1 CT is superior to single-detector row CT for
multiplanar and 3D imaging of the central airways.
2 pendently evaluated the CT images, including
multiplanar and minimum intensity reformations, for bili
3 or's institution, multi-detector row CT with
multiplanar and three-dimensional reconstruction has bec
4 be how to perform multi-detector row CT with
multiplanar and three-dimensional reconstruction in youn
5 Although multi-detector row CT with
multiplanar and three-dimensional reconstruction is expa
6 bility in image reconstruction, and improved
multiplanar and three-dimensional reformations.
7 zed 144 randomly ordered colonic segments in
multiplanar and volume-rendered endoscopic views.
8 Multiplanar and volume-rendered US images were evaluated
9 Axial,
multiplanar,
and three-dimensional images were evaluated
10 ere visible after scrolling +/- 15 mm in any
multiplanar axis compared with 16 (24%) for NDACC (P < .
11 l-time reconstruction of previously acquired
multiplanar computed tomography images.
12 Thin contrast- enhanced sections and
multiplanar CT and MR scan reformations helped to the fi
13 Study results suggest that multiphase,
multiplanar CT enterography may have a role in the evalu
14 f bronchi (up to third order) measureable on
multiplanar CT reformations were also measurable at VB.
15 We demonstrate here that
multiplanar excitation of fluorescence by a standing wav
16 All MR examinations consisted of
multiplanar fast spin-echo sequences with similar tissue
17 nguish uniplanar protonematal tip cells from
multiplanar gametophore bud cells in the moss Physcomitr
18 ere acquired without breath holding by using
multiplanar half-Fourier single-shot T2-weighted imaging
19 shoulder joint considering a possibility of
multiplanar image acquisition and non-invasive nature of
20 ng superior soft-tissue contrast resolution,
multiplanar image acquisition, and functional imaging ca
21 Two-dimensional
multiplanar images were assessed by using a five-point s
22 ne on transverse images and in both zones on
multiplanar images.
23 The advent of cross-sectional and
multiplanar imaging and the profound effects they had an
24 Magnetic resonance imaging provides
multiplanar imaging to the same degree, without the use
25 the role of high-resolution T2-weighted fast
multiplanar inversion-recovery (FMPIR) magnetic resonanc
26 trast material-enhanced T1-weighted and fast
multiplanar inversion-recovery (IR) and fast spinecho T2
27 Contrast-enhanced fast
multiplanar IR imaging is a sensitive and specific test
28 Coronal gadolinium-enhanced fast
multiplanar IR imaging was the only sequence that was se
29 Findings at gadolinium-enhanced fast
multiplanar IR imaging were not statistically different
30 producibility for the contrast-enhanced fast
multiplanar IR sequence was excellent (kappa statistic =
31 Among the existing imaging modalities,
multiplanar magnetic resonance is the best at detecting
32 ed with a synchrotron X-ray broad beam and a
multiplanar microbeam radiotherapy beam.
33 Through the use of
multiplanar MRI, identification of diffuse and focal cha
34 Multiplanar navigation with a new MARC catheter with rea
35 Multiplanar probes with improved pre- and intraoperative
36 Source, maximum intensity projection, and
multiplanar reconstruction images were evaluated.
37 Maximum intensity projection and
multiplanar reconstruction images were used to categoriz
38 s) with the use of CT (both with and without
multiplanar reconstruction).
39 Helical CT, both with and without the use of
multiplanar reconstruction, enabled highly accurate diff
40 the aneurysm sac was measured using a curved
multiplanar reconstruction.
41 exclusively transverse images, free oblique
multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs), free oblique maximum
42 The incremental yield of
multiplanar reconstructions compared with that of axial
43 In
multiplanar reconstructions orthogonal to the coronary a
44 ing transverse source images complemented by
multiplanar reconstructions.
45 ents underwent pre-operative helical CT with
multiplanar reconstructions.
46 rmance in polyp detection was found among 2D
multiplanar reformation and 3D display techniques, altho
47 Multiplanar reformation and 3D reconstruction images wer
48 spatial resolution, and enhanced quality of
multiplanar reformation and three-dimensional reconstruc
49 abdominal radiologists using two-dimensional
multiplanar reformation followed by selective use of thr
50 00); however, interobserver agreement for 2D
multiplanar reformation was lower (kappa, 0.53-0.80).
51 interpretation usually combines transverse,
multiplanar reformation, and three-dimensional endolumin
52 During the second review, FSE-Cube with
multiplanar reformations was used to detect these joint
53 stration and motion artifact while improving
multiplanar reformations.
54 With the use of
multiplanar reformats of axial CT data, CT 4-chamber (4-
55 ary tract can be evaluated more precisely in
multiplanar reformatted (MPR) and volume rendered (VR) i
56 ion by using the consensus interpretation of
multiplanar reformatted (MPR) images as the reference st
57 rnel acetabular fracture classification with
multiplanar reformatted and 3D multidetector CT images.
58 Multiplanar reformatted and three-dimensional (3D) CT im
59 ary tract can be evaluated more precisely in
multiplanar reformatted and volume rendered images.
60 of the literature, Frederiksen suggests that
multiplanar reformatted computed tomography (CT) is the
61 The
multiplanar scanning also permits immediate B-scan OCT c
62 layed gadolinium-enhanced, breath-hold, fast
multiplanar sequences with fat saturation.
63 Rotated apical six-plane method with
multiplanar Simpson's rule and apical biplane Simpson's
64 Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced fast
multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the
65 ed and characterized with contrast-enhanced,
multiplanar,
surface-coil MR imaging.
66 y evaluated with contrast material-enhanced,
multiplanar,
surface-coil MR imaging.
67 cal sites, standardized dynamic pelvic 1.5-T
multiplanar T2-weighted MR imaging was performed in thre
68 At the present time, the development of
multiplanar,
three-dimensional imaging shows great promi
69 l axial CT images and CT colographic images (
multiplanar two- and three-dimensional endoluminal image
70 le three-dimensional (3D) endoluminal and 2D
multiplanar views were available for problem solving.
71 By using
multiplanar visualization, 48 (70%) polyps were visible
72 Multiplanar volume reconstruction images were retrospect
73 Multiplanar,
volume-rendered, and stereoscopic three-dim
74 errelationships between adjacent in-plane or
multiplanar voxels or regions, respectively.