ライフサイエンスコーパス: myopic

1 s of children with age-adjusted ALD < -1 mm (myopic).

2 t one quarter of angle-closure patients were myopic.

3 some children's eyes grow longer and become myopic.

4 The mean postoperative refraction was myopic (-1.19+/-0.7 diopters [D]) in 19 eyes and hyperop

5 Eyes with betaPPA were more myopic (-1.49 +/- 0.27 vs -0.22 +/- 0.31 diopters, P = .

6 ed emmetropia while an equal proportion were myopic (45%) or hypermetropic (46%).

7 ears; interquartile range [IQR], 26.1-42.2), myopic (91.5%), female (87.2%), and white (75.9%).

8 tively as prophylaxis against haze in higher myopic ablations.

9 Axial length, and myopic ammetropy are highly associated with choroidal pa

10 A total of 381 myopic and 126 toric pIOLs were implanted.

11 umers basing their choices on a mixture of a myopic and a "stubborn" expectation of adoption.

12 osage, effectiveness as prophylaxis in lower myopic and hyperopic ablations, and long-term safety, pa

13 sis: sex, age at examination, anisometropia, myopic and hyperopic refractive error (>/= 3 dioptres),

14 mes and surgical complication between highly myopic and non-highly myopic eyes.

15 tic factors are important in the etiology of myopic and nonmyopic RRD.

16 as <1500 cells/mm(2) in 3.9% and 4.0% in the myopic and toric groups, respectively.

17 The risk significantly increases in a male, myopic, and intellectual disabled child.

18 Of the 94 myopic angle-closure patients, 28 (29.8%) were categoriz

19 Although myopic angle-closure subjects had longer ALs (P<0.001) a

20 Myopic angle-closure subjects had longer VLs and ALs, bu

21 identification with support from an induced myopic animal provides biological insights of myopic dev

22 In this sense, myopic aspiration learning in which the unconditional pr

23 that, compared to normal chicks, the highly myopic-astigmatic chicks had significantly higher expres

24 (LASIK) in eyes with low myopia and compound myopic astigmatism </= 0.75 diopter (D).

25 s (1800 eyes) who were treated for myopia or myopic astigmatism between January 2011 and March 2013 a

26 isual impairment (95%, 95% CI = 76.2, 98.8); myopic astigmatism was the commonest type of refractive

27 antation has been used to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism, although corneal decompensation can

28 of 21 patients received LASIK for myopia or myopic astigmatism.

29 ia shift of >/=1.0 diopter in those who were myopic at baseline).

30 A less hyperopic/more myopic baseline refractive error was consistently associ

31 fty-eight presbyopic patients (43% males, 82 myopic), bilaterally treated, suitable for laser in situ

32 in SV lens format, while for eyes first made myopic by pretreatment with -10 SV lenses, the 2-zone ne

33 eline, and 59% lower for every 1.0 D less in myopic change in the untreated eyes over the first year.

34 Eighty-four myopic children aged 6 to 11 years with spherical equiva

35 ion rate of the manifest refractive error of myopic children in a longer follow-up period (up to 12 y

36 Fifty-six myopic children were divided into three groups: 32 child

37 not be as effective as previously thought in myopic children with high accommodative lag.

38 spherical equivalent </= -0.5 diopter in non-myopic children). 2. Myopia progression (myopia shift of

39 We assigned 400 myopic children, 6 to 12 years of age, to receive atropi

40 myopiogenic stimulus to eye growth in these myopic children.

41 rior staphyloma, lacquer cracks, Fuchs spot, myopic chorioretinal atrophy, and myopic choroidal neova

42 ns and outcomes in eyes with treatment-naive myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in the United

43 %), retinal hemorrhage (n = 3, 0.9%), active myopic choroidal neovascularization (n = 3, 0.9%), and n

44 uchs spot, myopic chorioretinal atrophy, and myopic choroidal neovascularization) and optic disc (opt

45 l studies of visual outcome in patients with myopic CNV (duration ranging from less than 3 months to

46 finding that correlated with signs of active myopic CNV (either subretinal fluid/intraretinal cysts o

47 Two main patterns were identified on FAF in myopic CNV and were related to the prognostic evolution,

48 Exudative features of myopic CNV are more obvious on FA than on SD OCT, sugges

49 This suggests an overlap between myopic CNV in older patients and age-related macular deg

50 giography should be performed when new-onset myopic CNV is suspected.

51 Myopic CNV occurring in older patients (>/=55 years) is

52 as the identification of the FAF patterns of myopic CNV over a 12-month follow-up.

53 Myopic CNV was associated more frequently with patchy or

54 21: Progressive High (Degenerative) Myopia." Myopic CNV was defined as HM with the presence of subret

55 Twenty-seven eyes (27 patients) affected by myopic CNV were enrolled from January 2011 to January 20

56 a substantial proportion of patients develop myopic CNV, which mostly causes a significant progressiv

57 y and visual burden of pathologic myopia and myopic CNV.

58 and duration of symptoms with 47 non-highly myopic control eyes selected from the same cohort.

59 e final classification of myopic glaucoma or myopic control was based on consensus assessment by 3 cl

60 s were thinner compared with those of normal myopic controls, with means generally outside of normal

61 differences between patients with CSNB2 and myopic controls.

62 all CSNB2 patients and 4 age-similar, normal myopic controls.

63 sive) had significantly thinner retinas than myopic controls.

64 and in 5 (7.2%) of 69 eyes without excavated myopic conus (P<0.05).

65 rved in 14 (26.4%) of 53 eyes with excavated myopic conus and in 5 (7.2%) of 69 eyes without excavate

66 n age of 62.6 +/- 9.7 years and a history of myopic corneal refractive surgery were implanted with th

67 ions experienced a smaller IOP decrease than myopic corrections for both PRK and LASIK (P<0.0001).

68 The formation of a myopic crescent is accompanied by loss of metabolic acti

69 al tissue is damaged by the development of a myopic crescent, rather than simply translocated in a te

70 artially offset the effects of low income on myopic decisions.

71 st among low-income individuals lead to less myopic decisions.

72 -0.38 D for children with absolute superior myopic defocus (n = 67) and -0.65 D for children with ab

73 of optical designs that result in peripheral myopic defocus as a potential way to slow myopia progres

74 Imposing hyperopic and myopic defocus simultaneously using concentric contact l

75 Superior myopic defocus was associated with less central myopia p

76 for increased atRA synthesis in response to myopic defocus.

77 ide population-based prevalence estimates of myopic degeneration (MD) among Chinese Americans, the fa

78 y may play a key role in the pathogenesis of myopic degeneration.

79 uated, especially in the nasal regions where myopic degenerations are most commonly seen clinically.

80 PTPRR, and PPFIA2, are novel candidates for myopic development within the MYP3 locus that should be

81 yopic animal provides biological insights of myopic development.

82 The mean rate of change in a myopic direction from 1 month after cataract surgery to

83 age 1.5 years, the mean rate of change in a myopic direction was 0.97 D/year (95% CI, 0.66-1.28 D/ye

84 These results suggest that the myopic eye tends toward an ellipsoid shape, rather than

85 ry OCT scan is larger for a longer eye (more myopic eye), leading to a thinner RNFL measurement.

86 mum) and higher total choroidal volume than myopic eyes (9.80 +/- 1.87 mm(3) vs 8.14 +/- 1.48 mm(3))

87 ogMAR) but was significantly lower in highly myopic eyes (P < 0.001).

88 resented bilateral retinal tears; 59.1% were myopic eyes (p < 0.05).

89 ears were noted in 18.2% of eyes; 86.4% were myopic eyes (p = 0.01); 81.8% occurred within a 120 days

90 ignificantly older than patients with highly myopic eyes (P<0.05).

91 Myopic eyes (spherical equivalent [SE] <-0.5 diopter [D]

92 Thirty-two highly myopic eyes (with a refractive error of more than -6.00

93 Forty-seven highly myopic eyes (with axial length >26 mm) were included in

94 ean axial length was 28.5+/-2.2 mm in highly myopic eyes and 23.3+/-1.1 mm in controls (P < 0.001).

95 ckness for the identification of glaucoma in myopic eyes and offers a valuable diagnostic tool for pa

96 RPE humps were frequently observed in highly myopic eyes and they resulted from the presence of an un

97 Myopic eyes are less likely to have AMD and DR but more

98 A total of 206 myopic eyes had ICL implantation.

99 in each of the optical zones, in normal and myopic eyes in young chicks.

100 Ruling out glaucoma in myopic eyes often poses a diagnostic challenge because o

101 th 3-day postoperative positioning in highly myopic eyes resulted in satisfactory anatomic and functi

102 Along all measured meridians, myopic eyes showed a relative hyperopic shift in the per

103 Forty myopic eyes underwent LASIK using an excimer laser with

104 The choroid in high myopic eyes was thickest temporally compared to subfovea

105 Myopic eyes were more likely to have nuclear (OR, 1.57;

106 from 24 young-adult myopic eyes, and 24 non-myopic eyes were used in this investigation.

107 Low myopic eyes with a preoperative cylinder of </= 0.50 D w

108 They are more likely to appear in highly myopic eyes with advanced choroidal atrophy.

109 Posterior staphylomas in myopic eyes with an axial length shorter than 26.5 mm ex

110 ed longitudinal imaging results of 52 highly myopic eyes with dome-shaped macula.

111 Consecutive cases of highly myopic eyes with MH-associated RD were included.

112 Twenty-seven cases of highly myopic eyes with MHRD in 27 patients who underwent a vit

113 trols who had ERM surgery (n = 64 non-highly myopic eyes).

114 Data from 24 young-adult myopic eyes, and 24 non-myopic eyes were used in this in

115 nses resulted in relatively smaller and less myopic eyes, despite treated eyes being exposed to a gre

116 re the same or similar when considering only myopic eyes, only hyperopic eyes, and subgroups of eyes

117 ive in the repair of RD resulting from MH in myopic eyes, with retinal reattachment achieved more fre

118 e type and duration of disease in non-highly myopic eyes.

119 tation is common and not exclusive to highly myopic eyes.

120 ication between highly myopic and non-highly myopic eyes.

121 We also critique the myopic focus on prejudice reduction, but we do not suppo

122 tendency towards hyperopic for short ALs and myopic for long ALs.

123 A total of 414 children became myopic from grades 2 through 8 (ages 7 through 13 years)

124 The final classification of myopic glaucoma or myopic control was based on consensus

125 antation of the pIOL occurred in 6.0% in the myopic group and 4.8% in the toric group.

126 s to assess the level of trait anxiety among myopic group of teenagers in comparison to teenagers wit

127 In the myopic group, the variation in the subfoveal choroidal t

128 efractive error, 90 eyes (73.8%) were highly myopic (>/=-6.00 D), 24 eyes (19.7%) had low myopia (<-6

129 Children with 1 or 2 parents who were myopic had greater odds of incident myopia (1 parent: od

130 ld not assume that glaucoma patients who are myopic have open angles.

131 The refractive status was myopic in 16 eyes, plano in 3 eyes, and hyperopic in 2 e

132 yopia if they were nonmyopic at baseline and myopic in either eye at follow-up.

133 onths after birth, refractive error was less myopic in the study group than in the control group (-1.

134 expected refractive outcome was -0.36 (more myopic) in trabeculectomy eyes compared with +0.23 (more

135 Results were very similar for myopic individuals.

136 gher levels of community trust and make less myopic intertemporal choices than residents in control u

137 iduals with higher community trust make less myopic intertemporal decisions because they believe thei

138 late IOL power accurately in eyes with prior myopic laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive

139 acoemulsification and IOL implantation after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive k

140 ion-matched patients scheduled for bilateral myopic LASIK were enrolled and followed for 6 months aft

141 able to explain 42% of the IOP change after myopic LASIK, 34% of the change after myopic PRK, 25% of

142 o cylinder correction when combined with low myopic LASIK.

143 , amblyopia or organic conditions, 6.0% were myopic </= - 0.50DS, 0.6% hyperopic >/= + 2.00DS, 7.7% a

144 10, 11, 12, and 15 years, and classified as myopic (</=-1 diopters) or as emmetropic/hyperopic (>/=-

145 n highly myopic persons, the major cause was myopic macular degeneration (38.9%).

146 fest other macular disease including AMD and myopic macular degeneration.

147 elated macular degeneration (AMD) and 2 with myopic macular degeneration.

148 horoidal thickness is an important factor in myopic maculopathy and can be a better indicator of its

149 st that BCVA reduction in eyes with dry-type myopic maculopathy can be related to a thinner macular c

150 nd 2/10 or worse in 3 eyes, of which all had myopic maculopathy or deep amblyopia.

151 .5 mm exhibit features resembling pathologic myopic maculopathy.

152 es such as glaucoma, retinal detachment, and myopic maculopathy.

153 oretinal atrophy, which resembles pathologic myopic maculopathy.

154 under anesthesia yielded significantly more myopic measurements than cycloplegic retinoscopy for the

155 aduated from school after 13 years were more myopic (median, -0.5 diopters [D]; first quartile [Q1]/t

156 arget -0.50 D, average topography) or higher myopic (minimum topography, Haigis-L) results.

157 Here we show that the endosomal protein Myopic (Mop) regulates Fz trafficking in the Drosophila

158 of SCO2 were significantly downregulated in myopic mouse retinae.

159 pters (D) (spherical equivalent) and typical myopic optic disc morphology, with and without glaucoma,

160 gnostic tool for patients with glaucoma with myopic optic discs.

161 king myopia with glaucomatous disease, but a myopic optic nerve can pose significant challenges with

162 active multifocal IOLs in eyes with previous myopic or hyperopic LASIK can result in good refractive

163 EC loss was reported after implantation with myopic or toric iris-fixated pIOLs.

164 erally resulted in a shift from hyperopic to myopic outcomes in long eyes.

165 61 cells/mm(2) (standard error, 6.30) in the myopic (P < 0.001) and toric (P < 0.001) groups, respect

166 vs -2.8 +/- 1.4 D; P = .015), and to have 2 myopic parents (77.3% vs 48.1%; P = .012).

167 , while near work, time outdoors, and having myopic parents were not.

168 neration (AMD) patient, 1 from a 58-year-old myopic patient, and 1 from a 77-year-old nonexudative AM

169 153 eyes from 153 consecutive myopic patients (74 male, 79 female; mean age at surgery

170 Ninety eyes of 73 highly myopic patients (refractive error >/=-6 diopters) with C

171 Choroidal thickness profile in highly myopic patients differs from that in emmetropic patients

172 Charts and imaging studies of highly myopic patients presenting between September 2015 and Fe

173 Consecutive myopic patients undergoing PRK (38 eyes of 23 patients)

174 etinal detachment occurred in 8.5% of highly myopic patients versus 2.1% of controls, but the differe

175 e hundred and ninety-five eyes of 101 highly myopic patients were included.

176 Thirty-one eyes of 31 consecutive highly myopic patients with CNV and showing a subretinal hyperr

177 kness, yielded higher diagnostic accuracy in myopic patients with glaucoma.

178 SRT are most frequently observed in myopic patients, and are usually symptomatic.

179 In myopic patients, the multiadjusted HR associated with in

180 Young age was an additional risk factor in myopic patients.

181 retinal metabolic support in elderly, highly myopic patients.

182 er laser platform provide similar results in myopic patients; however, the WF-guided approach may yie

183 Children who became myopic performed significantly more near work (19.4 vs.

184 The cortical defect matches the myopic peripapillary crescent in size and shape, indicat

185 In high myopia, a region resembling the myopic peripapillary crescent was visible in cortical se

186 en by input from retina corresponding to the myopic peripapillary crescent.

187 In university graduates, the proportion of myopic persons was higher (53%) than that of those who g

188 t, and combined causes (each 25%); in highly myopic persons, the major cause was myopic macular degen

189 leted by 193 and 127 eyes implanted with the myopic pIOL and by 40 and 20 eyes implanted with the tor

190 ps had more aberration than that of a normal myopic population and experienced significant VA gains w

191 tive manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) for myopic PRK and LASIK (P<0.0001), weakly correlated with

192 after myopic LASIK, 34% of the change after myopic PRK, 25% of the change after hyperopic LASIK, and

193 or 6-mm pupil, mean depth of focus values in myopic-PRK and hyperopic-LASIK/PRK corneas were signific

194 vertical coma and fourth-order tetrafoil in myopic-PRK corneas, and third-order vertical coma and fo

195 orneas were greater than those in normal and myopic-PRK corneas.

196 In 220 normal eyes, 102 myopic-PRK eyes, and 106 hyperopic-LASIK/PRK eyes, anter

197 Myopic procedures lower measured IOP more than hyperopic

198 , but they were associated with less rebound myopic progression (for atropine 0.01%, mean myopic prog

199 In studies that evaluated myopic progression after cessation of treatment, a rebou

200 e effects, and similar long-term results for myopic progression after the study period and rebound ef

201 myopic progression (for atropine 0.01%, mean myopic progression after treatment cessation of 0.28+/-0

202 The prevalence, magnitude, and rate of myopic progression all were significantly higher in the

203 1 RCT) investigated time spent outdoors and myopic progression and found increasing time spent outdo

204 ne 1% eyedrops were effective in controlling myopic progression but with visual side effects resultin

205 s but the control group showed a significant myopic progression compared to the 0.125 % atropine grou

206 Most of the studies reported less myopic progression in children treated with atropine com

207 cy of topical atropine for the prevention of myopic progression in children.

208 Younger children and those with greater myopic progression in year 1 were more likely to require

209 ealed less myopic progression with atropine (myopic progression ranging from 0.04+/-0.63 to 0.47+/-0.

210 D)/year) compared with control participants (myopic progression ranging from 0.38+/-0.39 to 1.19+/-2.

211 el I and II studies that evaluated primarily myopic progression revealed less myopic progression with

212 contrast, they appear to exhibit more rapid myopic progression than UK children studied in the mid-2

213 Over the following 12 months, myopic progression was greater in the 0.5% eyes (-0.87 +

214 d primarily myopic progression revealed less myopic progression with atropine (myopic progression ran

215 with higher myopia, and greater tendency of myopic progression) who may still progress while receivi

216 he optimal dosage of atropine with regard to myopic progression, rebound after treatment cessation, a

217 ficient evidence of an effect of atropine on myopic progression.

218 s and prevalent myopia, incident myopia, and myopic progression.

219 ng time spent outdoors significantly reduced myopic progression.

220 ence supports the use of atropine to prevent myopic progression.

221 hypertension and is effective for retarding myopic progression.

222 There was a myopic rebound after atropine was stopped, and it was gr

223 Although there are reports of myopic rebound after treatment is discontinued, this see

224 lation between the magnitude of preoperative myopic refraction and the central epithelial thickness a

225 Significant increases in myopic refraction were observed.

226 There was a significant difference in myopic refraction, over the 9-month assessment period.

227 ssional education are associated with a more myopic refraction.

228 % humidity was associated with a 0.0004 more myopic refraction.

229 ity, sex (for NTG), systolic blood pressure, myopic refractive error (for NTG), and Raynaud's phenome

230 Prevalence of myopic refractive error (spherical equivalent less than

231 In multivariate analysis, myopic refractive error and astigmatism were significant

232 There was an inverse relationship between myopic refractive error and ocular sun exposure, with mo

233 High myopia was defined as myopic refractive error of </=6.0 diopters in the right

234 n the subfoveal choroidal thickness with the myopic refractive error was -10.45 mum per diopter.

235 For each participant, the eye with the worse myopic refractive error was included in this analysis.

236 In this young adult population, myopic refractive error was inversely associated with ob

237 Older age, smoking, and myopic refractive error were independent risk factors fo

238 eal choroidal thickness and axial length and myopic refractive error were obtained (r = -0.649, P < 0

239 e mCNV, which was defined as the presence of myopic refractive error worse than -6.0 diopters with th

240 n prevalence with increasing age, increasing myopic refractive error, and increasing axial length (al

241 Older age, myopic refractive error, history of diabetes, higher sys

242 ss remodeling correlated to the preoperative myopic refractive error.

243 pplication is effective for the treatment of myopic regression after LASIK compared with control grou

244 atropine-treated groups showing significant myopic retardation compared to the control group.

245 Myopic retinopathy is a frequent cause of VI and blindne

246 inopathy; the primary cause of blindness was myopic retinopathy.

247 The primary causes of VI were cataracts and myopic retinopathy; the primary cause of blindness was m

248 els of education were associated with a more myopic SE independent of gender.

249 uated from school after 13 years, 50.9% were myopic (SE, </=-0.5 D) versus 41.6%, 27.1%, and 26.9% af

250 ere was a slight but significant increase in myopic SEQ after PRK between 1 and 20 years, particularl

251 1 and 20 years there was an increase in mean myopic SEQ of -0.54 D (P < 0.02).

252 d with greater increase in AL (P = .001) and myopic shift (P = .02).

253 d with greater increase in AL (P = .009) and myopic shift (P = .03).

254 Greater degrees of myopic shift and astigmatism, steeper corneal curvatures

255 To report the myopic shift at 5 years of age after cataract surgery wi

256 Variability in eye growth and myopic shift continue to make refractive outcomes challe

257 PALs caused a myopic shift in peripheral defocus in three of four loca

258 PALs caused a myopic shift in peripheral defocus.

259 There was also significantly lower myopic shift in the ROC group compared with the control

260 IOL implantation during infancy, the rate of myopic shift occurs most rapidly during the first 1.5 ye

261 +/- 0.47 to 3.32 +/- 0.57, P < .001), and a myopic shift of 1.04 diopters (95% CI 0.03-2.05, P = .04

262 did not find a significant difference in the myopic shift or the postoperative visual acuity in child

263 Myopic shift varies substantially among patients.

264 Before 1.3 years old, the rate of myopic shift was -4.7 diopters (D)/y; after 1.3 years, t

265 A greater increase in AL and myopic shift was associated with cryotherapy and more ex

266 Maximum myopic shift was observed in children <2 years of age.

267 steepening at 3 and 9 months along with mild myopic shift.

268 s not associated with an increased risk of a myopic shift.

269 ave a significant effect on myopia onset and myopic shift.

270 ted vitreous chamber elongation and produced myopic shifts in refractive error.

271 Thirty patients scheduled for bilateral myopic SMILE and 30 age-, sex-, and refraction-matched p

272 Children who became myopic spent less time outdoors compared with children w

273 pressure (sbeta = -0.085; P < .001), a more myopic spherical equivalent (sbeta = 0.152; P < .001), a

274 9.3 +/- 1.5 years; P = .023), to have higher myopic spherical equivalent (SE) at baseline (-3.6 +/- 1

275 s from a population-based study suggest that myopic status is associated with lower odds of having di

276 The prevalence of MD was higher among older myopic subjects and among participants with more severe

277 In 50 eyes of 25 myopic subjects consecutively scheduled for ICL implant,

278 In 54 eyes of 27 myopic subjects FD-OCT iridocorneal angle measurements w

279 rection, we performed a subgroup analysis on myopic subjects only (n = 2742).

280 Myopic subjects with refraction error greater than -2 di

281 s (normative database), 7.1 +/- 4.3 degrees (myopic subjects), and 7.6 +/- 4.2 degrees (glaucomatous

282 cts (normative database), 46 nonglaucomatous myopic subjects, and 86 glaucomatous subjects.

283 The prevalence of any MD was 44.9% among myopic subjects, based on the presence of any degenerati

284 For myopic subjects, school year was the only variable signi

285 In myopic subjects, the specificity improved and worsened i

286 er conjunctival autofluorescence observed in myopic subjects.

287 selected cases of asymmetrical topographies, myopic surface ablation could induce a premature biomech

288 Asymmetrical-topography corneas treated with myopic surface ablation presented an increased short-ter

289 e used for screening with higher accuracy in myopic than hyperopic children.

290 0.81, p < 0.001) with higher coefficient in myopic than in hyperopic children (r = 0.91, p = 0.0002

291 autofluorescence was significantly lower in myopic than in nonmyopic subjects (31.9 mm(2) vs 47.9 mm

292 her educational achievements more often were myopic than individuals with less education.

293 The traction mechanisms causing myopic traction maculopathy are diverse.

294 ents who underwent vitreoretinal surgery for myopic traction maculopathy by a single surgeon at a ter

295 lution of foveal detachment in patients with myopic traction maculopathy without posterior vitreous d

296 c abnormality associated with retinoschisis, myopic traction maculopathy, epiretinal membrane, vitreo

297 sociated with PVD can occur in cases of high myopic traction maculopathy, especially in those without

298 ing axial elongation, making it an effective myopic treatment for children.

299 d three additional mutations in three highly myopic unrelated individuals (c.341G>A, c.418G>A, and c.

300 Choroids are thinner in longer, more myopic young adult eyes.