ライフサイエンスコーパス: neurologic examination

1 examination is an essential component of the neurologic examination.

2 brain death and are not a substitute for the neurologic examination.

3 brain death and are not a substitute for the neurologic examination.

4 one of many normal eye movements seen on the neurologic examination.

5 of 244 patients had peripheral neuropathy by neurologic examination.

6 urotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire and neurologic examination.

7 gh medical history and complete physical and neurologic examination.

8 eurocritical care as they allow for frequent neurologic examinations.

9 5/8; p < 0.03), and all survivors had normal neurologic examinations.

10 serial magnetic resonance imaging scans and neurologic examinations.

11 years of age or older, were given structured neurologic examinations.

12 e brain injury is reliant on features of the neurologic examination, anatomical and physiological cha

13 The neurologic examination and ancillary studies were consis

14 on interval may be shortened, and the second neurologic examination and apnea test (or all components

15 ion interval may be shortened and the second neurologic examination and apnea test (or all components

16 and medications that can interfere with the neurologic examination and apnea testing should be disco

17 and medications that can interfere with the neurologic examination and apnea testing should be disco

18 Neurologic examination and brain pathology were scored b

19 c work-up, including a complete physical and neurologic examination and cervical spine radiographs.

20 Main Outcomes and Measures: Quantitative neurologic examination and diffusion tensor imaging perf

21 hy controls were administered a standardized neurologic examination and measures of cognition, depres

22 n were prospectively assessed (by means of a neurologic examination and the Bayley Scales of Infant D

23 completed the study without change in their neurologic examination and with activation seen in eight

24 Neurologic examinations and outcomes, brain computed tom

25 ments, including neuropsychological testing, neurologic examination, and clinical and medical history

26 uction, central motor conduction, a clinical neurologic examination, and cognitive function were asse

27 C]PiB PET, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), neurologic examination, and detailed cognitive testing u

28 erwent DWI, comprehensive ophthalmologic and neurologic examination, and diagnostic evaluations for t

29 sis of the clinical features in the history, neurologic examination, and neuroimaging studies led to

30 underwent assessment with a nurse interview, neurologic examination, and neuropsychological testing.

31 he hospital, impede efforts to perform daily neurologic examinations, and increase the need for tests

32 Patients were evaluated by MRI, neurologic examinations, and neurocognitive tests.

33 cept for global muscle stiffness, results of neurologic examination are usually normal.

34 ) had "questionable" or abnormal findings on neurologic examination, as compared with 48 controls (29

35 All patients had independent neurologic examination before and after the procedure.

36 Patients had an independent neurologic examination before and after the procedure.

37 -free controls (n = 66) underwent systematic neurologic examination by a neurologist blinded to disea

38 ave a magnetic resonance image of the brain, neurologic examination by a neurologist, and cognitive t

39 netic resonance angiography (MRA) studies, a neurologic examination by a pediatric neurologist, and c

40 here is uncertainty about the results of the neurologic examination; c) if a medication effect may be

41 here is uncertainty about the results of the neurologic examination; (c) if a medication effect may b

42 on determines the child has met the accepted neurologic examination criteria for brain death.

43 on determines the child has met the accepted neurologic examination criteria for brain death.

44 Quality criteria consisted of postoperative neurologic examination details and follow-up timing.

45 part of the body correlated with appropriate neurologic examination findings in the FM group.

46 l intensity within 1 hour and who had normal neurologic examination findings, the Ottawa SAH Rule was

47 annual, standardized neuropsychological and neurologic examination findings, using criteria from the

48 n 6 months duration, confusion, and abnormal neurologic examination findings.

49 Detailed structured neurologic examinations, glucose control logs, pain scor

50 Subjects underwent neurologic examination immediately before and after MR i

51 We recommend a detailed neurologic examination in any case of persistent localiz

52 iven the challenges of performing a reliable neurologic examination in children, neuroimaging might b

53 Determine the utility of the neurologic examination in comatose patients from nontrau

54 The utility of a standardized neurologic examination in SLE for excluding overt neurol

55 lowing protocol: a standardized physical and neurologic examination in the emergency department, cran

56 f the SPECT scan, DLB patients had a routine neurologic examination including Hoehn and Yahr grading

57 n patients with TTR-FAP underwent a complete neurologic examination, including Neuropathy Impairment

58 operative evaluation, medication history and neurologic examination, intraoperative awareness of cond

59 urosensory toxicity of oxaliplatin, detailed neurologic examination, needle electromyography (EMG), a

60 Neurologic examination, neurodevelopmental assessment, a

61 was designed to establish the reliability of neurologic examination, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), a

62 Neurologic examination, neurophysiologic testing, and me

63 aphics, genetic testing, symptom evaluation, neurologic examination, neuropsychological bedside testi

64 nt of leukocyte galactocerebrosidase levels, neurologic examinations, neuropsychological tests, magne

65 formance was assessed using the Physical and Neurologic Examination of Subtle Signs (PANESS), with hi

66 ower than controls on the total score of the neurologic examination (P < 0.0001).

67 ining written, informed consent and baseline neurologic examinations, patients were randomized to tre

68 Neurologic examination remained normal, and follow-up he

69 The clinical neurologic examination remains central to determining pr

70 Neurologic examination results were unremarkable.

71 Neurologic examination revealed hyperactivity and autist

72 rom baseline and achieved stable or improved neurologic examination score and Karnofsky performance s

73 Although she was not amenable to a full neurologic examination, she reported subjective leg weak

74 After rewarming to 36.5 degrees C, neurologic examination showed no eye opening or response

75 infarcts on magnetic resonance imaging and a neurologic examination showing no abnormalities correspo

76 cal features, including presenting symptoms, neurologic examination signs, neuropsychological perform

77 ow Coma Scale and normal findings on a brief neurologic examination; the patients then underwent CT.

78 r predictor of intracranial injury than is a neurologic examination, though controversy continues as

79 The authors administered a structured neurologic examination to 21 adolescents with early-onse

80 The neurologic examination was consistent with brain death.

81 no percussion tenderness of his spine, and a neurologic examination was negative.

82 disability score was calculated, and a full neurologic examination was performed.

83 Detailed neurologic examinations were performed.

84 r, point tenderness at T10-T12, and a normal neurologic examination with preserved lower extremity st

85 MRI) of the brain in the setting of a normal neurologic examination without a history or physical fin

86 olled 56 subjects after a brief survey and a neurologic examination yielding normal Subjects were dir