ライフサイエンスコーパス: motor-evoked potential

1 onitor spinal cerebrospinal fluid signal and motor evoked potentials).

2 al muscle twitch can be produced, called the motor-evoked potential.

3 ike) of cortical excitability as measured by motor evoked potentials.

4 on and assessed using a limb motor score and motor-evoked potentials.

5 in cortical excitability were assessed using motor-evoked potentials.

6 Motor evoked potentials after stimulation of PMdAH were,

7 in intracortical facilitation (P < .01) and motor-evoked potential amplitude (P < .05) as well as a

8 The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the

9 Tibialis anterior motor-evoked potentials amplitude increased to 121% over

10 During this movement, motor-evoked potential amplitudes from the little finger

11 by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential amplitudes.

12 by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential amplitudes.

13 by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential amplitudes.

14 eus), as shown by increased amplitude of the motor evoked potentials and decreased duration of the co

15 ntensity to elicit a predefined amplitude of motor-evoked potential and EEG theta activity) and decre

16 F-OPC grafts recovered transcranial magnetic motor-evoked potential and magnetic interenlargement ref

17 ed associative stimulation induced change in motor-evoked potential and memory formation) after sleep

18 icians, vibration increases the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials and decreases the short-latency

19 ning-dependent increases in the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials and motor map reorganization are

20 By measuring spinal cord areas, motor-evoked potentials, and motor coordination and bala

21 with primary lateral sclerosis had abnormal motor-evoked potentials as assessed using transcranial m

22 ances, larger motor cortex maps, and smaller motor evoked potentials compared to young subjects.

23 ance deteriorates and both somatosensory and motor evoked potentials decrease over contralateral sens

24 The current literature suggests that motor-evoked potential, despite some advantages, still r

25 elivered to the C3-C5 level on (1) diaphragm motor-evoked potentials (DiMEPs) elicited by transcrania

26 We recorded motor-evoked potentials during a faked-action discrimina

27 In this study, we examined motor evoked potentials elicited by cortical (MEPs) and

28 Here, we examined motor evoked potentials elicited by cortical and subcort

29 Motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magneti

30 n cognitive context: pre-SMA facilitated the motor evoked-potential elicited by M1 stimulation only d

31 During observation, MR was assessed via motor-evoked potentials elicited with transcranial magne

32 rent inhibition was measured by conditioning motor evoked potentials, elicited by transcranial magnet

33 r activation, comparable to the monosynaptic motor-evoked potential evoked by TMS of primary motor co

34 rimary motor cortex, we examined ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (iMEPs) in a proximal arm muscle

35 from the arm representation, as measured by motor evoked potentials in the biceps.

36 ural excitability were assessed by measuring motor-evoked potentials in a small hand muscle before an

37 transection, 70% of OEG-treated rats showed motor-evoked potentials in hindlimb muscles after transc

38 ion significantly increased the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials in individuals with the SNP that

39 wo independent assays and recorded hind-limb motor-evoked potentials in infected class I-deficient an

40 ility was tested by measuring recruitment of motor-evoked-potentials "input-output (IO) curve" and of

41 rotocols to evaluate motor excitability with motor-evoked potentials, input-output (IOcurve) and shor

42 Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, recruitment curv

43 We measured motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes elicited by tran

44 netic stimulation of the motor cortex on the motor evoked potential (MEP) from transcranial magnetic

45 hemispheric) before acquisition of baseline motor evoked potential (MEP) recordings from each site a

46 ered at a subthreshold intensity to elicit a motor evoked potential (MEP), on the MEP response to an

47 ed with TMS, measuring motor threshold (MT), motor evoked-potential (MEP) size, and intracortical inh

48 hreshold, a greater proportional increase in motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude with voluntary fa

49 s usually limited to M1 through recording of motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude.

50 The amplitude of the motor-evoked potential (MEP) following a single or a pai

51 timulus (TS) was applied over M1 producing a motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the relaxed hand.

52 the first stimulus (S1) was set to produce a motor-evoked potential (MEP) of 1 mV in the resting cont

53 We measured motor-evoked potential (MEP) recruitment curves (RCs) an

54 rug application, INB plus rTMS increased the motor-evoked potential (MEP) size and decreased intracor

55 Whereas controls showed inhibition of APB motor-evoked potential (MEP) size during movement initia

56 entify EAE31, a locus controlling latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and clinical onset of exp

57 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and motor threshold were

58 nd cervicomedullary stimulation, we examined motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and the activity in intra

59 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by cortical, but

60 representations during response preparation, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial

61 rtex (PMd) (CS2) suppresses the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from a test pulse (TS) ov

62 otor conduction times, normal thresholds for motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in leg muscles, and a nor

63 , or during the left limb movement to obtain motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the muscles of the rig

64 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) monitoring can promptly d

65 We evaluated the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by a single TMS

66 TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) showed a modulation withi

67 tudies measuring the threshold for eliciting motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic

68 We recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic

69 and the dorsal cervical spinal cord in rats; motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured from biceps

70 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from contra

71 In addition, Hoffman reflex (H-reflex) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the ga

72 The effects on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), short interval intracort

73 a method for standardized quantification of motor evoked potentials (MEPs).

74 creases cortical excitability as measured by motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and (2) alters functional

75 eral nerve stimulation we examined in humans motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and the activity in intra

76 We evaluated motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and the cortical silent p

77 lity were traced by simultaneously recording motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and TMS-evoked EEG potent

78 ing the effect of ulnar nerve stimulation on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial

79 10% resting motor threshold (RMT) suppressed motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked in the first dorsa

80 y volunteers in two experiments, we measured motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from TMS of the motor cor

81 ested this hypothesis in humans by measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in a left finger muscle d

82 asure corticospinal excitability by means of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in both the hand and the

83 pulse TMS at a specific interval facilitates motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in hand muscles in a mann

84 suprathreshold test stimulus (TS) to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the right hand.

85 spinal excitability and RT, such that larger motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) measured at rest were ass

86 .8 in the BBB scale), decreased amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded on tibialis ante

87 TMS, inducing motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) simultaneously in the ext

88 ranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to measure motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) together with recruitment

89 Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained by transcra

90 Ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained in hand and

91 A paired-pulse protocol was used, in which motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were produced by cortical

92 transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), 25 motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded before, and

93 Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the ri

94 , with input from one hand muscle increasing motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), decreasing short and inc

95 r disturbances abolish hind limb myoelectric motor evoked potentials (mMEPs).

96 review was conducted to examine the role of motor-evoked potential monitoring in spine and central n

97 the cervical level and were correlated with motor-evoked potentials (n = 34).

98 threshold, the intensity needed to produce a motor evoked potential of 0.5 mV, and the amplitude of t

99 We found that the motor evoked potential of the effector that might need t

100 al changes in descending motor pathways with motor-evoked potentials recorded during cooling, we repo

101 pressure, we could increase the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials recorded from below or just abov

102 Our results show that the amplitude of the motor-evoked potentials recorded from the real hand is s

103 Analysis of motor-evoked potentials recorded from the thoracic spina

104 of D15A-GRPs recovered transcranial magnetic motor-evoked potential responses, indicating that conduc

105 duced (38%; SD +/- 7; P = 0.01) and the post-motor evoked potential silent period (101 ms; SEM +/- 10

106 We found that motor evoked potentials size increased in spinal cord in

107 short-term enhancement of cortico-pharyngeal motor evoked potentials, suggesting the feasibility of a

108 and grid walking] and transcranial magnetic motor-evoked potentials (tcMMEP) were studied at 1, 2, a

109 Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stim

110 The amplitude of TMS-induced motor-evoked potentials was taken as a measure of motor

111 Motor evoked potentials were recorded in 29 typically de

112 Repeated measurements of pharyngeal motor-evoked potentials were assessed with transcranial

113 Motor-evoked potentials were inhibited in task-irrelevan

114 Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from a hand muscle

115 Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from the resting a

116 physiological effects (change in heart rate, motor evoked potentials) were observed during any of the

117 -pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor-evoked potentials while healthy humans watched vid