ライフサイエンスコーパス: murmur

1 69 patients (37 pathological and 32 innocent murmurs).

2 the echocardiography laboratory for systolic murmur.

3 sence of other recognized causes of systolic murmur.

4 tients referred for evaluation of a systolic murmur.

5 tal defect (VSD) among children with a heart murmur.

6 nted with cardiovascular symptoms or a heart murmur.

7 d in the separation of innocent from organic murmurs.

8 ings other than a higher prevalence of heart murmurs.

9 e disease, 2 points; Auscultation of a heart murmur, 1 point (receiver operating characteristic = 0.8

10 levated blood pressure, 28% have a diastolic murmur, 31% have pulse deficits or blood pressure differ

11 riminator between heart disease and innocent murmur and can, in many instances, eliminate the expense

12 resenting symptom (42.2%), followed by heart murmur and supraventricular tachycardia.

13 Innocent murmur and syncope or palpitations with no other indicat

14 vinsonii antigens and uncharacterized heart murmurs and/or arrhythmias.

15 PR interval, clinically significant cardiac murmur, and heart failure were associated with atrial fi

16 ms were fever, splenomegaly, new or changing murmur, and microvascular phenomena.

17 eelings of repletion, flatulence, intestinal murmurs, and burping (p < 0.04).

18 hould be a clinical consideration when these murmurs are identified.

19 , the dog had been diagnosed with a systolic murmur at 16 months of age and underwent balloon valvulo

20 tid bruits completely resolved, her systolic murmur diminished, and her platelet count rose to 268,00

21 Presence of a diastolic murmur does little to change the pretest probability of

22 istinguish between innocent and pathological murmurs effectively.

23 Pathologic murmur had the highest yield of abnormal findings (40%).

24 Patients with intestinal murmurs had greater bowel wall thickness of the sigmoid

25 aphy laboratory for evaluation of a systolic murmur have IIVs in the absence of other recognized caus

26 tion between innocent and pathological heart murmurs have met with limited success.

27 , prior valve disease in 2 points, and heart murmur in 1 point.

28 iagnosis was intermediate VSD in 4, innocent murmur in 3, major VSD in 2, pulmonary stenosis in 2 and

29 Physical examination revealed a murmur in 70% of patients.

30 f carotid bruits, and improvement in cardiac murmur in a young female patient with sitosterolemia.

31 men presenting with hypotension and systolic murmur in critical care settings.

32 ar velocities are a common cause of systolic murmur in this group of patients and should be included

33 ed in the differential diagnosis of systolic murmurs in adults.

34 a median follow-up interval of 43.2 months, murmur intensity increased in all patients, and the aver

35 f states, including documentation of a heart murmur, irregular heart rhythm, peripheral pulses, or st

36 es are often diagnosed subacutely when a new murmur is heard.

37 nferred from a peripheral pulmonary stenosis murmur (n=41) in 76% of subjects.

38 revious Valve disease, Auscultation of heart murmur (NOVA) score-based on the following variables: Nu

39 The majority of our 11 patients reacquired murmurs of mitral regurgitation.

40 r back pain) and signs (aortic regurgitation murmur or pulse deficits) of dissection were less common

41 o the diagnosis of endocarditis were cardiac murmurs, persistent or recurrent fever, a history of hea

42 Only the Austin Flint murmur, the Corrigan pulse, the Duroziez sign, and the H

43 ation (TR), a long-held concept suggested by murmur variation, remains unproven and of unclear mechan

44 its were audible, and a grade II/VI systolic murmur was detected at the left upper sternal border.

45 The sole explanation for systolic murmur was IIVs in 16.7% of referred patients.

46 Among patients with MR, a murmur was inconsistently detected clinically.

47 An ejection systolic murmur was noted most often in the left third intercosta

48 referring veterinarian had detected a heart murmur, which led to progressive dyspnea and a diagnosis

49 37 (19%) had a peripheral pulmonary stenosis murmur with either a normal echocardiogram or no imaging

50 ds ratio, 13.4 [CI, 4.5 to 39.5]), and heart murmur without other known cardiac abnormalities (adjust