コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ly to the surprisingly large accumulation of nilotinib.
2 e was inhibited by daily oral treatment with nilotinib.
3 letion of alpha4 sensitized leukemia cell to nilotinib.
4 hagy might be a major mechanism of action of nilotinib.
5 inically important tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib.
6 e between ABL001 and the catalytic inhibitor nilotinib.
7 ilar persistent grade 2 nonhematologic AE on nilotinib.
8 e (CHR) at baseline (n = 52) achieved CHR on nilotinib.
9 ted with dasatinib and 45 (52%) treated with nilotinib.
10 her these cells were efficiently targeted by nilotinib.
11 ter treatment failure with both imatinib and nilotinib.
12 atients after failure with both imatinib and nilotinib.
13 or dasatinib and Y253H, E255V, and T315I for nilotinib.
14 of patients remained on imatinib, and 30% on nilotinib.
15 approach with selective, early switching to nilotinib.
16 ent or to the pharmacodynamics properties of nilotinib.
17 rate of EMR failure on imatinib, but not on nilotinib.
18 iled imatinib, should one offer dasatinib or nilotinib?
19 imatinib group, n=1 [1%, after crossover to nilotinib]).
20 6), dasatinib (0.28, 0.12-0.66, p=0.004), or nilotinib (0.42, 0.20-0.89, p=0.024) predicted for bette
21 nts (21) on imatinib 400 mg once daily as on nilotinib (11 patients each on nilotinib 300 mg twice da
22 was achieved in 3 of 6 patients treated with nilotinib, 2 of 2 with imatinib, and 0 of 3 with dasatin
24 ts were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive nilotinib 300 mg twice a day, nilotinib 400 mg twice a d
25 e daily as on nilotinib (11 patients each on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily and nilotinib 400 mg twice
26 ly, and 29 [10%] with imatinib; p<0.0001 for nilotinib 300 mg twice daily vs imatinib, p=0.0004 for n
27 ce daily, and 17 with imatinib; p=0.0003 for nilotinib 300 mg twice daily vs imatinib, p=0.0089 for n
28 nilotinib than with imatinib (201 [71%] with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 187 [67%] with nilotinib 4
29 2 patients were randomly assigned to receive nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 281 to receive nilotinib 4
30 with either dose of nilotinib (33 [12%] with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 30 [11%] with nilotinib 40
31 d those in the imatinib group (74 [26%] with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 59 [21%] with nilotinib 40
32 groups than in the imatinib group (two with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, five with nilotinib 400 mg
33 % of patients were headache (eight [3%] with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, four [1%] with nilotinib 4
34 on was low (found in 3, 2, and 3 patients on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice dai
35 s, 1 of 11, 2 of 11, and 7 of 21 patients on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice dai
37 s in the second year of the study (four with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, three with nilotinib 400 m
38 groups than in the imatinib group (five with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, three with nilotinib 400 m
39 ommon with imatinib than with either dose of nilotinib (33 [12%] with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 3
40 :1) to receive nilotinib 300 mg twice a day, nilotinib 400 mg twice a day, or imatinib 400 mg once a
42 nib 800 mg/day, and subsequently switched to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily for failing the same target
46 nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 187 [67%] with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 124 [44%] with imatini
47 with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, five with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 17 with imatinib; p=0.
48 nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 281 to receive nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 283 to receive imatini
49 nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 59 [21%] with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 29 [10%] with imatinib
50 nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 30 [11%] with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 59 [21%] with imatinib
51 3 patients on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and imatinib, respectively
52 21 patients on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and imatinib, respectively
53 ith nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, three with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and one with imatinib).
54 ith nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, three with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and ten with imatinib).
55 nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, four [1%] with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and two [<1%] with imatini
56 846) received nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, or imatinib 400 mg once da
58 andomly assigned patients (1:1) to switch to nilotinib 400 mg twice per day or an escalation of imati
60 er >/=2 years on imatinib were randomized to nilotinib (400 mg twice daily, n = 104) or continued ima
61 BCR-ABL(IS) >10%) on imatinib (33%) than on nilotinib (9%-11%); similarly at 6 months, 16% of patien
63 study, we evaluated the in vivo efficacy of nilotinib, a brain penetrant c-Abl inhibitor, in the acu
64 the rate of apoptosis caused by exposure to nilotinib, a drug used therapeutically to treat Ph-posit
67 or second-generation TKIs (ie, dasatinib or nilotinib) achieved complete cytogenetic response (58 [8
68 Responses can be achieved with dasatinib or nilotinib after failure of 2 prior tyrosine kinase inhib
71 ng enhanced the growth-inhibitory effects of nilotinib against 32D/T315I-Bcr-Abl1-derived mouse allog
72 ematologic imatinib intolerance discontinued nilotinib, all because of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia.
75 Therapy with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors nilotinib (AMN107) and dasatinib (BMS-354825) has produc
76 Preclinical in vitro studies have shown that nilotinib (AMN107), a new BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibi
78 bitor of BCR-ABL and Src family kinases) and nilotinib (AMN107, a selective BCR-ABL inhibitor), may p
81 unacceptable side effects from dasatinib or nilotinib and 70% of patients with the T315I mutation),
83 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including nilotinib and bosutinib and showed that they reduce the
84 ited high levels of endogenous TDP-43, while nilotinib and bosutinib did not alter TDP-43, underscori
86 proved ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) nilotinib and dasatinib, along with investigational TKIs
87 -ABL KD mutant at relevant concentrations of nilotinib and dasatinib, consistent with a central role
89 = .108) and 22.1% vs 8.7% of patients in the nilotinib and imatinib arms, respectively (P = .0087).
91 ts in reversal of the suppressive effects of nilotinib and imatinib mesylate on leukemic progenitor c
93 Recent reports of cardiovascular AEs with nilotinib and particularly ponatinib and of pulmonary ar
96 imatinib (or the chemically related compound nilotinib) and responded; however, selection for compoun
99 ve percent of patients on bosutinib, 100% on nilotinib, and 33% on imatinib had normal platelet aggre
100 of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib on B. malayi adult males, adult
101 15I) mutant is highly resistant to imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib, and is frequently detected in
106 of 3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, PKC412 and nilotinib, and imatinib, on 2 GIST-related PDGFRA mutant
108 eractions of bosutinib, dasatinib, imatinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib with recombinant hNTs (hENT1, 2
109 irdine, etravirine, felodipine, nicardipine, nilotinib, and sorafenib) or low micromolar range (abira
110 ivity of group 2 ATRT cells to dasatinib and nilotinib, and suggest that these are promising therapie
111 her arterial disorders in patients receiving nilotinib, and venous and arterial vascular occlusive ev
113 clinical benefits observed with switching to nilotinib are associated with improved long-term surviva
114 the second-line Abl inhibitors dasatinib and nilotinib are faring in the treatment of imatinib-resist
123 y Hh pathway inhibition, in combination with nilotinib, as a potentially effective therapeutic strate
126 the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, imatinib and nilotinib, by BAG956 was demonstrated against BCR-ABL ex
128 -generation inhibitors such as dasatinib and nilotinib can overcome the majority of these mutations b
132 nts at diagnosis (n = 21), on TKI (imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib) before achieving major molecular r
133 The second generation of Bcr-Abl inhibitors nilotinib, dasatinib, and bosutinib developed to overrid
135 of clinically important ABL TKIs (imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, ponatinib, and DCC-2036), we inter
136 s and confer varying resistance to imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, ponatinib, rebastinib, and bosutin
137 inferior responses previously observed with nilotinib/dasatinib therapy for imatinib-resistant patie
139 inistration of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib decreases Abl activity and ameliorates autopha
141 rt 2 patients failing any target switched to nilotinib directly, as did patients with intolerance or
144 inase activity with the c-Abl/Arg inhibitor, nilotinib, dramatically inhibits metastasis in a mouse m
145 developed resistance against vincristine or nilotinib, drugs with distinct cytotoxic mechanisms.
146 ntinued imatinib (n = 103) in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in clinical Trials-Complet
147 based on 4 years of follow up in Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials-Newly D
150 es in alpha-synuclein expressing brains, but nilotinib enhances protein deposition into the lysosomes
151 ed targeted therapies - imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, erlotinib, sunitinib, lapatinib, bortezomib,
152 ith 3 TKIs: 34 with dasatinib after imatinib/nilotinib failure and 14 with nilotinib after imatinib/d
153 in 2006 and 2007, approval of dasatinib and nilotinib followed for use in imatinib-resistant or into
155 2 microM for dasatinib, and 81.35 microM for nilotinib; for L3 larvae, 11.27 microM, 13.64 microM, an
156 ths was achieved by 48 of 96 patients in the nilotinib group (50%, 95.18% CI 40-61) and 40 of 95 in t
157 group (59.2% [95% CI 50.9-66.5]) than in the nilotinib group (51.6% [43.0-59.5]; hazard ratio 1.47 [9
158 er crossover, 48 (50%) of 96 patients in the nilotinib group and 34 (36%) of 95 patients in the imati
160 e reported in 11 (11%) of 96 patients in the nilotinib group and nine (10%) of 93 patients in the ima
161 d elevated lipase level (15; 5%), and in the nilotinib group were anaemia (18; 6%), elevated lipase l
163 tinib group, n=1 [1%]), and QT prolongation (nilotinib group, n=1 [1%]; imatinib group, n=1 [1%, afte
164 matinib group, n=1 [1%]), blast cell crisis (nilotinib group, n=1 [1%]; imatinib group, n=1 [1%]), an
165 ring in more than one patient were headache (nilotinib group, n=2 [2%, including 1 after crossover to
167 CML-related deaths had occurred in both the nilotinib groups than in the imatinib group (five with n
168 reatment, including clonal evolution, in the nilotinib groups than in the imatinib group (two with ni
169 BL1 (IS) of > 1% to </= 10% at 3 months with nilotinib had higher cumulative incidence of CCyR by 24
174 of phase I and II trials with dasatinib and nilotinib have provided promising data that may reduce d
175 argeted therapies (e.g. imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib) have been developed to treat Chronic Myeloid
176 t in CML SPCs and endorse the current use of nilotinib in combination with RUX in clinical trials to
177 gated the occurrence of cross-intolerance to nilotinib in imatinib-intolerant patients with CML.
179 is known about immune-modulatory effects of nilotinib in vivo, potentially predicting response to th
180 e identified with imatinib mesylate, 10 with nilotinib (including only 1 novel mutation, E292V) and 9
183 ciated protein 1 light chain 3 revealed that nilotinib induced autophagy in a dose- and time-dependen
184 ients on TKI or with imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib induced significant and dose-dependent inhibit
187 dephosphorylation, and enhanced imatinib- or nilotinib-induced growth inhibition in primary CD34(+) m
190 Moreover TNF-alpha inhibition combined with nilotinib induces significantly more apoptosis relative
191 dividually in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nilotinib inhibited hENT1-mediated uridine transport mos
193 nhibitor, used alone and in combination with nilotinib, inhibited the Hh pathway in CD34(+) CP-CML ce
195 uantification of two TKI drugs (imatinib and nilotinib) inside living cells using hyperspectral stimu
199 med that, like IM, the predominant effect of nilotinib is antiproliferative rather than proapoptotic.
200 agnosed CML and those resistant to imatinib, nilotinib is effective and well-tolerated for long-term
203 rget kinase, the combination of imatinib and nilotinib is highly efficacious in these models, indicat
205 rapy with imatinib (IM), dasatinib (DAS), or nilotinib is very effective in chronic-phase chronic mye
206 mice; however, the combination of ABL001 and nilotinib led to complete disease control and eradicated
208 of 104 for dasatinib vs 99 [93%] of 107 for nilotinib), major molecular response (51 [76%] vs 171 [8
210 ts in metastatic melanoma, and indicate that nilotinib may be useful in preventing metastasis in pati
211 MP2 suggesting that the protective effect of nilotinib may, in part, be parkin-independent or to the
212 842V-PDGFRA probably limits the potential of nilotinib monotherapy for D842V-PDGFRA-associated GIST.
213 alyzed the outcome of 113 patients receiving nilotinib (n = 43) or dasatinib (n = 70) after imatinib
216 34(+) cells, and in combination with the TKI nilotinib (NIL) significantly enhanced inhibition of pro
219 We investigated the effects of imatinib and nilotinib on human NK cells, monocytes, and macrophages.
220 farction was higher in patients treated with nilotinib or dasatinib (29 and 19 per 1000 person-years,
221 (160 nmol/L) in dual combination with either nilotinib or dasatinib achieved the same zero outgrowth
224 Phase III studies comparing imatinib with nilotinib or dasatinib in newly diagnosed CML were publi
226 and F359V/C) predict failure of second-line nilotinib or dasatinib therapy in patients with chronic
228 eloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with nilotinib or imatinib based on 4 years of follow up in E
229 small molecule inhibitors such as imatinib, nilotinib or sunitinib can result in clinical, radiologi
231 th dasatinib (OR, 3.86; 95% CI, 1.33-11.18), nilotinib (OR, 3.42; 95% CI, 2.07-5.63), and ponatinib (
234 cute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to receive nilotinib orally at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 400
236 18 (imatinib mesylate) and -0.042 +/- 0.015 (nilotinib) per day represents the turnover rate of leuke
237 (imatinib mesylate) and -0.0019 +/- 0.0013 (nilotinib) per day represents the turnover rate of leuke
240 pecific and potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib, reduced the activity of the JAK2/STAT5 pathwa
241 Our results show that administration of nilotinib reduces c-Abl activation and the levels of the
242 leukemia in chronic phase from the phase II nilotinib registration study with available postbaseline
243 nase inhibitors (TKIs) imatinib mesylate and nilotinib represents a successful application of molecul
246 g or the second-generation TKIs dasatinib or nilotinib resulted in superior and deeper responses than
247 riety of BCR-ABL+ cell lines to imatinib and nilotinib results in additive or synergistic cytotoxicit
249 hen combined with either imatinib or PKC412, nilotinib showed no evidence for antagonism and acted in
250 mozide and the kinase inhibitors imatinib or nilotinib shows enhanced effects in inhibiting STAT5 pho
252 nts treated with a novel sequential imatinib/nilotinib strategy aimed at achievement of optimal molec
253 with imatinib and the closely-related drug, nilotinib, strikingly increases tyrosine phosphorylation
254 h the ATP-competitive inhibitors imatinib or nilotinib, suppressed the emergence of resistance mutati
255 e.g., E255K, M351T) or to IM, dasatinib, and nilotinib (T315I) remained fully sensitive to sorafenib.
256 patients had a major molecular response with nilotinib than with imatinib (201 [71%] with nilotinib 3
257 ic and molecular responses with switching to nilotinib than with imatinib dose escalation, although t
260 ly reduced in mice that received imatinib or nilotinib therapy, but not in mice that received prednis
262 ML and a patient cohort receiving first-line nilotinib therapy, we found that successful long-term th
264 were strongly associated with EMR failure in nilotinib-treated, but not imatinib-treated, patients.
265 eterized by cell viability experiments under Nilotinib treatment and LDR, to explain the cellular res
272 designed to test the efficacy and safety of nilotinib versus imatinib as first-line therapy for pati
273 gate the safety and efficacy of switching to nilotinib vs imatinib dose escalation for patients with
274 K562, the inhibitory concentration (IC50) of nilotinib was 30 nM versus 600 nM for IM, consistent wit
275 In this phase 2 open-label study, 400 mg nilotinib was administered orally twice daily to 280 pat
280 eiving first-line or subsequent dasatinib or nilotinib who stopped therapy after at least 3 years of
283 to evaluate clofarabine with bortezomib and nilotinib with paclitaxel in patients with advanced canc
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。