ライフサイエンスコーパス: neutral theory

1 ctions of the background selection model (or neutral theory).

2 rted correlations support rather than reject neutral theory.

3 om the expected frequency spectrum under the neutral theory.

4 ions with large effective size by the nearly neutral theory.

5 s observed to deviate from that predicted by neutral theory.

6 e patterns are statistically consistent with neutral theory.

7 Analogies with niche and neutral theory and assembly models are also considered.

8 ory resolves many of the differences between neutral theory and classical tradeoff-based niche theori

9 genetic relatedness in pioneering studies of neutral theory and human migrations.

10 is is based on a partial misunderstanding of neutral theory and that their data alone cannot unambigu

11 enetic drift, recasting Kimura's selectively neutral theory as a special case of a generalized drift

12 ults were consistent with the predictions of neutral theory, as the abundant species almost always ha

13 A neutral theory (assuming no environmental selection or o

14 The nearly neutral theory attributes most nucleotide substitution a

15 Neutral theory, built around the hypothesis that individ

16 s relative abundances for which, contrary to neutral theory but consistent with numerous observations

17 so improves on the ecological predictions of neutral theory by explaining the occurrence of very comm

18 Thus, strong hypothesis tests for neutral theory can be formulated.

19 Our results also confirm that neutral theory cannot be used to infer an absence of nic

20 However, neutral theory cannot explain what generates high divers

21 about whether an alternative formulation of neutral theory could explain the data after all.

22 Niche and neutral theories emphasize different processes contribut

23 gth of the K(A)-K(S) correlation exceeds the neutral theory expectation when substitution rates are e

24 ill inflate the value of ZnS relative to its neutral theory expectations.

25 amus) are consistently too short relative to neutral-theory expectations, and they are also distorted

26 More recently, proponents of the neutral theory have placed a premium on how stochastic f

27 re we show that the framework of the current neutral theory in ecology can easily be generalized to i

28 metric community dynamics to yield Hubbell's neutral theory in the limit of functional equivalence am

29 The success of the neutral theory in two-dimensional forest ecosystems and

30 Poor performance of neutral theory is driven by its consistent inability to

31 , mathematical developments such as Kimura's neutral theory, Kingman's coalescent theory and efficien

32 r departure from the predictions of standard neutral theories of biodiversity and that an alternative

33 ributions to models associated with niche or neutral theories of community assembly, and tested the i

34 d provide an important alternative to recent neutral theories of diversity.

35 ntinents, which they suggested falsifies the neutral theory of biodiversity (NTB).

36 sent a theoretical framework for the unified neutral theory of biodiversity and an analytical solutio

37 The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography provides

38 The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and related theories base

39 ral theory of protein evolution to Hubbell's neutral theory of biodiversity, quantifying the relative

40 however, has recently been challenged by the neutral theory of biodiversity, which explains coexisten

41 based theory by adding mild selection to the neutral theory of biodiversity.

42 A general prediction of the neutral theory of evolution is that genetic diversity sh

43 dance patterns are seemingly well fit by the neutral theory of metacommunity assembly, we show that t

44 ual framework that establishes the classical neutral theory of molecular evolution (NTME) as the basi

45 on and evolution are not consistent with the neutral theory of molecular evolution and might be inapp

46 The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution predicts that slig

47 The neutral theory of molecular evolution predicts that the

48 The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution serves as the null

49 Under the neutral theory of molecular evolution, the expected hete

50 sites must be relaxed before abandoning the neutral theory of molecular evolution.

51 ance hypothesis for genetic variability; the neutral theory of molecular evolution.

52 heory on metabolic rate with the now-classic neutral theory of molecular evolution.

53 ion that is far higher than permitted by the neutral theory of molecular evolution.

54 From Kimura's neutral theory of protein evolution to Hubbell's neutral

55 Three areas in which the Neutral Theory plays a vital role are: interpreting rati

56 Neutral theory posits that genetic diversity will increa

57 ws that predicted by the neutral theory, the neutral theory predicts poorly the field experimental re

58 rare end of the abundance spectrum, however, neutral theory predicts the existence of approximately 5

59 tion models, the zero-sum model derived from neutral theory showed the best fit to our data.

60 e considered the dominant factor, whereas in neutral theory, stochastic forces, such as demographic n

61 ese results, when considered in light of the neutral theory, suggest fundamentally different modes of

62 ere, I introduce a strong method to test the neutral theory that combines field parameterization of t

63 of the system follows that predicted by the neutral theory, the neutral theory predicts poorly the f

64 We use neutral theory to estimate the number, relative abundanc

65 Hubbell generalized this neutral theory to explore the expected steady-state dist

66 Applying neutral theory to synonymous substitutions, we dated the

67 size, and, consistent with prediction by the neutral theory, we find evidence of strong purifying sel

68 vation consistent with a simple model of the neutral theory where most sites are either invariable or