ライフサイエンスコーパス: neuroscientific

1 cial for developing complete theoretical and neuroscientific accounts of altruistic behavior and more

2 Whereas extensive neuroscientific and behavioral evidence has confirmed a

3 Emerging neuroscientific and genetic findings emphasize the dimen

4 Neuroscientific and genetics research have yet to affect

5 utero life in shaping postnatal outcomes of neuroscientific and public health importance.

6 lation of region-specific brain circuits for neuroscientific and therapeutic applications.

7 nding and essential questions using a modern neuroscientific approach that draws on diverse fields su

8 ure in the normative brain is critical for a neuroscientific approach to both typical and atypical ea

9 The neuroscientific basis for this olfactory language 'defic

10 ion modulator, which will broadly enable new neuroscientific, biological, neurological and psychiatri

11 Our findings have important neuroscientific, clinical and developmental significance

12 ion, these data are of broad interest to the neuroscientific community because we have shown that pro

13 These data are of broad interest to the neuroscientific community, and the results will inspire

14 h prior work, and relevant computational and neuroscientific considerations; some argued for related

15 t practices, including psychotherapy, into a neuroscientific context may ultimately prove more useful

16 With the rapid accumulation of neuroscientific data comes a pressing need to develop mo

17 Corresponding neuroscientific data from both animals and humans implic

18 e accounts explain a range of behavioral and neuroscientific data on language processing and discuss

19 Behavioral and neuroscientific data on reward-based decision making poi

20 ion properties, and then review the relevant neuroscientific data on which mechanism brains actually

21 , accessing, and visualizing a wide range of neuroscientific data.

22 y subjects, and thus also contributes to the neuroscientific debate on the neural correlates of consc

23 Here, we consider how neuroscientific discoveries are thematically represented

24 These findings point toward a role for neuroscientific discoveries in shaping long-standing eco

25 grated, end-to-end solutions that accelerate neuroscientific discovery.

26 ne of the enduring questions that has driven neuroscientific enquiry in the last century has been the

27 Our results provide clear neuroscientific evidence for the systematic dissociation

28 Converging neuroscientific evidence has suggested that the neuropat

29 A wealth of neuroscientific evidence indicates that our brains respo

30 advanced substantially since 2000, with new neuroscientific evidence linking early adversity and nur

31 More broadly, we argue that neuroscientific evidence plays a critical role in unders

32 Here we review the available neuroscientific evidence regarding self-regulation and i

33 These results provide neuroscientific evidence that rhythmic arm movement cann

34 A neuroscientific experiment typically generates a large a

35 tations in humans is not known, because most neuroscientific experiments on human navigation have foc

36 Neuroscientific explanations of gambling disorder can he

37 consistent with views emerging from several neuroscientific fields, suggesting that phase synchroniz

38 gularly does alter, negate, and even reverse neuroscientific findings and conclusions down to the mol

39 beyond previous accounts by bridging between neuroscientific findings and detailed behavioral data, a

40 We summarize relevant neuroscientific findings and evidence-based principles o

41 Contemporary neuroscientific findings support the position that a wom

42 ing the representational implications of the neuroscientific findings.

43 By studying SES within a neuroscientific framework, we have the potential to expa

44 be useable as a probe for testing cognitive neuroscientific hypotheses that predict neuroanatomical

45 The clinical and neuroscientific implications of this overlap are discuss

46 etwork constructed solely based on empirical neuroscientific information and plausible assumptions fo

47 ould be sensitive to the social consequences neuroscientific information may have once it enters the

48 task-evoked functional connectivity-areas of neuroscientific inquiry typically considered separately.

49 By translating emerging neuroscientific insights and experimental research into

50 this end may obscure the effects of greatest neuroscientific interest.

51 cycling in rat and human brains facilitate a neuroscientific interpretation of functional imaging dat

52 variety of non-human animals, no systematic neuroscientific investigation of animal consciousness ha

53 nd emotional awareness can be helpful in the neuroscientific investigation of emotion.

54 us of intense behavioral and, more recently, neuroscientific investigation.

55 Unsurprisingly, the results of neuroscientific investigations into stress and motivatio

56 vioral decision-making literature and review neuroscientific knowledge on two contextual influences:

57 sociated with subjects smoking in the modern neuroscientific laboratory environment, however electron

58 tention are widely used in the cognitive and neuroscientific literatures.

59 Here, we use neuroscientific methods and a novel computational model

60 have increasingly sought to employ cognitive neuroscientific methods and data as evidence to influenc

61 Though many neuroscientific methods have been brought to bear in the

62 indings also challenge the prospect of using neuroscientific methods to measure utility in a context-

63 of Game Theory with modern psychological and neuroscientific methods, the neuroeconomic approach to t

64 ing, illuminating economic models of choice, neuroscientific models of affective learning, and the wo

65 Traditional neuroscientific models of creativity, such as the left b

66 ther messages from these workshops were that neuroscientific models of decision making could provide

67 Neuroscientific models of sensory perception suggest tha

68 The models include well-known neuroscientific object-recognition models (e.g. HMAX, Vi

69 ics of this process from a philosophical and neuroscientific perspective.

70 account, deeply rooted in psychological and neuroscientific perspectives on animal behaviour, of how

71 neuroscience, the extent and means by which neuroscientific progress will translate into clinical ca

72 A central neuroscientific pursuit is understanding neuronal intera

73 Consequently, neuroscientific questions involving the theoretical firi

74 interface (BMI), are gaining momentum in the neuroscientific realm, with potential applications rangi

75 r cross-fertilization between behavioral and neuroscientific research are highlighted.

76 Influential concepts in neuroscientific research cast the brain a predictive mac

77 The translation of neuroscientific research into care has led to new approa

78 The potential benefits of neuroscientific research into sexuality are great, but n

79 Recent neuroscientific research showed that the human brain sig

80 sections for electrophysiological and other neuroscientific research studies.

81 I review results from a number of strands of neuroscientific research that bear upon our intuitive no

82 direct implications affect a current area of neuroscientific research, and indicates how Hughlings Ja

83 s of human brain activity is a major goal of neuroscientific research.

84 pharmaceutical development, drug testing and neuroscientific research.

85 urprisingly neglected in economic theory and neuroscientific research.

86 These neuroscientific results provide some insight into the ne

87 ables visualization and analysis of dMRI for neuroscientific studies and patient-specific anatomic as

88 Recent neuroscientific studies have exploited multistable perce

89 However, neuroscientific studies have shown that attentional bias

90 Extant neuroscientific studies have typically investigated spat

91 processing, and have implications for future neuroscientific studies of decision making involving ext

92 p; second, he reviews experimental cognitive neuroscientific studies of perception, emotion, and memo

93 (VSTM) have been well documented, and recent neuroscientific studies suggest that VSTM performance is

94 pose a unified theoretical framework for the neuroscientific study of general resilience mechanisms.

95 ate a unifying theoretical framework for the neuroscientific study of general resilience mechanisms.

96 ies from across the neurosciences permit the neuroscientific study of the role of sleep in off-line m

97 Neuroscientific theories propose that the MTL supports m

98 luding the ready falsifiability of our view, neuroscientific theories that allow everything but deman

99 However, neuroscientific understanding of cross-modal plasticity