclusively activated periphe
188 ese data suggest that inhibition of IPSCs by morphine involves a beta-arr2/c-Src mediated mechanism.
189                                     Although morphine is a gold standard medication, long-term opioid
190                                              Morphine is an alkaloid from the opium poppy used to tre
191 ent of the neonatal abstinence syndrome with morphine is associated with a lengthy duration of therap
192                                              Morphine is one of the most widely used drugs for the tr
193               In current guidelines, though, morphine is recommended with decreasing strength of reco
194 receptors limits the therapeutic efficacy of morphine-like analgesics and mediates the long duration
195 is devoid of both respiratory depression and morphine-like reinforcing activity in mice at equi-analg
196  Regulating main brain-uptake transporter of morphine may restrict its tolerance generation, then mod
197                                              Morphine mediates its euphoric and analgesic effects by
198                             However, MOR and morphine metabolism involvement in OIH have been little
199                             In addition, the morphine metabolite morphine-3beta-D-glucuronide (M3G) e
200              Mice were treated with opioids (morphine, methadone, or buprenorphine) for up to 6 days.
201 PMA, dose of analgesics/sedatives (fentanyl, morphine, midazolam), mechanical ventilation, hypotensio
202 sks when considering increasing dosage to 50 morphine milligram equivalents or more per day, and avoi
203 s elegans, opioid receptor agonists, such as morphine, mimic serotonin, and suppress the overall with
204 as associated with a higher required dose of morphine (n=241, P=3.9 x 10(-2)).
205 rokinin 1 receptor (NK1R) in the VTA renders morphine non-rewarding.
206 e hypothesis that the attenuated response to morphine observed in females is the result of increased
207 AG contributes to the attenuated response to morphine observed in females.
208 Ps, beta-arr2 and c-Src in the inhibition by morphine of GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (
209 nteric glia mediates the prolonged effect of morphine on constipation.
210 orporates experimentally observed effects of morphine on inducing HIV-1 co-receptor expression.
211                                              Morphine, on the contrary, is a commonly used drug in th
212 ssed, a main reduction was found for each of morphine or M6G in cerebrums or epencephalons of acute m
213 ons of MOR bound to a classical opioid drug (morphine) or a potent G protein-biased agonist (TRV-130)
214                        Our results show that morphine pairing with environmental cues (ie, the condit
215  cocaine, codeine, heroine, methamphetamine, morphine, phentermine, L-phenylepherine, proglitazone, a
216                  Here, we find that repeated morphine potentiates excitatory transmission and increas
217  activation, and in this study we found that morphine potentiates P2X7R-mediated Ca(2+) responses in
218 ptors as a key mechanistic step required for morphine potentiation of P2X7R function.
219  data demonstrate that the main receptor for morphine predominantly shapes the so-called reward/avers
220                     Exposures to cocaine and morphine produce similar adaptations in nucleus accumben
221                        Our results show that morphine promotes a target cell subpopulation switch fro
222                                       Unlike morphine, PZM21 is more efficacious for the affective co
223                        All samples contained morphine ranging from 0.2 to 240mg/kg.
224 ents with cancer and moderate pain, low-dose morphine reduced pain intensity significantly compared w
225 g beta-arr2 exhibit increased sensitivity to morphine reinforcement; however, whether beta-arr2 and/o
226 lia activation is a significant modulator of morphine-related inflammation and constipation.
227                                     Although morphine remains the primary drug prescribed for allevia
228 sufficient to mediate morphine-sensitive and morphine-resistant forms of von Frey filament-evoked pun
229  recordings show that VT3(Lbx1) neurons form morphine-resistant polysynaptic pathways relaying inputs
230 G of females reverses the sex differences in morphine responsiveness.
231      Intrathecal injection of PDGF siRNA and morphine reversed thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia in
232 tions and pinpointing its role in regulating morphine reward by controlling the activity of nucleus a
233 S7 in dopaminergic neurons did not influence morphine reward.
234 educed morphine dependence without affecting morphine reward.
235 e to parenteral opioids such as subcutaneous morphine (SCM) to treat severe cancer pain episodes.
236 blated mice is largely sufficient to mediate morphine-sensitive and morphine-resistant forms of von F
237 ed the guidance reference value of 4mg/kg of morphine set by BfR in Germany, whereas 25% of the sampl
238 veloped analgesic tolerance more slowly than morphine, showed limited physical dependence, respirator
239  intravenous narcotic use (9.2 vs 17.2 mg of morphine sulfate equivalents, P = .03) were significantl
240 e (30-100 mg and >100 mg equivalents of oral morphine sulphate).
241 that females require two to three times more morphine than males to produce comparable levels of anal
242 ar determinant of the microglial response to morphine that critically underlies the development of mo
243    Here we report a total synthesis of (+/-)-morphine that employs two key strategic cyclizations: 1)
244 s showed that the biosynthesis of BIAs (e.g. morphine, thebaine) was significantly reduced in the tra
245 d place avoidance (CPA) in rats treated with morphine to control ongoing pain, consistent with clinic
246 oration of the possible mechanism(s) used by morphine to disrupt the autophagic process unveiled a si
247                Specifically, the Km value of morphine to OATP2B1 (57.58 +/- 8.90 muM) is 1.4-time mor
248 d MOR antagonist, was sufficient to abrogate morphine tolerance and OIH without diminishing antinocic
249 iated truncation in mE4M-B6 mice facilitated morphine tolerance and reduced morphine dependence witho
250  the exon 7-associated truncation diminished morphine tolerance and reward without altering physical
251 ed to morphine in man, selective reversal of morphine tolerance by ethanol may be a contributory fact
252  in the development, but not maintenance, of morphine tolerance in male rats.
253 orphine (10 mg/kg per day x 12 days) blocked morphine tolerance in WT but not in CB2KO mice.
254 solTNF), we demonstrate that solTNF mediates morphine tolerance induced by TLR4 signaling, stimulates
255                                              Morphine tolerance is a challenging clinical problem tha
256       However, the significance of miRNAs in morphine tolerance is still poorly understood.
257 r M6G in cerebrums or epencephalons of acute morphine tolerance mice.
258  is a key functional small RNA that reverses morphine tolerance through regulation of beta-arrestin 2
259 volved in the development and maintenance of morphine tolerance through regulation of beta-arrestin 2
260                                              Morphine tolerance was also reduced by oral vancomycin t
261 sessed to determine whether stabilization of morphine tolerance was associated with changes in their
262 f miR-365 prevented and reversed established morphine tolerance, and increased expression of miR-365
263  MORs specifically in nociceptors eliminated morphine tolerance, OIH and pronociceptive synaptic long
264 n of spinal microglia and the development of morphine tolerance.
265 romising and novel approach for treatment of morphine tolerance.
266 ne analgesia, and promote the development of morphine tolerance.
267 lamus, consistent with exon 7 involvement in morphine tolerance.
268  activity of NM0127 and NM0127 was active in morphine tolerant animals.
269 ident spinal microglia acutely isolated from morphine tolerant rats.
270 er day i.p. x 12 days), but it was absent in morphine-tolerant CB2KO mice.
271                                   Serum from morphine-treated (1 or 10 mg/kg, i.p. every 12 h) or sal
272 did not depress respiration but in prolonged morphine-treated animals respiratory depression was obse
273 action between serum from saline-treated and morphine-treated mice, which indicated that reduced prot
274 ed the decreased migration toward serum from morphine-treated mice.
275 morphine was also lacking in KF neurons from morphine-treated rats.
276 vation of protein kinase C or in slices from morphine-treated rats.
277  that were isolated from mice with long-term morphine treatment (in vivo) but not upon direct exposur
278 inus is differentially modulated by repeated morphine treatment and has no bearing on normal P2X7R fu
279 trol microglial cellular state under chronic morphine treatment remain unknown.
280                                    Prolonged morphine treatment results in a "leaky" gut, predisposin
281  of NAc GluA1, but not GluA2, increased with morphine treatment, suggesting postsynaptic insertion of
282 ntation (MSC-TP), which was performed before morphine treatment.
283 ollowing spontaneous withdrawal from chronic morphine treatment.
284 er restriction laws, and a low prevalence of morphine use remain common barriers to adequate palliati
285 ired morphine CPP design and was absent when morphine was administered in the home cage.
286                 Cellular tolerance to ME and morphine was also lacking in KF neurons from morphine-tr
287              Inhibition of IPSC frequency by morphine was also reduced in beta-arr2-/- neurons in whi
288 nflammation related to prolonged exposure to morphine was significantly attenuated by carbenoxolone (
289  differentially, with only NLP-3.3 mimicking morphine, whereas other nlp-3 peptides antagonize NLP-3.
290 FICANCE STATEMENT Opioid analgesics, such as morphine, which target the mu opioid receptor (muR), hav
291 P2, to WT neurons also reduced inhibition by morphine, while the inactive PP3, and the MEK inhibitor,
292 th of hospital stay than treatment with oral morphine, with similar rates of adverse events.
293 ave been shown to reduce somatic symptoms of morphine withdrawal (MWD).
294 se metabolism in males and females following morphine withdrawal and subsequent methadone or buprenor
295 ion drives ATP release from microglia during morphine withdrawal and that degrading endogenous spinal
296 d ATP release from microglia is required for morphine withdrawal in rodents and that blocking Panx1 a
297 on at these synapses and robustly suppresses morphine withdrawal symptoms.
298 tates, are necessary for aversive effects of morphine withdrawal.
299 facilitation and ameliorated the sequelae of morphine withdrawal.
300 ty of rewarding and reinforcing behaviors to morphine without affecting analgesia, tolerance, and wit

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top