ライフサイエンスコーパス: multicenter randomized trial

1 asive vs minimally invasive esophagectomy, a multicenter, randomized trial).

2 12 hours of symptom onset in a prospective, multicenter randomized trial.

3 esenting to 5 emergency departments within a multicenter randomized trial.

4 hese data are currently being confirmed in a multicenter randomized trial.

5 Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) multicenter randomized trials.

6 discharge are still needed from three large multicenter randomized trials.

7 d Independence for Elders (LIFE) study was a multicenter, randomized trial.

8 ed couples with unexplained infertility in a multicenter, randomized trial.

9 atin in preventing exacerbations in a large, multicenter, randomized trial.

10 In this large, multicenter, randomized trial, 2008 patients with stable

11 and RIF-based tuberculosis treatment in the multicenter randomized trial (ACTG A5221).

12 The AWESOME multicenter randomized trial and registry compared the l

13 One multicenter randomized trial and several nonrandomized r

14 Multicenter, randomized trials are needed to ascertain t

15 We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial at 14 CF centers with subj

16 be interpreted cautiously and validated in a multicenter randomized trial before adoption into practi

17 We performed a multicenter, randomized trial between February 2011 and

18 This multicenter randomized trial compared allopurinol to ras

19 This multicenter randomized trial compared the prognostic val

20 This multicenter, randomized trial compared capecitabine plus

21 Adjuvant brachytherapy may reduce LR This multicenter randomized trial compares SR to SR with brac

22 Viral Activation Transfusion Study, an NHLBI multicenter randomized trial comparing leukoreduced vers

23 Patients were enrolled in a Veterans Affairs multicenter randomized trial comparing PCI versus CABG f

24 We have carried out a multicenter randomized trial comparing three versus six

25 Single-center and multicenter randomized trials comparing primary angiopla

26 ACTG 333 was a multicenter, randomized trial comparing 2 formulations o

27 We performed a multicenter, randomized trial comparing a specific vacci

28 This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing DEB with EES in

29 We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing early nasoenteri

30 In a multicenter, randomized trial comparing open and laparos

31 We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing peginterferon pl

32 The PAVE pilot study was a multicenter, randomized trial comparing periodontal ther

33 We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing thymectomy plus

34 Multicenter randomized trial conducted among 374 critica

35 The Danish Calmette Study is a multicenter randomized trial conducted from 2012-2015 at

36 Multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 120 intensive

37 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective, multicenter, randomized trial conducted between June 6,

38 In this prospective, multicenter, randomized trial, DCB was superior to PTA a

39 Symplicity HTN-2, a multicenter, randomized trial, demonstrated that cathete

40 ot Study of Anti-Restenosis Treatment) was a multicenter randomized trial designed to estimate the ef

41 e present large-scale pooled analysis from 2 multicenter randomized trials, early ST was more frequen

42 This prospective, multicenter, randomized trial enrolled 502 patients with

43 This multicenter, randomized trial evaluated safety and effic

44 In a multicenter randomized trial, family members of hospital

45 Recently concluded multicenter, randomized trials for breast cancer with 5-

46 severe sepsis enrolled in usual care arms of multicenter randomized trials have experienced decreasin

47 Four large multicenter randomized trials have now completed enrollm

48 s global investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial, hepatitis B e antigen (HB

49 We performed a multicenter randomized trial in 219 patients at 18 hospi

50 This is the first multicenter randomized trial in ovarian cancer to longit

51 We performed a multicenter, randomized trial in 27 hospitals in the Net

52 In a multicenter, randomized trial in 310 noncirrhotic patien

53 This multicenter randomized trial involving 200 patients comp

54 We conducted a multicenter randomized trial involving 446 patients who

55 A multicenter randomized trial involving patients at a low

56 We performed a multicenter, randomized trial involving 793 newborns who

57 We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial involving women with a sin

58 A multicenter randomized trial is currently under way to c

59 A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial is needed to determine whe

60 In this multicenter randomized trial, long-term endoscopic varic

61 ed in the Medical Research Council UKALL2003 multicenter randomized trial (NCT00222612) between 2003

62 Department Patients With Heart Failure) is a multicenter randomized trial of a patient-centered trans

63 Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE) was a multicenter randomized trial of CRT among 610 patients w

64 In conjunction with a multicenter randomized trial of fidaxomicin versus vanco

65 The recent U.S. multicenter randomized trial of FK506 versus cyclosporin

66 We used prospectively collected data from a multicenter randomized trial of high dose ursodeoxycholi

67 lysis of prospectively collected data from a multicenter randomized trial of sedation (Randomized Eva

68 internally and externally using data from a multicenter randomized trial of suramin plus hydrocortis

69 Future studies should include a multicenter randomized trial of this model of care.

70 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of 384 patients with in-st

71 A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of CABG versus PTCA, which

72 left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) was a multicenter, randomized trial of CRT among patients with

73 We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial of dispatcher instructions

74 on-shock patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of mechanical reperfusion

75 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Multicenter, randomized trial of patients experiencing o

76 ited (n = 558) after primary treatment for a multicenter, randomized trial of psychoeducational inter

77 ith Preserved Ejection Fraction) study was a multicenter, randomized trial of sildenafil versus place

78 In conclusion, in this U.S. multicenter, randomized trial of therapy for HCV in pati

79 We conducted a phase 3, multicenter, randomized trial of transplantation of peri

80 Retrospective review of patients enrolled in multicenter, randomized trials performed from 2006 to 20

81 A multicenter randomized trial provides Level I evidence t

82 A multicenter randomized trial recruiting 321 patients 16

83 Recent results from the largest multicenter randomized trial (Shockless IMPLant Evaluati

84 This multicenter, randomized trial showed that tight glycemic

85 ct of this novel therapy and support further multicenter randomized trials targeted to address the im

86 Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) multicenter randomized trial testing laparoscopic versus

87 Status and Exercise Capacity in HFpEF) was a multicenter randomized trial testing the impact of silde

88 Neurohormonal Efficacy and Survival Study, a multicenter randomized trial that included serial KCCQ a

89 s the long-term results of the international multicenter randomized trial that investigated the use o

90 eeks of gestation and had been enrolled in a multicenter, randomized trial that compared HFOV with co

91 d Independence for Elders (LIFE) study was a multicenter, randomized trial that enrolled participants

92 The HERA trial was an international, multicenter, randomized trial that included 5099 patient

93 Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) is an ongoing, multicenter, randomized trial that randomized 155,000 me

94 on rates after the May 2008 publication of a multicenter, randomized trial that showed increased mort

95 In this prospective, single-blind, multicenter, randomized trial, the authors randomly assi

96 We designed this multicenter randomized trial to compare outcomes of prim

97 We report the first multicenter randomized trial to evaluate use of a distal

98 We performed a multicenter, randomized trial to compare physiotherapy a

99 rent standard of care and argue for a large, multicenter, randomized trial to definitively establish

100 We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to determine whether cryob

101 onducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized trial to test the hypothesis tha

102 This multicenter randomized trial was conducted in 22 centers

103 A multicenter randomized trial was conducted on patients u

104 This multicenter randomized trial was conducted to determine

105 This multicenter randomized trial was designed to test whethe

106 The purpose of this multicenter randomized trial was to compare total mortal

107 An investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized trial was conducted to assess wh

108 likelihood or durability of the response, a multicenter, randomized trial was performed at nine acad

109 rapy in heart failURE) trial, a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial, was conducted in patients

110 In this multicenter randomized trial, we assigned patients with

111 In a multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned 900 patients

112 In a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized trial, we compared the levonorge

113 In a prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial, we enrolled patients pres

114 ients (n = 1648) from 2 previously completed multicenter randomized trials were included.

115 In 2006, short-term outcomes from two large multicenter randomized trials were published.

116 This multicenter randomized trial with 2 parallel arms (drain

117 On the basis of these encouraging results, a multicenter, randomized trial with operators and patient

118 vention of Pulmonary Air Leakage study was a multicenter randomized trial, with blinded evaluation of

119 vention of Pulmonary Air Leakage study was a multicenter randomized trial, with blinded evaluation of