ライフサイエンスコーパス: nominal

1 hase can be substantially different from the nominal.

2 rates of association tests will be close to nominal.

3 ere exploratory, and P values are considered nominal.

4 regarded as descriptive and the p values are nominal.

5 scopy (EELS) showed the stoichiometry of the nominal 15 nm NbO2 layer in the as-fabricated MIM device

6 zene (TSPB), an aromatic tetrasulfonate with nominal 2-fold and mirror symmetry, exhibits three cryst

7 sence of the XPC protein, also generates the nominal 30-mer in UV-irradiated XP-C mutant cells.

8 form of 24- to 32-nucleotide-long oligomers (nominal 30-mer) by dual incisions.

9 a 3-dimensional (3D) macula scan covering a nominal 6 x 6-mm area with a resolution of 256 x 256 (65

10 In our nominal 6-muscle planar arm model, muscle synergies and

11 rease in MCT transport activity, even in the nominal absence of CO2/HCO3(-).

12 iding snapshots of gating transitions in the nominal absence of ligand.

13 superoxide-deficient T cells recognizing the nominal Ag OVA323-339 In this study, we demonstrate that

14 cells that retain the capacity to respond to nominal Ag with memory-like function.

15 entified a new subset of cells, specific for nominal Ag, but phenotypically and functionally similar

16 e Type-I error rates of all methods close to nominal alpha levels of 0.05 and 0.01.

17 ing in a group of human older adults who had nominal amounts of music training early in life, but who

18 The combustion conditions included nominal and high burn rate operation and individual comb

19 harmonized inventory data set including both nominal and uncertainty data is calculated for each stag

20 d positive replication of associations and a nominal association (p < 0.05).

21 rt of 367 LSL cases and 5159 controls showed nominal association (P= 0.03 for rs3746446) resulting in

22 Nominal association of C15orf53 with SC was observed in

23 Our data showed a nominal association of MetS with the APOA5 rs662799, BUD

24 de to triplet repeat number (P = .002) and a nominal association of the keratoplasty proportion with

25 an Hispanic subset, the most significant but nominal association was observed for CTNNA3, a well-know

26 %) of LD pruned variants set (n = 56) showed nominal association with gout in our sample (p < 0.05).

27 Twelve variants within CETP demonstrated nominal association with ICH, with the strongest associa

28 er mRNAs, of which 71 and 63 showed at least nominal association with systolic and diastolic BP, resp

29 ociations with schizophrenia and a very weak nominal association with the tight junction protein, cla

30 There was nominal association with type 2 diabetes and coronary ar

31 iple SNPs in LD with the variant support the nominal association.

32 However, we observed nominal associations for rare variants in CCDC71L and SL

33 In addition, we found nominal associations of the CLOCK SNP rs6853192 with lon

34 Nominal associations that did not survive correction for

35 in the CRP region, including rs3093059, had nominal associations with BPD.

36 ysis for coding and non-coding variants gave nominal associations with diagnosis and measures of mood

37 putatively functional SNPs revealed several nominal associations with T2D-ESKD, non-T2D-ESKD and T2D

38 oluble decoy VEGF receptor have demonstrated nominal benefit among patients.

39 ys with profound local deviations from their nominal bulk compositions and indicate further differenc

40 accination campaigns is frequently below the nominal campaign coverage, likely because campaigns nece

41 ted discharge rate of 1,000C with 50% of the nominal capacity delivered in less than 2 seconds.

42 a remarkable 60 nm of tuning (or 16% of the nominal centre wavelength) that is determined purely by

43 Secondary efficacy measures were nominal change in normalized total atheroma volume (TAV)

44 asures: The primary efficacy measure was the nominal change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) from bas

45 en though their nominal diameter exceeds the nominal channel diameter and although a closely related

46 lk electrolysis indicates that 94-99% of the nominal charge on different RAPs is accessible and that

47 nd and 1.03 per thousand, respectively, at a nominal CO2 mole fraction of 400 mumol mol(-1) in air.

48 CRY1, although statistical significance was nominal (combined OR = 1.05 [1.01-1.08], p = 0.008 and O

49 at approximately 400 MPa and 280 K with the nominal composition (H2O)2H2 and three formula units per

50 manganese(II) hexacyanoferrates(II) with the nominal composition Na2MnFe(CN)6.zH2O (Na2-deltaMnHFC).

51 A/cm(2)(Pt), alloy catalysts prepared with a nominal composition of PtNi displayed activities close t

52 concentrations corresponding to the initial nominal concentration and experimental conditions specif

53 tification was accurate when compared to the nominal concentration inferred from fluorometer measurem

54 Solutions with nominal concentration of 0.4 and 1.0 M were formed.

55 A nominal concentration of 15 mug/L IBF (actual = 13.7 mug

56 g BMD-T, the method that enables the highest nominal concentration of colistin in the test medium.

57 The same nominal concentration of Desogestrel and Drospirenone di

58 ion of MeP-adducted peptide (MeP-P) over the nominal concentration range of 2.0-250 ng/mL, with a coe

59 can vary by orders of magnitude for the same nominal concentration.

60 Nominal concentrations in the aqueous phase correspondin

61 After the treatments with MWCNTs at nominal concentrations of 0.01 mg/L and 1 mg/L, P. aerug

62 ng roughly to 1% and 0.1% the chemicals LC50(nominal concentrations of 4.0 and 12.0 mug/L for PCB 136

63 ish were exposed to an ethanol control or to nominal concentrations of FLX (0.54 mug/L) and EE2 (5 ng

64 ributed to the remarkably 30-70x higher-than-nominal concentrations of hypothetical new compounds (vi

65 o 2559 mumol kg(-1) dry weight soil based on nominal concentrations.

66 is that it provides a global chromosome-wide nominal control level to clustering, as opposed to previ

67 ficity, and valid statistical inference with nominal control of type 1 error in contrasts of connecti

68 s study, RDS was able to rapidly identify at nominal cost a substantial number of unaware and viremic

69 Using the nominal cost model could produce a net benefit of $278.1

70 approach, are projected to be less with the nominal cost model, amounting to $16.9 billion in 2015-3

71 ge populations for this genetic variant with nominal costs.

72 referred method honest estimation results in nominal coverage for 90% confidence intervals, whereas c

73 s large as several micrometers away from the nominal current path.

74 These results are consistent with the nominal degree of relative actomyosin movement observed

75 easured densities were 18-24% lower than the nominal density of metallic silver, with an overall mean

76 The results establish the possibility of nominal designs to respond to feedstock variations and m

77 Both enter the bulk even though their nominal diameter exceeds the nominal channel diameter an

78 ated titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) nanomaterial (nominal diameter of 5 nm).

79 ties of engineered silver nanoparticles with nominal diameters of 30, 60, 75, and 100 nm were measure

80 ing of four silver nanoparticle dispersions (nominal diameters of 40, 60, 80, and 100 nm) by spICPMS

81 al subtypes have now been described based on nominal differences in the amino acid sequences.

82 n the AMA-BRS when overexpanded 1.3 mm above nominal dilatation values ( approximately 48%) and lower

83 ccount the measured dissolved instead of the nominal diuron concentration, the toxic effect of diuron

84 teral cataract surgery in 2012 United States nominal dollars was $2653, an inflation-adjusted 34.2% l

85 All nominal dollars were adjusted for inflation by convertin

86 e H7N9 vaccine was given on days 0 and 21 at nominal doses of 3.75 microg, 7.5 microg, 15 microg, and

87 nistered intramuscularly on days 0 and 21 at nominal doses of 3.75, 7.5, 15, or 45 microg of hemagglu

88 PPI analyses provided evidence for a nominal effect of rTMS and poor test-retest reliability.

89 improving perioperative outcomes may have a nominal effect on reducing these costs.

90 rotective role for mast cells in exposure to nominal environmental allergens.

91 at P < 5.0 x 10(-8) in meta-analysis with a nominal evidence (P < .05) in each scan were considered

92 We observed nominal evidence at an observed p < 0.05 using either GR

93 ever, in a locus-by-locus analysis, we found nominal evidence for positive selection at 14 of the loc

94 In the meta-analysis of the Swedish cohorts, nominal evidence of a 3-way interaction (WGRSTGxBMIxsex)

95 (0.02 SD; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.11; N = 29,771), nominal evidence of a causal relationship with lower ins

96 Nine of the significant loci demonstrated nominal evidence of age-dependent effects on BP by tests

97 on time outdoors, however 5 variants showed nominal evidence of interactions with nearwork (top vari

98 0.9 billion, $262.6 billion)/birth cohort at nominal exchange rates, and $616.5 billion (95% CI: $365

99 truction of domain sizes commensurate with a nominal exciton diffusion length of order 10 nm.

100 Nominal expression was detected in internal organs.

101 se the whole-cell currents in the absence of nominal extracellular Ca(2+), whereas PS produced an inh

102 For a nominal familywise error rate of 5%, the parametric stat

103 te out the magnetic excitations derived from nominal Fe(2+) and Fe(3+) states.

104 ere more impaired on tests of perception and nominal functions.

105 en 157 degrees and 221 degrees C, within the nominal gas window, and biogenic gases yield formation t

106 lectro-active surface area was 619 times the nominal geometric surface area.

107 isomers for each cluster size have the same nominal geometry but differ in the arrangement of their

108 ics of glass-forming materials far below the nominal glass transition temperature.

109 tion about the condition, thereby ending the nominal goal of value-neutral counseling and setting the

110 alue of lifetime societal costs, and 10-year nominal government expenditures.

111 nsitional splenic B cells specific for 2F5's nominal gp41 MPER-binding epitope (containing the 2F5 ne

112 ion of novel phases that can emerge from the nominal ground states of frustrated lattices.

113 all statements and recommendations using the nominal group technique and the modified Delphi method,

114 A modified nominal group technique was used to gain the final conse

115 Nominal groups were assembled at key international meeti

116 ted with nitrogen uptake under conditions of nominal herbivory.

117 79 years) in the pooled cohort, the ratio of nominal HRs for all-cause mortality was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.

118 conclude that variation in APOL1 G3 makes a nominal, if any, contribution to ESRD in African America

119 llar to off pillar signals normalized by the nominal increase in surface area due to nanopillars were

120 95% of the each compound, on average, from a nominal initial surface coverage of 0.1 g/m(2) per analy

121 Variants with nominal interaction associations in the discovery analys

122 r dynamics, the Laplacian eigenvalues of the nominal interconnections, and the variance and location

123 ations, that the cation stoichiometry of the nominal LaAlO3 layer is key to 2-DEL formation: only Al-

124 culations of the potential energy across the nominal LaNiO3/SrTiO3 interface confirm that the oxygen

125 specific subacutely toxic Cd concentrations (nominal LC1; E. cyaneus: 18 nM (2.0 mug L(-1)); E. verru

126 Acute 48-h nominal LC50 values for penta- and octabromodiphenyl eth

127 (misleading significance) rate very near the nominal level across 100 distinct null settings in which

128 rejection percentages that are closer to the nominal level in almost every situation, and it is recom

129 Both loci were successfully replicated at a nominal level of significance (P < 0.05).

130 not in the other genes, were associated at a nominal level with an increased risk of exacerbations in

131 family wise error rate (FWER) at the desired nominal level, (d) is robust to the underlying distribut

132 s characteristically less than the specified nominal level, and confidence interval evaluation by any

133 and diabetes traits were significant at the nominal level, including those between genetically deter

134 mixed directional false discovery rate at a nominal level.

135 control the false positive error rate at the nominal level.

136 3.3; 95% CI, 1.61-7.05), and 2 loci reached nominal levels of significance (deletions at 2q11.2: 6 [

137 distinct loci were enriched among cases with nominal levels of significance (P < 0.05); however, none

138 We found nominal levels of significance with SNPs at 9 of the 27

139 orts, n = 3,187), 100% of CpGs gave at least nominal levels of significance, far more than expected b

140 time PCRs, particularly when plotted against nominal log10 IU values.

141 azard) and incidence of major complications (nominal logistic regression).

142 Going beyond the nominal M n+1AX n compounds enables not only fine tuning

143 nding on mass resolution, ions with the same nominal m/z.

144 In the study period, the nominal maintenance group had a median time to successfu

145 In three arms, the nominal maintenance model was compared against a "best p

146 ion chromatograms for components of the same nominal mass and isomers in the complex mixtures.

147 opes and exchanged deuterium shared the same nominal mass and overlapped at previous resolving powers

148 nsures that closely spaced peaks at the same nominal mass are resolved for proper image generation.

149 account whether isotopologues with the same nominal mass are resolved.

150 CD also produced v ions, which have the same nominal mass as the M+1 isotope of the w ion and can onl

151 ducing an abundant Y1-48 Da ion instead (the nominal mass difference is given relative to the unmodif

152 ease in the number of molecular features per nominal mass due to the WAF isomeric complexity.

153 nce Material (SRM) 2682c Subbituminous Coal (nominal mass fraction 0.5% sulfur).

154 lving powers that afforded only one peak per nominal mass in a given peptide's isotope distribution,

155 kbone yielded a NL of 254, 2 u less than the nominal mass of palmitic acid, whereas the analogous ter

156 Each of these moieties has a nominal mass of zero and a very small exact mass.

157 20 years of metal loading, which resulted in nominal metal concentrations of 1450, 100, and 2400 mg k

158 The cost of scaling up radiotherapy in the nominal model in 2015-35 is US$26.6 billion in low-incom

159 As nominal models of hydrogenase active sites, these bimeta

160 /calibrants diluted down from standards with nominal mole fractions of 50 mumol/mol.

161 large, reduction-sensitive oligomers with a nominal molecular mass of approximately 400 kDa.

162 separation characteristics of membranes with nominal molecular weight cut-offs (NMWCO) ranging from 3

163 tudy not only demonstrates how to adjust the nominal NBT composition for dielectric-based application

164 st, the lungs of wild-type-infected mice had nominal necrosis, but the spleens had widespread necrosi

165 n cellular properties are also seen within a nominal neuronal class and this heterogeneity can be exp

166 ts and receive amacrine cell synapses in the nominal OFF layer, creating novel motifs, including inhi

167 group (hazard ratio 0.65 [95% CI 0.45-0.95], nominal one-sided p=0.011).

168 ut its rejection percentages depart from the nominal ones (<5%), so its use is not recommended when t

169 opy (EELS) reveal a composition close to the nominal ones.

170 x 50 mm x 12 mm (L x W x H), yet providing a nominal optical absorption path length of more than 22 c

171 Results Binary classification and nominal/ordinal grades showed substantial or better agre

172 This phase is found to coexist with the nominal orthorhombic phase at room temperature, and is b

173 in a series of metal compounds with the same nominal oxidation and spin state, significant changes ar

174 myocardial infarction, and the global index (nominal P < .05 for trend by age).

175 ally expressed in SAT between the ND and CD (nominal P < 0.01; false discovery rate, 25%).

176 6 than those given placebo (39.2% vs 22.3%; nominal P = .001; relative risk, 1.8; 95% confidence int

177 on (26.6%) than those given placebo (12.1%) (nominal P = .001; relative risk, 2.2; 95% confidence int

178 tology-Self-Report (-7.5 vs -5.8; ES = 0.37, nominal P = .009), Clinical Global Impression-Improvemen

179 -rated MADRS remission rate (36.0% vs 22.0%; nominal P = .03) and response rate (50.5% vs 40.4%; nomi

180 ly higher for C25 (41.6%) versus D75 (30.9%; nominal P = .037, without multiplicity test adjustment).

181 beta carotene group (23 [2.0%] vs 11 [0.9%], nominal P = .04), mostly in former smokers.

182 ient-rated MADRS (-16.2 vs -13.3, ES = 0.28, nominal P = .04), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoma

183 P = .03) and response rate (50.5% vs 40.4%; nominal P = .13), A 0.5-mg dose of basimglurant MR had n

184 tegrast-treated subjects: ocular discomfort (nominal P = 0.0005) and eye discomfort (nominal, P < 0.0

185 t-treated participants at day 42 in itching (nominal P = 0.0318), foreign body sensation (nominal P =

186 nominal P = 0.0318), foreign body sensation (nominal P = 0.0418), and eye discomfort (P = 0.0048) ver

187 39A>T, presented exclusively in 11 SZ cases (nominal p = 4.8 x 10(-4)).

188 All nominal P values were less than .001 versus placebo, exc

189 month 60 was also reduced for tiw versus DT (nominal p<0.001).

190 ta-1a qw (nominal p<0.05) and tiw versus DT (nominal p<0.001); T2 and T1 hypointense lesion volume ch

191 was lower for sc IFN beta-1a tiw versus DT (nominal p<0.01).

192 ed hypointense lesions (thrice-daily BG-12) (nominal P<0.05 for each comparison).

193 6 candidate SNPs, 2 in ACVRL1 and MMP3 had a nominal p<0.05 in the replication cohort.

194 e lesions were lower with sc IFN beta-1a qw (nominal p<0.05) and tiw versus DT (nominal p<0.001); T2

195 6 SNPs had a nominal p<0.1 in the replication cohort and map to intro

196 some 8q23.3, near the EIF3H and UTP23 genes (nominal P(interaction) = 1.3 x 10(-4); adjusted P = 0.02

197 Nominal p-values are presented and are not corrected for

198 a difference of 7.8 (2.9 to 12.8; two-sided nominal p=0.0020).

199 olymerization and dendritic spine formation (nominal P=0.0031).

200 ents [1.6-2.7]; rate ratio 0.60 [0.42-0.86]; nominal p=0.0061).

201 -0.7% [-4.0 to 2.1] vs -6.4% [-9.8 to -3.7]; nominal p=0.0082), and fewer pulmonary exacerbations in

202 mug plus VI 25 mug: 0.060 L [0.010 to 0.109; nominal p=0.0182]).

203 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.90; nominal P=0.02).

204 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73 [95% CI 0.55-0.96]; nominal p=0.025, which did not meet the required thresho

205 ients with BRCAm (HR 0.62 [95% CI 0.41-0.94] nominal p=0.025; 34.9 months [95% CI 29.2-54.6] vs 30.2

206 zard ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.97; two-sided nominal p=0.029).

207 qw 40.7% (nominal p=0.084 vs DT); tiw 39.2% (nominal p=0.032 vs DT).

208 ved complete cytogenic response at 6 months (nominal p=0.058).

209 probability of CDMS was: DT 44.6%; qw 40.7% (nominal p=0.084 vs DT); tiw 39.2% (nominal p=0.032 vs DT

210 CA wild-type were HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.55-1.24, nominal p=0.37; 24.5 months [19.8-35.0] for those treate

211 ort (nominal P = 0.0005) and eye discomfort (nominal, P < 0.0001).

212 The two preparations differed in nominal particle diameter (12.1 +/- 3.7 and 23.3 +/- 9.8

213 s and veins with a diameter of less than the nominal pixel resolution (60 mum) can be visualized.

214 hy during hyperinsulinemic glucose clamps at nominal plasma glucose concentrations of 90, 75, 60, and

215 ed in a full-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR; nominal pore size 0.04 mum): (i) attachment of virus to

216 vinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane of 40 nm nominal pore size was used to study bacteriophage MS2 re

217 ugh the reactor and the proper choice of the nominal precursor concentration within the flowing solut

218 lts in a four-dimensional data set including nominal precursor ion mass, product ion mobility, accura

219 Although orally introducing nominal protein antigens is known to induce such pTreg c

220 d at the sites in Alabama and Mississippi at nominal rates of 56000 and 42000 ng/m(2) day(-1) in the

221 ppear unrelated (e.g., system justification, nominal realism, is-ought errors in moral reasoning).

222 showed suggestive association accompanied by nominal replication.

223 mages ((31)P MRI) of teeth are obtained at a nominal resolution of 0.5 mm in less than 15 minutes usi

224 ceptor 1 (IFNLR1) has been determined at the nominal resolution of 2.1A.

225 determined by cryo-electron microscopy at a nominal resolution of 4.5 angstroms.

226 To enhance the nominal resolution of a structure it is necessary to ali

227 ametric permutation test is found to produce nominal results for voxelwise as well as clusterwise inf

228 The dose for a nominal scan protocol (80 kVp, 108 mAs) was 9 mGy (absol

229 With devices being programmed to nominal sensitivity, ICDs remained unaffected in 91 pati

230 setting (30 of 40 intervals) and 229 to the nominal setting (18 of 24 intervals) for ventricular arr

231 strong enrichment of coding variants with a nominal signal of association with RA (p < 0.05) after a

232 ne length is correlated with GWAS results at nominal significance (P </= 0.05) levels.

233 f tubulin-folding cofactor D (TBCD) obtained nominal significance (P<0.01) in single SNP analysis.

234 nes replicated in both directionality and at nominal significance (P<0.05) in an independent post-mor

235 s, including approximately 50% that achieved nominal significance and approximately 75% that continue

236 e direction in at least one ethnic group; at nominal significance for 13 SNPs and with a trend for as

237 Two SNPs showed nominal significance for interaction (p < 0.05) between

238 ximately 0.30; P < 0.001), but did not reach nominal significance for participants with no retinopath

239 as the outcome, in DR3/4 subjects, there was nominal significance for two SNPs: rs17615 in CD21 [HR 1

240 ld across all cohorts, while 49 OTUs achieve nominal significance in at least one replication sample.

241 Another peak was identified at nominal significance in both populations (8q12); however

242 0% were directionally consistent and reached nominal significance in the validation cohort.

243 The new test maintains the nominal significance level and can be adapted to test hy

244 Adopting a cFDR nominal significance level of 0.05, 287 loci were identi

245 Three of these SNPs met nominal significance levels in the replication cohort wi

246 ent >/= 20%; n = 112) was an ACQ change with nominal significance noted; ACQ responses were nominally

247 nts at eight loci have demonstrated at least nominal significance with other metabolic traits in prio

248 cance and a corroborating test with at least nominal significance, rare and low-frequency NSVs in one

249 5% were directionally consistent and reached nominal significance.

250 e replicated, with the remaining two showing nominal significance.

251 e GWAS datasets, four candidate SNPs reached nominal significance.

252 sted and 11 SNPs (8 independent SNPs) showed nominal significant association with high-density lipopr

253 In the fully adjusted model, a nominal significant interaction between SSB intake categ

254 nificant at a Bonferroni-type-corrected 0.05 nominal significant level.

255 was consistent among species and there were nominal similarities in the functions associated with th

256 a miniprotein) conformational changes, with nominal simulation times ranging from nanoseconds to mic

257 method, surface charge (zeta-potential), nor nominal size had any influence in the observed biologica

258 ability of a small silver nanoparticle (nAg; nominal size of 5 nm with a polyacrylate coating) by the

259 The QS method maintains the nominal size well and consistently achieves higher power

260 he CuO and ZnO NPs were increased from their nominal sizes of <50 nm and <100 nm, to ~317 nm and ~483

261 mn with either Ag(0), Ag2S, CuO or CuS ENMs (nominal sizes of 4.67 +/- 1.4, 18.1 +/- 3.2, 31.1 +/- 12

262 hown by negligible effect on skin integrity, nominal skin irritation potential and cytotoxicity.

263 Nominal spatial resolutions of 8 x 8 x 16 mm(3) and 9.5

264 ad with large sample sizes of several of the nominal species allowing detailed analysis of intra- and

265 arine Canyon (California), resembles the two nominal species from Sweden.

266 within the Lujiatun beds and that the three nominal species represent different taphomorphotypes of

267 The genus and two nominal species were described from the west coast of Sw

268 wly recognized as cytoform 'L' of the latter nominal species.

269 isplacements (0.1-0.3 mum per sarcomere) and nominal speeds (0.4 and 0.8 mum/s).

270 nce vessel diameter (RVD) was calculated as (nominal stent diameter-RVD)/RVDx100 (%).

271 es) than nature, fully reversibly and with a nominal stoichiometry that mimics nature.

272 (-4) for CAC in CRIC, 28 SNPs in 23 loci had nominal support (p < 0.05 and in same direction) for CAC

273 xtends the locus of neuromodulation from the nominal target to afferent brain regions.

274 pillary part, (v) inter/extrapolation to the nominal temperature, (vi) internal standard-based correc

275 proach that can help to identify the optimal nominal ternary alloy compositions for this reaction is

276 of nTiO2 (0 versus 2 mg/L) as well as seven nominal test concentrations of the respective element.

277 Most differences were nominal (that is, relative difference <10%).

278 ts show that self-organized In seeds of 5 nm nominal thickness give rise to the best separation and t

279 ks of single crystal sheets of CaCO3, with a nominal thickness of 17 A, the same as a unit-cell dimen

280 A), interleaved with amorphous carbon with a nominal thickness of 8 A.

281 deposited Ag nanoparticles on ITO by varying nominal thicknesses, and post annealing was carried out

282 A total of 93 genes were altered, using nominal thresholds of >1.4-fold change and P<0.001.

283 ed with consecutive control patients who had nominal THV balloon deployment (n = 87).

284 ve lifestyle intervention (0.0037) and had a nominal treatment interaction (P=0.035).

285 l moments, which seem to be at odds with the nominal valence of Ru(5+) in the [Formula: see text] con

286 y an escalation to forces higher than 43 pN (nominal value).

287 eviation of nanoparticle size and shape from nominal value, significantly influences GNR heat generat

288 em to be at least 50% lower than the current nominal value, which is outside its present error bars.

289 adherin is lower than dsDNA unzipping force (nominal value: 12 pN) during initial cadherin-mediated c

290 .0 (5.0-10.5) when overexpanded 1.0 mm above nominal values ( approximately 34%).

291 ed in the Amaranth BRS group at 1.3 mm above nominal values ( approximately 48% overexpansion).

292 The relationship between the nominal values of standards and the measured values vari

293 lts were compared in a pairwise fashion with nominal values provided by each manufacturer.

294 ppeared to have a much better correlation to nominal values than did the other two.

295 Quantitative accuracy (compared to nominal values) and variability were determined based on

296 o distinct tension levels: 12-54 piconewton (nominal values) tensions generated during platelet adhes

297 e oxidation states that are lower than their nominal values, suggesting the existence of oxygen defic

298 with various magnitudes of bias compared to nominal values.

299 volunteers (total experimental time: 40 min, nominal voxel sizes 0.5 mL), and found statistically sig

300 are doped with W metal and normalized to the nominal W isotopic composition.