戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 events consisted of 3 deaths, 2 acute MIs, 1 non-Q-wave MI, and 3 cases of CHF.
2 yocardial infarction (MI); positive group, 4 non-Q-wave MIs and 12 myocardial revascularizations; non
3       There were 28 patients (16%) who had a non-Q-wave MI.
4  routine evaluation were defined as having a non-Q-wave MI.
5 time, and there is no specific ECG sign of a non-Q-wave MI.
6 7 women and 976 men with unstable angina and non-Q wave MI at the time of enrollment were compared.
7        The proportion of unstable angina and non-Q wave MI for women was similar in the trial and Reg
8 n compared with men with unstable angina and non-Q wave MI have not been extensively studied.
9      2) The outcome with unstable angina and non-Q wave MI is related to severity of illness and not
10 th revascularization for unstable angina and non-Q wave MI was similar for women and men.
11 evaluating patients with unstable angina and non-Q wave MI, little prospective information is availab
12 ower incidence of peri-procedural Q-wave and non-Q-wave MI.
13  myocardial infarction [MI] through 30 days; non-Q-wave MI through 24 h; and ipsilateral stroke or ne
14 ial infarction [MI]) in patients who evolved non-Q-wave MI (NQMI) following thrombolytic therapy.
15 r, proportionately more men in the trial had non-Q wave MI than men in the Registry.
16 osite end point of death, postprocedural MI, non-Q-wave MI after PCI hospitalization, or urgent targe
17 ttributable mainly to a greater frequency of non-Q-wave MI with acolysis (19.6% versus 7.9%, P=0.03).
18  with a significant reduction in the risk of non-Q-wave MI (unadjusted odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidenc
19 tted to the hospital with unstable angina or non-Q wave MI.
20 l of 8676 admissions with unstable angina or non-Q-wave MI were enumerated and, of these, 3318 patien
21 .1% vs. 0.06%, p = 0.009) and periprocedural non-Q wave MI (8.7% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.003) were more frequ
22 re was a higher prevalence of periprocedural non-Q wave MI (28% vs. 16%, p = 0.009) in the multiple S
23 ificantly higher frequency of periprocedural non-Q-wave MIs, and 3) equivalent repeat revascularizati
24 acteristics, (2) a higher rate of procedural non-Q-wave MI, and (3) similar TLR and overall major car
25 associated with a reduced risk of procedural non-Q-wave MIs.
26  with a lower incidence of procedure-related non-Q-wave MIs (duration of pretreatment <1 day, 29% had
27 ery useful in risk stratifying patients with non-Q wave MI.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。