ライフサイエンスコーパス: multivariable-adjusted

1 s the lowest quartile of PVC frequency had a multivariable-adjusted, 3-fold greater odds of a 5-year

2 Multivariable adjusted age-specific odds ratios (ORs) fo

3 ed with lower relative cMGP concentration in multivariable adjusted analyses (beta=-8.99; P=0.04).

4 In multivariable adjusted analyses, kidney disease associat

5 In multivariable adjusted analyses, men in the highest HDL-

6 in 2005/2007; 2.7% in 2009/2011; P=0.19) and multivariable adjusted analyses.

7 fidence interval: 3.69, 14.00; P < 0.01) and multivariable-adjusted analyses (age, sex, smoking, seru

8 In multivariable-adjusted analyses (n = 5,708), higher long

9 In multivariable-adjusted analyses considering joint effect

10 y associated with increased risk of death in multivariable-adjusted analyses of time-varying FGF23 (h

11 /MS- had 2.5% lower LS (SE, 0.7%; P=0.001 in multivariable-adjusted analyses) and 10.8 ms greater dys

12 In multivariable-adjusted analyses, lower risk of becoming

13 In pooled multivariable-adjusted analysis, both PDI and hPDI were

14 In multivariable-adjusted analysis, factors associated with

15 Among 7514 prematch patients, multivariable-adjusted and propensity-adjusted hazard ra

16 sponding OR estimates from the conventional, multivariable adjusted, and Egger Mendelian randomisatio

17 On a continuous scale, the multivariable-adjusted association of potassium values a

18 The multivariable-adjusted association of serum potassium wi

19 s, other variables found to have significant multivariable adjusted associations with functionality s

20 s and generalized additive models to examine multivariable-adjusted associations between serum albumi

21 In the longitudinal analysis, multivariable-adjusted attributable differences in child

22 Multivariable-adjusted attributable differences in heigh

23 Multivariable-adjusted competing risk survival models we

24 ths of each biomarker was estimated by using multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression i

25 In multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression m

26 In multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression m

27 intake with HCC risk was evaluated by using multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression t

28 In stepwise regression, the multivariable-adjusted correlates of the change in the t

29 ection fraction <45%) were assessed by using multivariable adjusted Cox models and restricted cubic s

30 Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated with multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards models,

31 Multivariable adjusted Cox regression was used to examin

32 iated with a lower risk of hip fracture in a multivariable-adjusted Cox model (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95

33 disease, and incident ischemic stroke using multivariable-adjusted Cox models in a nationwide cohort

34 A multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard model was

35 Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models we

36 Sex-stratified multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling

37 Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models w

38 Using sex-stratified multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models,

39 In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models,

40 and for death due to prostate cancer, using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

41 for an enlarged segment was determined using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

42 1:5 propensity score-matched and traditional multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

43 In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regressi

44 In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regressi

45 In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regressi

46 Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regressi

47 llow-up Study and Nurses' Health Study using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regressi

48 In multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analyses, ID assoc

49 CI, 1.10 to 3.20; P = .021) and traditional multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analysis (hazard r

50 Multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models estimated h

51 d all-cause mortality were assessed by using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models.

52 We used multivariable-adjusted Cox regression to estimate hazard

53 The multivariable-adjusted decline in FEV1 in asthma-COPD ov

54 The multivariable-adjusted differences in 5-year cumulative

55 Multivariable-adjusted differences in standardized cogni

56 previous myocardial infarction) and direct (multivariable-adjusted) effects of self-reported total a

57 In a multivariable-adjusted estimates, left atrium volume >16

58 tion in major adverse cardiovascular events (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio [HR(adj)]=0.75, 95%

59 A multivariable adjusted hazard ratio of mortality for SxO

60 The multivariable adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence int

61 The multivariable adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence

62 compared with never-smokers without asthma, multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for asthma exacerba

63 Elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for AVS of 1.2 (95%

64 We calculated multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for midwall, endoca

65 r each increment of 10 beats per minute, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratios in men were 1.16 (9

66 We assessed the 10-year risk of AF in multivariable-adjusted hazard models.

67 For the highest quartile versus lowest, the multivariable-adjusted hazard rate ratios were 0.91 (95%

68 The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence

69 ntly associated with PCSM (prediagnosis use, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.92, 95% CI

70 <25 kg/m(2)) and metabolically healthy, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for AMI was 1.1

71 The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of skin cancer

72 not associated with breast cancer incidence (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio = 1.08, 95% confiden

73 isk of rosacea associated with past smoking (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio = 1.09, 95% confiden

74 ore was strongly associated with risk of HF (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence

75 ncident HF with preserved ejection fraction (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.34; 95% conf

76 ared with the low genetic risk category, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for coronary heart d

77 In prospective analyses, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for incident diabete

78 The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for incident nonfata

79 The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for men using vitami

80 eat, men who consumed 75 g/day or more had a multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio of 1.21 (95% confide

81 west tertiles of exposure were compared, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio of pancreatic cancer

82 mong estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio per five nevi, 1.09,

83 69%, and 71% without secondary precipitants; multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% confidenc

84 eous nevi had higher risks of breast cancer (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.04, 95% confidenc

85 diovascular events than those who continued (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidenc

86 a marginally higher risk of developing CHD (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% confidenc

87 sence; difference, 2.92 [95% CI, 2.02-3.83]; multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.44-

88 In patients with AF, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence int

89 ared with being adherent to all 3 therapies, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence int

90 rds regression modeling was used to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs.

91 ing with time-varying covariates to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (MV-adjusted HRs).

92 Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence

93 Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence

94 gression analyses were conducted to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence

95 ortional hazards models to estimate age- and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence

96 es (deaths per 100,000 persons per year) and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for adults, aged 19

97 [table: see text] The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause morta

98 The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for death from any

99 The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for death were 1.47

100 The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for death within 30

101 Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for statin users, a

102 cation pooled-cohort equations), we compared multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for the composite o

103 Within the class III obesity range, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for total deaths an

104 The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios of total mortality

105 The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios of women with RLS f

106 The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios were 0.70 (95% conf

107 Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios were 1 (reference),

108 lanoma than with risk of SCC and BCC in men (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios were 2.41 (95% conf

109 Standard multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios were closer to the

110 Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios were computed using

111 rian FP was associated with lower mortality (multivariable-adjusted HR for >/= 40 compared with <30 p

112 diagnostic circulating cotinine levels had a multivariable-adjusted HR for death of 1.76 (95% CI, 1.2

113 years before diagnosis, heavy smokers had a multivariable-adjusted HR for death of 2.47 (95% CI, 1.2

114 Results The multivariable-adjusted HR for death was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.

115 The multivariable-adjusted HR for death was 1.53 (95% CI, 1.

116 were confirmed by medical record review.The multivariable-adjusted HR for intermediate AMD comparing

117 ruit and berry juices), the extreme-quartile multivariable-adjusted HR for T2D was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.57

118 The multivariable-adjusted HR for the highest quintile of LC

119 k of BCC for use during high school/college (multivariable-adjusted HR for use more than six times pe

120 f 100 mg cholesterol/d was associated with a multivariable-adjusted HR of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.02) f

121 dditional egg (55 g)/d was associated with a multivariable-adjusted HR of 1.17 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.61) i

122 uintile of intake, the lowest quintile had a multivariable-adjusted HR of 1.86 (95% CI: 1.67, 2.06).

123 stically significantly associated with risk (multivariable-adjusted HR per 1-g/d increment; 95% CI) o

124 ed with a lower risk of all-cause mortality [multivariable-adjusted HR: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.97), P

125 ssociated with risk for all-cause mortality (multivariable-adjusted HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.28; p

126 [HR], 1.58; 95% CI, 1.34-1.87; P < .001) and multivariable-adjusted (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.25-1.75; P <

127 R: 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.92), P = 0.002] and multivariable-adjusted [HR: 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.93), P

128 ion affected risk was also investigated, and multivariable adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 1, 0.88 (0.78,

129 In analysis of seasonal cycling, multivariable adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 1, 0.88 (0.83,

130 Multivariable adjusted HRs (95% confidence interval [CI]

131 The multivariable adjusted HRs for highest compared with low

132 intile of the inflammatory pattern score had multivariable adjusted HRs for premenopausal breast canc

133 For the AHEI, the multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for total, CVD, can

134 Pooled multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 0.93 (0.88, 0.

135 Multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 1.0 (reference

136 Multivariable-adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for the associati

137 The multivariable-adjusted HRs for CKD for people with fruct

138 We used Cox regression to estimate multivariable-adjusted HRs for death according to nut co

139 ared with patients with insufficient levels, multivariable-adjusted HRs for death were 0.79 (95% CI,

140 icrovascular disease states versus none, the multivariable-adjusted HRs for the primary outcome were

141 Pooled multivariable-adjusted HRs over increasing cumulative av

142 Multivariable-adjusted HRs were 0.83 for fatty fish (95%

143 In comparison with 0.9 servings/wk, multivariable-adjusted HRs were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.96

144 ersus below 0.34 x 10(9) cells per liter had multivariable-adjusted incidence rate ratios of 1.76 (95

145 nal logistic regression was used to estimate multivariable-adjusted incidence rate ratios of lymphoma

146 Cox proportional hazards models to estimate multivariable-adjusted incidence rate ratios.

147 Multivariable-adjusted linear and logistic regression mo

148 We used multivariable-adjusted linear mixed effect models to det

149 spective weight change were analyzed using a multivariable-adjusted linear mixed-effects model.

150 ircumferential strain, and e' velocity using multivariable-adjusted linear mixed-effects models (to a

151 central obesity and cardiac mechanics using multivariable-adjusted linear mixed-effects models to ac

152 Multivariable-adjusted linear regression analyses were u

153 with changes in LV geometry and function by multivariable-adjusted linear regression models.

154 Multivariable-adjusted linear regression was used to est

155 Using multivariable-adjusted linear regression, we evaluated m

156 We used multivariable-adjusted linear regressions to estimate me

157 Multivariable adjusted, linear regression within each co

158 rphism dosages with residuals generated from multivariable-adjusted logarithmically transformed BNP c

159 amivudine and emtricitabine were compared by multivariable adjusted logistic regression and Cox propo

160 ticipants aged >/=18 y, 55% women), applying multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models to ass

161 Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were u

162 Age- and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were u

163 By using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models, a sig

164 In multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models, each

165 Multivariable-adjusted mean +/- SD changes in body weigh

166 Multivariable-adjusted mean Agatston scores were 2.36, 2

167 Multivariable-adjusted mean differences were 1.00 (stand

168 h lower absolute global longitudinal strain (multivariable-adjusted mean global longitudinal strain [

169 The multivariable-adjusted means of systolic BP responses to

170 In a multivariable-adjusted model and compared with the group

171 In the first subsample, the full multivariable-adjusted model showed that participants wi

172 take was not associated with T2D risk in the multivariable-adjusted model that included age, BMI, die

173 [95% CI]: 1.12 [1.03 to 1.21], p = 0.0053 in multivariable-adjusted model) and when other QTc correct

174 In a multivariable-adjusted model, AF (n=1545) as a time-vary

175 In a multivariable-adjusted model, the hazard ratio was 0.57

176 timates were substantially attenuated in the multivariable adjusted models for major cardiovascular d

177 In multivariable adjusted models HCV infection was associat

178 In multivariable adjusted models including aerobic MVPA, th

179 In the multivariable adjusted models, compared with nondrinkers

180 In multivariable adjusted models, overall, blacks had 21% h

181 ression analyses were used in unadjusted and multivariable adjusted models.

182 01-2.09; IL6: HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.04-2.32 in multivariable adjusted models.

183 ighest compared with the lowest quartiles in multivariable adjusted models.

184 iation remained statistically significant in multivariable adjusted models.

185 major disability or major disability in the multivariable-adjusted models (1.07 (0.89 to 1.29) and 0

186 ), or prevalent infarcts in cross-sectional, multivariable-adjusted models (all P > .05).

187 baseline serum total and LDL cholesterol in multivariable-adjusted models (beta: 0.199, SE: 0.056, P

188 igher risk of incident HF hospitalization in multivariable-adjusted models (odds ratio, 3.30 [1.66-6.

189 preemptive transplant were calculated using multivariable-adjusted models and examined across health

190 Multivariable-adjusted models showed sex differences for

191 Multivariable-adjusted models were built to determine in

192 In multivariable-adjusted models, 1-mug/L increases in wate

193 In multivariable-adjusted models, 1-SD increases in eicosap

194 In multivariable-adjusted models, greater total sedentary t

195 In multivariable-adjusted models, higher interleukin-6 leve

196 In multivariable-adjusted models, individuals in the lowest

197 In multivariable-adjusted models, nonsmoking, a healthy bod

198 In multivariable-adjusted models, PFOA was associated with

199 In multivariable-adjusted models, sTie-2 and hepatocyte gro

200 In multivariable-adjusted models, the hazard ratio (95% con

201 In multivariable-adjusted models, the hazard ratios for mor

202 In multivariable-adjusted models, we observed nonsignifican

203 associated with risk of HF in both age- and multivariable-adjusted models.

204 onal hazards regression analysis in age- and multivariable-adjusted models.

205 % CIs for colorectal cancer incidence, using multivariable-adjusted models.

206 site-specific cancer risk in unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted models.

207 The crude and multivariable adjusted odds of dying after cardiogenic s

208 Multivariable adjusted odds ratio combining data from bo

209 The multivariable adjusted odds ratio for IgE levels greater

210 in combination with DVT (P-trend < 0.0001): multivariable adjusted odds ratio was 2.1 (95% confidenc

211 ed with those with 2+ high-risk factors, the multivariable-adjusted odds of having any disability in

212 lowest quartile (Q1) of HCB, the lipid- and multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for failed implan

213 ss than 4.5 mEq/L (5.0%; 95% CI, 4.7%-5.3%), multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.19 (95% CI, 1.

214 th statistically and clinically significant (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio 12.5; 95% CI, 1.1-146.

215 ither overall (for highest third vs. lowest, multivariable-adjusted odds ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence

216 seropositivity and the presence of fibroids (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence

217 ntrols with plasma hormone measurements, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratio for every five nevi at

218 The multivariable-adjusted odds ratio for PAD associated wit

219 In cross-sectional analyses, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratio for prevalent diabetes

220 ter insertion significantly decreased from a multivariable-adjusted odds ratio of 1.29 (95% confidenc

221 The multivariable-adjusted odds ratio of high salt sensitivi

222 ared with 17% (562/3335) without sibling MR (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence

223 rmalities visualized by computed tomography (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.49-4.

224 f breast cancer (for bilateral oophorectomy, multivariable-adjusted odds ratios = 0.60, 95% confidenc

225 0.77; for hysterectomy without oophorectomy, multivariable-adjusted odds ratios = 0.68, 95% confidenc

226 The multivariable-adjusted odds ratios comparing persons in

227 In the first year of follow-up, multivariable-adjusted odds ratios for having frequent e

228 ile 1 (referent), subjects in quartile 4 had multivariable-adjusted odds ratios for hyperuricemia of

229 ntake with those in the lowest quintile, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratios of T2D were 2.13 [95%

230 Moreover, the multivariable-adjusted OR for short telomeres (z score <

231 cer risk and those in the top quintile had a multivariable-adjusted OR of 3.02 [95% confidence interv

232 s than 5.0 mEq/L (10.0%; 95% CI, 9.1%-10.9%; multivariable-adjusted OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.68-2.36), and

233 Multivariable-adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for HF across conse

234 nal logistic (or Cox) regression to estimate multivariable-adjusted ORs (or HRs) for HF and CAD.

235 The multivariable-adjusted ORs of hyperglycemia associated w

236 The multivariable-adjusted ORs of hyperglycemia based on dif

237 The multivariable-adjusted ORs of obesity based on different

238 diastolic function, and LV filling pressure (multivariable adjusted p = 0.001).

239 n (apical view), and longitudinal synchrony (multivariable-adjusted P<0.0001).

240 Multivariable adjusted Poisson models were used to estim

241 In multivariable-adjusted pooled analyses, higher proportio

242 lowest (<5%) predicted ASCVD risk category, multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratios (95% confidence

243 Multivariable-adjusted proportional hazard models adjust

244 Multivariable-adjusted proportional hazards models revea

245 We performed multivariable-adjusted proportional hazards models to as

246 Using multivariable-adjusted proportional hazards regression,

247 nks per week was associated with a 19% lower multivariable-adjusted rate of HF compared with never dr

248 was shown between vitamin C and HNC overall (multivariable-adjusted rate ratio for quartile 4 compare

249 ; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.66; P-trend < 0.001), OCC (multivariable-adjusted rate ratio for quartile 4 compare

250 % CI: 0.16, 0.77; P-trend < 0.05), and OHPC (multivariable-adjusted rate ratio for quartile 4 compare

251 ges of 25-35 or ages 36-59 years, the pooled multivariable-adjusted rate ratios for >/=11 hours per w

252 Cohort-specific multivariable-adjusted rate ratios from Cox proportional

253 Outcomes included multivariable-adjusted rates of myocardial infarction, s

254 Multivariable adjusted regression analysis showed that p

255 In a multivariable-adjusted regression model, higher FWA (bet

256 We used multivariable-adjusted regression models to examine asso

257 sk of diabetes using Cox proportional hazard multivariable-adjusted regression models.

258 olor (for black hair vs. red or blonde hair, multivariable-adjusted relative risk (RR) = 0.99, 95% co

259 d adults with and without AKI and reported a multivariable-adjusted relative risk (RR) for the associ

260 (for >6 years of use compared with <1 year, multivariable-adjusted relative risk = 1.01, 95% confide

261 (for >6 years of use compared with <1 year, multivariable-adjusted relative risk = 1.09, 95% confide

262 (for >6 years of use compared with <1 year, multivariable-adjusted relative risk = 1.10, 95% confide

263 sociated with a higher risk of colon cancer (multivariable-adjusted relative risk = 1.54, 95% confide

264 onal hazards regression was used to estimate multivariable-adjusted relative risk.

265 Multivariable-adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence

266 rds regression models were used to calculate multivariable-adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence

267 Multivariable-adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence

268 d Cox proportional hazard models to estimate multivariable-adjusted relative risks.

269 Multivariable-adjusted repeated measure logistic regress

270 l Modification-defined sepsis (n = 568), the multivariable adjusted risk of 90-day mortality was 1.6-

271 s not on statin therapy pre-hospitalization, multivariable adjusted risk ratios for filling a high-in

272 15 years of follow-up in the Bruneck Study, multivariable adjusted risk ratios per one-SD higher log

273 ot a significant predictor of incident HF in multivariable-adjusted risk model, but the combination o

274 ect were strong predictors of incident HF in multivariable-adjusted risk models (hazard ratio, 3.79;

275 lock are strong predictors of incident HF in multivariable-adjusted risk models, but RBBB is not a si

276 nts had a 2.12-, 2.06-, and 2.13-fold higher multivariable-adjusted risk of incident CKD, composite o

277 ival to discharge in multivariable analysis (multivariable-adjusted risk ratio [RR] per minute delay,

278 Cohort-specific multivariable-adjusted risk ratios (RRs) of ALS incidenc

279 Multivariable-adjusted risks were elevated only in men w

280 In multivariable-adjusted robust linear regression models,

281 in tanning ability (for dark tan vs. no tan, multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.92, 1.05), s

282 rick skin phototype (for type IV vs. type I, multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.92, 1.05).

283 n with blisters vs. practically no reaction, multivariable-adjusted RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.08), o

284 e of intake of long-chain omega-3 PUFAs, the multivariable-adjusted RR for hearing loss among women i

285 ho rarely consumed fish (<1 serving/mo), the multivariable-adjusted RR for hearing loss among women w

286 The pooled, multivariable-adjusted RR for the highest to the lowest

287 The multivariable-adjusted RR of having >/=4 cups (600 mL) c

288 women in the lowest quintile of intake, the multivariable-adjusted RR of hearing loss among women in

289 urvival with favorable neurological outcome (multivariable-adjusted RR per minute delay, 0.95 [95% CI

290 also associated with decreased risk of ROSC (multivariable-adjusted RR per minute delay, 0.97 [95% CI

291 9]), decreased risk of survival at 24 hours (multivariable-adjusted RR per minute delay, 0.97 [95% CI

292 scharge (21.0% [49/233] vs 33.1% [438/1325]; multivariable-adjusted RR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60-0.93]; P =

293 Pooled multivariable adjusted RRs (95% CIs) comparing the highe

294 Multivariable-adjusted RRs (95% CIs) of GDM for comparis

295 ards regression models were used to estimate multivariable-adjusted RRs and 95% CIs.

296 Multivariable-adjusted statistical models accommodating

297 of patients) were evaluated with simple and multivariable-adjusted statistical models.

298 Multivariable-adjusted subgroup analysis by QRS duration

299 Multivariable-adjusted time-varying Cox proportional haz

300 ong 718 480 patients studied, unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted transplant rates differed conside