ライフサイエンスコーパス: moving object

1 he future by extrapolating the position of a moving object.

2 ptive fields permit only a limited view of a moving object.

3 icted to the case of stationary observer and moving object.

4 cy of heading judgments in the presence of a moving object.

5 motor mapping or increasing the speed of the moving object.

6 erceived heading induced by an independently moving object.

7 llows us to rapidly identify and intercept a moving object.

8 t object motion, simulating an independently moving object.

9 -movement to heading in the direction of the moving object.

10 predictive capacity in the interception of a moving object.

11 they differ in their performance tracking a moving object.

12 g infant's environment routinely consists of moving objects.

13 ile participants viewed simple animations of moving objects.

14 is not known how the brain decides to act on moving objects.

15 moving objects, and even segregate multiple moving objects.

16 ty to both the slit-viewed and fully visible moving objects.

17 he various local motion signals generated by moving objects.

18 constructed natural scenes with recognizable moving objects.

19 on fields generated by several independently moving objects.

20 colliculus (SC) respond selectively to small moving objects.

21 ined retinal circuit enhances sensitivity to moving objects.

22 ing visual motion produced by self-motion or moving objects.

23 c prey capture behavior in response to small moving objects.

24 ge in spatial position over time afforded by moving objects.

25 dimensions, as well as the ability to track moving objects.

26 ny locomotor tasks involve interactions with moving objects.

27 which typically includes stationary or slow moving objects.

28 imation of the three-dimensional velocity of moving objects.

29 isually guided interception and avoidance of moving objects.

30 t speeds to plan hand movements to intercept moving objects.

31 ibit an enhanced sensitivity to regressively moving objects.

32 nse recovery impair patients' ability to see moving objects.

33 preglomerular complex as cells responsive to moving objects.

34 eter-sized structures in both stationary and moving objects.

35 rected, and (3) abrupt onsets and offsets of moving objects.

36 of improving estimates of the 3D velocity of moving objects.

37 eurons can control complex interactions with moving objects.

38 area PM helps guide behaviors involving slow-moving objects.

39 (ON and OFF cells, respectively), colour or moving objects.

40 nerated by the perspective transformation of moving objects.

41 irection preference for both bright and dark moving objects.

42 tion identifies differences between adjacent moving objects.

43 ting stereopsis to measuring the distance of moving objects against a stationary background, insects

44 When the moving object alone is experienced, the cell is weakly d

45 stal of individually addressable ions as the moving object and a periodic light-field potential as th

46 short time and multi-dimensional sensing of moving objects and dynamical processes with fine tempora

47 on, disturbance of perception of velocity of moving objects and dyscalculia.

48 tput of these cells could assist in tracking moving objects and estimating their future position.

49 unctions, such as encoding the velocities of moving objects and surfaces relative to the observer.

50 eld, the local edge detector, in response to moving objects and textures.

51 mall spots depends on the vertical size of a moving object, and not on looming, it can function at a

52 ial muscles are needed for generating force, moving objects, and accomplishing work.

53 ive for differential motion can rapidly flag moving objects, and even segregate multiple moving objec

54 In motion standstill, a quickly moving object appears to stand still, and its details ar

55 at perceptions of the relative position of a moving object are determined by accumulated experience w

56 Moving objects are detected by virtue of their shifting

57 enes is important for detecting and tracking moving objects as well as for monitoring self-motion thr

58 n make saccadic eye movements to intercept a moving object at the right place and time.

59 We demonstrated high-speed 3D videography of moving objects at up to 75 volumes per second.

60 ving animals often have difficulty detecting moving objects because self-generated optic flow pattern

61 n because moving edges, which are present in moving object boundaries, and saccades induce transients

62 retina anticipate the location of a smoothly moving object, but that it can also signal violations in

63 epolarized VIP cells enhance V1 responses to moving objects by reducing self-induced surround suppres

64 he slow speed of phototransduction so that a moving object can be accurately located.

65 sition, trajectory, and contour profile of a moving object can be visualized in high resolution, demo

66 A moving object can cover a considerable distance in this

67 V1 neuron responses to some features of the moving objects can be selectively enhanced.

68 ple of causality imply that the speed of any moving object cannot exceed that of light in a vacuum (c

69 Because the retinal activity generated by a moving object cannot specify which of an infinite number

70 Cells close to a moving object code quasilinearly for its position, while

71 preference of these neurons for horizontally moving objects conforms the visual ecology of the crab's

72 el's heading estimate over time, even when a moving object crosses the future path.

73 When a moving object cuts in front of a moving observer at a 90

74 As a result, the W3 cell can detect small moving objects down to the receptive field size of bipol

75 moderately subnormal, but the ability to see moving objects, especially with low-contrast, was severe

76 ales followed and extended their wing toward moving objects (even a moving piece of rubber band) inte

77 ividuals, although quick at perceiving small moving objects, exhibit disproportionately large impairm

78 d functional MRI to measure the responses to moving objects (faces, cars, simple spheres) and the fun

79 a perpendicular path just as if viewing the moving object from a stationary vantage point.

80 extrapolate the instantaneous position of a moving object from its past trajectory.

81 t participants were attempting to pursue the moving object in accord with the veridical motion proper

82 ability to predict the future location of a moving object in the brief time that it takes to perceiv

83 To track a moving object in the natural environment, its motion fir

84 In the flash-lag illusion, a flash and a moving object in the same location appear to be offset.

85 e multiple spatial frequencies that comprise moving objects in natural scenes.

86 In particular, the presence of independently moving objects in naturalistic environments limits the c

87 Fine motor control, moving objects in relation to the body, and stamina are

88 ignals produced both by self-movement and by moving objects in the environment.

89 lements while they were attentively tracking moving objects in the foreground.

90 L efferent neurons to encode the position of moving objects in the presence and absence of self-gener

91 tem is thought to represent the direction of moving objects in the relative activity of large populat

92 ng mechanisms in judging motion direction of moving objects in visual periphery (Experiment 1) and fo

93 Tracking moving objects, including one's own body, is a fundament

94 s dramatically whereas the saturation of the moving object increases.

95 ern-motion cells' represent the direction of moving objects independent of their particular spatial p

96 The moving object induced significant biases in perceived he

97 c voltage to encode the actual position of a moving object instead of its delayed representation.

98 Determining the approach of a moving object is a vital survival skill that depends on

99 briefly presented flash in the vicinity of a moving object is misperceived to lag behind the moving o

100 ction selectivity of the On pathway when the moving object is on a homogenous background, but is requ

101 Keeping track of multiple moving objects is an essential ability of visual percept

102 ne illusion [3]), the perceived direction of moving objects is distorted (trajectory misperception [4

103 co-ordinate the eyes and head when tracking moving objects is important for survival.

104 ing object is misperceived to lag behind the moving object, is a useful tool for studying the dynamic

105 To track a moving object, its motion must first be distinguished fr

106 fluence on position is not restricted to the moving object itself, and that even the positions of sta

107 m (OAM) of a tilted light beam eclipsed by a moving object, lateral motion of the object can be detec

108 Moving objects may also occupy large portions of the vis

109 We have also imaged a moving object obscured by a scattering medium.

110 al findings that show that our perception of moving objects often depends on the motion of terminator

111 ntain motion signals originating either from moving objects or from retinal slip caused by self-motio

112 Interacting with a moving object poses a computational problem for an anima

113 Intercepting a moving object requires prediction of its future location

114 Neural representations of a moving object's distance and approach speed are essentia

115 How are moving objects seamlessly tracked when they traverse vis

116 m the eye to extrapolate the trajectory of a moving object, so that it is perceived at its actual loc

117 mechanical energy harvesting from arbitrary moving objects such as humans, a new mode of triboelectr

118 eans for accurately determining the depth of moving objects such as prey.

119 gregarious locusts respond earlier to small moving objects, such as conspecifics, than solitarious l

120 SLAM is best suited for fast imaging of moving objects, such as the heart, confined to 1/n of th

121 We show that when a moving object suddenly reverses direction, there is a br

122 o showed greater activity to a fully visible moving object than to the undistorted slit-viewed object

123 etter to terminators that are intrinsic to a moving object than to those that are accidents of occlus

124 For a continuously moving object, the brain compensates for delays in trans

125 ht is presented in physical alignment with a moving object, the flash is perceived to lag behind the

126 esponses (spike counts) to the position of a moving object, the network learns to represent the veloc

127 To detect moving objects, the brain must distinguish local motion

128 e flies freeze in response to a regressively moving object, they ignore a progressively moving one.

129 is influenced by physical properties of the moving object, though the neural mechanisms underlying t

130 viewing conditions, observers can perceive a moving object through a narrow slit even when only porti

131 to extrapolate the trajectory of an occluded moving object to make perceptual judgments based on the

132 m software for automatic tracking of diverse moving objects usable on various microscope setups.

133 ion thresholds measured in the presence of a moving object were largely consistent with the predictio

134 vates an explicit neural representation of a moving object, which can then disrupt the representation

135 s move through environments containing other moving objects, which introduce optic flow that is incon

136 lect an a priori expectation that a downward moving object will accelerate.

137 etinal circuitry effectively predicts that a moving object will continue moving in a straight line, a

138 nits in head-fixed rats trained to contact a moving object with one whisker.

139 mpromised because the observer must detect a moving object within the pattern of optic flow created b