ライフサイエンスコーパス: mutualistic

1 type of species interaction (antagonistic or mutualistic).

2 ith all microbes: pathogenic, commensal, and mutualistic.

3 onship between unequally defended species is mutualistic.

4 gatum, from mycoheterotrophic gametophyte to mutualistic aboveground sporophyte.

5 We applaud Baumard et al.'s mutualistic account of morality but detect circularity i

6 We describe mutualistic and antagonistic effects of mites on insect-

7 riments to assess the relative importance of mutualistic and antagonistic interactions for spatial va

8 We consider systems with varying mixtures of mutualistic and antagonistic interactions, showing that

9 s an insect-microbe association that is both mutualistic and coevolved.

10 rey interactions, which are stabilizing, and mutualistic and competitive interactions, which are dest

11 librium, demonstrating that the symbiosis is mutualistic and facultative.

12 alism in both guilds and coexistence of more mutualistic and more exploitative strategies within each

13 lationship between pollinator and plant less mutualistic and more exploitative.

14 e that liverwort-Mucoromycotina symbiosis is mutualistic and mycorrhiza-like, but differs from liverw

15 molecule "colibactin" has been identified in mutualistic and pathogenic Escherichia coli.

16 We show mutualistic and specific symbiosis between a eusporangia

17 nd diverse communities of bacteria establish mutualistic and symbiotic relationships with the gut aft

18 cture of a large series of real pollination (mutualistic) and herbivory (trophic) networks.

19 Whether this association is mutualistic, and how its functioning was affected by the

20 ants, increasing antagonistic behavior by a mutualistic ant associate and shifting competitive domin

21 with different levels of specialization for mutualistic ant symbionts, to study the ecological conte

22 we examined effects of tending by the native mutualistic ant Tapinoma melanocephalum on growth of P.

23 In mutualistic ant-plant symbioses, plants host ant colonie

24 mortality relative to trees occupied by the mutualistic ant.

25 Mutualistic ants can protect their partners from natural

26 can cause the clustered distribution of the mutualistic ants in the first place.

27 New research shows that mutualistic ants inhabiting certain species of Acacia pr

28 Baumard et al., we can find support for the mutualistic approach to morality even in early instances

29 Among other things, Baumard et al.'s "A Mutualistic Approach to Morality" considers the enforcem

30 In line with this mutualistic approach, the study of a range of economic g

31 have different preferences over the possible mutualistic arrangements.

32 Often the interactions are mutualistic, as in the symbiosis between phytoplankton,

33 e aspects of an interaction may dominate the mutualistic aspects.

34 acting species in shaping coevolution within mutualistic assemblages.

35 The discovery of this mutualistic association and the elucidation of the under

36 have resulted from an evolutionarily stable mutualistic association between plants and rhizosphere m

37 rous plants as they digest prey in a complex mutualistic association in which the prey-derived nutrie

38 This mutualistic association leads to dramatic developmental

39 ar mycorrhizal symbiosis (AMS), a widespread mutualistic association of land plants and fungi(1), is

40 he family Enterobacteriaceae that lives in a mutualistic association with a Heterorhabditis nematode

41 cterium Xenorhabdus nematophila engages in a mutualistic association with an entomopathogenic nematod

42 In filarial nematodes, which host a mutualistic association with Wolbachia, the use of antib

43 When two species form a mutualistic association, the degree of control that each

44 In this mutualistic association, the fungus colonizes the root c

45 ilitate rhizobacterial colonization and host-mutualistic association.

46 ly deceased females indicating a potentially mutualistic association.

47 This discovery indicates that mutualistic associations between conifer root nodules an

48 ding in a well-studied system indicates that mutualistic associations between insects and antibiotic-

49 Stable multipartite mutualistic associations require that all partners benef

50 We find that aphid species that have mutualistic associations with ants that protect them fro

51 Corals are animals that form close mutualistic associations with endosymbiotic photosynthet

52 whether mature O. vulgatum sporophytes form mutualistic associations with fungi of the Glomeromycota

53 organisms can have intimate, ancient, and/or mutualistic associations with hosts without having under

54 Most flowering plants establish mutualistic associations with insect pollinators to faci

55 Animals often engage in mutualistic associations with microorganisms that protec

56 Legumes establish mutualistic associations with mycorrhizal fungi and with

57 ng, overlooks some important issues, such as mutualistic associations with parasites that are benefic

58 Drosophila have evolved strong mutualistic associations with yeast communities that bes

59 To sustain mutualistic associations, host cells also reprogram the

60 downregulating fixation(5,6) by sanctioning mutualistic bacteria(7)) are common in the tropics, wher

61 Xenorhabdus nematophila, the mutualistic bacterium of the nematode Steinernema carpoc

62 le of xenorhabdicin in the life cycle of the mutualistic bacterium X. nematophila.

63 Altogether, we demonstrate a novel mutualistic bacterium-fungus relationship that occurs at

64 oral-dinoflagellate symbioses are defined as mutualistic because both partners receive benefit from t

65 The partnership is mutualistic, because the prymnesiophyte receives fixed N

66 At modest antibiotic concentrations, the mutualistic behavior enables long-term survival of the o

67 nvestigate how genome evolution is shaped by mutualistic behaviour.

68 n be categorised as pathogenic, parasitic or mutualistic, but in practice few examples exactly fit th

69 re usually regarded as nonpathogenic or even mutualistic, but whether plants respond antagonistically

70 he trade-off between competitive ability and mutualistic capacity does not always exist.

71 on and infection is required to maintain the mutualistic character of the interaction.

72 y dynamics that are likely required to drive mutualistic co-evolution of hosts and microbes.

73 f the microbiota, the presence of individual mutualistic commensal bacteria with immunomodulatory eff

74 the architecture of interaction networks in mutualistic communities and their stability.

75 er, in contrast to food web assembly, stable mutualistic communities form rapidly.

76 examples of generally smaller and primarily mutualistic communities in the context of these network

77 uce mechanisms of persistence in antagonized mutualistic communities that were previously found prone

78 -independent metabolism for nutrient-limited mutualistic communities.

79 However, models for mutualistic community assembly are still needed, especia

80 his Boolean network approach to the study of mutualistic community assembly offers a great opportunit

81 s the colonization and extinction process of mutualistic community assembly.

82 ndicating that this early colonizer promotes mutualistic community development.

83 ith few free parameters, the dynamics of new mutualistic community formation from the regional source

84 to study the causes and consequences of this mutualistic-competitive transition in experimentally tra

85 However, we will suggest that mutualistic cooperation is not the basis of fairness; in

86 The target article convincingly argues that mutualistic cooperation is supported by partner choice.

87 result predicted by impartiality but not by mutualistic cooperation.

88 eds; wild Cucurbita were likely left without mutualistic dispersal partners in the Holocene because t

89 We show that mutualistic ecological communities are localized, and lo

90 and the mechanisms ensuring the stability in mutualistic ecological communities are still unclear.

91 as well as asymmetric competitive (-/-) and mutualistic (+/+) ecological interactions]).

92 undation tree species (Pinus edulis) and its mutualistic ectomycorrhizal fungal (EMF) associates, we

93 articular combinations of plant genotype and mutualistic EMF communities improve the survival and gro

94 of African trypanosomes, have coevolved with mutualistic endosymbiont Wigglesworthia glossinidiae.

95 bination encourage radical genome erosion in mutualistic endosymbionts and other intracellular bacter

96 The mutualistic endosymbiosis between cnidarians and dinofla

97 e arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis is a mutualistic endosymbiosis formed by plant roots and AM f

98 ve genomics from mitochondria, plastids, and mutualistic endosymbiotic bacteria has shown that the st

99 e were successfully superinfected with their mutualistic facultative symbiont, Sodalis glossinidius,

100 l plant-fungus pathosystem has conditionally mutualistic features.

101 to wild bees' nests, in a rare example of a mutualistic foraging partnership between humans and free

102 Besides revealing insights into mutualistic functions governed by the microbiota of this

103 els and greenhouse experiments, we show that mutualistic fungal endophytes ameliorate drought stress

104 These alkaloids are produced by mutualistic fungal symbionts (endophytes) living on cert

105 In Arabidopsis thaliana roots, the mutualistic fungus Piriformospora indica initially colon

106 for root colonization of Arabidopsis by the mutualistic fungus Piriformospora indica.

107 Mutualistic gobies and corals appear to represent a mari

108 ispecies community interactions resulting in mutualistic growth on saliva as the sole nutritional sou

109 al colonizer Streptococcus oralis but showed mutualistic growth when paired with two other initial co

110 s, growth-independent fermentation inhibited mutualistic growth when the E. coli cell density was ade

111 e data suggest that different capsules equip mutualistic gut bacteria with the ability to thrive in v

112 e immune system is essential to maintain the mutualistic homeostatic interaction between the host and

113 that NilD RNA is conditionally necessary for mutualistic host colonization and suggest that it functi

114 lterations can be viewed as an uncoupling of mutualistic host-microbe relationships, it is valuable t

115 However, mutualistic host-microbial interactions prevent disease

116 Our findings demonstrate a novel mutualistic host-protozoan interaction that increases mu

117 al (probably the most common lifestyle), and mutualistic (important beneficial partners).

118 Facultative symbionts are mutualistic in the context of various ecological interac

119 y adapted mycorrhizal associations were more mutualistic in the two phosphorus-limited sites and less

120 Compared with their free-living relatives, mutualistic insect symbiotic bacteria inhabit a static e

121 ies are regulated by factors external to the mutualistic interaction (e.g., limiting background resou

122 Syntrophy is a tightly coupled mutualistic interaction between hydrogen-/formate-produc

123 Nodulation is the result of a mutualistic interaction between legumes and symbiotic so

124 on equations of enzyme kinetics to study the mutualistic interaction between the leaf cutter ant and

125 drogen-consuming Arcobacter, indicating that mutualistic interaction between these two groups of micr

126 is an insect pathogen that also maintains a mutualistic interaction with nematodes from the family H

127 ients, we tuned strength and symmetry of the mutualistic interaction.

128 f remaining seed dispersers either increased mutualistic interactions (contributing to "interaction c

129 Antagonistic and mutualistic interactions among bacteria have also been i

130 also observe constraints on the evolution of mutualistic interactions among species, because it is di

131 c mechanism for the long-term persistence of mutualistic interactions and the assembly of complex com

132 With increased virus discovery, more mutualistic interactions are being described and more wi

133 Mutualistic interactions are characterized by positive d

134 Mutualistic interactions are found in plant, insect, and

135 Mutualistic interactions are taxonomically and functiona

136 Mutualistic interactions benefit both partners, promotin

137 We examined differences in mutualistic interactions between frugivores and fruiting

138 ts impose novel selection pressures on naive mutualistic interactions between native plants and their

139 The common occurrence of mutualistic interactions between plants and root symbion

140 Actinorhizal symbioses are mutualistic interactions between plants and the soil bac

141 For example, mutualistic interactions between species are often stron

142 Empirical studies have found that the mutualistic interactions forming the structure of plant-

143 Tritrophic mutualistic interactions have been best studied in plant

144 rms to gene products mediating pathogenic or mutualistic interactions involving other microbes will e

145 A core interest in studies of mutualistic interactions is the 'effectiveness' of mutua

146 of a common framework of 'effectiveness' of mutualistic interactions limits generalisation and the d

147 Mutualistic interactions may be especially vulnerable be

148 positive (> 80%), suggesting that extensive mutualistic interactions may occur among rhizosphere bac

149 autophagy-related process is crucial for the mutualistic interactions of P. vulgaris with beneficial

150 d this issue for one of the most significant mutualistic interactions on Earth, which associates plan

151 nd their symbiotic bacteria has selected for mutualistic interactions that are essential for human he

152 However, data show mutualistic interactions to be common and persistent.

153 These results illustrate the potential for mutualistic interactions to play a fundamental role in t

154 Mutualistic interactions typically involve the exchange

155 , and is concordant with the hypothesis that mutualistic interactions with animals can have an impact

156 eria therefore engage in both pathogenic and mutualistic interactions with different invertebrate hos

157 corrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria, establish mutualistic interactions with plants, which can indirect

158 The modeling results suggested a lack of mutualistic interactions within the community.

159 long-term advantage in an important class of mutualistic interactions.

160 erges from the dynamics of partner choice in mutualistic interactions.

161 alone can allow the persistence of obligate mutualistic interactions.

162 interactions and with decreasing strength of mutualistic interactions.

163 genetic diversity in environments requiring mutualistic interactions.

164 e a report of a beneficial apicomplexan: the mutualistic marine endosymbiont Nephromyces.

165 y a host-bacterial interaction that promotes mutualistic mechanisms at the intestinal interface.

166 impacts those cellular interactions between mutualistic microbes and their hosts.

167 unism and geographical expansion by invasive mutualistic microbes could profoundly influence the resp

168 The ability of root cells to distinguish mutualistic microbes from pathogens is crucial for plant

169 nd generally limit the invasion potential of mutualistic microbes in insects.

170 Knowledge of the plant-mediated effects of mutualistic microorganisms is limited to aboveground ins

171 by allowing the emergence and maintenance of mutualistic microorganisms within the host.

172 these relationships are typically viewed as mutualistic, molecular and cellular analysis reveals num

173 In such systems, mutualistic motivations are not necessarily a key compon

174 Therefore, although mutualistic motives are likely an important contributor

175 cult to understand such behavior in terms of mutualistic motives.

176 decreased C-assimilation and generated less mutualistic mycorrhizal phenotypes with reduced plant an

177 icrobial communities, thus ensuring that the mutualistic nature of the host-microbial relationship is

178 The mutualistic nature of this relationship depends on maint

179 The striking emergence of the mutualistic Nephromyces from a quintessentially parasiti

180 association between the nested structure of mutualistic networks and community persistence.

181 ses for our understanding of the dynamics of mutualistic networks and their response to global change

182 The architecture of mutualistic networks facilitates coexistence of individu

183 how these processes structure hawkmoth-plant mutualistic networks from five communities in four bioge

184 r of realized pollinators, thereby rendering mutualistic networks more vulnerable to environmental ch

185 e mechanisms enabling coevolution in complex mutualistic networks remains a central challenge in evol

186 tude of interaction compensation within real mutualistic networks remains largely unknown.

187 We use the structure of 79 empirical mutualistic networks to simulate a scenario of gradual e

188 works, including food webs, antagonistic and mutualistic networks, and find that the number of dimens

189 architecture promotes community stability in mutualistic networks, whereas the stability of trophic n

190 gatively affected by nestedness in bipartite mutualistic networks.

191 ty fundamentally differs between trophic and mutualistic networks.

192 arded as key to understanding cooperation in mutualistic networks.

193 interactions, as exemplified by plant-animal mutualistic networks.

194 s been repeated debate on whether there is a mutualistic or a parasitic relationship between unequall

195 If the interaction is mutualistic or commensal, there is no buffering and only

196 ned interactions (for example predator-prey, mutualistic or competitive).

197 y of strain-specific exoproteins involved in mutualistic or hostile interactions (i.e. hemolysins, pi

198 ses, in which microbes have either positive (mutualistic) or negative (parasitic) impacts on host fit

199 Mutualistic organisms can be particularly susceptible to

200 ment, mediated by DGKs, are required for the mutualistic outcome of the Rhizopus-Burkholderia symbios

201 wever, certain circumstances can rupture the mutualistic pact with our intestinal counterpart, pushin

202 ization tradeoffs, wherein increasingly more mutualistic partners (acting as superior competitors) ar

203 trade may reflect competition for access to mutualistic partners among plants.

204 hat competition for the benefits provided by mutualistic partners could be a source of negative densi

205 A model of the carbon trade-offs for the mutualistic partners shows that the observed strategies

206 nally, game theoretical models of trade with mutualistic partners suggest that the optimal trade may

207 spatial expansions may also make it hard for mutualistic partners to stay together, because genetic d

208 reorganization of the adaptive landscape of mutualistic partners under changing environments.

209 othesis, in structuring interactions between mutualistic partners, revealing that the role of niche-b

210 Carbohydrates, obtained largely through mutualistic partnerships with other organisms, thus repr

211 that such genetic diversity can destabilise mutualistic partnerships.

212 er territorial space through kin-selected or mutualistic pathways can reduce both immediate energetic

213 that interact with plants in pathogenic and mutualistic patterns, as well as in microbes that feed o

214 eference significantly increased, leading to mutualistic payoffs.

215 Mutualistic phenotypes are most likely in P-limited syst

216 In mutualistic pollinators and antagonistic herbivores, pas

217 sects, and their historical association with mutualistic polydnaviruses have all contributed to Micro

218 rstood about how antagonistic (negative) and mutualistic (positive) interactions combine to create ca

219 res produced by acacia trees to reward their mutualistic protective ants.

220 is driven by the transfer of hydrogen and is mutualistic, providing benefits to both partners.

221 how that improved environments can slow down mutualistic range expansions as a result of genetic drif

222 hanisms that prevent overexploitation of the mutualistic relationship are still poorly understood.

223 is defined as a distinctive coevolutionary, mutualistic relationship between domesticator and domest

224 igen presentation by cDCs is essential for a mutualistic relationship between the host and intestinal

225 same bioreactor was achieved by designing a mutualistic relationship between the two species in whic

226 aci Q rather than B in China suggests a more mutualistic relationship between TYLCV and Q.

227 Our data suggest that a mutualistic relationship exists between the rosy apple a

228 attachment-related genes, consistent with a mutualistic relationship in which they are dependent on

229 This mutualistic relationship of nucleic acids and proteins,

230 als is often attributed to photosymbiosis, a mutualistic relationship scleractinian corals developed

231 s and insights into the molecular basis of a mutualistic relationship with its Wolbachia endosymbiont

232 but multiple bacteria and fungi establish a mutualistic relationship with plants, and some act as pa

233 of commensal microorganisms that exist in a mutualistic relationship with the host.

234 harbors an enormous amount of bacteria in a mutualistic relationship with the host.

235 e argue that the evolution towards a lasting mutualistic relationship would be more likely when paras

236 Gut microbiota and the host exist in a mutualistic relationship, with the functional compositio

237 rphs exhibits the conventional trophobiotic (mutualistic) relationship with ants of the genus Tetramo

238 Mutualistic relationships have been described in detail

239 he context of establishment and evolution of mutualistic relationships involving these bacteria.

240 The ability of plants to form mutualistic relationships with animal defenders has long

241 ammaproteobacterial Photorhabdus genus share mutualistic relationships with Heterorhabditis nematodes

242 tionships and establishes the partnership in mutualistic relationships.

243 ce of its parasites--has shaped contemporary mutualistic relationships.

244 Mutualistic rhizosphere microbes of the S. ericoidesPR p

245 onema primitia is interesting because of its mutualistic role in the termite gut, where it is believe

246 A mutualistic role of gut microbes is to digest dietary co

247 This novel finding may explain the mutualistic role of S. mutans and C. albicans in carioge

248 maximus is not resolved, we propose possible mutualistic roles for these bacteria in protection of th

249 c variation and can have both pathogenic and mutualistic roles.

250 Mutualistic root microbiota can also influence plant dis

251 how the natural selection theory of people's mutualistic sense of fairness and the biofunctional theo

252 g strategies, specialized versus diversified mutualistic services, and the role of spatial structures

253 Such mutualistic sharing of iron and fixed carbon has importa

254 ted by kin-selected (genetic relatedness) or mutualistic (social familiarity) mechanisms.

255 us theory predicts persistence provided that mutualistic species are regulated by factors external to

256 f microbe-derived molecules that mediate the mutualistic state remains elusive.

257 y are especially relevant for pathogenic and mutualistic strains that inhabit iron-limited environmen

258 Our study reveals that mutualistic strategy profoundly affects the pace of morp

259 y analysis, where we demonstrate that nested mutualistic structures are minimally stable.

260 gainst pathogens but also in maintaining the mutualistic symbiont community inside the leech, demonst

261 s katoptron' is the first described obligate mutualistic symbiont of a vertebrate.

262 proteobacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila is a mutualistic symbiont that colonizes the intestine of the

263 exists either in a free-living state or as a mutualistic symbiont within a host organism such as the

264 Fungi are perhaps also the most important mutualistic symbionts in modern ecosystems, transporting

265 d-decaying species, as well as pathogens and mutualistic symbionts.

266 nium and may represent parasitic rather than mutualistic symbionts.

267 ed Queen effect"), but disfavored in certain mutualistic symbioses (the "Red King effect").

268 Mutualistic symbioses between scleractinian corals and e

269 ifferent species' physiological functions in mutualistic symbioses increased the range of suboptimal

270 Mutualistic symbioses shape the evolution of species and

271 ycorrhizal fungi (AMF) have formed intimate, mutualistic symbioses with the vast majority of land pla

272 In mutualistic symbioses, such as division of labor, both p

273 ue, but little is known of their function in mutualistic symbioses.

274 ed between the physiological consequences of mutualistic symbiosis and life's average long-term impac

275 The mutualistic symbiosis between gut microbiota and host im

276 ur experimental data uncover an unrecognized mutualistic symbiosis between Varroa and DWV, which perp

277 The mutualistic symbiosis involving Glomeromycota, a distinc

278 for Mucoromycotina establishing the earliest mutualistic symbiosis with land plants.

279 A sequencing of Populus trichocarpa roots in mutualistic symbiosis with the ectomycorrhizal fungus La

280 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form a mutualistic symbiosis with two-thirds of land plants, pr

281 arial species that infect people co-exist in mutualistic symbiosis with Wolbachia bacteria, which are

282 rine bacterium Vibrio fischeri establishes a mutualistic symbiosis within the light organ of the Hawa

283 ting nutrients to their plant host through a mutualistic symbiotic relationship with host roots.

284 Over 35 years ago, it was hypothesized that mutualistic symbiotic soil fungi assisted land plants in

285 he community structure of a pollinator-plant mutualistic system.

286 anic matter, making nutrients circulate in a mutualistic system.

287 that the range of coexistence conditions in mutualistic systems can be analytically predicted.

288 tions compatible with species coexistence in mutualistic systems, also known as structural stability.

289 ere it is thought to promote biodiversity in mutualistic systems.

290 Mutualistic theory explains convincingly the prevalence

291 Myriad symbiotic microbes, ranging from mutualistic through to pathogenic, deliver 'effector' mo

292 may shift seagrass-bivalve interactions from mutualistic to antagonistic, which is important for cons

293 This view accommodates the range from mutualistic to parasitic symbioses that plants form with

294 ose short-term individual effects range from mutualistic to parasitic.

295 ay have driven the spread of the N2-fixation mutualistic trait.

296 nalysis revealed that, in both parasitic and mutualistic treatments, evolution repeatedly targeted th

297 We propose that mutualistic two-species and multispecies oral biofilm co

298 same strain becoming part of a three-species mutualistic web in scenarios in which the two-strain mut

299 This relationship can be mutualistic, when the algal host provides food for the b

300 nt, %GC, and repetitive DNA allied wPpe with mutualistic Wolbachia, whereas gene repertoire analyses