ライフサイエンスコーパス: neighboring base

1 Nase II activity is also sensitive to the 3'-neighboring base.

2 pared with the free nucleoside, depending on neighboring bases.

3 h base flipping depends on the stacking with neighboring bases.

4 pping rather than from direct recognition of neighboring bases.

5 ctions that perturb the electron orbitals of neighboring bases.

6 t electron transfer (hole migration) between neighboring bases.

7 these 2-APs are no longer stacked onto their neighboring bases.

8 and base-unstacking and to the nature of the neighboring bases.

9 tween each anomer of the abasic site and the neighboring bases.

10 ained partial stacking interactions with its neighboring bases.

11 pear to be dependent upon the composition of neighboring bases.

12 equences by including the interdependence of neighboring bases.

13 orotation angle of the sugar ring for the 5'-neighboring base A6, as determined from scalar coupling

14 en base pairs, stacking interactions between neighboring bases and long-range intra- and inter-backbo

15 intrastrand (vertical) interactions between neighboring bases; and (ii) formation of double helices

16 namics is observed in the case where the two neighboring bases are both A and/or T.

17 The uracil, and potentially neighboring bases, are processed by error-prone base exc

18 res were examined; the influence of specific neighboring bases, as opposed to the general A + T conte

19 terms, of the relative positions of pairs of neighboring bases (both intra- and interstrand) in Carte

20 uanine maintained stacking interactions with neighboring bases but was not Watson-Crick hydrogen bond

21 oxygen; (iv) there is no involvement of the neighboring bases by way of inter- or intrastrand cross-

22 a given base mutates "to." We find that both neighboring bases have a significant effect on the mutat

23 rds, we sought to determine what effects the neighboring bases have on what a given base mutates "to.

24 Group II-bulged bases had at least one neighboring base identical to it.

25 indicating that 2AP is more stacked with the neighboring bases in the former sequence.

26 codon, but this is not observed when the 3' neighboring base is a G.

27 anical effects of the pi-pi coupling between neighboring bases is measured.

28 otency by only 2-3-fold, suggesting that two neighboring bases may be sufficient for significant inte

29 ackbone and decreased base interactions with neighboring bases might be the origin of the decreased s

30 3' base or analog transiently base paired to neighboring bases of the template.

31 ven when (CP)G and (CP)C are incorporated as neighboring bases on the same strand, their efficiency o

32 rises from base stacking and collisions with neighboring bases only but is insensitive to base-pairin

33 roxyl group and C(20) O(2) located in the 5'-neighboring base pair G(5) x C(20).

34 structural analysis of the effect of the 5'-neighboring base pair on recognition of an intrahelical

35 ite of the adduction at X(7) x C(18) and its neighboring base pair, A(8) x T(17).

36 rve the strong van der Waals' attractions of neighboring base-pair planes.

37 ules could originate in the deformability of neighboring base-pair steps.

38 In both the former cases, the neighboring base pairs (G6-C21 and A8-T19) are closer to

39 the extent of carcinogenic interaction with neighboring base pairs and the thermodynamic properties

40 d pi-pi stacking interaction energy with the neighboring base pairs compared to the natural S-CPT.

41 show that this wobble base pair destabilizes neighboring base pairs on only one side of the wobble.

42 ce contexts (considering only the 5'- and 3'-neighboring base pairs).

43 N is the unpaired base and X.X' and Z.Z' the neighboring base pairs, could be well-represented (+/-0.

44 ions between the intercalated ligand and the neighboring base pairs, provide <50% of the thermodynami

45 ring at the misincorporation site and at the neighboring base pairs, the observed inhibition of relig

46 e lesion is dominated by the identity of the neighboring base pairs, with the cross strand partner ba

47 s own base pair but had little effect on the neighboring base pairs.

48 cking interaction between the carcinogen and neighboring base pairs.

49 ismatch was observed up to a distance of two neighboring base pairs.

50 itution or mismatch as well as by the site's neighboring base pairs.

51 ing between the IQ moiety and the 5'- and 3'-neighboring base pairs.

52 ed by the two looped-out bulge bases and the neighboring base pairs.

53 eading to hydrogen-bonding interactions with neighboring base-pairs.

54 hin reads by comparing position-specific and neighboring base quality scores with the distribution of

55 c stacking and collisional interactions with neighboring bases, respectively (see the preceding paper

56 n the trimers bring it into proximity of the neighboring bases, resulting in efficient charge transfe

57 otides were used to explore the influence of neighboring base sequence context on the mutagenic poten

58 are apparently mediated by interactions with neighboring bases, spectral changes that occur as probe-

59 DNA protons were observed, mostly to the 5'-neighboring base, T4 in the modified strand.

60 imarily to collisional interactions with the neighboring bases, the absence of dynamic quenching in t

61 f thymine is due to methyl interactions with neighboring bases, thus adding to our understanding of t

62 a GTA mismatch, affects the stability of the neighboring base triplets.

63 A bulged base with no identical neighboring base was defined as a Group I base bulge.

64 Neighboring bases, which are one or more positions remov

65 increasing the solvent accessibility of the neighboring bases while maintaining the overall hairpin

66 the base stacking between the f(5)C and the neighboring bases while not causing significant global a