ライフサイエンスコーパス: nodulation

1 rs independent of the LjLhk1 receptor during nodulation.

2 in cortical cells during the early stages of nodulation.

3 rotein complex are involved in regulation of nodulation.

4 of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis and nodulation.

5 sential signal molecules that trigger legume nodulation.

6 the presence of an additional signal during nodulation.

7 aluate the role of G-protein subunits during nodulation.

8 red for years to be specifically involved in nodulation.

9 view of transcriptional reprogramming during nodulation.

10 ck loop involving auxin and cytokinin during nodulation.

11 d infection thread development during legume nodulation.

12 rotransposon in the bHLH gene led to reduced nodulation.

13 ecause Micromonospora itself does not induce nodulation.

14 s, appear to play essential roles in soybean nodulation.

15 ve epidermal infection events uncoupled from nodulation.

16 he importance of GS52 enzymatic activity for nodulation.

17 also required for rhizobial colonization and nodulation.

18 des, is critical for rhizobial infection and nodulation.

19 ecially traits associated with symbiosis and nodulation.

20 signal to shoot tissues to suppress further nodulation.

21 state and affects the growth parameters and nodulation.

22 uggest a role for CND in controlling soybean nodulation.

23 ar adenosine diphosphate is important during nodulation.

24 ght act as auxin transport regulators during nodulation.

25 ing flavonoid compounds are also critical to nodulation.

26 whereas flavone-deficient roots had reduced nodulation.

27 f S. meliloti nod genes, completely restored nodulation.

28 itical role for the GS52 ecto-apyrase during nodulation.

29 he level of rhizobial infection and enhanced nodulation.

30 P2 DNA binding domain, that is necessary for nodulation.

31 roduced factors are essential for successful nodulation.

32 modulate auxin transport is not essential to nodulation.

33 hibit indeterminate but not determinate-type nodulation.

34 ction of genistein was sufficient to support nodulation.

35 te plants, these plants had severely reduced nodulation.

36 owing that these compounds are essential for nodulation.

37 dzein or genistein, failed to restore normal nodulation.

38 s could be blocked at multiple points during nodulation.

39 important role for this group of enzymes in nodulation.

40 X/LAX family of auxin influx transporters in nodulation.

41 ides are also involved in controlling legume nodulation.

42 in acclimation to nutrient deficiencies and nodulation.

43 ine the precise stage at which SLs influence nodulation.

44 uding the CRE1 receptor essential to promote nodulation.

45 aintenance of rhizobial endosymbiosis during nodulation.

46 led to increased NF induction of ENOD11 and nodulation.

47 positive and negative roles in M. truncatula nodulation.

48 cesses, and for comparative analysis of stem nodulation.

49 ers involved in vascular differentiation and nodulation.

50 encode key transcription factors involved in nodulation.

51 creased sensitivity to nitrate inhibition of nodulation.

52 MtDELLA1 can bind the ERN1 (ERF required for nodulation 1) promoter and positively transactivate its

53 (for Ethylene Responsive factor required for Nodulation), a direct target gene of MtNF-YA1 and MtNF-Y

54 -induced gene expression and for spontaneous nodulation activated by the calcium- and calmodulin-depe

55 lls in three different development stages of nodulation after rhizobium infection.

56 dvances in cloning of the genes required for nodulation and AM symbioses from the two model legumes,

57 nearly all cloned legume genes required for nodulation and AM symbioses have their putative ortholog

58 Nodulation and arbuscular mycorrhization require the act

59 ial infection, increased expression of early nodulation and autoregulation of nodulation genes, and i

60 of a putative heavy-metal efflux-resistance nodulation and division type copper efflux system (encod

61 Knockdown mutants were impaired for nodulation and early root hair deformation responses wer

62 vidence supports a passive bacterial role in nodulation and infection after the microsymbiont has tri

63 Tight control of nodulation and infection is required to maintain the mut

64 sion in M. truncatula plants led to enhanced nodulation and infection.

65 tCEP1 and its likely receptor, CRA2, mediate nodulation and lateral root development through differen

66 in2b are required for negative regulation of nodulation and Ljein2a Ljein2b double mutants are hypern

67 unctions at the earliest stage of the common nodulation and mycorrhization symbiosis signaling pathwa

68 ence on the evolutionary relatedness between nodulation and mycorrhization.

69 s, suggesting common infection mechanisms in nodulation and mycorrhization.

70 living Bradyrhizobium isolates, lacking both nodulation and nitrogen fixation genes, to have their ge

71 identify a role for cytokinin in regulating nodulation and nitrogen fixation in response to nitrate

72 otypes, deletion mutants exhibited wild-type nodulation and nitrogen fixation when they were inoculat

73 were delineated, including known factors for nodulation and nitrogen fixation, and candidates with pr

74 regulation of nodulation genes, and improved nodulation and nitrogen fixation.

75 nstruct or mutations in ARGONAUTE7, enhances nodulation and rhizobial infection, alters the spatial d

76 nip/latd mutants have pleiotropic defects in nodulation and root architecture.

77 As part of the transcriptional machinery for nodulation and symbiosis across a range of Rhizobium, No

78 role of NolR in the regulation of different nodulation and symbiosis genes are proposed.

79 A sequences from diverse rhizobial genes for nodulation and symbiosis.

80 ula ecotype R108 was screened for defects in nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation.

81 the two developmental pathways required for nodulation and that activation of the pathway involving

82 The link between nodulation and the biosynthesis of nitrogen-containing a

83 in signaling in these cells led to increased nodulation and, as a consequence, to higher nitrogen fix

84 e expression patterns of genes implicated in nodulation, and also transcription factors, using both t

85 E INFECTIONS3 (DMI3/CCaMK), ERF REQUIRED FOR NODULATION, and SUPERNUMERARY NODULES (SUNN).

86 t the operon is selectively expressed during nodulation, and the scattered distribution of the operon

87 t development and systemic autoregulation of nodulation (AON) integrated with nitrogen (N) signaling

88 l meristem, is involved in autoregulation of nodulation (AON), a mechanism that systemically controls

89 Autoregulation of nodulation (AON), a systemic signaling pathway in legume

90 esses in plants, including autoregulation of nodulation (AON), which allows legumes to limit the numb

91 The effects of light on nodulation are dependent on a functional lov gene.

92 cess and some of them display a profuse stem nodulation as exemplified in the African Aeschynomene af

93 Using competitive nodulation assays, we have demonstrated that a functiona

94 S344D was shown to suppress the spontaneous nodulation associated with a gain-of-function mutant of

95 tokinin and had attenuated expression of key nodulation-associated transcription factors known to be

96 ted LRR receptor kinases determined that all nodulation autoregulation genes identified to date are t

97 ed beds displays various patterns, including nodulation, banding and scallops and fingers.

98 might also have a direct role in regulating nodulation because overexpression of their phospho-mimic

99 - Fix-), one mutant with delayed and reduced nodulation but effective in nitrogen fixation (dNod+/- F

100 on test indicates that Os-POLLUX can restore nodulation, but not rhizobial infection, to a Medicago t

101 ulation of legume-specific processes such as nodulation, but the lack of genetic data from a legumino

102 Mechanisms inhibiting legume nodulation by low soil pH, although highly prevalent and

103 ene in soybeans (Glycine max) that restricts nodulation by many strains of Bradyrhizobium elkanii.

104 MtCEP1 increases nodulation by promoting rhizobial infections, the develo

105 When tested for nodulation by Sinorhizobium meliloti, flavonoid-deficien

106 flux pump is the archetype of the resistance nodulation cell division (RND) exporters from Gram-negat

107 MexAB-OprM, an efflux pump of the resistance nodulation cell division (RND) family, or expression of

108 y-metal resistance is mediated by resistance nodulation cell division (RND)-based efflux pumps compos

109 unction in transport [such as the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) efflux pump MexGHI-OpmD]

110 ripartite efflux complexes in the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) family to expel various t

111 ia, transporters belonging to the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) superfamily of proteins a

112 pumps belonging to the ubiquitous resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) superfamily transport sub

113 Transporters of the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) superfamily typically ass

114 Here we identified six putative resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) type factors.

115 Resistance-nodulation-cell division efflux pumps are integral membr

116 TMs 2-13 exhibit a typical resistance-nodulation-cell division fold, among which TMs 3-7 const

117 rescent substrate for a number of resistance-nodulation-cell division permease transporters.

118 One mechanism involves an RND (resistance-nodulation-cell division protein family)-driven triparti

119 mphiphile efflux subfamily, these resistance-nodulation-cell division proteins largely form trimeric

120 d multidrug efflux pumps from the resistance-nodulation-cell division superfamily (vexB and vexD [her

121 sidual activity provided by other resistance-nodulation-cell division superfamily-type efflux pumps,

122 ite efflux pumps belonging to the resistance-nodulation-cell division superfamily.

123 d transporters that belong to the resistance-nodulation-cell division superfamily.

124 tite efflux complexes in the RND (resistance-nodulation-cell division) family to expel diverse toxic

125 divergently transcribed putative resistance-nodulation-cell-division (RND) efflux pump, encoded by z

126 our efflux pumps belonging to the resistance nodulation/cell division class including mexAB-oprM, we

127 The pooled correlation between rhizobium nodulation competitiveness and plant aboveground biomass

128 g of the innate mechanisms regulating legume nodulation control under acidic conditions, which could

129 initial inoculum, plant population size and nodulation cycle length.

130 minated by non-fixing bacteria during serial nodulation cycles with a probability that is function of

131 -1 for root architecture defects but not for nodulation defects.

132 ed mutants that suppress both the growth and nodulation defects.

133 grafting studies using an autoregulation-of-nodulation-deficient mutant line, altered in the autoreg

134 efflux pump, which belongs to the resistance nodulation division (RND) family, recognizes and extrude

135 Resistance nodulation division efflux systems have a major role in

136 These studies suggest that two resistance nodulation division efflux systems, a P-type ATPase, and

137 Efflux pumps of the resistance-nodulation division superfamily, such as AcrB, make a ma

138 l G288D substitution in AcrB, the resistance-nodulation division transporter in the AcrAB-TolC tripar

139 that the periplasmic component of resistance nodulation division-type efflux systems plays an active

140 ve bacteria utilize dual membrane resistance nodulation division-type efflux systems to export a vari

141 enes encoding the VexAB and VexGH resistance-nodulation-division (RND) efflux systems and their cogna

142 pecially those that belong to the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) family, often show very broad

143 efflux pump, which belongs to the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) family, recognizes and extrude

144 roton antiporter belonging to the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) superfamily.

145 ems (a P1B-ATPase, a porin, and a resistance-nodulation-division (RND) system) and of a putative Cu(+

146 derstand better the mechanisms of resistance-nodulation-division (RND)-type multidrug efflux pumps, w

147 e outer membrane component of the resistance-nodulation-division AcrAB-TolC efflux pump of Escherichi

148 uctural features of an MFP in the resistance-nodulation-division efflux system and provide direct evi

149 tite efflux complex CusCBA of the resistance-nodulation-division family that is essential for bacteri

150 efflux complexes belonging to the resistance-nodulation-division family to expel diverse toxic compou

151 hese products is mediated by RND (resistance-nodulation-division) family efflux systems.

152 RND (resistance-nodulation-division) family transporters in Gram-negativ

153 trimeric transporters of the RND (resistance-nodulation-division) superfamily, which often conduct ef

154 negatively regulates rhizobial infection and nodulation during the nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbio

155 nhibitor 2,3,5,-triiodobenzoic acid, rescued nodulation efficiency in cre1 mutants and allowed auxin

156 signalling control rhizobial infections and nodulation efficiency.

157 n ERF transcription factor, ERF Required for Nodulation (ERN), which contains a highly conserved AP2

158 h competitive inhibition of ERF Required for Nodulation (ERN1).

159 ht not play a critical role in M. truncatula nodulation, even though they are the most abundant root

160 s chitin, peptidoglycan (PGN), and rhizobial nodulation factor (NF), that induce immune or symbiotic

161 r genes responsible for d-arabinosylation of nodulation factor in Azorhizobium caulinodans.

162 proteins directly interact with the soybean nodulation factor receptors NFR1alpha and NFR1beta, sugg

163 t, indicating that MtCBS1 acts downstream of nodulation factor signaling.

164 S. meliloti nodulation factor treatments of MtROP9i led to deformed

165 Nodulation factor-induced Ca(2+) responses were observed

166 se genes function as receptors for bacterial nodulation factor.

167 Rhizobial nodulation factors (NFs) activate a specific signaling p

168 tiated following the perception of rhizobial nodulation factors by the host plant.

169 Large reductions in nodulation frequency, plant growth, and significant shif

170 and functions downstream of DMI3 to activate nodulation gene expression.

171 This indicates a specialization in nodulation gene induction downstream of Nod-factor perce

172 er to accurately and efficiently reconstruct nodulation gene network, a crowdsourcing platform, Crowd

173 ing based on the observations that the early nodulation gene NODULE INCEPTION was not induced and tha

174 roots because of their ability to induce the nodulation genes of Bradyrhizobium japonicum.

175 sativa) depends on the timely expression of nodulation genes that are controlled by LysR-type regula

176 on of early nodulation and autoregulation of nodulation genes, and improved nodulation and nitrogen f

177 bial infection, and the induction of two key nodulation genes, Nodulation Signaling Pathway1 (NSP1) a

178 measuring transcript numbers of known early nodulation genes.

179 sponse Factor Required for Nodulation1 early nodulation genes.

180 ompanied by reduced expression of some early nodulation genes.

181 e contrasted genomic properties and the stem-nodulation habit of its parental lineages (4x).

182 ular and morphological characters, including nodulation, have led to major changes in our understandi

183 and polysomal mRNAs for 15 genes involved in nodulation identified a group of transcripts with slight

184 involved in the long-distance regulation of nodulation in actinorhizal symbioses.

185 K, SYMRK, and HK1 are required for efficient nodulation in Aeschynomene evenia.

186 However, the same treatment did not restore nodulation in flavonoid-deficient roots, suggesting that

187 eated S. meliloti cells, completely restored nodulation in flavonoid-deficient roots.

188 y rhizobial signals which initiate infection/nodulation in host legume species, the identity of the e

189 fied B. japonicum Nod signals rescued normal nodulation in IFS-silenced roots, indicating that the ab

190 t expression of the GS52 apyrase can enhance nodulation in L. japonicus and points to an important ro

191 Nodulation in legumes involves the coordination of epide

192 Nodulation in legumes requires the recognition of rhizob

193 conserved NF-Y protein complexes to control nodulation in leguminous plants.

194 show that antisense inhibition of LNP blocks nodulation in Lotus japonicus.

195 e supporting that flavones are important for nodulation in M. truncatula.

196 e role of the WOX5 transcription factor upon nodulation in Medicago truncatula and pea (Pisum sativum

197 nin accumulation is tightly regulated during nodulation in order to balance the requirement for cell

198 CRE1-dependent CK pathway to regulate early nodulation in response to both NF and CK signals critica

199 in regulation of the G-protein cycle during nodulation in soybean.

200 our companion study, we found inhibition of nodulation in the ENM but not in the bulk/dissolved trea

201 ents, our results suggest that inhibition of nodulation in the ENM treatment was primarily due to phy

202 In contrast with the sunn-1 mutant, nodulation in the lss mutant is more extensive and is le

203 sing L. japonicus plants confirmed increased nodulation in these plants.

204 K-kd was 6-fold higher than rhizobia-induced nodulation in TR25/SYMRK roots.

205 Spontaneous nodulation in TR25/SYMRK-kd was 6-fold higher than rhizo

206 cate that elements specifically required for nodulation include NIN and possibly related gene network

207 hrough processes not previously connected to nodulation, including phosphorous supply and salicylic a

208 SLs appear to influence nodulation independently of ethylene action, as SL-defic

209 rdingly, MtCEP1 counteracts the reduction in nodulation induced by increasing ethylene precursor conc

210 sis indicated that ckx3 mutants have reduced nodulation, infection thread formation and root growth.

211 e still many gaps to be filled before legume nodulation is sufficiently understood to be managed for

212 Nodulation is the result of a mutualistic interaction be

213 Nodulation is the result of a symbiosis between legumes

214 N, required for N-mediated autoregulation of nodulation, is not involved.

215 e underlying molecular mechanisms leading to nodulation, many efforts are underway to identify nodula

216 nes are associated with nitrogen metabolism, nodulation, metal homeostasis, and stress responses.

217 e developed a relational database, NodMutDB (Nodulation Mutant Database), to provide a comprehensive

218 Analyses of nodulation mutants showed that perception of Nod factor

219 of nodulating root systems of many Medicago nodulation mutants shows MtIRE expression correlates wit

220 e course of these experiments, nine Medicago nodulation mutants, including sli and dnf1 to 7 mutants,

221 ffects of exogenous SA on indeterminate-type nodulation, NahG expression in M. truncatula plants led

222 mNARK is critical for systemic regulation of nodulation (new organ made on the root through symbiosis

223 Rhizobial nodulation (Nod) factors activate both nodule morphogene

224 induced in roots and root hairs by rhizobial nodulation (Nod) factors via activation of the nodulatio

225 nd dependent on host perception of bacterial nodulation (Nod) factors.

226 transcriptional regulators (LTTRs), mediates nodulation (nod) gene expression in the soil bacterium S

227 l regulators that mediates the expression of nodulation (nod) genes in the soil bacterium Sinorhizobi

228 the rooting of cuttings, and facilitate the nodulation of legumes.

229 id (1-NOA) and 2-NOA, which we found reduced nodulation of Medicago truncatula.

230 Nodulation of soybean (Glycine max) root hairs by the ni

231 evidence that isoflavones are essential for nodulation of soybean roots because of their ability to

232 LA1 protein can partially rescue the reduced nodulation of the cre1 mutant and triggers the formation

233 t not the che2 cluster, promotes competitive nodulation of the peas.

234 nin alfalfa is a direct result of changes in nodulation or nitrogen fixation efficiency.

235 ions locally and has no apparent function in nodulation or root development.

236 ntified a previously unsuspected role of the nodulation pathway in the establishment of different bac

237 Here we identify a Lotus japonicus nodulation pectate lyase gene (LjNPL), which is induced

238 ted shoot growth, and show that the aberrant nodulation phenotype caused by LORE1 insertions in the A

239 re we show that ern2 mutants exhibit a later nodulation phenotype than ern1, being able to form nodul

240 atula displayed a shoot controlled increased nodulation phenotype, similar to the clv2 mutants of pea

241 s reported previously, str shows a wild-type nodulation phenotype.

242 ene inhibitor treatment counteracts the cra2 nodulation phenotype.

243 We performed a screen for aberrant nodulation phenotypes using the Lotus japonicus LORE1 in

244 ications were shown to alter root growth and nodulation phenotypes, revealing additional regulators o

245 Fewer than 20 plant genes involved in the nodulation process have been functionally characterized.

246 tion, precisely how this protein impacts the nodulation process remains undetermined.

247 e iso/flavonoids have been implicated in the nodulation process, but questions remain as to their spe

248 wild-type and three mutant plants during the nodulation process.

249 utant line, altered in the autoregulation-of-nodulation receptor kinase GmNARK, determined that a sys

250 The symbiotic receptor-like kinases nodulation receptor-like kinase (NORK) and lysin motif d

251 nitiate spontaneous nodule organogenesis and nodulation-related gene expression in the absence of rhi

252 The method predicted a soybean nodulation-related gene regulatory network consisting of

253 ation, many efforts are underway to identify nodulation-related genes and determine how these genes i

254 dentified 533 miRNA targets, including three nodulation-related genes and eight nodule-specific genes

255 me, become a comprehensive knowledge base of nodulation-related pathways.

256 site (RRBS) in their promoters, we found the nodulation-related Type-A RR Mt RR4 and the Nodulation S

257 Nodulation requires the reprogramming of the plant cell,

258 hat the MtCEP1 peptide-dependent increase in nodulation requires the symbiotic signaling pathway and

259 thylene production is an early and sustained nodulation response that acts at multiple stages to regu

260 nosuppression was characterized by a reduced nodulation response, which was associated with a signifi

261 inal domain of MtEIN2 is sufficient to block nodulation responses, consistent with previous reports i

262 d signaling, 240 nutrient-responsive and 365 nodulation-responsive Signaling-SSPs were identified, gr

263 standing the molecular basis of Rj4-mediated nodulation restriction and facilitates the development o

264 e control of genotype-specific infection and nodulation reveals a common recognition mechanism underl

265 During nodulation, rhizobia are entrapped within curled root ha

266 nvestigate the role of SGF14c during soybean nodulation, RNA interference was employed to silence SGF

267 nodulation-related Type-A RR Mt RR4 and the Nodulation Signaling Pathway 2 (NSP2) TF.

268 dulation (Nod) factors via activation of the nodulation signaling pathway and the NIN transcription f

269 Activation of the nodulation signaling pathway in spontaneously nodulating

270 d the induction of two key nodulation genes, Nodulation Signaling Pathway1 (NSP1) and NSP2 Accordingl

271 the following genes: DMI1, DMI2, DMI3, NIN, NODULATION SIGNALING PATHWAY1 (NSP1), NSP2, SUNN, and SI

272 hairs that involves the complex interplay of Nodulation Signaling Pathway1 (NSP1)/NSP2 GRAS and Ethyl

273 gnaling genes as well as of the CK-regulated Nodulation Signaling Pathway2 and Ethylene Response Fact

274 gets the key nodulation transcription factor Nodulation Signaling Pathway2, correlates with bacterial

275 ms that DELLA proteins can interact with the nodulation signalling pathway 2 (NSP2) and nuclear facto

276 -specific gene and specifically activated by nodulation signals.

277 protein, named Scarecrow-like13 Involved in Nodulation (SIN1), localizes both to the nucleus and the

278 recently shown that an autoactive form of a nodulation-specific calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein

279 r (NF)-stimulated plant responses, including nodulation-specific gene expression, is mediated by the

280 mbiosis-signaling pathway has parallels with nodulation-specific signaling and functions to promote m

281 ased levels of genistein, but did not affect nodulation, suggesting that the endogenous production of

282 tative lipid-binding BON (bacterial OsmY and nodulation) superfamily, and a C domain (residues 201-32

283 This includes orthologues of nodulation-suppressing CLE peptides and AtCLE40 that con

284 Rhizobium and Ensifer: this was confirmed by nodulation tests.

285 ogress made in plant genetic control of root nodulation that occurs in non-legume actinorhizal plant

286 s, the developmental competency of roots for nodulation, the formation of fused nodules, and an incre

287 We also show that during nodulation, the G-protein cycle is regulated by the acti

288 During the course of nodulation, there is a nodule-specific redirection of Mt

289 . elkanii strains are highly competitive for nodulation; thus, cultivars harboring an Rj4 allele are

290 ion, maturity, morphology, pigmentation, and nodulation traits.

291 onical miR171 isoform, which targets the key nodulation transcription factor Nodulation Signaling Pat

292 This absence of nodulation was due to a defect in Nod factor signaling b

293 When the CND gene was silenced, nodulation was reduced.

294 To test the role of auxin influx in nodulation we used the auxin influx inhibitors 1-naphtho

295 further investigate the role of GS52 during nodulation, we used RNA interference to silence GS52 exp

296 lleles varied, root length and the extent of nodulation were not significantly different between the

297 leted roots and led to significantly reduced nodulation when inoculated with S. meliloti.

298 -deficient roots had a near complete loss of nodulation, whereas flavone-deficient roots had reduced

299 Analysis of temporal WOX5 expression during nodulation with quantitative reverse transcription-polym

300 two soybean genes Rj2 and Rfg1 that restrict nodulation with specific strains of Bradyrhizobium japon