戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ly to the surprisingly large accumulation of nilotinib.
2 e was inhibited by daily oral treatment with nilotinib.
3 letion of alpha4 sensitized leukemia cell to nilotinib.
4 hagy might be a major mechanism of action of nilotinib.
5 inically important tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib.
6 e between ABL001 and the catalytic inhibitor nilotinib.
7 ilar persistent grade 2 nonhematologic AE on nilotinib.
8 e (CHR) at baseline (n = 52) achieved CHR on nilotinib.
9 ted with dasatinib and 45 (52%) treated with nilotinib.
10 her these cells were efficiently targeted by nilotinib.
11 ter treatment failure with both imatinib and nilotinib.
12 atients after failure with both imatinib and nilotinib.
13 or dasatinib and Y253H, E255V, and T315I for nilotinib.
14 of patients remained on imatinib, and 30% on nilotinib.
15  approach with selective, early switching to nilotinib.
16 ent or to the pharmacodynamics properties of nilotinib.
17  rate of EMR failure on imatinib, but not on nilotinib.
18 iled imatinib, should one offer dasatinib or nilotinib?
19  imatinib group, n=1 [1%, after crossover to nilotinib]).
20 6), dasatinib (0.28, 0.12-0.66, p=0.004), or nilotinib (0.42, 0.20-0.89, p=0.024) predicted for bette
21 nts (21) on imatinib 400 mg once daily as on nilotinib (11 patients each on nilotinib 300 mg twice da
22 was achieved in 3 of 6 patients treated with nilotinib, 2 of 2 with imatinib, and 0 of 3 with dasatin
23 inib 200 mg daily, dasatinib 50 mg daily, or nilotinib 200 mg twice daily) for 12 months.
24 ts were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive nilotinib 300 mg twice a day, nilotinib 400 mg twice a d
25 e daily as on nilotinib (11 patients each on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily and nilotinib 400 mg twice
26 ly, and 29 [10%] with imatinib; p<0.0001 for nilotinib 300 mg twice daily vs imatinib, p=0.0004 for n
27 ce daily, and 17 with imatinib; p=0.0003 for nilotinib 300 mg twice daily vs imatinib, p=0.0089 for n
28 nilotinib than with imatinib (201 [71%] with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 187 [67%] with nilotinib 4
29 2 patients were randomly assigned to receive nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 281 to receive nilotinib 4
30 with either dose of nilotinib (33 [12%] with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 30 [11%] with nilotinib 40
31 d those in the imatinib group (74 [26%] with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 59 [21%] with nilotinib 40
32  groups than in the imatinib group (two with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, five with nilotinib 400 mg
33 % of patients were headache (eight [3%] with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, four [1%] with nilotinib 4
34 on was low (found in 3, 2, and 3 patients on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice dai
35 s, 1 of 11, 2 of 11, and 7 of 21 patients on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice dai
36                  Patients (n = 846) received nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice dai
37 s in the second year of the study (four with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, three with nilotinib 400 m
38 groups than in the imatinib group (five with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, three with nilotinib 400 m
39 ommon with imatinib than with either dose of nilotinib (33 [12%] with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 3
40 :1) to receive nilotinib 300 mg twice a day, nilotinib 400 mg twice a day, or imatinib 400 mg once a
41 0 mg twice daily or 100 mg daily (n=106), or nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (n=108).
42 nib 800 mg/day, and subsequently switched to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily for failing the same target
43 300 mg twice daily vs imatinib, p=0.0004 for nilotinib 400 mg twice daily vs imatinib).
44 300 mg twice daily vs imatinib, p=0.0089 for nilotinib 400 mg twice daily vs imatinib).
45 nts each on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily and nilotinib 400 mg twice daily).
46 nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 187 [67%] with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 124 [44%] with imatini
47 with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, five with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 17 with imatinib; p=0.
48 nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 281 to receive nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 283 to receive imatini
49  nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 59 [21%] with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 29 [10%] with imatinib
50  nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 30 [11%] with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 59 [21%] with imatinib
51  3 patients on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and imatinib, respectively
52 21 patients on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and imatinib, respectively
53 ith nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, three with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and one with imatinib).
54 ith nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, three with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and ten with imatinib).
55 nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, four [1%] with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and two [<1%] with imatini
56  846) received nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, or imatinib 400 mg once da
57 eive oral imatinib 400 mg once daily or oral nilotinib 400 mg twice daily.
58 andomly assigned patients (1:1) to switch to nilotinib 400 mg twice per day or an escalation of imati
59                                              Nilotinib (400 mg twice daily) was approved on the basis
60 er >/=2 years on imatinib were randomized to nilotinib (400 mg twice daily, n = 104) or continued ima
61  BCR-ABL(IS) >10%) on imatinib (33%) than on nilotinib (9%-11%); similarly at 6 months, 16% of patien
62 p (42%, 32-53%; difference 7.9% in favour of nilotinib; 95% CI -6.2 to 22.0, p=0.31).
63  study, we evaluated the in vivo efficacy of nilotinib, a brain penetrant c-Abl inhibitor, in the acu
64  the rate of apoptosis caused by exposure to nilotinib, a drug used therapeutically to treat Ph-posit
65                                              Nilotinib, a recently approved multitargeted tyrosine ki
66                  Treatment using imatinib or nilotinib abolished the aberrant activation of c-Abl and
67  or second-generation TKIs (ie, dasatinib or nilotinib) achieved complete cytogenetic response (58 [8
68  Responses can be achieved with dasatinib or nilotinib after failure of 2 prior tyrosine kinase inhib
69  or with Ph(+) ALL treated with dasatinib or nilotinib after imatinib failure.
70 after imatinib/nilotinib failure and 14 with nilotinib after imatinib/dasatinib failure.
71 ng enhanced the growth-inhibitory effects of nilotinib against 32D/T315I-Bcr-Abl1-derived mouse allog
72 ematologic imatinib intolerance discontinued nilotinib, all because of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia.
73 resence of imatinib mesylate, dasatinib, and nilotinib, alone and in dual combinations.
74  inhibition using the alternative inhibitor, nilotinib, also resulted in cell death.
75  Therapy with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors nilotinib (AMN107) and dasatinib (BMS-354825) has produc
76 Preclinical in vitro studies have shown that nilotinib (AMN107), a new BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibi
77                       The BCR-ABL inhibitor, nilotinib (AMN107), is significantly more potent against
78 bitor of BCR-ABL and Src family kinases) and nilotinib (AMN107, a selective BCR-ABL inhibitor), may p
79                                              Nilotinib, an orally bioavailable, selective Bcr-Abl tyr
80 ts were enrolled; of whom 324 were allocated nilotinib and 320 were allocated imatinib.
81  unacceptable side effects from dasatinib or nilotinib and 70% of patients with the T315I mutation),
82        96 patients were randomly assigned to nilotinib and 95 patients were randomly assigned to imat
83 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including nilotinib and bosutinib and showed that they reduce the
84 ited high levels of endogenous TDP-43, while nilotinib and bosutinib did not alter TDP-43, underscori
85                   The second-line inhibitors nilotinib and dasatinib are effective in patients with i
86 proved ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) nilotinib and dasatinib, along with investigational TKIs
87 -ABL KD mutant at relevant concentrations of nilotinib and dasatinib, consistent with a central role
88       However, in primary CD34(+) CML cells, nilotinib and IM were equipotent for inhibition of BcrAb
89 = .108) and 22.1% vs 8.7% of patients in the nilotinib and imatinib arms, respectively (P = .0087).
90 s 20.8% and 29.2% vs 3.6% of patients in the nilotinib and imatinib arms, respectively.
91 ts in reversal of the suppressive effects of nilotinib and imatinib mesylate on leukemic progenitor c
92  clinically used tyrosine kinase inhibitors, nilotinib and osimertinib.
93    Recent reports of cardiovascular AEs with nilotinib and particularly ponatinib and of pulmonary ar
94                               The effects of nilotinib and PKC412, alone and combined, were investiga
95 persisted and accumulated over 72 hours with nilotinib and remained caspase-3 negative.
96 imatinib (or the chemically related compound nilotinib) and responded; however, selection for compoun
97 atients, 271 received imatinib, 105 received nilotinib, and 107 received dasatinib.
98 ts on imatinib, or second-line dasatinib and nilotinib, and 24 controls.
99 ve percent of patients on bosutinib, 100% on nilotinib, and 33% on imatinib had normal platelet aggre
100  of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib on B. malayi adult males, adult
101 15I) mutant is highly resistant to imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib, and is frequently detected in
102 ) for front-line treatment of CML: imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib.
103 BL mutation mediates resistance to imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib.
104 mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, abatacept, nilotinib, and fresolimumab.
105                       The effects of PKC412, nilotinib, and imatinib, alone and in combination, were
106  of 3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, PKC412 and nilotinib, and imatinib, on 2 GIST-related PDGFRA mutant
107        Conclusions and Relevance: Dasatinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib increase vascular occlusive eve
108 eractions of bosutinib, dasatinib, imatinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib with recombinant hNTs (hENT1, 2
109 irdine, etravirine, felodipine, nicardipine, nilotinib, and sorafenib) or low micromolar range (abira
110 ivity of group 2 ATRT cells to dasatinib and nilotinib, and suggest that these are promising therapie
111 her arterial disorders in patients receiving nilotinib, and venous and arterial vascular occlusive ev
112       A similar risk was also suspected with nilotinib, another BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TK
113 clinical benefits observed with switching to nilotinib are associated with improved long-term surviva
114 the second-line Abl inhibitors dasatinib and nilotinib are faring in the treatment of imatinib-resist
115                                Dasatinib and nilotinib are potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) w
116           BMS-354825 (dasatinib) and AMN107 (nilotinib) are potent alternate Abl inhibitors with acti
117                            No patient in the nilotinib arm lost CCyR, vs 3 in the imatinib arm.
118       Adverse events were more common in the nilotinib arm, as expected with the introduction of a ne
119 ents in the imatinib arm vs 3% and 7% in the nilotinib arms had EMR failure.
120  with EMR and found distinct patterns in the nilotinib arms vs the imatinib arm.
121                        These results support nilotinib as a first-line treatment option for patients
122             The data also support the use of nilotinib as a treatment option for V561D-PDGFRA-associa
123 y Hh pathway inhibition, in combination with nilotinib, as a potentially effective therapeutic strate
124 nsplant donor, should one offer dasatinib or nilotinib before recommending a transplantation?
125 f the ABCG2 inhibitors Ko143, gefitinib, and nilotinib, but not an ABCB1 inhibitor.
126 the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, imatinib and nilotinib, by BAG956 was demonstrated against BCR-ABL ex
127          Phase 1/2 clinical trials show that nilotinib can induce remissions in patients who have pre
128 -generation inhibitors such as dasatinib and nilotinib can overcome the majority of these mutations b
129                                              Nilotinib cannot be recommended for broad use to treat f
130                                              Nilotinib continues to show better efficacy than imatini
131 identify patient subsets for whom first-line nilotinib could be of clinical benefit.
132 nts at diagnosis (n = 21), on TKI (imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib) before achieving major molecular r
133  The second generation of Bcr-Abl inhibitors nilotinib, dasatinib, and bosutinib developed to overrid
134 ular responses by the second-generation TKIs nilotinib, dasatinib, and bosutinib.
135  of clinically important ABL TKIs (imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, ponatinib, and DCC-2036), we inter
136 s and confer varying resistance to imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, ponatinib, rebastinib, and bosutin
137  inferior responses previously observed with nilotinib/dasatinib therapy for imatinib-resistant patie
138                                              Nilotinib decreased soluble and insoluble TDP-43, while
139 inistration of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib decreases Abl activity and ameliorates autopha
140                                              Nilotinib did not induce cellular apoptosis.
141 rt 2 patients failing any target switched to nilotinib directly, as did patients with intolerance or
142  receiving dasatinib, and 27 (25%) receiving nilotinib discontinued treatment for any reason.
143                            Both imatinib and nilotinib displayed potent activity in vitro against the
144 inase activity with the c-Abl/Arg inhibitor, nilotinib, dramatically inhibits metastasis in a mouse m
145  developed resistance against vincristine or nilotinib, drugs with distinct cytotoxic mechanisms.
146 ntinued imatinib (n = 103) in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in clinical Trials-Complet
147  based on 4 years of follow up in Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials-Newly D
148          We present data from the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in clinical Trials-newly d
149                     In summary, switching to nilotinib enabled more patients with chronic myeloid leu
150 es in alpha-synuclein expressing brains, but nilotinib enhances protein deposition into the lysosomes
151 ed targeted therapies - imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, erlotinib, sunitinib, lapatinib, bortezomib,
152 ith 3 TKIs: 34 with dasatinib after imatinib/nilotinib failure and 14 with nilotinib after imatinib/d
153  in 2006 and 2007, approval of dasatinib and nilotinib followed for use in imatinib-resistant or into
154 sequential treatment with both dasatinib and nilotinib for a total of 146 instances.
155 2 microM for dasatinib, and 81.35 microM for nilotinib; for L3 larvae, 11.27 microM, 13.64 microM, an
156 ths was achieved by 48 of 96 patients in the nilotinib group (50%, 95.18% CI 40-61) and 40 of 95 in t
157 group (59.2% [95% CI 50.9-66.5]) than in the nilotinib group (51.6% [43.0-59.5]; hazard ratio 1.47 [9
158 er crossover, 48 (50%) of 96 patients in the nilotinib group and 34 (36%) of 95 patients in the imati
159        Seven (7%) of 96 patients died in the nilotinib group and five (5%) of 93 patients died in the
160 e reported in 11 (11%) of 96 patients in the nilotinib group and nine (10%) of 93 patients in the ima
161 d elevated lipase level (15; 5%), and in the nilotinib group were anaemia (18; 6%), elevated lipase l
162 1 [4%] in the imatinib group, 14 [4%] in the nilotinib group).
163 tinib group, n=1 [1%]), and QT prolongation (nilotinib group, n=1 [1%]; imatinib group, n=1 [1%, afte
164 matinib group, n=1 [1%]), blast cell crisis (nilotinib group, n=1 [1%]; imatinib group, n=1 [1%]), an
165 ring in more than one patient were headache (nilotinib group, n=2 [2%, including 1 after crossover to
166           Significantly more patients in the nilotinib groups achieved a complete molecular response
167  CML-related deaths had occurred in both the nilotinib groups than in the imatinib group (five with n
168 reatment, including clonal evolution, in the nilotinib groups than in the imatinib group (two with ni
169 BL1 (IS) of > 1% to </= 10% at 3 months with nilotinib had higher cumulative incidence of CCyR by 24
170                                              Nilotinib has a relatively favorable safety profile and
171                                              Nilotinib has shown greater efficacy than imatinib in pa
172                                              Nilotinib has significant efficacy in patients with newl
173                                Dasatinib and nilotinib have proven to be highly effective alternate a
174  of phase I and II trials with dasatinib and nilotinib have provided promising data that may reduce d
175 argeted therapies (e.g. imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib) have been developed to treat Chronic Myeloid
176 t in CML SPCs and endorse the current use of nilotinib in combination with RUX in clinical trials to
177 gated the occurrence of cross-intolerance to nilotinib in imatinib-intolerant patients with CML.
178                The favorable tolerability of nilotinib in patients with imatinib intolerance leads to
179  is known about immune-modulatory effects of nilotinib in vivo, potentially predicting response to th
180 e identified with imatinib mesylate, 10 with nilotinib (including only 1 novel mutation, E292V) and 9
181                    Importantly, imatinib and nilotinib increased tyrosine phosphorylation of p130Cas,
182                                              Nilotinib induced a major cytogenetic response in 66% an
183 ciated protein 1 light chain 3 revealed that nilotinib induced autophagy in a dose- and time-dependen
184 ients on TKI or with imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib induced significant and dose-dependent inhibit
185                       Our data indicate that nilotinib-induced AMPK activation is mediated by PP2A, a
186       Up-regulating PP2A activity suppressed nilotinib-induced AMPK phosphorylation and autophagy, su
187 dephosphorylation, and enhanced imatinib- or nilotinib-induced growth inhibition in primary CD34(+) m
188                                 Imatinib and nilotinib-induced tyrosine phosphorylation was dependent
189            Together, our results reveal that nilotinib induces autophagy, but not apoptosis in HCC, a
190  Moreover TNF-alpha inhibition combined with nilotinib induces significantly more apoptosis relative
191 dividually in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nilotinib inhibited hENT1-mediated uridine transport mos
192         Preventive therapy using imatinib or nilotinib inhibited the development of sclerodermatous c
193 nhibitor, used alone and in combination with nilotinib, inhibited the Hh pathway in CD34(+) CP-CML ce
194                                              Nilotinib inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity of ABL1/
195 uantification of two TKI drugs (imatinib and nilotinib) inside living cells using hyperspectral stimu
196                                              Nilotinib is a potent selective inhibitor of the BCR-ABL
197                                              Nilotinib is an effective option for the initial managem
198                                              Nilotinib is an orally available receptor tyrosine kinas
199 med that, like IM, the predominant effect of nilotinib is antiproliferative rather than proapoptotic.
200 agnosed CML and those resistant to imatinib, nilotinib is effective and well-tolerated for long-term
201                    This study indicates that nilotinib is effective, with a manageable safety profile
202                                  In summary, nilotinib is highly active and safe in patients with CML
203 rget kinase, the combination of imatinib and nilotinib is highly efficacious in these models, indicat
204                                              Nilotinib is used for adult leukemia treatment and it en
205 rapy with imatinib (IM), dasatinib (DAS), or nilotinib is very effective in chronic-phase chronic mye
206 mice; however, the combination of ABL001 and nilotinib led to complete disease control and eradicated
207                                     Overall, nilotinib led to fewer treatment-emergent BCR-ABL mutati
208  of 104 for dasatinib vs 99 [93%] of 107 for nilotinib), major molecular response (51 [76%] vs 171 [8
209                      These data suggest that nilotinib may be a therapeutic strategy to degrade alpha
210 ts in metastatic melanoma, and indicate that nilotinib may be useful in preventing metastasis in pati
211 MP2 suggesting that the protective effect of nilotinib may, in part, be parkin-independent or to the
212 842V-PDGFRA probably limits the potential of nilotinib monotherapy for D842V-PDGFRA-associated GIST.
213 alyzed the outcome of 113 patients receiving nilotinib (n = 43) or dasatinib (n = 70) after imatinib
214 ), bosutinib (n = 32), imatinib (n = 19), or nilotinib (n = 9).
215 he ENEST1st clinical study, investigating 52 nilotinib-naive patients with chronic-phase CML.
216 34(+) cells, and in combination with the TKI nilotinib (NIL) significantly enhanced inhibition of pro
217  suggesting that PP2A mediates the effect of nilotinib on AMPK phosphorylation and autophagy.
218        This study investigated the effect of nilotinib on HCC.
219  We investigated the effects of imatinib and nilotinib on human NK cells, monocytes, and macrophages.
220 farction was higher in patients treated with nilotinib or dasatinib (29 and 19 per 1000 person-years,
221 (160 nmol/L) in dual combination with either nilotinib or dasatinib achieved the same zero outgrowth
222 c significance for subsequent treatment with nilotinib or dasatinib as second-line therapy.
223           Equal numbers of patients received nilotinib or dasatinib following imatinib, and 18 receiv
224    Phase III studies comparing imatinib with nilotinib or dasatinib in newly diagnosed CML were publi
225                        Combining SGX393 with nilotinib or dasatinib preempted emergence of resistant
226  and F359V/C) predict failure of second-line nilotinib or dasatinib therapy in patients with chronic
227 matinib-resistant patients before they began nilotinib or dasatinib therapy.
228 eloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with nilotinib or imatinib based on 4 years of follow up in E
229  small molecule inhibitors such as imatinib, nilotinib or sunitinib can result in clinical, radiologi
230  unacceptable side effects from dasatinib or nilotinib or who had the BCR-ABL T315I mutation.
231 th dasatinib (OR, 3.86; 95% CI, 1.33-11.18), nilotinib (OR, 3.42; 95% CI, 2.07-5.63), and ponatinib (
232 atients who received 400 or 800 mg imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib were analyzed.
233  We recommend as initial treatment imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib.
234 cute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to receive nilotinib orally at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 400
235 (imatinib 800 mg p=0.029, dasatinib p=0.003, nilotinib p=0.031).
236 18 (imatinib mesylate) and -0.042 +/- 0.015 (nilotinib) per day represents the turnover rate of leuke
237  (imatinib mesylate) and -0.0019 +/- 0.0013 (nilotinib) per day represents the turnover rate of leuke
238         Pharmacological inhibition of ZAK by nilotinib, preventing ZAK-autophosphorylation and thereb
239                      When combined, LDE225 + nilotinib reduced CD34(+) CP-CML cell engraftment in NSG
240 pecific and potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib, reduced the activity of the JAK2/STAT5 pathwa
241      Our results show that administration of nilotinib reduces c-Abl activation and the levels of the
242  leukemia in chronic phase from the phase II nilotinib registration study with available postbaseline
243 nase inhibitors (TKIs) imatinib mesylate and nilotinib represents a successful application of molecul
244 ncluding those associated with dasatinib and nilotinib resistance, except T315I.
245            We developed an in vitro model of Nilotinib-resistant Ph+ leukemia cells to investigate wh
246 g or the second-generation TKIs dasatinib or nilotinib resulted in superior and deeper responses than
247 riety of BCR-ABL+ cell lines to imatinib and nilotinib results in additive or synergistic cytotoxicit
248 atinib treatment were imatinib-resistant and nilotinib-sensitive.
249 hen combined with either imatinib or PKC412, nilotinib showed no evidence for antagonism and acted in
250 mozide and the kinase inhibitors imatinib or nilotinib shows enhanced effects in inhibiting STAT5 pho
251  activity both strongly reduced imatinib and nilotinib stimulated invasion.
252 nts treated with a novel sequential imatinib/nilotinib strategy aimed at achievement of optimal molec
253  with imatinib and the closely-related drug, nilotinib, strikingly increases tyrosine phosphorylation
254 h the ATP-competitive inhibitors imatinib or nilotinib, suppressed the emergence of resistance mutati
255 e.g., E255K, M351T) or to IM, dasatinib, and nilotinib (T315I) remained fully sensitive to sorafenib.
256 patients had a major molecular response with nilotinib than with imatinib (201 [71%] with nilotinib 3
257 ic and molecular responses with switching to nilotinib than with imatinib dose escalation, although t
258                                              Nilotinib therapy may induce perifollicular inflammation
259                      Augmentation of LDR and Nilotinib therapy seems to be beneficial to control Ph+
260 ly reduced in mice that received imatinib or nilotinib therapy, but not in mice that received prednis
261                            At month 6 during nilotinib therapy, CD62L expression returned to levels o
262 ML and a patient cohort receiving first-line nilotinib therapy, we found that successful long-term th
263 lp and body hair within weeks after starting nilotinib therapy.
264 were strongly associated with EMR failure in nilotinib-treated, but not imatinib-treated, patients.
265 eterized by cell viability experiments under Nilotinib treatment and LDR, to explain the cellular res
266                                 Imatinib and nilotinib treatment increased two dimensional cell migra
267                     Imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib treatment of scleroderma and normal fibroblast
268 hatase PP2A inactivation were detected after nilotinib treatment.
269       Of 321 patients, 124 (39%) continue on nilotinib treatment.
270 diagnosis and significantly decreased during nilotinib treatment.
271                                    Moreover, nilotinib up-regulated the phosphryaltion of AMP-activat
272  designed to test the efficacy and safety of nilotinib versus imatinib as first-line therapy for pati
273 gate the safety and efficacy of switching to nilotinib vs imatinib dose escalation for patients with
274 K562, the inhibitory concentration (IC50) of nilotinib was 30 nM versus 600 nM for IM, consistent wit
275     In this phase 2 open-label study, 400 mg nilotinib was administered orally twice daily to 280 pat
276                        The safety profile of nilotinib was consistent with other reported studies.
277                                              Nilotinib was effective in patients harboring BCR-ABL mu
278 cular response and longer-term outcomes with nilotinib was examined.
279                        Of note, imatinib and nilotinib were also effective for treatment of experimen
280 eiving first-line or subsequent dasatinib or nilotinib who stopped therapy after at least 3 years of
281                    However, a combination of nilotinib with an allosteric type IV inhibitor was recen
282                                 Furthermore, nilotinib with IM led to further accumulation of this po
283  to evaluate clofarabine with bortezomib and nilotinib with paclitaxel in patients with advanced canc
284 d with imatinib followed by dasatinib and/or nilotinib, with a median follow-up of 28.5 months.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top