戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 r gene therapy, whether using viral (53%) or nonviral (47%) vectors, have thus far disclosed no evide
2 generality of this approach, we engineered a nonviral, 60-subunit capsid, lumazine synthase from Aqui
3 ays, Th1 cytokine secretion, and by adding a nonviral Ag highly overexpressed in HPV-induced cancers.
4 r gene was 5-10 times higher than the common nonviral agents Fugene-6 and Lipofectamine in the presen
5  of specific cell-surface receptors for both nonviral and viral gene delivery vectors.
6 on either in naive mice or in the context of nonviral and viral immunogens.
7 zes cell membranes and offers a nonchemical, nonviral, and noninvasive method for cellular drug deliv
8 s report, we harnessed the highly efficient, nonviral, and plasmid-based piggyBac transposon system t
9 findings suggest a new paradigm of targeting nonviral antigens in immunotherapy of virally associated
10                  In this paper, we show that nonviral apoptotic proteins can be displayed on viral me
11 ystemically in tumor-bearing mice by using a nonviral approach.
12 ct has clear advantages over viral and other nonviral approaches currently being tested.
13 plementing/replenishing miRNAs in vivo using nonviral approaches to boost protective immunity against
14 integration, as well as other site-selective nonviral approaches.
15 ) are up-regulated in PEL and other types of nonviral B-NHL.
16 nsidering that most RNA viruses tolerate few nonviral bases beyond their natural termini.
17 erminal bases, in the presence or absence of nonviral bases, generated progeny with a mixture of wt a
18                                              Nonviral, biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles were dev
19 ects the host against development of primary nonviral cancers but also sculpts tumor immunogenicity.
20 gy has been less successful in patients with nonviral cancers owing to their many and varied immune e
21 n engineered variant of lumazine synthase, a nonviral capsid protein with a negatively charged lumina
22                The DNAzyme in complex with a nonviral carrier also significantly inhibited tumor grow
23 er disease due to viral causes (HBV, HCV) or nonviral causes (alcohol-induced liver disease, autoimmu
24  hepatitis C virus infection (HCV), although nonviral causes also play a role in a minority of cases.
25 y HCV, but not against damage due to various nonviral causes.
26 at are compatible with all current viral and nonviral cell delivery methods.
27 e-associated TCRs could be identified in the nonviral chronic liver diseases primary biliary cirrhosi
28 used worldwide as gene vectors (carriers) in nonviral clinical applications of gene delivery, albeit
29 the main cause of cervical cancer, yet other nonviral cofactors are also required for the disease.
30 tent patients and in patients with viral and nonviral coinfections.
31 reover, this pathway also degrades AGO1 in a nonviral context, especially when the production of miRN
32                                  A promising nonviral delivery method for genetic vaccines involves m
33                            Here we show that nonviral delivery of a 9-kb self-amplifying RNA encapsul
34          Alternative emerging strategies for nonviral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 core components into hu
35                                    Efficient nonviral delivery of plasmid DNA to rat RPE in vivo was
36                  Using a hydrodynamic-based, nonviral delivery protocol, we induced HCV transgene exp
37 ach has important implications for viral and nonviral delivery strategies for vaccines or gene therap
38 nst the EWS-FLI1 gene product by a targeted, nonviral delivery system dramatically inhibits tumor gro
39                                          The nonviral delivery system uses a cyclodextrin-containing
40 to mammalian cells and may serve as a potent nonviral delivery system.
41 nthetic, self-amplifying mRNA delivered by a nonviral delivery system.
42                       Both viral vectors and nonviral delivery systems can be developed to circumvent
43 fects; and 382 articles describing viral and nonviral delivery systems.
44  liposome (CL)-DNA complexes are a prevalent nonviral delivery vector, but their efficiency requires
45           Our data suggest several viral and nonviral determinants of cervical HPV acquisition and cl
46                                    Viral and nonviral determinants of HPV acquisition and clearance w
47 unosuppression, the suspected role of MV in "nonviral" diseases such as multiple sclerosis and Paget'
48 cytes can be genetically programmed by using nonviral DNA and turned into powerful antigen-presenting
49                                              Nonviral DNA complexes are typically formed by combining
50                                              Nonviral DNA complexes show promise as alternative and a
51 nsfection and level of gene expression after nonviral DNA delivery remain low, suggesting the existen
52  Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon system is a nonviral DNA delivery system in which a transposase dire
53 oratories are involved in the development of nonviral DNA delivery vehicles.
54 , we studied whether local gene therapy with nonviral DNA encoding VEGF and/or Ang1 into the ulcer ba
55 cellular transport of hundreds of individual nonviral DNA nanocarriers with 5-nm and 33-ms resolution
56                                              Nonviral DNA nanoparticles (NPs) can accommodate large g
57 eneimine (PEI) has been used previously as a nonviral DNA transfer vector.
58                           A novel method for nonviral DNA transfer, called electron avalanche transfe
59 poly(beta-amino esters) for potential use as nonviral DNA vectors.
60 s in five assays that monitor insertion into nonviral DNA.
61  nanoparticles represent a new and promising nonviral DNA/gene delivery approach endowing immunomodul
62 eract prior viral immunity by priming with a nonviral, DNA vaccine.
63                                              Nonviral, DNA-mediated gene transfer is an alternative t
64 nct evolutionary origins, in particular from nonviral elements, and insufficient sampling to the spar
65 ct groups of archaeal viruses from different nonviral elements, providing important insights into the
66  budding of CD63 and several other viral and nonviral EMV proteins.
67                        In sharp contrast, in nonviral, episomal plasmid DNA-injected mice, transgene
68 ntly larger than that for ESLD patients with nonviral etiologies.
69  with therapeutics for cancers with viral or nonviral etiologies.
70 e findings imply the potential importance of nonviral factors in natural SIV host species, such as in
71 brain barrier after i.v. administration of a nonviral formulation of the gene.
72 ected cells with biotinylated DNA encoding a nonviral gene and then infected the cells with wild-type
73 ute the common belief that the efficiency of nonviral gene carriers is dramatically reduced because o
74 ries of pyridinium cationic lipids useful as nonviral gene delivery agents were prepared by reaction
75 th viral gene transfer vectors and transient nonviral gene delivery approaches that are prevalent in
76                                         Oral nonviral gene delivery is the most attractive and arguab
77 ne approach using ORMOSIL nanoparticles as a nonviral gene delivery platform have a promising future
78  approach for breast cancer, consisting of a nonviral gene delivery system (SN) and a proapoptotic ge
79 es transgene expression in polycation-based, nonviral gene delivery systems, a number of CQ analogues
80 n of all systemically delivered nanoparticle nonviral gene delivery systems.
81                                              Nonviral gene delivery to the liver has been under evolu
82 ping Beauty (SB) transposon (Tn) system is a nonviral gene delivery tool that has widespread applicat
83             Quantitatively understanding how nonviral gene delivery vectors (polyplexes) are transpor
84 particles are ideal for use as a part of new nonviral gene delivery vectors.
85    These studies might help to develop novel nonviral gene delivery vehicles.
86 o nondividing cells, is a limiting factor in nonviral gene delivery.
87 important in vivo and for the improvement of nonviral gene delivery.
88 enhanced by anti-FasL mAb, suggesting that a nonviral gene product could be used to regulate the beha
89                                         This nonviral gene therapeutic approach led to persistent and
90 support further clinical development of this nonviral gene therapy approach.
91 NA (CL-DNA) complexes are abundantly used in nonviral gene therapy clinical applications.
92               This study demonstrates that a nonviral gene therapy combining the immunological proper
93 sease reversal and makes application of this nonviral gene therapy in humans with lupus (and perhaps
94 ategies for BTICs and establishes a flexible nonviral gene therapy platform with the capacity to chan
95                                              Nonviral gene therapy represents a promising treatment f
96  the use of small interfering RNA, viral and nonviral gene therapy, and microparticle or viscous gel
97  (bPEI) representing the current standard in nonviral gene therapy.
98 els of glioma, a lethal brain tumor, because nonviral gene transfer is typically transient.
99   Electroporation is one of the most popular nonviral gene transfer methods for embryonic stem cell t
100 the last major barrier to a fully successful nonviral gene transfer system for the liver.
101 Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon is a natural nonviral gene transfer system that can mediate long-term
102 lls with Sleeping Beauty transposon-mediated nonviral gene transfer, highlighting the potential of th
103                      Belagenpumatucel-L is a nonviral gene-based allogeneic tumor cell vaccine that d
104 uman IDO-encoding Sleeping Beauty (SB)-based nonviral gene-integrating approach, halted and attenuate
105 ed in FVIII-knockout (FVIII-KO) mice using a nonviral gene-transfer system.
106 was delivered to donor lungs in vivo using a nonviral gene-transfer vector, polyethylenimine.
107 e findings establish a practical approach to nonviral genetic correction of severe human genetic diso
108  the usefulness of electroporation-enhanced, nonviral genetic immunization for the active immunothera
109 a self-antigens, we used a novel strategy of nonviral genetic vaccination coupled with muscle electro
110                                      Current nonviral genetic vaccine systems are less effective than
111  FH and in 3 of 22 livers from patients with nonviral hepatic disease.
112 m individuals with viral (HCV and/or HBV) or nonviral hepatitis contained TCRgammadelta(+) T cells th
113 iopsy tissues obtained from individuals with nonviral hepatitis or from normal controls had no prefer
114 atients that is absent in liver tissues from nonviral hepatitis or healthy subjects.
115 ssociation between coffee intake and risk of nonviral hepatitis-related cirrhosis mortality (P for tr
116 rse relationship between caffeine intake and nonviral hepatitis-related cirrhosis mortality became nu
117 onstrates the protective effect of coffee on nonviral hepatitis-related cirrhosis mortality, and prov
118             The 5' ends of the mRNAs contain nonviral heterologous oligonucleotides that originate fr
119 ity achieved by using a lung-tissue-targeted nonviral human IDO gene transfer approach reduced, but d
120  to compare GP73 protein levels in viral and nonviral human liver disease and in normal livers, to id
121 nder cell-free conditions, which supported a nonviral hypothesis for the agent.
122 he strategy of combination of cisplatin with nonviral IL-2 gene therapy resulted in significant antit
123 ant immunity, we discuss analogous viral and nonviral immune concepts and propose working definitions
124  unnoticed in the realm of RNA silencing and nonviral immune responses.
125 tory functions in host immunity to viral and nonviral infections; however, the role of endogenous typ
126 ival was profoundly reduced during different nonviral inflammatory situations in the mouse, through a
127    Our results indicate that expression of a nonviral ITAM-containing protein is sufficient for cell
128 culture media in the laboratory diagnosis of nonviral keratitis.
129 lock TLR2-driven responses to both viral and nonviral ligands at or downstream of the MyD88 adaptor a
130  from patients with chronic HCV infection or nonviral liver disease to analyze markers of Tfh cells.
131 th spontaneous HCV resolution, patients with nonviral liver disease, and normal controls.
132 tients with hepatitis B and C and those with nonviral liver disease.
133 grase may be a simple and effective tool for nonviral long-term gene transfer in the eye.
134  of intron-containing HIV-1 gag RNA and also nonviral luc RNA.
135 /neck cancers, but the mechanisms underlying nonviral malignancies are unclear.
136      Taken together, our findings imply that nonviral maternal factors, such as the cytokine milieu,
137                          Thus, SB provides a nonviral means for sustained FVIII gene delivery in a mo
138                       The demonstration of a nonviral-mediated delivery of functional proteins into t
139 enesis, which are associated with viral- and nonviral-mediated gene therapy.
140 moderately hydrophobic segments of viral and nonviral membrane fusion proteins that enable these prot
141 cruitment, since it could be replaced with a nonviral membrane-binding domain without blocking active
142 ted lipofection is a comparatively efficient nonviral method for delivering genes to the corneal endo
143     The Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon is a nonviral method of gene delivery that overcomes some of
144                                            A nonviral method of gene delivery was applied to transfec
145           DNA transposons offer an efficient nonviral method of permanently modifying the genomes of
146 om multiple inherited disease patients via a nonviral method.
147                           The development of nonviral methods for efficient gene transfer to the lung
148  basis for developing safer, more efficient, nonviral methods for reprogramming human somatic cells.
149                       More recently, various nonviral methods that avoid permanent and random transge
150 ansduction has been increasingly replaced by nonviral methods to generate induced pluripotent stem ce
151 iPSC derivation by transfection of a simple, nonviral minicircle DNA construct into human adipose str
152 ry of cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) with a nonviral minicircle plasmid carrying HIF1 (MC-HIF1) into
153 soenzyme 2 and FIH were inserted into novel, nonviral, minicircle vectors.
154 advances in the mechanisms and strategies of nonviral miRNA delivery systems and provide a perspectiv
155 nistic rationale for the clinical testing of nonviral miRNA mimetics.
156 is report, we demonstrate systemic, in vivo, nonviral mRNA delivery through lipid nanoparticles (LNPs
157  genome into the 3' untranslated region of a nonviral mRNA leads to the specific encapsidation of thi
158 ough N can augment translation initiation of nonviral mRNA, initiation of viral mRNA by N is superior
159 iral RNAs and with our study of encapsidated nonviral mRNAs containing inserts of viral sequence.
160  efficiency; therefore it may become a novel nonviral nanosystem for gene delivery.
161                                         This nonviral, non-stem cell approach enables autologous, adu
162               However, telomere extension by nonviral, nonintegrating methods remains inefficient.
163 RNA.VEGF-A-loaded PLGA NPs are an effective, nonviral, nontoxic, and sustainable form of gene therapy
164 linical implementation of safe and effective nonviral nucleic acid therapeutics, and preparation with
165 e augmented by other means in vivo to render nonviral oral gene delivery practical.
166     Single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) molecules of nonviral origin also induce TLR7-dependent production of
167  lymphomas and HCCs, but not in lymphomas of nonviral origin or HBV-associated HCC.
168  as well as an additional 66 bp insertion of nonviral origin.
169 edge, the first known human -1 PRF signal of nonviral origin.
170 ponses to these LCMV CD4 epitopes as well as nonviral, OVA-specific responses were actively suppresse
171 n be detrimental to the host in a variety of nonviral pathogen infection models.
172 est Nile virus), and 3 had coinfections with nonviral pathogens (2 with Ehrlichia chaffeensis and 1 w
173 nd 2 with varicella zoster virus) and 3 with nonviral pathogens (2 with pneumococcus and 1 with Crypt
174  by which MPYS mediates host defense against nonviral pathogens are unknown.
175  and demethylation in plant immunity against nonviral pathogens.
176 peripheral blood and was transfected using a nonviral plasmid carrying complementary DNA for modified
177 mphocytes can be genetically programmed with nonviral plasmid DNA for the biogenesis and delivery of
178  noninvasive intravenous administration of a nonviral plasmid formulation.
179 ing Beauty (SB) transposon is an integrative nonviral plasmid system.
180  noninvasive intravenous administration of a nonviral plasmid that is reformulated with gene-targetin
181  the site around the ulcer was injected with nonviral plasmid-encoding full-length complementary DNA
182 ene delivery and increased the efficiency of nonviral platforms to levels previously attained only by
183 tuation is perhaps most prevalent in current nonviral polycationic gene-delivery systems in which the
184 l of nature's most efficient DNA viruses and nonviral polyethylenimine/DNA nanocomplexes were reveale
185 cells are often difficult to transfect using nonviral polyplexes.
186                                           In nonviral preclinical models, the angiogenic cytokine VEG
187                                              Nonviral producer cell proteins incorporated into retrov
188 that elements of the latency locus protect a nonviral promoter against silencing in primary human cel
189 e cells, including HSCs, and accommodating a nonviral promoter to control the transgene expression in
190         Bacterial encapsulins are a class of nonviral protein cages that self-assemble in vivo into s
191 positive selection in a variety of viral and nonviral protein-coding genes.
192  expedient means for generating novel mutant nonviral proteins in mammalian cells.
193                                  Remarkably, nonviral proteins made up about two thirds of VC protein
194 d approach can be applied to other viral and nonviral proteins.
195 nsignificant pathology, acute rejection, and nonviral pulmonary infection.
196 proteins between Z and Xenopus Neuralized, a nonviral RING finger protein, indicated that the structu
197                                              Nonviral risk factors for acquisition of HR HPV infectio
198  Efficient incorporation into BMV virions of nonviral RNA chimeras containing NE and the PE provides
199 er is able to discriminate between viral and nonviral RNA molecules and, interestingly, recognizes an
200 plex that can discriminate between viral and nonviral RNA molecules during the early steps of the enc
201 capable of altering the binding potential of nonviral RNA to levels seen with wild-type vRNAs.
202 o minimize the risk of accidental capping of nonviral RNA when Pol is dormant.
203 s 3' deletion mutants of both vRNA and cRNA, nonviral RNA, and hybrid viral/nonviral RNA, were analyz
204                This region, if placed within nonviral RNA, is capable of altering the binding potenti
205 prevents HBV core protein from assembling on nonviral RNA, preserving the protein for virus productio
206 RNA and cRNA, nonviral RNA, and hybrid viral/nonviral RNA, were analyzed for their ability to interac
207  confer 1a-induced membrane association on a nonviral RNA.
208 bility to transform the binding potential of nonviral RNA?
209 st that APOBEC3G interactions with viral and nonviral RNAs that are packaged into viral particles are
210 RNA replication signals, which also directed nonviral RNAs to P bodies.
211                           Equivalently sized nonviral RNAs, including high copy potential in vivo com
212 e S-IGR of Lassa virus (LASV) or an entirely nonviral S-IGR-like sequence (Ssyn), are viable, indicat
213                    The maintenance of such a nonviral sequence was surprising considering that most R
214 than specific sequences, we examined whether nonviral sequences can be used to facilitate minus-stran
215                    These data indicated that nonviral sequences could be used to efficiently mediate
216 were constructed to contain substitutions of nonviral sequences in place of bases 21 to 72 of the ant
217                       We further report that nonviral sequences that are rapidly deleted from recombi
218 t of the ACMV origin of replication flanking nonviral sequences that can be mobilized and replicated
219 e proteins more efficiently than did control nonviral sequences, suggesting that it might be involved
220 es of viral ssRNAs are smaller than those of nonviral sequences.
221 onas vaginalis, which causes the most common nonviral sexually transmitted disease worldwide, is itse
222 and causes trichomonosis, the most prevalent nonviral sexually transmitted disease.
223 chomonas vaginalis is one of the most common nonviral sexually transmitted human infections and, worl
224 richomonas vaginalis (TV) is the most common nonviral sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the wor
225  Trichomoniasis vaginalis is the most common nonviral sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide,
226 is estimated to be the most widely prevalent nonviral sexually transmitted infection in the world.
227  Trichomonas vaginalis is the most prevalent nonviral sexually transmitted infection worldwide, and i
228 chomonas vaginalis causes the most prevalent nonviral sexually transmitted infection worldwide.
229 ponsible for trichomoniasis, the most common nonviral sexually transmitted infection worldwide.
230  Trichomonas vaginalis is the most prevalent nonviral sexually transmitted infection, affecting an es
231 Trichomoniasis vaginalis, the most prevalent nonviral sexually transmitted infection, is associated w
232 euraminidase repeats that are a signature of nonviral sialidases.
233 , this is the most efficacious and selective nonviral siRNA delivery system for gene silencing in hep
234 or the safety and efficacy of this targeted, nonviral siRNA delivery system.
235 pplicable therapeutic strategy that involves nonviral siRNA delivery to ameliorate the response to va
236  cells (ECs) in vitro and use a rapid 10-min nonviral siRNA transfection technique to determine the e
237 s that biological pressures on the choice of nonviral sites would be minimal was validated when most
238                    We tested the safety of a nonviral somatic-cell gene-therapy system in patients wi
239  sequence with higher affinity than to other nonviral ssRNA sequences.
240 , we predict the average MLD values of large nonviral ssRNAs scale as N(0.67+/-0.01), where N is the
241 ings indicate that replacement of L-IGR by a nonviral Ssyn could serve as a universal molecular deter
242         One of these is the first identified nonviral substrate for Nedd4-mediated monoubiquitylation
243                                        These nonviral synthetic IGRs can be used as universal molecul
244  us to generate recombinant LCMVs containing nonviral synthetic IGRs.
245 afe DNA delivery that has great promise as a nonviral system of gene transfer.
246 on, and retroviral integration, we propose a nonviral system that would potentially allow for site-se
247  We have therefore investigated the use of a nonviral system, transferrin-mediated lipofection, to tr
248  of this protein residue in the selection of nonviral target DNA sites is likely to be a general prop
249 rus type 1 integrase, affected the choice of nonviral target DNA sites.
250  integrases for alterations in the choice of nonviral target DNA sites.
251 s suggest that a comprehensive evaluation of nonviral technologies to deliver self-amplifying RNA vac
252 ds great promise for human gene therapy as a nonviral technology to deliver therapeutic genes.
253 llowing RNA transfection is due, in part, to nonviral terminal sequences present in the in vitro-deri
254                       We found that a 2-part nonviral Tet-KRAB inducible expression system repressed
255 V entry and replication and can be important nonviral therapeutic targets.
256 ctors is a major concern when novel viral or nonviral therapeutics are proposed for applications in h
257          For this reason, they are promising nonviral transfection agents.
258 lated with those needed to achieve efficient nonviral transfection in vivo.
259                             Although various nonviral transfection methods are available, cell toxici
260 t retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), by using nonviral transfection methods for gene transfer and the
261                                      Current nonviral transfection methods, empirically designed to m
262 ion of gene expression in central neurons by nonviral transfection techniques, including production o
263 ity of viral vectors and the inefficiency of nonviral transfection techniques.
264 e large research effort focused on enhancing nonviral transfection vectors has clearly demonstrated t
265 t this hypothesis, we have generated using a nonviral transformation procedure a bone marrow-derived
266                               Both viral and nonviral tumor antigen-specific T cells resided predomin
267 r directed to the diasialoganglioside GD2, a nonviral tumor-associated antigen expressed by human neu
268          T cells specific for LMP as well as nonviral tumor-associated antigens (epitope spreading) c
269   Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) directed to nonviral tumor-associated antigens do not survive long t
270 th most viral vectors, we believe this novel nonviral vector can be of great value for cardiac gene t
271              The SB-Tn system is a promising nonviral vector for efficient genomic insertion conferri
272 modified silica (ORMOSIL) nanoparticles as a nonviral vector for efficient in vivo gene delivery.
273 ganically modified silica nanoparticles as a nonviral vector for gene delivery and biophotonics metho
274                                            A nonviral vector for highly efficient site-specific integ
275 ansposon (SB-Tn) has emerged as an important nonviral vector for integrating transgenes into mammalia
276                               Both viral and nonviral vector gene delivery systems have been used to
277    The improved understanding of what limits nonviral vector gene transfer efficiency in vivo has res
278                         To our knowledge, no nonviral vector has been proposed that allows for the po
279 was soon recognized that the properties of a nonviral vector resulting in efficient transfection in v
280 is study, we investigated the use of a novel nonviral vector system, the Sleeping Beauty (SB) transpo
281            In this study, we develop a novel nonviral vector that robustly and persistently expresses
282  possible after the i.v. administration of a nonviral vector with the combined use of gene targeting
283                                We designed a nonviral vector, PEI-PEG-DUPA (PPD), comprising polyethy
284 prove the efficiency of gene transfer by the nonviral vector.
285  concerns regarding their use in humans make nonviral vectors an attractive alternative.
286 on skipping, to gene therapy using viral and nonviral vectors and cell-based approaches.
287 subtle changes in the physical properties of nonviral vectors and provides a basis for the definition
288                                Consequently, nonviral vectors can incorporate numerous vector composi
289 demonstrations established relatively simple nonviral vectors could mediate gene expression in HepG2
290 new understandings in the rational design of nonviral vectors for efficient gene delivery.
291          Such systems have high potential as nonviral vectors for gene delivery and will allow for mo
292 biochemical mechanisms associated with using nonviral vectors for gene delivery.
293         Research into the design of suitable nonviral vectors has been slow.
294  Gene therapy based on delivery of viral and nonviral vectors has shown great promise for the treatme
295 e advantages, gene-delivery strategies using nonviral vectors have poorly translated into clinical su
296                                              Nonviral vectors, on the other hand, offer safety but ha
297                                    Among the nonviral vectors, the lipoplexes (complexes of cationic
298  molecules, utilizing a variety of viral and nonviral vectors, to induce antigen-specific immune resp
299 delivery are usually classified as viral and nonviral vectors.
300          This article reviews both viral and nonviral work with focus on two candidates for clinical

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top