ライフサイエンスコーパス: mycorrhizal

1 We analyzed the contribution of roots and mycorrhizal activities to carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) tu

2 two types of mycorrhizal fungi - arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi - and t

3 t the two dominant associations - arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi - posse

4 shed that plants associating with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi cycle c

5 ng in their relative abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) trees.

6 nclude Glomeromycota that form an arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) association intracellularly within the

7 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) associations enhance the phosphorous an

8 lso addressed the hypothesis that arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonisation (another P acquisition str

9 red root phosphatase activity and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization among two N2 - and two non

10 We found that arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) dominant forests, which are characteris

11 ed for both the rhizobial and the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) endosymbioses.

12 Notably, roots associating with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi - generally considered for their

13 d plants live in association with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and rely on this symbiosis to sca

14 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and rhizobium bacteria are accomm

15 rstanding the natural dynamics of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and their response to global envi

16 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are root symbionts that can incre

17 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are the most abundant plant symbi

18 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi associate with the vast majority

19 534 535 References 535 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi associate with the vast majority

20 In general, plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi exchange photosynthetically fixed

21 e lived in close association with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi for over 400 million years.

22 on mycorrhizal networks (CMNs) of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi in the soil simultaneously provid

23 capacity of fungi and plants make arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi inherently more nitrogen (N) limi

24 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi interconnect plants in common myc

25 tion and water stress resistance, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi may modulate the effects of chang

26 single type of mycorrhizal fungi (arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi or ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi),

27 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi play a key role in the nutrition

28 at effector proteins from ECM and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi regulate host defenses by manipul

29 tly, the colonization of roots by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi seems to be greater in species wi

30 the global diversity of symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi using currently available data on

31 host plant Allium vineale and two arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi within a split-root system.

32 wn to reduce root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, but the influence of P on the di

33 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, in symbiosis with plants, facili

34 mbiosis formed between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, the root cortical cells are colo

35 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, which form symbioses with the ro

36 to organic nitrogen sources than arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi.

37 s, including the interaction with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi.

38 We used arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus DNA from 1014 plant-root samples

39 servation of the NSP1 sequence in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) host and non-AM host plants and careful

40 la is widely used for analyses of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis and nodulation.

41 In nature, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis represents the default state

42 During arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis, deposition of the plant peri

43 During arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis, the plant gains access to ph

44 lonization) across six coexisting arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) temperate tree species with and without

45 corrhizal (ECM) trees rather than arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) trees.

46 gnaling molecules involved in the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM)symbiosis.

47 he low compatibility cultivar was reduced by mycorrhizal arbuscule formation.

48 k for considering how tree species and their mycorrhizal associates differentially couple carbon (C)

49 opy spectral properties to detect underlying mycorrhizal association across a gradient of AM- and ECM

50 ted against measurements of tree species and mycorrhizal association across ~130 000 trees throughout

51 were able to predict 77% of the variation in mycorrhizal association distribution within the forest p

52 lations of North American trees, the type of mycorrhizal association explained much of the variation

53 cations for this work move us toward mapping mycorrhizal association globally and advancing our under

54 Under elevated CO(2), mycorrhizal association increased the titer of virus inf

55 Mycorrhizal association type, plant growth form and clim

56 After accounting for mycorrhizal association, sample size, and climatic range

57 nteraction between nitrogen availability and mycorrhizal association.

58 locked root nodule symbiosis and reduced the mycorrhizal association.

59 Secondary growth eliminated arbuscular mycorrhizal associations as cortical tissue was destroye

60 tion ([CO2]) may modulate the functioning of mycorrhizal associations by altering the relative degree

61 elatedness, climatic ranges, growth form and mycorrhizal associations, we quantified the importance o

62 O2] significantly altered the functioning of mycorrhizal associations.

63 quantitatively more important than increased mycorrhizal associations.

64 of trees with ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal associations.

65 The magnitude and mechanisms driving mycorrhizal-CO2 responses reflected species-specific dif

66 tration Graph (EPG) technique, we found that mycorrhizal colonisation increased aphid phloem feeding

67 Mycorrhizal colonisation increased the attractiveness of

68 ching intensity, first-order root length and mycorrhizal colonization - in 27 coexisting species from

69 he response to Myc-LCOs and the frequency of mycorrhizal colonization are significantly reduced in th

70 t (NPK) addition, root growth increased, but mycorrhizal colonization decreased significantly, wherea

71 The per cent mycorrhizal colonization did not differ among treatments

72 essors alter root lifespan, rooting depth or mycorrhizal colonization directly.

73 Mycorrhizal colonization of plant was enhanced by legume

74 We assessed whether (1) arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of roots (RC) and/or plant resp

75 led an additional role of ATA in restricting mycorrhizal colonization of the root meristem.

76 weight, but shaded plants in intact CMNs had mycorrhizal colonization similar to that of sunlit plant

77 root length and mass proliferation but lower mycorrhizal colonization than species with thick absorpt

78 failed to show a positive growth response to mycorrhizal colonization under Pi-limiting conditions.

79 gy and architecture, root proliferation, and mycorrhizal colonization) across six coexisting arbuscul

80 consistently decreased root branching and/or mycorrhizal colonization, but increased lateral root len

81 ner roots showed more root growth, but lower mycorrhizal colonization, than species with thicker root

82 first-order root length and consistently low mycorrhizal colonization, whereas species with thicker r

83 to increased root proliferation and reduced mycorrhizal colonization.

84 onger first-order roots and maintaining high mycorrhizal colonization.

85 is or P. putida, only the cultivar with high mycorrhizal compatibility showed a synergistic increase

86 The cultivar with high mycorrhizal compatibility supported higher levels of rhi

87 These findings support mycorrhizal competition for nitrogen as an independent d

88 However, experimental tests of the mycorrhizal competition hypothesis are lacking.

89 Soil fertility is a key controller of mycorrhizal costs and benefits and the Law of the Minimu

90 In monoculture, mycorrhizal dependency of legumes was higher than that o

91 ion of mycorrhizae and a deep exploration of mycorrhizal diversity that helps to uncover the molecula

92 Our results suggest that knowledge of mycorrhizal dominance at the stand or landscape scale ma

93 When mycorrhizal dominance was switched - ECM trees dominatin

94 water-biogeochemical interactions on roots, mycorrhizal dynamics that mediate root resilience and mo

95 Ectomycorrhizal and ericoid mycorrhizal (EEM) fungi produce nitrogen-degrading enzym

96 ositive values at 700 microL L(-1) [CO2] and mycorrhizal effects on photosynthesis and leaf growth ra

97 land plants able to develop rhizobial and/or mycorrhizal endosymbiosis.

98 The existence of a root/mycorrhizal exudation-hyphal uptake pathway was supporte

99 n of high concentrations of ABA that impairs mycorrhizal factor-induced calcium oscillations, suggest

100 recognition by the host plant of fungus-made mycorrhizal factors.

101 structures, and symbiotic relationships with mycorrhizal flora.

102 Mycorrhizal functioning in the fern Ophioglossum is comp

103 suggest a 'take now, pay later' strategy of mycorrhizal functioning through the lifecycle O. vulgatu

104 To evaluate [CO2] effects on mycorrhizal functioning, we calculated response ratios b

105 the majority of information about arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities.

106 ant species cultured significantly different mycorrhizal fungal and bacterial soil communities, indic

107 Orchid mycorrhizal fungal communities responded most strongly t

108 Orchid and ericoid mycorrhizal fungal communities were more modular than ec

109 Orchids are highly dependent on their mycorrhizal fungal partners for nutrient supply, especia

110 oots in response to rhizobial and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal signals.

111 the distribution and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and the rules that govern AMF as

112 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are significantly depleted in H.

113 s and antagonists), feedback with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) collected from soils of conspeci

114 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form a mutualistic symbiosis wit

115 For more than 450 million years, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) have formed intimate, mutualisti

116 Understanding the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in plant interaction is essentia

117 ersity and community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is important for potentially opt

118 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) perform an important ecosystem s

119 These arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) perform vital functions in the p

120 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) protect host plants against dive

121 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) transfer plant photosynthate und

122 Perception of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) triggers distinct plant signalli

123 redominantly via association with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF).

124 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF, Glomeromycota) colonize roots of

125 redominantly associate with a single type of mycorrhizal fungi (arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi or

126 ere those from the members of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota), which though abundant

127 iotic relationships with one of two types of mycorrhizal fungi - arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ecto

128 tive and exotic dandelions) with and without mycorrhizal fungi across a broad [CO2] gradient (180-1,0

129 r a complementarity exists between roots and mycorrhizal fungi across these two types of root system

130 independent of land use, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacterial channel biomass.

131 e that L. bicolor, in contrast to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and biotrophic pathogens, promotes mut

132 ted from roots as attractants for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and have a wide range of endogenous fu

133 Mycorrhizal fungi and methanogenic archaea decreased in

134 hat multilateral interactions between roots, mycorrhizal fungi and PGPR can have synergistic effects

135 elowground interactions between plant roots, mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacter

136 number of soil-borne microorganisms, such as mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria, establish mutualist

137 osts and benefits of plant interactions with mycorrhizal fungi and symbiotic N-fixing microbes.

138 lay crucial roles in the interaction between mycorrhizal fungi and their environment.

139 seed coating with a consortium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma atroviride (coated and

140 Given that mycorrhizal fungi are instrumental for P acquisition and

141 In most cases, both roots and mycorrhizal fungi are needed for plant nutrient foraging

142 Overall, we present and discuss how mycorrhizal fungi can affect the feeding behaviour of S.

143 Mycorrhizal fungi can form common mycelial networks (CMN

144 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can interconnect plant root systems th

145 as been recently suggested that responses of mycorrhizal fungi could determine whether forest net pri

146 t, despite the fact that many plants rely on mycorrhizal fungi for survival and growth, the structure

147 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi form associations with most land plant

148 l fungi now continues later in the year, but mycorrhizal fungi generally have a more compressed seaso

149 Plant interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi have long attracted interest for their

150 root endophytic communities, with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in an intermediate position.

151 fine-root classes, explicit incorporation of mycorrhizal fungi into fine-root studies, and wider adop

152 ariation in fine-root traits, integration of mycorrhizal fungi into fine-root-trait frameworks, and t

153 osynthate allocation to tree roots and their mycorrhizal fungi is hypothesized to fuel the active sec

154 Mycorrhizal fungi live in the roots of host plants and a

155 ing under elevated CO(2) at this site, while mycorrhizal fungi may contribute more to soil C degradat

156 Fruiting of both saprotrophic and mycorrhizal fungi now continues later in the year, but m

157 they enhance hyphal branching of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of the Glomus and Gigaspora spp., and

158 The negative impacts of mycorrhizal fungi on root herbivores, for instance, rais

159 otrophs and heterotrophs, such as plants and mycorrhizal fungi or symbiotic algae and corals, underpi

160 Rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi produce signals that are perceived by

161 , and thus they are more specialized towards mycorrhizal fungi than autotrophic plants.

162 hat colonize roots of legumes and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that colonize roots of the majority of

163 e roots of most land plants are colonised by mycorrhizal fungi that provide mineral nutrients in exch

164 This finding links the functional traits of mycorrhizal fungi to carbon storage at ecosystem-to-glob

165 nlinear effects may limit plant responses to mycorrhizal fungi under future [CO2].

166 gen-fixing rhizobium bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi use lipochitooligosaccharide (LCO) sig

167 and colonization by rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi was maintained.

168 In addition, the reliance on mycorrhizal fungi was reduced by nutrient additions acro

169 suggesting that the abundance of beneficial mycorrhizal fungi will increase with amount of above-gro

170 forms elaborate symbiotic relationships with mycorrhizal fungi, and includes several nonphotosyntheti

171 anisms, including beneficial plant microbes (mycorrhizal fungi, nitrogen-fixing bacteria), antagonist

172 ole of intra- and interspecific diversity of mycorrhizal fungi, which are critical for plant fitness,

173 Lipids are transferred from the plant to mycorrhizal fungi, which are fatty acid auxotrophs, and

174 form beneficial associations with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, which facilitate nutrient acquisition

175 For arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, which facilitate plant uptake of phos

176 Mycorrhizal fungi, with their vast filamentous networks

177 e in beneficial interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

178 cost than plants associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

179 46) in plants that associate with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

180 al interactions between roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

181 g and symbiotic interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

182 n, whereas thick-root species forage more by mycorrhizal fungi.

183 ots, whereas thick-root species rely more on mycorrhizal fungi.

184 o forage more by proliferating roots than by mycorrhizal fungi.

185 in the mix of signals produced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

186 tter suggest various roles in the biology of mycorrhizal fungi.

187 nt species live in symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

188 ith parasitic weeds and symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

189 cally increased the colonization of roots by mycorrhizal fungi.

190 e able to form endosymbioses with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

191 with and without inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

192 ring plant species, endophytic bacteria, and mycorrhizal fungi.

193 s-specific responses to [CO2] and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

194 mutualisms such as those between plants and mycorrhizal fungi.

195 r LCOs produced by rhizobial bacteria and by mycorrhizal fungi; however, Myc-LCOs activate distinct g

196 ificity of O. vulgatum sporophytes towards a mycorrhizal fungus closely related to Glomus macrocarpum

197 d CMN between two tomato plants in pots with mycorrhizal fungus Funneliformis mosseae, challenged a '

198 LNP is also required for infection by the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices, suggesting that

199 form mycorrhiza were (co)inoculated with the mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis and the rhizo

200 We identified, in the genome of the orchid mycorrhizal fungus Tulasnella calospora, two functional

201 feedback with Glomus etunicatum, a dominant mycorrhizal fungus.

202 yc-LCOs and to be colonized by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus.

203 Across each site's 'mycorrhizal gradient', we measured fungal biomass, funga

204 Convergent evolution of the mycorrhizal habit in fungi occurred via the repeated evo

205 ganic matter, the importance of root- versus mycorrhizal-induced changes in soil processes are presen

206 Those levels were augmented by mycorrhizal infection.

207 mpact of host genotype on growth response to mycorrhizal inoculation was investigated in a panel of d

208 Forced mycorrhizal inoculations from neighboring wild-type plan

209 iduals were grown with or without arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculum, and after 2 wk, plants were inocul

210 Establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal interactions involves plant recognition of d

211 We investigated the mycorrhizal interactions of both green and mycoheterotro

212 cks, dynamic responses to coupled stressors, mycorrhizal interactions, and which challenge widely-acc

213 fy the nutrient availability associated with mycorrhizal interactions, indicating that FTIRI has the

214 dopted an expression profile more related to mycorrhizal large lateral than to noncolonized crown roo

215 N, P, S and Mg concentrations of mycorrhizal legumes were larger than these of non-mycorr

216 rhizal legumes were larger than these of non-mycorrhizal legumes.

217 To elucidate the genetic bases of mycorrhizal lifestyle evolution, we sequenced new fungal

218 onse ratios based on the relative biomass of mycorrhizal (MBio) and nonmycorrhizal (NMBio) plants (RB

219 es at low latitudes as C-intensive root- and mycorrhizal-mediated nutrient capture is progressively r

220 bove-ground resources, with implications for mycorrhizal mediation of plant productivity with anthrop

221 the most beneficial mutualist could maintain mycorrhizal mutualism.

222 dispersal, plant protection, rhizobial, and mycorrhizal mutualisms.

223 ntial allocation towards the most beneficial mycorrhizal mutualist depends upon above-ground resource

224 rmine environmental patterns in abundance of mycorrhizal mutualists.

225 ion of symbiotic signaling by the arbuscular mycorrhizal (Myc) fungal-produced LCOs and COs in legume

226 Here, we show that mycorrhizal mycelia can also act as a conduit for signal

227 nected to aphid-infested plants via a common mycorrhizal mycelial network.

228 Our findings demonstrate that common mycorrhizal mycelial networks can determine the outcome

229 Common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs) link multiple plants togethe

230 Common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs) of arbuscular mycorrhizal (A

231 zal (AM) fungi interconnect plants in common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs) which can amplify competitio

232 le preventing, disrupting or allowing common mycorrhizal networks among them.

233 Plants interconnected by common mycorrhizal networks had 8% greater colonized root lengt

234 n the absence of root system overlap, common mycorrhizal networks likely promote asymmetric competiti

235 Only with intact common mycorrhizal networks were whole-plant dry weights negati

236 ect plant root systems through hyphal common mycorrhizal networks, which may influence the distributi

237 gon gerardii monocultures compete via common mycorrhizal networks.

238 ncentrations than plants severed from common mycorrhizal networks.

239 repay' fungal carbon (C) invested in them by mycorrhizal partners during the initially heterotrophic

240 osphorus nutrition of the host plant via the mycorrhizal pathway, i.e., the fungal uptake of Pi from

241 ants are unable to take up phosphate via the mycorrhizal pathway.

242 However, no mycorrhizal phenotype was observed and no induction of C

243 Law of the Minimum is a useful predictor of mycorrhizal phenotype.

244 Mycorrhizal phenotypes arise from interactions among pla

245 -assimilation and generated less mutualistic mycorrhizal phenotypes with reduced plant and fungal bio

246 r experiments generated the full spectrum of mycorrhizal phenotypes.

247 ot-internal and -external fungal structures, mycorrhizal phosphorus uptake, and accumulation of trans

248 compartment system, using (33) P to quantify mycorrhizal phosphorus uptake.

249 venness and richness) of individuals of both mycorrhizal plants and fungi, and the need to take a 'co

250 t1 transcripts and high phosphorus uptake by mycorrhizal plants.

251 Stimulation of mycorrhizal production by elevated CO2 was observed duri

252 3) fungal adaptability that may help predict mycorrhizal responses to carbon dioxide enrichment, nitr

253 raits may provide a framework for predicting mycorrhizal responses to global change.

254 rgets several auxin receptors, in arbuscular mycorrhizal root colonization.

255 modulated effects of CO(2) and P addition on mycorrhizal root colonization.

256 May and June) decreased annual production of mycorrhizal root tip length by 50%.

257 ong 45 transcription factors up-regulated in mycorrhizal roots of the legume Lotus japonicus, express

258 ate concentration was five times higher near mycorrhizal roots than further out into the rhizosphere.

259 expressed Piloderma genes were detected from mycorrhizal roots, including genes for protein metabolis

260 l based on the C costs of N acquisition from mycorrhizal roots, nonmycorrhizal roots, N-fixing microb

261 MtCBS1, MtCBS2, was specifically induced in mycorrhizal roots, suggesting common infection mechanism

262 ) and ammonium (1723.m00046) transporters in mycorrhizal roots.

263 ntly known chitin-based rhizobial/arbuscular mycorrhizal signaling molecules.

264 he ascomycete Cenococcum geophilum, the only mycorrhizal species within the largest fungal class Doth

265 lance is hypothesised to be sensitive to the mycorrhizal strategies that plants use to acquire nutrie

266 Remarkably well-preserved fossils prove that mycorrhizal symbionts were diverse in simple rhizoid-bas

267 It is our hope that mycorrhizal symbioses can be effectively integrated into

268 Mycorrhizal symbioses link the biosphere with the lithos

269 ignaling pathway shared by the rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbioses.

270 nctional significance of the biodiversity of mycorrhizal symbioses.

271 orests remains elusive, but may be linked to mycorrhizal symbioses.

272 Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis (AMS), a widespread mutualistic as

273 During arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis (AMS), considerable amounts of lip

274 iments as evidence of an interaction between mycorrhizal symbiosis and soil nitrogen availability.

275 A key feature of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is improved phosphorus nutrition o

276 und in flowering plants that form arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, an ancestral mutualism between so

277 RAD1 is also required for arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, and rad1 mutants show reduced col

278 During arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, arbuscule development in the root

279 upports root nodule symbiosis and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, indicating that phosphorylation a

280 ing processes are shared with the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.

281 but a limited growth response to arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.

282 blishes root nodule symbiosis and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.

283 refore unlikely that increased production of mycorrhizal tips can explain the lack of progressive nit

284 This increased the standing crop of mycorrhizal tips during 2007 and 2008; during 2008, sign

285 Annual NPP of mycorrhizal tips was greatest during years with warm Jan

286 The well-characterized mycorrhizal tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotype 76

287 degradation rates with any addition level in mycorrhizal treatments were all significantly higher tha

288 e all significantly higher than those in non-mycorrhizal treatments.

289 Additionally, arbuscular mycorrhizal trees exhibited strong conspecific inhibitio

290 l collected beneath conspecifics, arbuscular mycorrhizal trees experienced negative feedback, whereas

291 y data, we explored how dominant forest tree mycorrhizal type affects understory plant invasions with

292 We also found no difference in the mycorrhizal type composition of understory invaders betw

293 as the second most important factor, whereas mycorrhizal type had little effect.

294 r results indicate that dominant forest tree mycorrhizal type is closely linked with understory invas

295 Forest mycorrhizal type mediates nutrient dynamics, which in tu

296 Hence the effect of mycorrhizal type on soil carbon content holds at the glo

297 The effect of mycorrhizal type on soil carbon is independent of, and o

298 These results suggest that mycorrhizal type, through effects on plant-soil feedback

299 ed nestedness and modularity among different mycorrhizal types and endophytic fungal guilds.

300 Mycorrhizal uptake represented the dominant pathway by w