1 ion alone with CPR by chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation.

2 e and 279 assigned to chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation.

3 similar to those with chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation.

4 plete than instructions for compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation.

5  compression alone or chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation.

6 ong those assigned to chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation (14.6 percent vs. 10.4 percen

7 r the group receiving chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation and 81 percent of episodes fo

8 o combining step A (airway control), step B (mouth-to-mouth ventilation), and step C (sternal (cardia

9 similar to that after chest compression with mouth-to-mouth ventilation, and chest compression alone

10 estigations of the cardiovascular effects of mouth-to-mouth ventilation during CPR suggest that there

11                                     However, mouth-to-mouth ventilation during respiratory arrest is

12 s: group 1, chest compressions and simulated mouth-to-mouth ventilation (FI(O2) = 0.17, FI(CO2) = 0.0

13 ocates continuous chest compressions without mouth-to-mouth ventilations for witnessed cardiac arrest

14       Instructions in chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation given by dispatchers over the

15 ander CPR, chest compressions plus simulated mouth-to-mouth ventilation improved systemic oxygenation

16 t compressions only (CC); group 3, simulated mouth-to-mouth ventilation only (V); and group 4, no CPR

17                                              Mouth-to-mouth ventilation performed by single layperson

18        Data show that such interruptions for mouth-to-mouth ventilation require a period of "rebuildi