ライフサイエンスコーパス: nasal swab

1 arance for the direct detection of MRSA from nasal swabs.

2 ultures of the acute-phase serum samples and nasal swabs.

3 ected by vaginal swabs compared to rectal or nasal swabs.

4 s identified by axillary samples paired with nasal swabs.

5 ee stools (0.3%) and for the first time in a nasal swab (0.1%).

6 a modest prevalence of M. bovis shedding in nasal swabs (2.9%) and milk (1.4%) and of B. abortus in

7 n oropharyngeal swab, compared with use of a nasal swab alone, increased the frequency of detection o

8 haryngeal swabs, compared with collection of nasal swabs alone, for detection of common respiratory v

9 steurella multocida were isolated by using a nasal swab and a transtracheal swab from individual calv

10 e similarity of the isolates obtained from a nasal swab and from a transtracheal swab was compared by

11 Cytology of nasal smear by taking with nasal swab and Hansel's staining was performed.

12 Nasal swab and serum samples were collected prior to ons

13 solation of DNA from an anthrax spore-spiked nasal swab and the subsequent on-chip amplification of t

14 We performed nasopharyngeal or nasal swabbing and/or serum sampling (n = 148) in Lancas

15 orrelated with a reduction in viral titer in nasal swabs and lungs, following challenge with H1N1 pan

16 were assessed by determining virus titers in nasal swabs and respiratory tissues, which were also use

17 Regular bacterial analyses of nasal swabs and sputum were performed, and clinical even

18 ble rapid broad-spectrum pathogen testing on nasal swabs and therefore allow implementation of infect

19 e initial evaluation consisted of 403 paired nasal swabs and was done using the specimen preparation

20 ive isolation of B. parapertussis from ovine nasal swabs and, in successfully excluding overgrowth wi

21 determined by culturing ear, umbilicus, and nasal swabs, and (iii) the distribution of GBS serotypes

22 was 85% with nasopharyngeal swabs, 78% with nasal swabs, and 69% with nasopharyngeal washes.

23 ch as blood, probang samples, and saliva and nasal swabs, and herd-level samples, such as air samples

24 e-motif 21 (TRIM21) messenger RNA indexes in nasal swabs as potential biomarkers of viral respiratory

25 was associated with a positive culture from nasal swabs at discharge.

26 virus-associated RTI episodes confirmed from nasal swabs by using nucleic acid testing.

27 rmed by using 16S rDNA pyrosequencing of 872 nasal swabs collected biweekly from 47 unselected infant

28 In addition, IBV was detected in 3 nasal swabs collected from PRRSV-seropositive pigs by re

29 Nasal swabs collected from the patient and from one of h

30 These results suggest that a nasal swab culture can be predictive of the bacterial pa

31 individuals) provided concurrent symptom and nasal swab data for 4166 person-weeks.

32 ty symptomatic pilgrims underwent additional nasal swabs during their pilgrimage in the KSA, of which

33 tional study were interviewed and provided a nasal swab for S. aureus analysis.

34 rmance of nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and nasal swabs for the detection of influenza virus using r

35 We examined the children and obtained nasal swabs for the detection of RSV during each respira

36 visits were made to identify ARI and obtain nasal swabs for viral detection using real-time reverse-

37 Nasal lavage for flow cytometry and nasal swabs for viral PCR were performed at enrollment a

38 arriage were screened with eight consecutive nasal swabs (four standard rayon, four charcoal-coated r

39 Nasal swabs from 11 of 17 (65%) employees tested positiv

40 Human coronavirus was detected by RT-PCR in nasal swabs from 3 of 20 patients but in no sinus secret

41 axillary aspirates from 8 (40%) patients and nasal swabs from 9 (45%) patients, by reverse transcript

42 ective ability of MBM was evaluated with 200 nasal swabs from conventionally reared sheep, and B. par

43 tively collecting weekly symptom diaries and nasal swabs from families for 1 year, (2) analyzed data

44 Nasal swabs from patients positive by Xpert MRSA PCR and

45 Home visits were conducted to obtain nasal swabs from persons with ARI/ILI.

46 rlpools and taping gel and from 35 of the 84 nasal swabs from players and staff members (42 percent).

47 IBV was detected in 3 nasal swabs from PRRSV-seropositive pigs by real-time re

48 h 84 primary isolation plates generated from nasal swabs from swine with clinical signs of atrophic r

49 ly ill patients and also being asked to test nasal swabs from the potentially exposed.

50 ms for a year and collected 4,190 individual nasal swabs from three distinct pig subpopulations.

51 Nasal swabs had equal or greater sensitivity than oropha

52 samples were bacteriologically positive the nasal swab identified the same bacterial species as the

53 The nasal swab isolate was genetically identical to the tran

54 One hundred percent of archival nasal swab lysates yielded the expected PCR results when

55 4 weeks, facilitating detection of MRSA from nasal swab lysates, and may decrease the amount of unuse

56 NxG assay with prospectively collected rayon nasal swabs (n = 1,103) and flocked swab (ESwab) nasal s

57 ntained milk from 10 animals and in 56.2% of nasal swabs (n = 121) from cattle from tuberculin test-p

58 re, a simplified collection approach using a nasal swab (NS) is described.

59 Self-collected foam nasal swabs (NS) obtained after instillation of saline s

60 The prospective study collected MRSA from nasal swabbing of residents of 26 nursing homes in Orang

61 rich and sequence viral nucleic acids in the nasal swabs of 50 young dairy cattle with symptoms of BR

62 was, however, isolated from the tonsils and nasal swabs of the asymptomatic T15 pigs at 26 days post

63 Thirty-one carriers had two or more positive nasal swabs; of these, the isolates in all swabs from a

64 This assay can detect SPPV in buffy coats, nasal swabs, oral swabs, scabs, and skin lesions as well

65 y tract infections based on parent-collected nasal swabs over the winter months.

66 Virus titers from nasal swabs peaked on day 2, and low titers were detecte

67 Compared to PCR, direct plating of nasal swabs performed poorly, especially for patients wi

68 Here, we assessed the concordance of paired nasal swabs processed using commercial PCR and culture a

69 apertussis in conventionally reared sheep by nasal swabbing proved futile with existing selective med

70 ins of the H3N8 subtype were evaluated using nasal swabs received for routine diagnosis and swabs col

71 Matching criteria were center, date of first nasal swab sample, and exposure time.

72 detect H3N2 IAVs directly from nasal wash or nasal swab samples collected from laboratory-challenged

73 hildren's Hospital; clinical staff collected nasal swab samples from 25 patients and then operated te

74 rthermore, we analysed by BuV qPCR stool and nasal swab samples from 955 children with gastroenteriti

75 We performed HBoV testing on nasal swab samples from a prospective, longitudinal stud

76 The sensitivity of this test, using nasal swab samples taken from both symptomatic and asymp

77 influenza or respiratory syncytial virus had nasal swab samples tested for rhinovirus, coronavirus OC

78 Twenty-three nasal swab samples that tested positive for methicillin-

79 Patients whose nasal swab samples were always negative served as contro

80 Nasal swab samples were collected during respiratory ill

81 icity and other adverse events and blood and nasal swab samples were obtained following vaccination.

82 ng HHCs were as follows: 49% (51 of 104) for nasal swab samples, 53.8% (56 of 104) for nasal biopsy s

83 ty among patients were 66.4% (75 of 113) for nasal swab samples, 71.7% (81 of 113) for nasal turbinat

84 re screened for spore exposure by collecting nasal swab samples.

85 cts recorded symptoms and provided blood and nasal swab samples.

86 Our results suggest that large-scale nasal-swab screening for potential exposure to anthrax s

87 lonized patients would have been missed with nasal swab specimen culture only.

88 ates but are rather common human isolates, a nasal swab specimen for culture was collected voluntaril

89 or the rapid detection of MRSA directly from nasal swab specimens (IDI-MRSA; Infectio Diagnostic, Inc

90 study (traditional medium used, SBA) and 667 nasal swab specimens from MCW (traditional medium used,

91 For this study, 767 nasal swab specimens from the multicenter study (traditi

92 identification of MRSA strains directly from nasal swab specimens taken from the anterior nares.

93 tein-based detection of influenza virus from nasal swab specimens was developed and evaluated in a cl

94 ruses A and B and adenoviruses (AdV), paired nasal swab specimens were collected from 384 recruits wi

95 Paired nasal swab specimens were collected from patients who we

96 Throat and nasal swab specimens were collected, combined, and teste

97 Three nasal swab specimens were obtained 1 month apart on ente

98 A total of 515 compliant remnant nasal swab specimens were sequentially used to inoculate

99 assay for the direct detection of MRSA from nasal swab specimens.

100 l, Lenexa, KS), for the detection of MRSA in nasal swab specimens.

101 e conducted a retrospective cohort study and nasal-swab survey of 84 St.

102 The median time from symptom onset to nasal swab was 2 days; 65.4% of samples were positive fo

103 A nasal swab was positive for S. aureus on at least one oc

104 sideration of results from oropharyngeal and nasal swabs was as effective as consideration of results

105 signs of FMD, viremia, or viral shedding in nasal swabs was found in the Ad5-boIFN-lambda3-treated a

106 -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from nasal swabs, was evaluated in this multicenter study for

107 in-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in nasal swabs, we compared BD GeneOhm MRSA PCR and various

108 and RT-PCR identification of influenza from nasal swabs, we tracked the course of seasonal and pande

109 Nasal swabs were collected at respiratory illness onset

110 Flocked nasal swabs were collected during 3 influenza seasons (2

111 Nasal swabs were collected from participants and tested

112 Nasal swabs were obtained at ICU admission and weekly th

113 Thirty-seven ocular, urogenital, or nasal swabs were obtained from 21 wild western barred ba

114 Nasal swabs were obtained from a national cohort of midd

115 188 children with nasal discharge, 64 (34%) nasal swabs were PCR positive.

116 Nasal swabs were taken from health-care workers every 4

117 irs completed a questionnaire and provided a nasal swab which was analyzed for S. aureus, methicillin

118 Tracheal wash fluid, nasal swabs, whole blood samples, and serum samples from

119 us virus were 2 to 3 logs lower in ocular or nasal swabs with 51g than with 51gR.