戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 l training of the reviewer (ie, physician or nurse practitioner).
2       CBE was performed on all patients by a nurse practitioner.
3 s compared to usual care without access to a nurse practitioner.
4 ediatrics, adolescent medicine, or pediatric nurse practitioner.
5 a telephone follow-up after discharge from a nurse practitioner.
6 4% of physicians who reported working with a nurse practitioner.
7  by 16 pediatric gastroenterologists and one nurse practitioner.
8 ced by attendings, fellows, residents, and a nurse practitioner.
9 ish the internist from family physicians and nurse practitioners.
10 s were taken at the discretion of the school nurse practitioners.
11 hemotherapy nurses and those run by advanced nurse practitioners.
12 atients, and earning higher incomes than did nurse practitioners.
13  physicians and 1.74 (95% CI, 1.68-1.79) for nurse practitioners.
14  of pediatric oncologists, endocrinologists, nurse practitioners, a urologist, and a radiation oncolo
15 cy Department study who were photographed by nurse practitioners after <30 minutes of training follow
16 l colleague, the properly trained nephrology nurse practitioner, allows the nephrologist to provide c
17             The CBC group received care by a nurse practitioner and a community health worker in a co
18 eived integrated medical care on-site from a nurse practitioner and a full-time nurse care manager su
19 nefits of LTC staff about having access to a nurse practitioner and benefits of the pain team, along
20 nurse practitioner care, six focused on both nurse practitioner and physician assistant care, and fiv
21 45 articles were reviewed on the role of the nurse practitioner and physician assistant in acute and
22 d 2 years of home-based care management by a nurse practitioner and social worker who collaborated wi
23 ugh 135 of these schools (19%) also approved nurse practitioners and 244 schools (34%) allowed athlet
24 ergo prophylactic mastectomy, whereas 12% of nurse practitioners and 34% of physicians would be likel
25 ecommendation about testing, but only 43% of nurse practitioners and 68% of physicians would do so.
26  In light of the limited discordance between nurse practitioners and consumers, nurse practitioners c
27 presence of a fracture between the emergency nurse practitioners and emergency physicians was 0.83.
28 ted adult limb radiographs between emergency nurse practitioners and emergency physicians.
29 here were no significant differences between nurse practitioners and junior doctors in the accuracy o
30 d accident and emergency research registrar, nurse practitioners and junior doctors made clinically i
31                                              Nurse practitioners and PAs can provide high-quality car
32                                              Nurse practitioners and PAs had statistically significan
33                                              Nurse practitioners and PCPs with compact didactic train
34             Advanced practitioners including nurse practitioners and physician assistants are contrib
35                                     In 2012, nurse practitioners and physician assistants billed inde
36 Provider Survey, administered to physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants from June-S
37  of care is needed to promote optimal use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in acute an
38 though existing research supports the use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in acute an
39                       However, the impact of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the inte
40 Further research that explores the impact of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the inte
41 glish-language literature of publications on nurse practitioners and physician assistants utilizing O
42                         Mid-level providers (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) were origi
43 s to use advanced practice providers (APPs) (nurse practitioners and physician assistants).
44 al solutions include expanded utilization of nurse practitioners and physician assistants, telemedici
45 ith significantly fewer prenatal visits with nurse practitioners and physician assistants.
46 eve that advanced practice clinicians (APCs [nurse practitioners and physician assistants]) provide c
47                                Six emergency nurse practitioners and ten emergency physicians partici
48           We surveyed 426 at-risk women, 143 nurse practitioners, and 296 physicians in five specialt
49 ed 56 physicians, 28 physician assistants or nurse practitioners, and 9 registered nurses.
50 located treatment, but patients, clinicians, nurse practitioners, and other health-care professionals
51 ter visits, clinicians--physicians, fellows, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants--were inte
52 iewed (nine surgeons, 16 intensivists, three nurse practitioners, and two "other" clinicians).
53 epted the need for compliance and instituted nurse practitioner antiemetic prescribing, with almost c
54                                      Being a nurse practitioner (aOR = 5.6, 95% CI = 2.6-11.9) compar
55 supply and scope of practice of primary care nurse practitioners are controversial.
56 hysician providers (physician assistants and nurse practitioners) are being used with increasing freq
57  clinical and diagnostic skills of emergency nurse practitioners assessed in the interpretation of is
58         In conclusion, additional support by nurse practitioners attenuated the decline of kidney fun
59 tioner-led pain team (full intervention); 2) nurse practitioner but no pain management team (partial
60 e between nurse practitioners and consumers, nurse practitioners can play an increasing role in educa
61                 Of those, 20 were focused on nurse practitioner care, six focused on both nurse pract
62 mized control trials assessing the impact of nurse practitioner care.
63 omplications were entered prospectively by a nurse practitioner directly involved in patient care.
64 sit, 66.1% of physicians agreed and 75.3% of nurse practitioners disagreed.
65                               Physicians and nurse practitioners do not agree about their respective
66 quality examination and consultation than do nurse practitioners during the same type of primary care
67 articipants were also encouraged to attend 3 nurse practitioner-facilitated peer support group sessio
68 tings led by a palliative care physician and nurse practitioner for surrogates of patients in medical
69 medical history and fewer patients seen by a nurse practitioner had to seek unplanned follow-up advic
70 ocation was also significantly higher in the nurse practitioner-ICU (31.7% in nurse practitioner-staf
71                    LTC homes should employ a nurse practitioner, ideally located onsite as opposed to
72 of current CKD guidelines through the aid of nurse practitioners improves renal outcome.
73 ach year, utilizing physician assistants and nurse practitioners in greater numbers, and improving pr
74  past two decades, the role of critical care nurse practitioners in neonatal and adult settings has d
75 viral conjunctivitis underwent evaluation by nurse practitioners in Occupational Health and rapid dia
76 es about the effect of expanding the role of nurse practitioners in primary care.
77 information on the practice of critical care nurse practitioners in tertiary care centers is lacking.
78 uality for nonmydriatic photographs taken by nurse practitioners in the ED.
79 ey of 972 clinicians (505 physicians and 467 nurse practitioners) in primary care practice.
80        One emergency physician and emergency nurse practitioner independently clinically assessed eac
81 e integration of the pediatric critical care nurse practitioner into the health care team, definition
82 hat the quality of primary care delivered by nurse practitioners is equal to that of physicians.
83                             CBE performed by nurse practitioners led to the diagnosis of 14 cancers i
84 port (RPS) arm patients participated in a HF nurse practitioner-led goal setting group session, recei
85 A mixed method design was used to evaluate a nurse practitioner-led pain management team, including b
86  were allocated to one of three groups: 1) a nurse practitioner-led pain team (full intervention); 2)
87 ed over the intervention period for both the nurse practitioner-led pain team and nurse practitioner-
88 s from this study showed that implementing a nurse practitioner-led pain team can significantly impro
89                               Implementing a nurse practitioner-led pain team in LTC significantly re
90  in the nurse care management arm attended a nurse practitioner-led session to address their HF care
91 valuated the effectiveness of implementing a nurse practitioner-led, inter-professional pain manageme
92 t Efficacy in Renal Patients with the Aid of Nurse Practitioners (MASTERPLAN) study after extended fo
93  unrealized for many reasons, but support by nurse practitioners may improve risk factor levels in th
94 t were enrolled and randomized with either a nurse practitioner (n = 806) or physician (n = 510).
95 or injuries were randomly assigned care by a nurse practitioner (n=704) or by a junior doctor (n=749)
96 ement team (partial intervention); or, 3) no nurse practitioner, no pain management team (control gro
97                                              Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs)
98 ing primary care providers (PCPs), including nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs)
99                 The effective utilization of nurse practitioners (NPs) has been proposed as a solutio
100 ening and referral behaviors of primary care nurse practitioners (NPs) in relation to the periodontal
101 those with primary care physicians (PCPs) or nurse practitioners (NPs) in terms of reduced worrying a
102     This study examines 10 such disciplines: nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), n
103 y of HCV treatment independently provided by nurse practitioners (NPs), primary care physicians (PCPs
104 of the impact of the pediatric critical care nurse practitioner on patient outcomes in the tertiary c
105 oth the nurse practitioner-led pain team and nurse practitioner-only groups; these changes did not oc
106 inicians: chiropractors, midwives, nurses or nurse practitioners, optometrists, podiatrists, physicia
107 ts with minor injuries who were managed by a nurse practitioner or a junior doctor in our accident an
108       Each patient was first assessed by the nurse practitioner or junior doctor who did a clinical a
109 ed to compare the clinical assessment of the nurse practitioner or junior doctor with the assessment
110 evalence of nonwhite residents, and lacked a nurse practitioner or physician assistant on staff.
111 ect comparison of outcomes for patients with nurse practitioner or physician providers.
112 uded residents (n = 9), fellows (n = 4), and nurse practitioners or physician assistants (n = 2).
113  or pharmacies that are typically staffed by nurse practitioners or physician assistants.
114                                              Nurse practitioners or those who reported feeling 'more
115    Physicians, physician assistants, nurses, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, dentists, dental hygie
116 athic medicine), advance practice providers (nurse practitioner, physician assistant, nurses, pharmac
117 15, by 84 health care providers (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants) from across t
118 and 470 APCs, including certified registered nurse practitioners, physician assistants, clinical nurs
119                    These disciplines include nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurse-midwive
120 thousand three hundred sixty-one physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, respiratory t
121       However, these studies did not measure nurse practitioner practices that had the same degree of
122   The work environment was measured with the Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate Q
123 ractice, and outcomes to date of a pediatric nurse practitioner program in our pediatric critical car
124  wider range of health professionals such as nurse practitioners, registered nurses and other clinica
125                          A total of 80.9% of nurse practitioners reported working in a practice with
126 comes except for medical ICU length of stay (nurse practitioner-resident-staffed 7.9 +/- 7.5 d vs res
127                    A pediatric critical care nurse practitioner role can be implemented successfully
128 ure to date focuses on implementation of the nurse practitioner role in neonatal and adult critical c
129 the extensions to practice for the emergency nurse practitioner role is to appropriately order and in
130 tical aspects of testing, and physicians and nurse practitioners should pay more attention to the lim
131 ecutive medical ICU admissions including 221 nurse practitioner-staffed medical ICU admissions (19.1%
132  To compare usage patterns and outcomes of a nurse practitioner-staffed medical ICU and a resident-st
133  found no difference in mortality between an nurse practitioner-staffed medical ICU and a resident-st
134 gher in the nurse practitioner-ICU (31.7% in nurse practitioner-staffed medical ICU vs 23.9% in resid
135                     Patients admitted to the nurse practitioner-staffed medical ICU were older (63 +/
136 ate to severe CKD were randomized to receive nurse practitioner support added to physician care (inte
137 xpanding the supply and scope of practice of nurse practitioners to address increased demand for prim
138 y care physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners to effectively implement EHR systems
139 This article describes the successful use of nurse practitioners to extend the scope of nephrology ca
140 gular primary care providers (physicians and nurse practitioners) to improve care for depression.
141  greater use of physician-extenders, such as nurse practitioners, to provide enhanced access to speci
142  conducted with 391 internal medicine and 81 nurse practitioner trainees between 2007 and 2013 at the
143                  Among internal medicine and nurse practitioner trainees, simulation-based communicat
144            The specificity for the emergency nurse practitioners was 85% and for the emergency physic
145            The sensitivity for the emergency nurse practitioners was 91% and 88% for the emergency ph
146                                          The nurse practitioners were better than junior doctors at r
147 ficity of emergency physicians and emergency nurse practitioners were calculated.
148                                              Nurse practitioners were less likely to recommend patien
149                                              Nurse practitioners were more likely than physicians to
150      Properly trained accident and emergency nurse practitioners, who work within agreed guidelines c
151                   It has been suggested that nurse practitioners, working within an inter-professiona

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top