ライフサイエンスコーパス: nutritional support

1 trition for patients needing chronic enteric nutritional support.

2 ould be improved with the use of hypocaloric nutritional support.

3 A bottom-up protocol improved nutritional support.

4 ween the endocrine response to infection and nutritional support.

5 rapy, and isocaloric, isonitrogenous enteral nutritional support.

6 ammatory response in the presence of limited nutritional support.

7 ically ill septic children receiving limited nutritional support.

8 y needs of critically ill patients requiring nutritional support.

9 red in the ICU results in grossly inadequate nutritional support.

10 us total parenteral nutrition (IV TPN) or no nutritional support.

11 feeding tube placement in patients requiring nutritional support.

12 capuchins or to important, if intermittent, nutritional support.

13 ive way in which to optimize the response to nutritional support.

14 of lean body mass that was not prevented by nutritional support alone.

15 have been used safely in patients receiving nutritional support, although some probiotic products (s

16 hat cannot be fully reversed by conventional nutritional support and leads to progressive functional

17 tays of therapy for cystic fibrosis, such as nutritional support and mechanical mucus clearance, are

18 bers and types of infections while receiving nutritional support and nitrogen balance after 5 days of

19 Both nutritional support and orexigenic agents play a role in

20 ant hepatic failure (FHF) would help develop nutritional support and other nonsurgical medical therap

21 Previous studies showed that nutritional support and pharmacologic intervention with

22 An analysis of the changes induced by nutritional support and those obtained only at the end o

23 remains as it was 40 years ago: abstinence, nutritional support, and corticosteroids.

24 on, correction of electrolyte abnormalities, nutritional support, and critical care management for re

25 sion of consistent carbohydrate calories and nutritional support, and dextrose replacement for hypogl

26 CTs) have investigated enteral or parenteral nutritional support, and evidence-based clinical guidanc

27 boembolism prophylaxis, surgical infections, nutritional support, and other complications that may be

28 , appropriate resuscitation, sepsis control, nutritional support, and re-establishment of esophageal

29 admission serum albumin, time to initiating nutritional support, and route of nutrition did not affe

30 y drugs, coordinated care packages, improved nutritional support, and the intensive use of antibiotic

31 Data detailing the effects of aggressive nutritional support before transplantation are scarce, a

32 t developments in the field of perioperative nutritional support by reviewing clinically pertinent En

33 Nutritional support, dialysis, and chronic kidney diseas

34 Thirteen RCTs (n = 439) of nutritional support [dietary advice (1 RCT), oral nutrit

35 uality RCTs and provides new perspectives on nutritional support during critical illness and recovery

36 ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07-1.92), and type of nutritional support (e.g., early enteral nutrition: odds

37 patients who required ECMO and were provided nutritional support, either enterally or parenterally.

38 deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A, plus nutritional support extended median survival of spinal m

39 ned on oxygen on an "as needed" basis and on nutritional support for 1 to 2 mo.

40 nt of micronutrient deficiency diseases, and nutritional support for at-risk groups, including infant

41 reater mean (+/-SE) improvements in favor of nutritional support for body weight (1.94 +/- 0.26 kg, P

42 e enteral nutrition therapy is the preferred nutritional support for dysphagic patients with a range

43 The ineffectiveness of nutritional support for muscle was due to alterations in

44 3) What is the optimal mode and timing of nutritional support for the patient with SAP?

45 eratolysis, possibly because of impedance of nutritional support from the aqueous humor.

46 e prospectively randomized into one of three nutritional support groups after surgery: 10 patients re

47 Therefore, nutritional support has gained increasing interest in cr

48 Standard nutritional support has not significantly altered outcom

49 are increasingly used in patients receiving nutritional support; however, some case reports and tria

50 Adequate nutritional support in children after cardiac surgery is

51 e most effective route for delivery of early nutritional support in critically ill adults.

52 sociated with the route of delivery of early nutritional support in critically ill adults.

53 of early compared with delayed beginnings of nutritional support in critically ill obese patients are

54 led trials (RCTs) to clarify the efficacy of nutritional support in improving intake, anthropometric

55 ral nutrition can be safely administered for nutritional support in pediatric patients undergoing eit

56 in combination with antibiotic coverage and nutritional support in the form of early enteral tube fe

57 The efficacy of nutritional support in the management of malnutrition in

58 Patient demographics, nutritional support, incidence of sepsis, inhalation inj

59 supportive care including oral pain control, nutritional support, infection treatment and control of

60 the enteral route to a delivery route, with nutritional support initiated within 36 hours after admi

61 ensive care unit (ICU), affected the time of nutritional support initiation.

62 ure of the liver to appropriately adapt when nutritional support is administered.

63 Nutritional support is an essential component of the man

64 Goal-directed nutritional support is essential to improving morbidity

65 -threatening disease for which adequate oral nutritional support is recommended.

66 For alcoholic hepatitis, nutritional support is the mainstay of treatment; steroi

67 With appropriate nutritional support, lambs on the system demonstrate nor

68 tematic review and meta-analysis showed that nutritional support, mainly in the form of ONS, improves

69 bowel disease, including initial evaluation, nutritional support, medical and surgical intervention,

70 arm, and cutaneous toxicity and the need for nutritional support more frequent in the CTX arm.

71 n mean total protein and energy intakes with nutritional support of 14.8 g and 236 kcal daily.

72 The optimal nutritional support of critically ill patients should be

73 o manufacture solutions used for intravenous nutritional support of hospitalized and ambulatory patie

74 ependent) but apparently receives sufficient nutritional support only from tumor tissue.

75 Conventional nutritional support only partially ameliorates this proc

76 or prolonged mechanical ventilation, type of nutritional support, or use of dopamine.

77 ences in need for postoperative (par)enteral nutritional support, other complications, hospital morta

78 e indicates that the provision of adjunctive nutritional support (parenteral or enteral nutrition, or

79 rategy involved early drainage of sepsis and nutritional support prior to elective ECF repair, with s

80 of drainage of acute sepsis, maintenance of nutritional support prior to surgery, and selective use

81 eral approach remains an important method of nutritional support: recent data help to ensure its safe

82 Guidelines recommend an early nutritional support, regardless of the previous nutritio

83 appropriately designed mixed fuel system of nutritional support replete in protein does not quell th

84 This neglect of skin grafting and nutritional support resulted in critically ill children

85 Data indicate that despite adequate nutritional support, severe thermal injury leads to decr

86 arginine monotherapy in the context of full nutritional support should be carried out so as to defin

87 mature infants might be reduced by improving nutritional support, specifically targeting lipids and t

88 Insufficient nutritional support still remains a widespread problem d

89 ficial treatments, for example, provision of nutritional support; surrogate and survivor satisfaction

90 e safety of probiotics in patients receiving nutritional support through a systematic review of case

91 Nutritional support to increase energy, calcium intake,

92 health worker, directly observed treatment, nutritional support, transportation stipends, and other

93 Continued progress in the areas of optimal nutritional support, understanding the implications of a

94 A consisted of 14 patients who were provided nutritional support using total parenteral nutrition.

95 The initiation of nutritional support was delayed in obese ICU patients.

96 In our program, in which nutritional support was provided to potential recipients

97 Nutritional support was provided to rats for 7 days by o

98 Neither canned supplements nor nutritional support were used effectively.

99 ions may lead to underfeeding and inadequate nutritional support with a direct effect on patient outc

100 plasma GSH and TNF-alpha levels by adequate nutritional support with adjuvant rhGH during the postin

101 ully quantify clinical benefits and optimize nutritional support with FOSL-HN should be undertaken.

102 Nutritional support with sodium and water supplementatio

103 , a combination of antimicrobial agents, and nutritional support, with or without drainage of the inf