ライフサイエンスコーパス: narcotic

1 the endoscopist with benzodiazepine and/or a narcotic.

2 effects normally associated with the opiate narcotics.

3 ing the BBB in the physiological response to narcotics.

4 because of the side effects associated with narcotics.

5 s and were not using hormonal medications or narcotics.

6 performed on patients receiving preoperative narcotics.

7 evere, ultimately necessitating control with narcotics.

8 e pain and perhaps obviate the need for oral narcotics.

9 efined narcotics versus the predefined polar narcotics.

10 fusion that resolved with discontinuation of narcotics), 3 (0.3%) cases of atelectasis, 2 (0.2%) corn

11 nesthesia, one patient required supplemental narcotics (5 mg of oxycodone) and sedatives (1 mg loreza

12 in smoking (n=6), marijuana use (n=79), oral narcotic abuse (n=20), and intravenous drug use (n=21).

13 Papaverine is a non-narcotic alkaloid found endemically and uniquely in the

14 The use of narcotics among patients with Crohn disease (CD) is ende

15 prohibited substances, including stimulants, narcotics, anabolic agents, diuretics, peptides, and gly

16 Use of patient-controlled narcotic analgesia and duration of use decreased (63.2%

17 omyalgia, approximately 50% of whom required narcotic analgesia and/or were disabled, treatment with

18 Intrathecal narcotic analgesia is used increasingly in fast-tracking

19 Narcotic analgesia was required in 98% of general anesth

20 have been shown to be effective adjuncts to narcotic analgesia.

21 n all cases of pain, patients were receiving narcotic analgesia.

22 Many changes relate to improvements in non-narcotic analgesic techniques and use of various suprala

23 Morphine, a potent narcotic analgesic used for the treatment of acute and c

24 atients) and reduction or discontinuation of narcotic analgesics (55% of patients), as well as improv

25 f entry onto the study, 15 patients required narcotic analgesics for bone pain; after treatment, eigh

26 s, and conservative therapy with bracing and narcotic analgesics gave little improvement.

27 Use and abuse of prescription narcotic analgesics have increased dramatically in the U

28 Postoperative pain relief (freedom from narcotic analgesics) was achieved in 153 of 185 patients

29 ents, reduced dependence on narcotic and non-narcotic analgesics, improved performance status and qua

30 e less likely than whites to be treated with narcotic analgesics.

31 t alleles might display altered responses to narcotic analgesics.

32 bodies eliminated the pain and the need for narcotic analgesics.

33 lity improvement vs. control periods, use of narcotic and benzodiazepine infusions were substantially

34 sible), and performed chart review to assess narcotic and benzodiazepine use and time from ventilator

35 lity in many patients, reduced dependence on narcotic and non-narcotic analgesics, improved performan

36 ter extubation, and respiratory arrest after narcotic and sedative medication.

37 Total doses of narcotics and benzodiazepines increased after implementa

38 (alcohols and anilines) with predefined MOA (narcotics and polar narcotics) were investigated at diff

39 ics, beta-2 agonists, diuretics, stimulants, narcotics, and beta-blockers) spiked in human urine and

40 Antibiotics, antimotility agents, narcotics, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs sho

41 nical management of postsurgical reversal of narcotic anesthesia and opioid side effects as well as t

42 d patients who lived in close proximity to a Narcotics Anonymous meeting location.

43 These results confirm that tertiary narcotic antagonist quaternization substantially reduces

44 Quaternary narcotic antagonists that are assumed not to penetrate t

45 gastrointestinal stimulants, antibacterials, narcotics, antipsychotics, inotropes, digoxin, anestheti

46 Opioid-based narcotics are the most widely prescribed therapeutic age

47 While morphine and other narcotics are the most widely prescribed therapy for mod

48 Application of the system to detection of narcotics at airport security control points is discusse

49 A newly described condition, Narcotic Bowel Syndrome (NBS)/Opioid-Induced GI Hyperalg

50 s warranted to determine the epidemiology of narcotic bowel syndrome and delineate the most efficacio

51 underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of narcotic bowel syndrome are incompletely understood; how

52 Narcotic bowel syndrome is characterised by worsening ab

53 Although narcotic bowel syndrome is rarely diagnosed, given the c

54 (DM) exposed to sublethal doses of presumed narcotic chemicals with log Kow >/= 1.8.

55 t may facilitate development of valuable non-narcotic clinical analgesics utilizing cotreatment with

56 Given that narcotics commonly are administered to patients after se

57 neous or individual detection of three major narcotic components, heroin, noscapine and morphine at m

58 en preparations simultaneously, and 63% used narcotic-containing compounds.

59 and toxicity tests using an assumed baseline narcotic critical body residue (CBR) and a range of orga

60 Narcotic dependence decreased and activity level increas

61 Severe pain/narcotic dependency, tumor size larger than 10 cm, and n

62 Apomorphine is a non-narcotic derivative of morphine, which acts as a dopamin

63 eatments for alleviating incisional pain and narcotic drug withdrawal symptoms, which are now in clin

64 intravenous propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol, narcotic drug) infusion.

65 edures usually involve the administration of narcotic drugs as anesthetics or adjuvants.

66 le in mediating acute and chronic effects of narcotic drugs.

67 to extrinsic contamination of the parenteral narcotic fentanyl by a health care worker.

68 Intravenous infusion narcotics (fentanyl, morphine, or hydromorphone) were us

69 n modulation should be tried before starting narcotics for pain control.

70 a brief interval after receiving additional narcotics for pain during the procedure.

71 more immediate concerns when choosing opiate narcotics for pain therapy.

72 evious studies have used oral or intravenous narcotics for supplementation.

73 ly less likely to receive a prescription for narcotics for their symptoms than patients in the nonsta

74 block, preoperative carbohydrate loading and narcotic free pain regimens.

75 recorded as being at work or as retrieving a narcotic from an automated dispensing cabinet in an area

76 neural dysfunction, inflammatory mediators, narcotics, gastrointestinal hormone disruptions, and ana

77 Preoperative use of narcotics in patients undergoing abdominal surgery for C

78 Despite common use of narcotics in the clinical management of severe traumatic

79 The narcotic independence rate at 1 year was 55% and continu

80 ining physiological responsiveness to opioid narcotics is considered, micro opioids derived from salv

81 Since stress influences the potency of narcotics, it may be an important physiological componen

82 Narcotics may be needed to provide relief in some cases.

83 a standard scale ranging from 0 to 10), and narcotic medication use (intravenous morphine equivalent

84 ctive application of regional analgesia, non-narcotic medications, and complimentary alternative opti

85 the antinociceptive actions of the alkaloid narcotic, morphine, following either i.p. or intracerebr

86 has been shown to decrease operative times, narcotic need and permit quicker return of bowel functio

87 interval, 1.37-2.26), respectively, that of narcotic nonusers.

88 ive sleep apnea; b) to examine the effect of narcotics on postoperative obstructive sleep apnea.

89 g, sleeping) and required significantly less narcotic opioids (P < .001); improvement in the patient'

90 -field sample testing of toxins, explosives, narcotics or other hazardous chemicals.

91 time, and 30% had not received any sedation, narcotic, or psychotropic drug in the previous 24 hrs.

92 r rate of infection or the use of sedatives, narcotics, or antibiotics in the catheter group.

93 Patients were assigned to receive either a narcotic- or a halothane-based anesthetic for adenotonsi

94 among those who did not receive prescription narcotics (P<0.0001).

95 ter ketorolac introduction required 58% less narcotics (P<0.001), recalled having less postoperative

96 generation of vapor samplers for explosives, narcotics, pathogens, or even cancer, and could inform f

97 Patients were less likely to receive narcotics prescriptions from primary care providers when

98 1.22-1.43]; HR(high), 1.33 [1.17-1.53]) to a narcotics-related conviction (HR(moderate), 2.23 [2.14-2

99 To date, opioid narcotics represent the largest and most potent class of

100 eroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can decrease narcotic requirement and recovery time.

101 Perioperative outcomes and postoperative narcotic requirement were compared among patient groups.

102 es produced an analgesic effect that reduced narcotic requirements compared with patients who receive

103 End points included narcotic requirements, glycemic control, islet function,

104 Blood loss, length of stay, parenteral narcotic requirements, resumption of diet, and return to

105 d postoperative sensory block that minimizes narcotic requirements.

106 ministration, a significant reduction in the narcotic's ability to produce antinociception during str

107 thought to be the cellular target of opioid narcotics such as morphine and heroin, mediating their e

108 Operative time, doses of narcotics, surgical difficultly and hospital charges wer

109 ion and assessments of strategies to prevent narcotics tampering in all health care settings are need

110 ressants, pain killers, anti-psychotics, and narcotics that are poor substrates for microsomal CYP1A1

111 For patients taking long-term narcotics, the mean use per week was 639 mg (95% CI, 220

112 eral nutrition (TPN), and days of injectable narcotic therapy (all over 28 days), days in hospital (o

113 0001), (4) 2.6 additional days of injectable narcotic therapy (P <.0001), (5) 2.6 additional days in

114 r antagonists may improve the reliability of narcotic therapy.

115 ion of potent short-acting beta-blockers and narcotics to control hemodynamic variables are examples

116 "a physician providing a sufficient dose of narcotics to enable a patient to kill himself." Responde

117 to minimize the contribution of prescription narcotics to the nationwide opioid epidemic, reductions

118 tanding the intrinsic mechanisms involved in narcotic tolerance and dependence.

119 avenues for the study and treatment of pain, narcotic tolerance, and dependence.

120 ve the first indications of the link between narcotic toxicity and the chemical activity of organic c

121 its use is restricted to federally licensed narcotic treatment programs (NTPs).

122 efore their TP-IAT was 7.1 +/- 0.3 years and narcotic usage of 3.3 +/- 0.2 years.

123 room (3.2 vs 4.7, P = .003), interval total narcotic use (6.7 vs 12.5 mg, P = .003 at <4 hours and 0

124 = .01 at 8-12 hours), and total intravenous narcotic use (9.2 vs 17.2 mg of morphine sulfate equival

125 of stay (4 versus 7 days), and decreased IV narcotic use (all P < 0.05.Postoperative morbidity was e

126 as associated with reduced LOS and decreased narcotic use after donor nephrectomy.

127 significantly reduces postoperative pain and narcotic use after LVHR.

128 Overall narcotic use also decreased by nearly 50% (45.6 vs. 21.3

129 rbidity, as well as significant decreases in narcotic use and cost.

130 months 9 and 12 after randomization, with no narcotic use and no further sphincter intervention.

131 Among adult patients, the odds of narcotic use at 1 year were increased by previous endosc

132 on the outcome implications of prescription narcotic use before kidney transplantation.

133 in patients that is associated with illicit narcotic use by health care workers.

134 reatic pain" similar to preoperative levels, narcotic use for any reason, and islet graft failure at

135 Patients with preoperative narcotic use had a longer mean (SD) length of stay (11.2

136 7% of evaluable patients, with a decrease in narcotic use in 56%.

137 There was a significant increase in narcotic use in control patients in the first 24 hours (

138 measures were pain over 6 hours, parenteral narcotic use over 24 hours, duration of hospitalization,

139 Pain scores were lower and 24-hour narcotic use was less in patients who received lidocaine

140 ariable analysis indicated that preoperative narcotic use was the only independent risk factor associ

141 onor recipients with the highest quartile of narcotic use were 2.3 times (aHR, 2.27; 95% confidence i

142 y, wake-up times, emetic symptoms, pain, and narcotic use were compared.

143 Patients with a history of chronic narcotic use were excluded.

144 nalog pain scales) and subjective (mobility, narcotic use) scores were monitored before and after ver

145 ssociated with significant reduction in i.v. narcotic use, a rapid return to diet, and shorter hospit

146 were gathered regarding ethanol abuse, pain, narcotic use, and recurrent acute exacerbations requirin

147 omitant depression, chronic pain, alcohol or narcotic use, and/or take several preparations simultane

148 racture progression had significantly higher narcotic use, change in Karnofsky performance score, and

149 Laparoscopic approach, narcotic use, length of stay, 30-day readmission, ileus

150 Before starting regular narcotic use, patients with CD should be considered for

151 ience through improved pain control and less narcotic use, without increased length of stay or compli

152 ermine what effect this may have on pain and narcotic use.

153 d clinical variables, including preoperative narcotic use.

154 ductions in bone turnover markers, pain, and narcotic use.

155 rs, mechanical ventilation, benzodiazepines, narcotics, use of physical restraints, and exposure to v

156 Subgroup analysis indicated that outpatient narcotic users had increased incidence of adverse postop

157 rative outcomes compared with inpatient-only narcotic users.

158 up is designed for a quick identification of narcotics using automated sampling.

159 points were patient-reported outcomes, total narcotic utilization, and complications.

160 result in a classification of the predefined narcotics versus the predefined polar narcotics.

161 omated dispensing cabinet in an area where a narcotic was administered to each of the 3 case patients

162 The relief from narcotics was sustained.

163 forcement Administration's list of scheduled narcotics was used to query opioid use.

164 Concomitant tricyclic antidepressants and/or narcotics were continued if therapy was stabilized prior

165 nal surgery, and chronic preoperative use of narcotics were independently correlated with POI on mult

166 Patients receiving narcotics were more likely to have a current smoking hab

167 ial confidence interval: 63%, 100%) for whom narcotics were prescribed prior to the procedure reporte

168 es) with predefined MOA (narcotics and polar narcotics) were investigated at different levels of biol

169 ounds were significantly lower than those of narcotics, whereas no differences were found between end

170 nd some insight into the pharmacokinetics of narcotics while on uteroplacental support has been gaine

171 Serious adverse events included the narcotic-withdrawal syndrome and sirolimus-associated pn

172 tients who had at least 1 pharmacy claim for narcotics within 1 month before surgery was 41.5 years a

173 profound analgesic properties of intrathecal narcotics without motor blockade make them an excellent