ライフサイエンスコーパス: neighboring group

1 e to defend their range against intrusion by neighboring groups.

2 o dramatically alter the electron density of neighboring groups.

3 ar to be the result of recent gene flow from neighboring groups.

4 flow can accelerate differentiation between neighboring groups.

5 of the ribooxocarbenium analogue between the neighboring group 5'-hydroxyl and bidentate hydrogen bon

6 ne-protected galactopyranosyl donors bearing neighboring group-active protecting groups at O2 are dis

7 ve centre is fully consistent with the known neighboring-group catalytic mechanism in which E173 acts

8 in the absence of the traditional C(2)-ester neighboring group effect is described.

9 ) of stabilizing the cation by a pi or sigma neighboring group effect.

10 tic mechanism of reactant destabilization by neighboring group electrostatic interactions, transition

11 Neighboring group interactions are discussed with refere

12 through thermodynamic control facilitated by neighboring group interactions with a transient cationic

13 n of the ribosyl oxocarbenium ion occur from neighboring group interactions with the phosphate anion

14 ith the RAS pathway, specifies and positions neighboring groups of cardiac progenitors within each se

15 Here we show that conflicts between neighboring groups of cooperatively breeding green woodh

16 atorial glycosidic bonds without recourse to neighboring group participation and its associated probl

17 sides proceeds through a mechanism involving neighboring group participation by a C2-oxyanion and rat

18 methodology in combination with traditional neighboring group participation by esters to introduce b

19 Neighboring group participation by the 2-nitrogen in ant

20 nopivaloyl (PivCN) ester to ensure effective neighboring group participation during the glycosylation

21 uatorial, and 6-O positions, indicating that neighboring group participation from those sites does no

22 Neighboring group participation in glycopyranosylation r

23 This appears to happen when an intermediate neighboring group participation involving a double bond

24 tional studies were undertaken to examine if neighboring group participation involving fused [4.2.0]

25 r mustards react with Grignard reagents with neighboring group participation of the sulfur atom.

26 rate under these conditions is likely due to neighboring group participation or diastereoselective at

27 s indicate the prominence of charge-directed neighboring group participation reactions involved in ph

28 oiety at C-2 of a glycosyl donor can perform neighboring group participation to give a quasi-stable a

29 bility of sulfonamido nitrogen to enter into neighboring group participation was established in two d

30 e less positive for those compounds in which neighboring group participation was geometrically possib

31 ly easy to synthesize by taking advantage of neighboring group participation, whereas synthesis of th

32 considered as a new type of inverse lactone neighboring group participation.

33 s are obtained selectively in the absence of neighboring group participation.

34 of sulfonamide nitrogen centers to engage in neighboring group participation.

35 a-glucosylations in the absence of classical neighboring group participation.

36 s part of its catalytic potential from 5'-OH neighboring group participation.

37 in order to gain reliable stereocontrol via neighboring group participation.

38 c media with the aim of controlling nitrogen neighboring group participation.

39 ituted tetrahydropyran acetals revealed that neighboring-group participation does not control product

40 This observation implicates neighboring-group participation in the solvolysis of tos

41 Consequently, neighboring-group participation was not responsible for

42 ete beta-selectivity can be attained through neighboring-group participation.

43 (E,E-, E,Z-, or Z,Z-) and in the context of "neighboring group" participation by nonvicinal esters in

44 genetic and cultural differentiation between neighboring groups show how natural selection on large g

45 ith the use of a 2-O-picolyl moiety, a novel neighboring group that is capable of efficient participa

46 es which do not have F atoms in contact with neighboring groups, we find an approximately 1 ppm mean