ライフサイエンスコーパス: nerve-sparing

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します

1 58.6% of unilateral, and 56.0% of bilateral nerve-sparing).

2 he procedure was nerve sparing (65.6% of non-nerve-sparing, 58.6% of unilateral, and 56.0% of bilater

3 aried according to whether the procedure was nerve sparing (65.6% of non-nerve-sparing, 58.6% of unil

4 Current trends towards nerve-sparing and focal cryoablation are also discussed.

5 ective suturing of dorsal venous complex and nerve sparing approach.

6 ntiation of intrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing approaches.

7 areful attention to technique, especially in nerve-sparing cystectomy and orthotopic cystoplasty may

8 The technique of nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy should

9 Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, althou

10 g of pelvic anatomy to recognize the optimal nerve-sparing plane and technical finesse to minimize st

11 ection of the prostate away from the optimal nerve-sparing plane to maximally preserve nerve fibers w

12 ing cryodamage of the neurovascular bundles (nerve-sparing procedure), and focal ablation of a specif

13 tectomy on sexual function were mitigated by nerve-sparing procedures.

14 e functional anatomy approach, starting with nerve-sparing prostatectomy, assumes that quality-of-lif

15 r to be less than reported in men who have a nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPL

16 oundaries of modified templates, a bilateral nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is t

17 ed from a pool of 322 patients who underwent nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy witho

18 and dynamic contrast-material enhanced) and nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, duri

19 For nerve-sparing surgery, though some proponents of laparos

20 ectile dysfunction or are not candidates for nerve-sparing surgery.

21 articularly after radical prostatectomy, and nerve-sparing surgical technique had little apparent ben

22 R imaging data changed the decision to use a nerve-sparing technique during RALP in 27% of patients i

23 in 17 of the 28 patients (61%) and to a non-nerve-sparing technique in 11 (39%).

24 ts (27%); the surgical plan was changed to a nerve-sparing technique in 17 of the 28 patients (61%) a

25 atients whose surgical plan was changed to a nerve-sparing technique, there were no positive margins

26 With advances in nerve-sparing techniques and the probability of disease

27 owever, refinement of tissue handling during nerve-sparing to minimize lateral displacement of the ne

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。