ライフサイエンスコーパス: mutual

1 lets; however, lipid droplets display weaker mutual activation between RDH10 and DHRS3, suggesting re

2 These associations remained with mutual adjustment and persisted when adjusting for basel

3 d chronic effects of exposure to PM2.5, with mutual adjustment for short- and long-term exposure, as

4 Pairwise mutual adjustment of the 9 measures left the association

5 After mutual adjustment, no ARV was associated with osteonecro

6 After mutual adjustment, six psychosocial and socioeconomic fa

7 t DB270 bound protein independently of their mutual affinities for sequence-specific DNA.

8 emical equilibria each differentiated by the mutual affinities of the components.

9 range attraction, short-range repulsion, and mutual alignment between adjacent swimmers.

10 ween neighboring cells: collisions lead to a mutual alignment of the cell velocities and to the forma

11 We suggest that the mutual antagonism between CynA and regions of responsive

12 itment to chromatin at active genes and that mutual antagonism between RNA and chromatin underlies th

13 fh-Teff cell fate commitment is regulated by mutual antagonism between the transcription factors Bcl6

14 ior of the Gwl-ENSA pathway emerges from its mutual antagonism with PP2A:B55.

15 mitting quantum dots in a living plant via a mutual antagonistic reaction.

16 ation between winner RHP and costs suggested mutual assessment during the pre-escalation phase but no

17 Here we report evidence for mutual assessment in a wild primate.

18 esents some of the first direct evidence for mutual assessment in primate signaling contests.

19 underlying changes in social status rely on mutual assessment of fighting ability.

20 The mutual assessment strategy, where the individual assesse

21 ence can be beneficial in the development of mutual assessment whereas profound experience may result

22 Despite the benefits of such mutual assessment, few studies have been able to reject

23 agonistic encounters to become proficient at mutual assessment.

24 This paper reports a mutual association between the BBWV 2 VP37-tubule comple

25 tological observations provide evidence of a mutual association of MP-derived tubules and PD in a nat

26 ween C. albicans and F. nucleatum leads to a mutual attenuation of virulence, which may function to p

27 s between the host and its microbiota are of mutual benefit and promote health.

28 on occurs where it is risky to cooperate for mutual benefit because successful cooperation depends on

29 age and sense of ownership; and (iv) gaining mutual benefit from both the research process and its pr

30 Our results offer the first support for the 'mutual benefit of association' hypothesis regarding the

31 fection, but may in the present case act for mutual benefit.

32 en WikiPathways and Reactome illustrates the mutual benefits of combining these two approaches.

33 articipation in collections demonstrates the mutual benefits of undergraduate involvement.

34 spersal by forming multispecies swarms, with mutual benefits.

35 For CDI, a lower bound for the required mutual coherence factor of |mu 12| >/= 0.75 is found by

36 Mutual coherence of the PCSEL elements is verified throu

37 ical carriers possess a sufficient degree of mutual coherence.

38 -ray crystallographic structures confirm the mutual columnar self-assembly of triarylamines and crown

39 ed Site 1, Site 2, and Site 3 based on their mutual competition of binding to the receptor.

40 litate information sharing through trust and mutual confidence building, and ultimately improve effic

41 the complexation of protein and DNA involves mutual conformational changes, especially for a specific

42 b loss, in M1, partially in S1, and in their mutual connectivity.

43 Based on parallel efforts and a mutual consensus now shared by both chemists and physici

44 For chemically denatured proteins we obtain mutual consistency in our inferences based on RG and RE

45 Here, we disentangle mutual contributions of cell size and cell stiffness to

46 connect bias to situational factors, lack of mutual control, and individual integrity.

47 a reinforcement learning strategy promoting mutual cooperation in two-player situations.

48 eurodegenerative disorders investigating the mutual correlations between predetermined regions or nod

49 l phenolics to an antioxidant activity their mutual correlations were evaluated.

50 onredundant set of indicators based on their mutual correlations.

51 h the paired electrons minimize their strong mutual Coulomb repulsion.

52 in order to reduce the commonplace issues of mutual coupling and grating lobes.

53 Here, we report a new scheme with mutual coupling between a mechanical oscillator supporti

54 he circular rings of the POA array and their mutual couplings are analyzed using the LCC model.

55 It is found that the mutual couplings are not only between the adjacent anten

56 The LCC model reveals the mutual couplings between the antenna rings.

57 e cooperative umpolung annulation eliminates mutual deactivation and leads to a diverse set of benzaz

58 either owing to physician recommendation or mutual decision by the physician and parents.

59 Nevertheless, the two pathways exhibit mutual dependence.

60 The mutual dependencies between chromatin organization and p

61 ses, we still lack an understanding of their mutual dependencies.

62 Mutual differences, Spearman correlations, area under th

63 Mutual diffusivities and their composition dependence ar

64 lymer stress and a Fujita-type dependence of mutual diffusivities on composition, depending on parame

65 /cellulose (K15M) demonstrate that API-water mutual diffusivity in the presence of excipient cannot g

66 sphorylation inhibition, ligand and receptor mutual dynamics, and the presence of an alternate bindin

67 ent prognosis, a better understanding of the mutual effect of fibrosis in AF and heart failure is of

68 between seeds and rosette leaves along with mutual effects between the Asp family and SMM pathways o

69 These examples demonstrate mutual effects between the fast physiological processes

70 Our data suggest mutual effects between the two cell types.

71 rface, thereby taking into consideration the mutual effects of both protein structural complexity and

72 We further observed mutual enhancement of microbial activity and photodegrad

73 ning such a negative Wigner function and the mutual entanglement of virtually all atoms is unpreceden

74 ent aspects of metabolic rates affects their mutual evolution is poorly understood.

75 could be interconverted to a large extent by mutual exchange of Gln/Glu at position 180 or by Gly/Arg

76 ily passivates the cathode particles through mutual exchange of surface species.

77 tarburst amacrine cells (SACs), we show that mutual excitation among SACs is critical for Stage II (c

78 rons are more amenable to synchronization by mutual excitation.

79 ins bind to Dicer in a similar manner and by mutual exclusion.

80 ch interaction but also helps us to find the mutual exclusive interactions.

81 We investigate the role of mutual exclusive physical states in the recent work of s

82 that inhibiting DNA methylation by 5-Aza-dC mutual-exclusively regulates the lineage determination o

83 However, mutual exclusivity alone is not sufficient to indicate t

84 tivate NF-kappaB signalling, and we observed mutual exclusivity among tumours with somatic NF-kappaB

85 Currently, most of mutual exclusivity analyses are preformed focusing on a

86 A comprehensive mutual exclusivity analysis allowed us to uncover mutual

87 Mutual exclusivity analysis helps address these challeng

88 In addition, we utilized our mutual exclusivity analysis in support of a previously p

89 e computing cost and perform less restricted mutual exclusivity analysis, we developed an efficient m

90 he mutational landscape of cancer, including mutual exclusivity and co-occurrence of mutations, has b

91 s, while the within module relations combine mutual exclusivity and functional interactions.

92 CoMEt includes an exact statistical test for mutual exclusivity and techniques to perform simultaneou

93 ly related; (ii) BeME-WithCo, which combines mutual exclusivity between modules with co-occurrence wi

94 We also demonstrate mutual exclusivity between the MYC G-quadruplex and i-mo

95 e importantly, our results demonstrated that mutual exclusivity can also provide information that goe

96 lly interacting, the pairs in between cancer mutual exclusivity class are more often disconnected in

97 eam effect on the signaling network, using a mutual exclusivity criterion that ensures that each gene

98 lly characterize patterns of co-mutation and mutual exclusivity in 6,456 cancers across 23 tumor type

99 exact test for assessing the significance of mutual exclusivity in an arbitrary number of mutational

100 Mutual exclusivity in the nature of forward and reserve

101 We introduce a classification of mutual exclusivity into three basic classes: within tiss

102 Mutual exclusivity is a widely recognized property of ma

103 Our new method, Mutual Exclusivity Module Cover (MEMCover) not only iden

104 f gene alterations, for example, showing how mutual exclusivity of FGFR3 and TP53 mutations is interp

105 ) (Cancer Correlation Clustering), leverages mutual exclusivity of mutations, patient coverage and dr

106 K7 serves as a cellular switch that enforces mutual exclusivity of the inflammasome response and cell

107 remote islands is rising, and challenge the mutual exclusivity of the non-equilibrium and equilibriu

108 g1/Raptor in mammalian TORC1, explaining the mutual exclusivity of these two proteins.

109 results also provide an explanation for the mutual exclusivity of WT1 and TET2 mutations in AML, and

110 n the group significantly contributes to the mutual exclusivity pattern.

111 This mutual exclusivity signal can be confounded by high and

112 ploring the interplay between co-occurrence, mutual exclusivity, and functional interactions between

113 enetic alterations, such as co-occurrence or mutual exclusivity, are often observed in cancer, where

114 relations between modules are enriched with mutual exclusivity, while genes within each module are f

115 tary relationship with no safeguards against mutual exploitation.

116 s of particular social importance, including mutual eye contact and mutual reward receipt.

117 The pattern depends on mutual feedback between auxin and cytokinins mediated by

118 Mutual gametophytic sterility was overcome by complement

119 ns: benevolence was associated with enhanced mutual gaze and empathic eye blinking, whereas indiffere

120 ditional neonatal face-to-face interactions (mutual gaze and intermittent lip-smacking) with human ca

121 and connections, we show that: long-lasting, mutual, glutamatergic excitation between the neurons all

122 Primed CD4 and CD8 T cells provided mutual help to sustain these functions in both subsets.

123 ed trial with near-perfect ART adherence and mutual HIV status disclosure among all participating cou

124 This mutual imitation experience allowed the robot to recogni

125 We report 3 experiments using a mutual imitation task between robots, adults, typically

126 arn from an interactive experience involving mutual imitation.

127 ey residues in the D- and K-channel show the mutual impact of the two proton-conducting channels to b

128 Here, we tackle this mutual incompatibility by recognizing that the 8-oxo-pur

129 ng the generation of nonclassicality and the mutual incompatibility of two states connected by time e

130 an equivalent circuit model and introduce a mutual inductance parameter M whose sign is shown to cha

131 nce device (SQUID) magnetometry, double-coil mutual inductance, and magneto-transport, data that prov

132 Blends and areas of mutual influence between the research communities were i

133 This produces mutual influence between the two levels, with far-rangin

134 Blends between communities indicate that mutual influence has occurred as interruptions research

135 lls organized in a loop to investigate their mutual influence in the establishment of their codes for

136 al interaction) or prerecorded (with no such mutual influence).

137 based registration, multi-attribute combined mutual information (MACMI) registration and scale-invari

138 i-modal image co-registration via optimizing mutual information (MI) is based on the assumption that

139 Several mutual information (MI)-based algorithms have been devel

140 el sequence-based approach with multivariate mutual information (MMI) of protein feature representati

141 quantify by an extension of the entropy and mutual information analyses proposed for the single-laye

142 Finally, mutual information analyses quantifying the relation bet

143 Using Granger causality and conditional mutual information analyses, we provide evidence that fe

144 Mutual Information analysis identifies a complexed corre

145 Furthermore, using mutual information analysis, we confirm the existence of

146 Using mutual information analysis, we demonstrate that ISR can

147 information theoretic approach based on the mutual information and the generalised mutual informatio

148 d routing patterns, as quantified by delayed mutual information and transfer entropy measures between

149 lytically the equivalence of the traditional mutual information approach and our autocorrelation appr

150 single cell signaling measures to calculate mutual information as a measure of information transfer

151 tatistically significant increase in average mutual information at a consistent time delay.

152 ied across regression analyses, depending on mutual information available (N = 1524-1836).

153 lar FPs; whereas traditional methods such as mutual information benefit from refinements such as shuf

154 of an optimal noise level that maximizes the mutual information between sensor input and output, howe

155 duced increases in firing rates enhanced the mutual information between visual stimuli and single neu

156 We first derive gene-gene mutual information by utilizing the cooccurrence of gene

157 e previous methodology, while preserving the Mutual Information estimator and the Network inference a

158 Then, we use a novel multivariate mutual information feature representation scheme, combin

159 Here, we report the use of positional mutual information in multiple microsecond-length molecu

160 Subsequently, the mutual information is combined with known protein-protei

161 Mutual information is now often used to quantify the fid

162 slow global variability, and hence that its mutual information is underestimated by a population ave

163 e, correlation methods performed better than mutual information methods at some genes.

164 methods, including six correlation and four mutual information methods, were tested.

165 eless affect catalysis, we utilize an excess mutual information metric.

166 tructure and connect this computation to the mutual information of a sequence-structure pair for RNA

167 ed a consensus clustering procedure based on mutual information of partitions, an information theory

168 was calculated on the basis of the estimated mutual information of the sources' activity, and the cor

169 We quantified the mutual information that neurons carried about an upcomin

170 Applying mutual information theory and site-directed mutagenesis,

171 ell sorting, high-throughput sequencing, and mutual information theory to explore the role that every

172 n the mutual information and the generalised mutual information to characterise a state-of-the-art du

173 Specifically, we propose the use of mutual information to characterize and measure nonlinear

174 use a coupling measure based on time-lagged mutual information to identify effective connections bet

175 Here we use time-delayed mutual information to investigate information flow relat

176 This revealed mutual information values <1 bit, implying that individu

177 es, such as dendrogram-based I(X 1; X 2; Y) (mutual information), doublets (gene pairs) and MIC(X 1;

178 ding diverse techniques such as correlation, mutual information, and regression, consistently rank hi

179 The tool computes three covariance metrics: mutual information, chi-square statistic, Pearson correl

180 , the methods which are employed to estimate mutual information, e.g. binarization, histogram-based a

181 fixed structure, each having nearly the same mutual information, that are nevertheless poorly aligned

182 We now expand ET to consider mutual information, with validation in GPCR structure an

183 stly due to the inclusion of knowledge-based mutual information.

184 artitioning strategy (AP) for estimating the Mutual Information.

185 dynamic models are inferred from data using mutual information.

186 DP) models to cluster variables based on the mutual-information measures among variables.

187 e same canonical cortical circuit model with mutual inhibition and a fatigue process can explain perc

188 We also find suggestive evidence for ARTR mutual inhibition and ARTR projections to premotor neuro

189 s and verified a synthetic gene circuit with mutual inhibition and auto-activations to be quadrastabl

190 r results suggest that realistic plasticity, mutual inhibition and natural stimuli are jointly necess

191 movement (REM) sleep and non-REM sleep, how mutual inhibition between specific pathways gives rise t

192 reprogramming, positive auto-regulation and mutual inhibition have been described as being expressed

193 LORE and CDF5 antiphasic expression reflects mutual inhibition in a similar way to frq/qrf.

194 circadian regulatory module with conserved (mutual inhibition) and unique (function in trans) featur

195 is driven by both attentional modulation and mutual inhibition, which have distinct selectivity (feat

196 spiking activity dedicated to each item via mutual inhibition, which irreparably degrades the fideli

197 specific behaviors and are connected through mutual inhibition.

198 t both feedforward and lateral synapses) and mutual inhibition.

199 The background activity induces a mutual-inhibition mechanism for short-term memory, which

200 We describe how miRNAs coordinate the mutual interaction between chronic endothelial repair an

201 development in north Shanxi was a result of mutual interaction between natural factors and human act

202 ives rise to the formation of polarons whose mutual interaction can be effectively tuned using an ext

203 ed in response to RUNX1 depletion, and their mutual interaction causes the physiological resistance a

204 the hippocampus-entorhinal circuit uses the mutual interaction of place and grid cells to encode the

205 Microglia are perpetually engaged in a mutual interaction with the surrounding environment in C

206 cochemical and microbial processes and their mutual interaction.

207 activities involves their binding to DNA and mutual interaction.

208 involve fine-tuning of expression levels and mutual interactions among electron/proton transfer compo

209 keletal proteins adducin and spectrin, whose mutual interactions are perturbed in IP6K3-null mutants.

210 genomic locations corresponding to optimized mutual interactions at the same scale.

211 Mutual interactions between the sensory signals were evi

212 Their mutual interactions can be short or long range, and thei

213 Although topological defects and their mutual interactions have been extensively studied, littl

214 for the analysis of the near-field and their mutual interactions in the circular ring POA array.

215 ng is intimately related to the dynamics and mutual interactions of RBCs, the major component of bloo

216 of individual information channels and their mutual interactions under different conditions.

217 These particle mutual interactions were exploited to improve the enrich

218 on individual effect without considering the mutual interactions with other features.

219 iovascular health promotion, focusing on: 1) mutual interdependence of the family system; 2) shared e

220 We show that mutual interdependency is favoured at intermediate level

221 r performs all functions and others none; or mutual interdependency where partners perform complement

222 by providing a key mechanism for minimizing mutual interference.

223 cooperate to regulate RNAP while minimizing mutual interference.

224 We report that repressed Hox genes form mutual intra- and interchromosomal interactions with oth

225 kappa, Pol iota or Pol zeta, suggesting the mutual involvement of multiple translesion synthesis pol

226 In interactions involving mutual knowledge about only the other players' nationali

227 Mutual lattice orientations dictate the types and magnit

228 gets, foster country-to-country exchange and mutual learning, and build high-level political commitme

229 promises to enhance our understanding of the mutual links between genome function and ecological proc

230 c function, the mechanisms controlling their mutual localization remain unexplored.

231 in the presence of CO2 or formaldehyde form mutual, methylene-bridged cross-links between Lys(158) a

232 surfactants, which display a broad range of mutual miscibilities in mixed micelles.

233 ice performance is attributed to the lack of mutual miscibility between this particular polymer:fulle

234 interaction between Hsp47 and FKBP65 confers mutual molecular stability and also allows for a synergi

235 m diagnosis to end-stage disease, suggesting mutual need for tumorigenesis.

236 the vast majority of land plants, providing mutual nutritional benefits and protecting hosts against

237 the vast majority of land plants, providing mutual nutritional benefits and protecting hosts against

238 rutile nanocrystals, as a function of their mutual orientation and surface hydration extent.

239 The correct mutual orientation of the planes, though, and the coordi

240 ork, in which control of the donor-fullerene mutual orientation was achieved through chemical bond fo

241 d solvents", which bind pigments at specific mutual orientations, thus tuning the overall energetic l

242 By virtue of mutual pi-stacking and charge transfer interactions with

243 Moreover, the mutual position of the difluoromethyl- and tert-butyldim

244 o excitable systems that are coupled through mutual positive feedback and memory.

245 Remarkably, BB0238 and BB0323 contribute to mutual posttranslational stability, because deletion of

246 tes increase further when both partners show mutual preference for one another.

247 care staff used strategies of face-work and mutual pretence to alleviate feelings of discomfort when

248 are controlled by the prefrontal cortex via mutual projections and contribute to hippocampal activit

249 Here we investigate the mutual protection provided by spherical growth of a mono

250 ative maladies emanate from the failure of a mutual protein folding mechanism?

251 Vital to the association is mutual recognition involving the release of diffusible s

252 l known regulators of transcription, but the mutual regulation between CCR4-NOT and HIPKs extends the

253 The mutual regulation between p53 and LMP1 may play an impor

254 Our study revealed an interesting mutual regulation between Plk3 and SIAH2 and uncovered a

255 We find that the mutual regulation between Satb2 and Fezf2 enables Satb2

256 rdependent, but the molecular basis of their mutual regulation has only begun to emerge in plants.

257 tal role and reveals the significance of the mutual regulation of autophagy and cell metabolism in ma

258 e in epithelial cells and describe a complex mutual regulation of both cytokines during intestinal in

259 altered AtOR protein levels, corroborating a mutual regulation of PSY and OR.

260 sults reveal unanticipated complexity in the mutual regulation of the TRC40 receptor subunits and rai

261 To elucidate the mechanism of this mutual regulation, we measured the thermodynamics and ki

262 Mammalian MondoA/B and TFEB show similar mutual regulation.

263 characterized, especially in regards to the mutual regulations between TFs and miRNAs in cancers.

264 -myocytes are known to communicate and exert mutual regulatory effects.

265 This algorithm combines the mutual reinforcement feature of Hypertext Induced Topic

266 Our results reveal the mutual relationship between pressure-driven lattice coll

267 anans, and foundational explanation of their mutual relationship.

268 We discovered mutual relationships among binding specificity, binding

269 provide the first holographic calculation of mutual Renyi information between two disks of arbitrary

270 controlled by neuronal activity and suggest mutual repositioning of synaptic components as a potenti

271 uts of Nanog and Hoxa1 on shared targets and mutual repression between Hoxa1 and the core pluripotenc

272 Our findings can be explained by a simple mutual repression circuit modulated by FGF/MAPK signalin

273 lude subcircuits encoding positive feedback, mutual repression, and coherent feedforward, as well as

274 tween Hoxa1 and Nanog through a mechanism of mutual repression.

275 ading edge actin networks forms the basis of mutual repulsion in Drosophila hemocytes.

276 ons on a closed driving track at the Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety: (i) a postsleep ba

277 importance, including mutual eye contact and mutual reward receipt.

278 turally present in the mushroom skins play a mutual role in creating inner void spaces throughout the

279 airing) nucleotides and mechanisms for their mutual selection within a complex chemical environment h

280 was added to the background electrolyte for mutual separation of rebaudioside A and stevioside.

281 nce alignment of short motifs, even if their mutual sequence similarity is only partial.

282 We call the mutual sequestration mechanism through which pCPI-17 and

283 It was demonstrated that mutual shading of reactor panels has a decisive effect o

284 ffect size 0.99 [0.29 to 1.68]), but time in mutual shared attention was reduced (-0.16 [-0.26 to -0.

285 s of liquids with different volatilities and mutual solubilities has not yet been explored.

286 Y93H), indicating that daclatasvir targets a mutual, specific function of NS5A inhibiting both proces

287 imental evidence for these species and their mutual stabilization is missing.

288 the chemically bonded interface, exhibiting mutual strengthening, compatible deformability, and a li

289 assume diverse forms and are not limited to mutual suppression.

290 reach balanced states of evolution ensuring mutual survival, which makes it difficult to appreciate

291 Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) is a mutual symbiosis that involves a complex symbiotic inter

292 ocial signals could act to bring brains into mutual temporal alignment, creating a joint-networked st

293 Domains and subdomains mutual to both perspectives are related to "Auditory" (l

294 that both 2' and 3' isomeric esters undergo mutual transformation via the cyclic intermediate orthoe

295 cess, to establish rapport, and to cultivate mutual trust with their coachees during introductory mee

296 ether a good working atmosphere that fosters mutual trust, support and a 'sense of unity' (organizati

297 shing a good working atmosphere that fosters mutual trust, support and a 'sense of unity', and this s

298 tions, establishing rapport, and cultivating mutual trust.

299 ipated double-helix regions that result from mutual twisting of the chains about each other, illustra

300 e from different cultures and thereby foster mutual understanding.