ライフサイエンスコーパス: neutral evolution

1 genetic analyses showed purifying selection (neutral evolution).

2 lection pinpointed several regions under non-neutral evolution.

3 and their growth through both Darwinian and neutral evolution.

4 that Pyl appeared in MaThg1 as the result of neutral evolution.

5 91 ( approximately 94%) sites have undergone neutral evolution.

6 sitions are less biased by the hypothesis on neutral evolution.

7 to localised mutational biases coupled with neutral evolution.

8 e human gene pool faster than expected under neutral evolution.

9 (SH) and those introduced meiotically during neutral evolution.

10 ved in S. franciscanus bindin is a result of neutral evolution.

11 ion of S. franciscanus bindin is a result of neutral evolution.

12 ility type, provided an internal standard of neutral evolution.

13 Fst among loci is greater than expected from neutral evolution.

14 thought that K = u holds very generally for neutral evolution.

15 of gene expression levels and patterns and 2-neutral evolution accompanied by selective constraint.

16 ormance to the McDonald and Kreitman test of neutral evolution all indicate that random mutation foll

17 This observation has led to a belief that neutral evolution along these paths can drive transition

18 Both showed that under a model of neutral evolution and exponential growth, the mean Hammi

19 also pseudogenes in M. leprae showed nearly neutral evolution, and their relative ages were similar

20 First, many important genes show evidence of neutral evolution as a consequence of relaxed selection

21 amics compared with the expected change from neutral evolution at the branches of potential functiona

22 nterference-free null model assuming initial neutral evolution before immune response elicitation.

23 ion is not caused by differences in rates of neutral evolution but instead appears to be related to d

24 larity is usually viewed as the signature of neutral evolution, but several lines of evidence indicat

25 tworks has reached the target state, further neutral evolution can lead to an increase in both the mu

26 rajectories, long considered the hallmark of neutral evolution, can arise even when mutations are str

27 Several tests of neutral evolution employ the observed number of segregat

28 Neutral evolution enables tolerance of hypermutation, wh

29 This shows that neutral evolution explores phenotype space and can play

30 There was insufficient evidence to reject neutral evolution for 6 genes encoding signaling compone

31 A test of the neutral evolution hypothesis, through use of the Hudson/

32 xpression evolution are considered: 1-purely neutral evolution (i.e., no selective constraint) of gen

33 In contrast with neutral evolution in a homogenous environment, as demons

34 yang phenomenon can be explained by strictly neutral evolution in a well-mixed population.

35 ion within the glb1 locus is consistent with neutral evolution in all four taxa.

36 important consequences for the occurrence of neutral evolution in clonal populations.

37 s the relative role of natural selection and neutral evolution in producing biogeographic patterns.

38 ndent datasets for evaluating the pattern of neutral evolution in the human genome, for example, they

39 l where age at first reproduction influences neutral evolution in the nuclear genome.

40 Our data show hallmarks of neutral evolution, including similar rates of synonymous

41 Neutral evolution is a frequently used model to analyse

42 This process of neutral evolution is an important mode of genetic change

43 ased on the framework developed we show that neutral evolution is not an adequate description of the

44 the population during the whole period under neutral evolution) is a powerful indicator of departures

45 Our theory quantitatively describes how neutral evolution leads to marginally stable proteins an

46 With respect to purely neutral evolution, levels of change in gene expression b

47 mmetry pattern that is inconsistent with the neutral evolution model, and reflects their functional r

48 Under a neutral evolution model, each mononucleotide or oligonuc

49 cute viral decline stage than predicted by a neutral evolution model.

50 Proteins with such partly neutral evolution nonetheless have no fewer protein inte

51 y matched cohort we found evidence for rapid neutral evolution of HCV in persons with rapid progressi

52 To provide a baseline for neutral evolution of the trait, we estimate the distribu

53 he) (GAA) therefore attributes the seemingly neutral evolution of the two spacers to their escape fro

54 We tested for departures from neutral evolution on the basis of partial sequences of E

55 ing from genetic drift in which constructive neutral evolution progressively incorporates weakly stab

56 ein, with omega = 1, < 1, and > 1 indicating neutral evolution, purifying selection, and positive sel

57 round this locus were also suggestive of non-neutral evolution, raising the possibility that the evol

58 ous evolution rate in those regions than the neutral evolution rate.

59 vers by neighbors (coalescence), after which neutral evolution reestablishes the province and the pat

60 Bole1b sequence increased, resulting in net neutral evolution relative to Bole1b across the entire 5

61 Statistical tests of neutral evolution showed that a few haplotypes predomina

62 Second, proteins undergo neutral evolution so that the fitness landscape has a fl

63 mmelinids, variation in copy number, and non-neutral evolution suggests overlapping or fluid function

64 have patterns of variation incongruent with neutral evolution: They have too much or too little vari

65 in repeat regions can be explained by adding neutral evolution to what is already known about the mut

66 s with a strong signal of secondary contact; neutral evolution under this history produces clines as

67 -ta region, while significant deviation from neutral evolution was not found in all O. sativa groups.

68 Also for neutral evolution, where species with exactly the same p

69 The model of neutral evolution with selective constraint predicts a r

70 or mariner transposon evolution that expects neutral evolution within particular hosts, with selectio

71 tterns of sequence diversity consistent with neutral evolution, yet loci near the proximal breakpoint