ライフサイエンスコーパス: multidetector CT

1 .8) and eccentric (cardiac MR 23.2% +/- 2.0; multidetector CT 24.4% +/- 2.1) remodeling groups relati

2 66 years; range, 45-81 years) underwent 110 multidetector CT examinations after endovascular repair

3 n both concentric (cardiac MR 25.1% +/- 4.2; multidetector CT 28.4% +/- 2.8) and eccentric (cardiac M

4 fication with multiplanar reformatted and 3D multidetector CT images.

5 In 19 of 45 (42%) multidetector CT scans, ischemia was confirmed at surger

6 reated surgically within the next 7 days, 45 multidetector CT scans were retrospectively reviewed.

7 to control group (cardiac MR 18.9% +/- 1.9, multidetector CT 22.0% +/- 1.7, P < .05, all comparisons

8 Images were reviewed by applying a multidetector CT-based grading system, and the amount of

9 neral density may go unreported at abdominal multidetector CT if sagittal reconstructions are not rou

10 range, 19-94 years) underwent both abdominal multidetector CT and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (D

11 mage quality parameters of routine abdominal multidetector CT images compared with those of ASIR and

12 te appendicitis who underwent abdominopelvic multidetector CT.

13 Early hypoenhancement was recognized on all multidetector CT and cardiac MR images.

14 ied the fractures with radiography alone and multidetector CT alone.

15 ess differences between (18)F-FDG PET/CT and multidetector CT (MDCT) findings, to compare (18)F-FDG P

16 ngle-snapshot radiography, cone-beam CT, and multidetector CT.

17 Radial strain for both cardiac MR and multidetector CT was abnormal in both concentric (cardia

18 combination of preoperative radiographic and multidetector CT image findings and intraoperative findi

19 d patients who underwent calcium scoring and multidetector CT angiography before conventional coronar

20 however, in addition to coronary assessment, multidetector CT can be used to evaluate numerous noncor

21 ductions of radiation dose are achievable at multidetector CT angiography of the peripheral arteries

22 r quadrant pain, a nonvisualized appendix at multidetector CT reliably excludes acute appendicitis.

23 Measurements of hepatic tumor attenuation at multidetector CT are reproducible.

24 tions of organ-specific injuries depicted at multidetector CT are also discussed.

25 correlation between percent ISR evaluated at multidetector CT versus intravascular US was higher in g

26 of ccRCCs affects their imaging features at multidetector CT examinations.

27 en (13%) wound tracks were not identified at multidetector CT (six upper extremity wounds and four th

28 sterior area of the neck) were identified at multidetector CT.

29 and ground-glass opacity within the lung at multidetector CT are supportive of drowning in the appro

30 The plaque area was overestimated at multidetector CT by 400% (4.61/1.15) on average, and the

31 ent reconstruction improves image quality at multidetector CT coronary angiography but does not signi

32 les with a 0.30-06 rifle and then scanned at multidetector CT.

33 Conversely, when the appendix was seen at multidetector CT and was abnormal, appendicitis was pres

34 quisition of four additional image series at multidetector CT.

35 on significantly decreased agreement between multidetector CT angiography and QCA to detect a coronar

36 layed hyperenhancement were compared between multidetector CT and cardiac MR imaging with Pearson cor

37 t (n = 12) had very good correlation between multidetector CT (4% +/- 4) and cardiac MR imaging (3% +

38 Correlation between multidetector CT and TTE for global function (r = 0.68)

39 There was no significant difference between multidetector CT and myocardial perfusion SPECT groups f

40 arct was not significantly different between multidetector CT (6.3% +/- 0.8 of the LV mass), MR imagi

41 d stent maximal lumen narrowing site between multidetector CT and intravascular US were higher in gro

42 showed good CNR and correlated well between multidetector CT and cardiac MR imaging.

43 Total-body multidetector CT was performed, immediately prior to rou

44 /unenhanced multidetector CT and split-bolus multidetector CT for restaging were investigated retrosp

45 Fused FDG PET/split-bolus multidetector CT provides additional information compare

46 Radiation dose was low in both multidetector CT groups (1.9 mSv+/-0.2).

47 pliance with HIPAA regulations by using both multidetector CT and (3)He MR imaging.

48 Endoscopic ultrasonography followed by multidetector CT was performed in all patients.

49 Cardiac multidetector CT was performed in 102 patients (34 with

50 l-enhanced electrocardiography-gated cardiac multidetector CT.

51 y, a noncontrast, ECG-gated, 8-slice cardiac multidetector CT was performed.

52 In four cases, multidetector CT aided in accurate assessment of organ i

53 In 48 negative cases, multidetector CT depicted alternative findings that acco

54 Although certain multidetector CT findings are very specific for the diag

55 All CTAs were performed using a 32-channel multidetector CT scanner.

56 Strain analysis of cine multidetector CT images of the left ventricle was optimi

57 ed contrast agent calibrated with a clinical multidetector CT scanner served as contrast agent-enhanc

58 catheterization were imaged with a clinical multidetector CT scanner.

59 The clinical multidetector CT scanner provides reliable measurements

60 Microscopy measurements confirmed multidetector CT quantitative measurements and differenc

61 the SAN and AVN were examined with coronary multidetector CT in 102 patients (55 men, 47 women; mean

62 and contrast-enhanced CT ((18)F-FDG PET/CT), multidetector CT (MDCT), and MR imaging in differentiati

63 ography, cone-beam computed tomography (CT), multidetector CT, and micro-CT.

64 DE multidetector CT with advanced postprocessing techniques

65 endovascular repair of AAAs underwent 24 DE multidetector CT examinations, which were performed with

66 inary observations suggest that obtaining DE multidetector CT data by using a single 60-second contra

67 m and insert was scanned with five different multidetector CT scanners on five separate occasions by

68 pplication of PICCS to standard FBP low-dose multidetector CT abdominal images results in substantial

69 y sediment is highly suggestive of drowning; multidetector CT findings of pan sinus fluid, mastoid ce

70 ing enables reconstruction of the AIF during multidetector CT perfusion imaging.

71 n the area under the curve (AUC) for dynamic multidetector CT-derived AIF (3108 + or - 1250 [standard

72 the reader's ability to successfully employ multidetector CT imaging protocols for evaluation of TBM

73 mm) were examined at 64-section dual-energy multidetector CT by using a dual-detector "double-decker

74 ns were examined with 64-section dual-energy multidetector CT by using a novel dual-detector "double-

75 on]) and dynamic (13.8% +/- 4.9) dual-energy multidetector CT data sets.

76 T with those determined with the dual-energy multidetector CT enhancement algorithm revealed no signi

77 ired, contrast material-enhanced dual-energy multidetector CT images were acquired at 80 and 140 kVp.

78 onenhanced and contrast-enhanced dual-energy multidetector CT of the abdomen.

79 Dual-energy multidetector CT performed with optimized acquisition pa

80 Dual-energy multidetector CT with iodine quantification can be used

81 Contrast-enhanced dual-energy multidetector CT with material density analysis allows d

82 Dual-energy multidetector CT with novel postprocessing techniques en

83 h OCT with those determined with dual-energy multidetector CT, and the significance of factors such a

84 tion beyond that achieved with single-energy multidetector CT acquisitions with basic attenuation ass

85 tent beyond that achieved with single-energy multidetector CT.

86 ming and beam hardening beyond single-energy multidetector CT.

87 s of signal attenuation at contrast-enhanced multidetector CT and counterstaining of infarct at micro

88 Contrast-enhanced multidetector CT is a suitable noninvasive imaging techn

89 nd RBF were measured using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT, and renal oxygenation by 3-T blood oxy

90 in seven dogs and contrast material-enhanced multidetector CT was performed during adenosine infusion

91 Delayed-enhancement multidetector CT (13% +/- 9) correlated well with delaye

92 ology results and clinical outcome evaluated multidetector CT images for evidence of EPNI and duodena

93 uted tomography (CT) technology has evolved, multidetector CT has become an integral part of the init

94 was measured at histopathologic examination, multidetector CT, and flat-panel-volume CT.

95 the AUC was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88) for multidetector CT angiography and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0

96 Mean follow-up interval for multidetector CT after treatment was 30 days.

97 a guide to select blunt trauma patients for multidetector CT angiographic evaluation.

98 and 12.4 seconds +/- 0.6, respectively, for multidetector CT and 17.2 seconds +/- 0.8 and 12.5 secon

99 of the scatterplots indicated a tendency for multidetector CT to overestimate thickness.

100 Strain values for multidetector CT versus cardiac MR showed better agreeme

101 , reconstructions of cartilage geometry from multidetector CT arthrographic data could be used as a p

102 the AUC for the AIF measured during helical multidetector CT correlated best with MBF (R(2) = 0.86,

103 f bolus-tracking and time-registered helical multidetector CT data.

104 When AIF analysis was applied to helical multidetector CT myocardial perfusion measurements, the

105 Advances in multidetector CT (MDCT) technology with submillimeter sl

106 Such advances have resulted in multidetector CT being increasingly used as a complement

107 r techniques to analyze bone quality include multidetector CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and quanti

108 In multivariate regression that included multidetector CT findings as well as the three tradition

109 meticulous bowel preparation and inflation, multidetector CT, combined two- and three-dimensional vi

110 zation of parathyroid adenomas that involves multidetector CT image acquisition during two or more co

111 and three-dimensional reconstructions makes multidetector CT an ideal noninvasive method for evaluat

112 At 7-8 weeks after microembolization, multidetector CT and MR imaging were used to assess LV f

113 dy to examine the accuracy of 64-row, 0.5-mm multidetector CT angiography as compared with convention

114 Modern multidetector CT scanners merge acquisition speed and hi

115 Conclusion: Modern multidetector CT and MR imaging are sensitive modalities

116 Enhancement at multiphasic multidetector CT, if prospectively validated, may assist

117 and oncocytoma with preoperative multiphasic multidetector CT with as many as four phases (unenhanced

118 The diagnostic performance of nonenhanced multidetector CT and dual-energy material densities was

119 lecting an improved ability over nonenhanced multidetector CT for diagnosis of lipid-poor adenoma.

120 nostic performance compared with nonenhanced multidetector CT attenuation (sensitivity of 67% [16 of

121 Thus, on otherwise normal multidetector CT scans in patients suspected of having a

122 s, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of multidetector CT for ISR identification were 96%, 95%, a

123 Despite all the advantages of multidetector CT, clearing the spine in which injury is

124 the past decade, mostly due to the advent of multidetector CT.

125 e development and widespread availability of multidetector CT scanners, CT has assumed a greater role

126 The effect of multidetector CT imaging regimen, tube current, cyst dia

127 article, the authors review the elements of multidetector CT technique that are currently relevant f

128 Readers were shown radiographs at the end of multidetector CT image reading to see if this would chan

129 The evaluation of multidetector CT coronary angiography with interactive i

130 ying results from the various generations of multidetector CT scanners used.

131 atically increased since the introduction of multidetector CT (MDCT) scanners.

132 the authors present a step-by-step primer of multidetector CT imaging for evaluating infants and chil

133 ls, two- and three-dimensional processing of multidetector CT data, and image interpretation.

134 Sensitivity and specificity of multidetector CT for ischemia were 63% (12 of 19) and 92

135 This review centers on the current state of multidetector CT as a triage tool for penetrating torso

136 aging algorithm resulted in decreased use of multidetector CT in patients who presented with BAPT to

137 The use of multidetector CT technology has made this a versatile ex

138 In particular, the use of multidetector CT to provide pulmonary and cardiac venous

139 ry angle determination in models with use of multidetector CT.

140 the established appropriate clinical uses of multidetector CT in the assessment of structural heart d

141 Pseudoenhancement is strongly dependent on multidetector CT convolution kernel.

142 mated quantification of RV myocardial fat on multidetector CT images is feasible and performs better

143 The size of PD on multidetector CT had a moderate correlation against SPEC

144 on is centered on the increasing reliance on multidetector CT in the work-up of these patients but al

145 46 mL +/- 4, and 50% +/- 3, respectively, on multidetector CT images and 92 mL +/- 8, 48 mL +/- 5, an

146 icrosphere deposition increased after TAE on multidetector CT, cone-beam CT, and micro-CT images (P <

147 iagnosis of perforated appendicitis, overall multidetector CT sensitivity is poor.

148 tage of left ventricular mass) at first-pass multidetector CT (11% +/- 6) correlated well with those

149 al myocardium were comparable for first-pass multidetector CT and cardiac MR imaging, cardiac MR imag

150 First-pass multidetector CT and MR imaging demonstrated significant

151 For detection of acute MI in patients, multidetector CT sensitivity was 94% (32 of 34) and spec

152 Portal venous phase multidetector CT images are highly specific and moderate

153 patients was measured on portal venous phase multidetector CT images by using a single ROI, the avera

154 tion was observed from pre- to posttreatment multidetector CT (P < .05).

155 PNI and/or duodenal invasion on preoperative multidetector CT images have significantly reduced survi

156 atients with PDAC who underwent preoperative multidetector CT and subsequent pancreaticoduodenectomy.

157 g clinical indications, patient preparation, multidetector CT techniques and protocols, two- and thre

158 less abscess or extraluminal gas is present, multidetector CT cannot enable the diagnosis of perforat

159 The accuracy of quantitative multidetector CT angiography to depict substantial (>/=

160 X-ray multidetector CT provides a new, noninvasive way to inve

161 With the use of x-ray multidetector CT with interactive 3D reconstruction, the

162 The authors recommend multidetector CT with oral, rectal, and intravenous cont

163 s who preoperatively underwent 40- or 64-row multidetector CT for penetrating torso trauma below the

164 ducts (40, 75, 110, and 150 mAs) on a 64-row multidetector CT scanner with 10-cm scan length.

165 low velocity can be measured from row-to-row multidetector CT projectional data obtained during a sin

166 fractures on chest radiographs and sagittal multidetector CT reconstructions.

167 ransverse (axial) and retrospective sagittal multidetector CT reconstructions were reviewed for the p

168 jection (MIP) images created at a 16-section multidetector CT console with three-dimensional (3D)-wor

169 age, 27 years) were scanned with 16-section multidetector CT prior to routine autopsy.

170 al axial scans were obtained with 16-section multidetector CT while a 10-mL bolus of contrast materia

171 imaged with both cardiac MR and 320-section multidetector CT at a temporal resolution of less than 5

172 rd deviation]) were examined with 64-section multidetector CT and cardiac MR imaging 5 days or fewer

173 ocardiograms (ECGs), and coronary 64-section multidetector CT angiograms in 317 patients were reviewe

174 al occlusive disease referred for 64-section multidetector CT angiography of the lower limb (0.625-mm

175 ed with both electron-beam CT and 64-section multidetector CT at 1-week intervals in randomized order

176 andard deviation]) underwent both 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography and conventional a

177 Diagnostic accuracy of 64-section multidetector CT for ischemia associated with SBO was ex

178 el-wall attenuation on unenhanced 64-section multidetector CT images is a specific sign for ischemia

179 a, who had undergone preoperative 64-section multidetector CT of the chest and abdomen, and who had s

180 enhancement was the most accurate 64-section multidetector CT sign for diagnosing ischemia (sensitivi

181 ears) with urolithiasis underwent 64-section multidetector CT with 75-150 mA and noise index of 30.

182 ies for detection of PDI by using 64-section multidetector CT with postprocessing software ranged fro

183 iver tumors underwent dual-energy 64-section multidetector CT.

184 emodynamics and function by using 64-section multidetector CT.

185 Sixty-four-section multidetector CT trajectography facilitates the identifi

186 Sixteen-section multidetector CT data sets for 40 patients (30 men, 10 w

187 s performed using contrast-enhanced 64-slice multidetector CT imaging, and vitamin D levels and the p

188 oracic electrocardiography-gated dual-source multidetector CT angiographic images were used from 250

189 obtained with single-source and dual-source multidetector CT implementations.

190 n phantom was scanned by using a dual-source multidetector CT platform.

191 Split-bolus spectral multidetector CT resulted in vascular, liver, and pancre

192 od was developed and validated to synthesize multidetector CT data sets at multiple radiation exposur

193 and positive predictive values indicate that multidetector CT angiography cannot replace conventional

194 stic regression analysis results showed that multidetector CT grade and the abbreviated injury scale

195 The multidetector CT finding of frothy airway fluid or high-

196 The multidetector CT group was less likely to undergo corona

197 mage reading to see if this would change the multidetector CT-based classification.

198 aphs add little information for changing the multidetector CT classification.

199 Two radiologists reviewed in consensus the multidetector CT images obtained in all patients for var

200 es of angina were significantly lower in the multidetector CT group (4.3% vs 6.4%, P < .001).

201 Adjusted CAD costs in the multidetector CT group were 25.9% lower than in the myoc

202 Those in the multidetector CT group were more likely to undergo downs

203 In this article, the authors review the multidetector CT technique for evaluation of congenital

204 e images and interpretations to validate the multidetector CT determinations.

205 The shift from single-detector CT to multidetector CT and the use of decreasing section thick

206 In patients with blunt head trauma, multidetector CT venographic evaluation should be perfor

207 g cohorts) using prospectively ECG-triggered multidetector CT.

208 and sex-matched control patients undergoing multidetector CT.

209 tion and/or other aortic disorders underwent multidetector CT.

210 patients with blunt splenic injury underwent multidetector CT at admission to the hospital.

211 y one patients with splenic injury underwent multidetector CT.

212 individuals without known CAD who underwent multidetector CT (n = 1647) compared with those in a mat

213 c or distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent multidetector CT angiography and surgery at our institut

214 Individuals without known CAD who underwent multidetector CT as an initial diagnostic test, compared

215 e DSSE strategy in 19 patients who underwent multidetector CT of the liver for metastatic colorectal

216 f the 400 consecutive patients who underwent multidetector CT, 132 (33.0%) were male and 268 (67.0%)

217 ic patients who underwent FDG PET/unenhanced multidetector CT and split-bolus multidetector CT for re

218 information compared with FDG PET/unenhanced multidetector CT in oncologic patients.

219 ers and the percentage infarct size by using multidetector CT (r = 0.82 for creatinine phosphokinase,

220 PD was detected by using multidetector CT and was correlated with cardiac biomark

221 age thickness measurements obtained by using multidetector CT arthrography and yielded data pertinent

222 nts with acute MI can be identified by using multidetector CT on the basis of RWM abnormalities and P

223 with contrast material, and scanned by using multidetector CT.

224 ransthoracic echocardiography (TTE) by using multidetector CT.

225 lent correlation between regional MECV using multidetector CT and microscopy (r(2) = 0.92).

226 With multidetector CT, radiologists can now perform objective

227 iography and substantial (kappa = 0.70) with multidetector CT.

228 diac MR imaging at all examinations and with multidetector CT at 11 of 15 examinations.

229 thout DM, we assessed coronary arteries with multidetector CT angiography and invasive conventional a

230 Compared with multidetector CT, endoscopic ultrasonography is superior

231 -HU cysts; was significantly correlated with multidetector CT imaging regimen (P<.0001), cyst diamete

232 trauma over 9 years and were evaluated with multidetector CT angiography.

233 ardiac structures that can be evaluated with multidetector CT, and outlines the established appropria

234 ute blunt head trauma and were examined with multidetector CT venography because they were considered

235 the surgeons' classification was higher with multidetector CT than with radiography (P < .01 for one

236 ex vivo coronary arteries were measured with multidetector CT and intravascular US.

237 TACs obtained with multidetector CT were qualitatively similar to those obt

238 Three ex vivo hearts were scanned with multidetector CT and flat-panel-volume CT after institut

239 In two cases of a chest wound, multidetector CT aided in accurate assessment of the che