1 ification of potential sources of pathologic nipple discharge.

2 identify both benign and malignant causes of nipple discharge.

3 enign versus malignant sources of pathologic nipple discharge.

4 y was performed in women who had problematic nipple discharge.

5 ciated findings such as microcalcifications, nipple discharge, and interval change were evaluated.

6 ears to have been therapeutic as well, since nipple discharge ceased after the procedure.

7                       Data including type of nipple discharge, future biopsy, and pathology reports w

8 56 patients who underwent CDR for pathologic nipple discharge greater than 15 years previous were rev

9                           CDR for pathologic nipple discharge is an effective way to diagnose and tre

10 ersion or retraction (n = 4), and associated nipple discharge (n = 2).

11               Patients found with pathologic nipple discharge present a diagnostic dilemma to surgeon

12 nely used to evaluate women with spontaneous nipple discharge (SND), but definitive diagnosis is usua

13 ary 1992 and December 1998, 23 patients with nipple discharge underwent contrast material-enhanced MR

14                                              Nipple discharge was not present.

15 fective way to diagnose and treat pathologic nipple discharge without missing underlying cancers.