ライフサイエンスコーパス: offender

1 0 [81%] men, 2568 [26%] of 9776 were violent offenders).

2 prohibit the possession of firearms by these offenders.

3 ning and assessment tools for use with young offenders.

4 athways initiated by inflammatory and immune offenders.

5 proving the efficacy of treatment for sexual offenders.

6 atment program for heroin-dependent criminal offenders.

7 ined in DSM-IV, in a group of pedophilic sex offenders.

8 mong substance abusing or dependent juvenile offenders.

9 rvivors of domestic violence and of criminal offenders.

10 but not psychopathy, and 18 were healthy non-offenders.

11 ffenders without psychopathy and healthy non-offenders.

12 he sellers; and (e) the buyers as vulnerable offenders.

13 targets for high-risk groups of patients and offenders.

14 has collated an impressive data set on such offenders.

15 s in a population of adult male incarcerated offenders.

16 k of violence) among intellectual disability offenders.

17 ossession by intimate partner violence (IPV) offenders.

18 ces in 2Dratio4D ratio and impulsivity among offenders.

19 nd female prisoners and both adult and young offenders.

20 isposition to impulsive behavior in juvenile offenders.

21 iduals with personality disorders, including offenders.

22 ual characteristics of intellectual disabled offenders.

23 ms have shown such promise with drug-abusing offenders.

24 Violent offenders (1,369 [11.0%]) were the most prevalent offend

25 cohol use and other psychiatric disorders in offenders 15 years after a first conviction for driving

26 h subjects, including 166 alcoholic criminal offenders, 261 relatives, and 213 healthy controls.

27 and subjective level in severe psychopathic offenders after SCP-neurofeedback training and could con

28 995 with a convenience sample of 63 juvenile offenders aged 13 through 18 years, each of whom was inc

29 ell established that the mental state of the offender and the severity of the harm he caused are the

30 Nineteen incarcerated violent offenders and 24 healthy control nonoffenders were inclu

31 Overall, 51.4% of male young adult offenders and 43.6% of female offenders had a child psyc

32 To test this possibility, 44 male offenders and 46 nonoffenders completed the Eysenck Impu

33 isorders persisted over 10 years among first offenders and greatly exceeded those found in a general

34 lth needs screening tools for use with young offenders and implications for this vulnerable group.

35 There is some evidence that female offenders and persistent offenders are particularly at r

36 ealth, educational and social needs of young offenders and the implications for key agencies that com

37 hiatric disorders in a sample of young adult offenders and then tested which childhood disorders best

38 ferent groups, that is, fire setters, sexual offenders and those with problems of anger and aggressio

39 en a biological marker and impulsivity among offenders (and lack thereof among non-offenders), which

40 terize the nature of the problem and alleged offender, and compared with each physician's risk manage

41 ive behaviors, while controlling for victim, offender, and crime-related characteristics.

42 intervention demonstrate, that psychopathic offenders are able to gain control of their brain excita

43 nce-based treatment of intellectual disabled offenders are not widely explored issues.

44 vidence that female offenders and persistent offenders are particularly at risk of psychosocial probl

45 If potential offenders are sufficiently deterrable, increasing the co

46 and digit ratio measurements compared to non-offenders, but higher impulsivity scores.

47 by a small group of antisocial recidivistic offenders, but no genes have been shown to contribute to

48 The extent to which offenders can be persuaded, through knowledge of crimina

49 In contrast, research with offenders claiming amnesia for their crimes has emphasiz

50 lity were conducted in 804 Finnish alcoholic offenders, controls, and their relatives, in a sample th

51 identification, evaluation, and treatment of offenders, despite increasing concerns and awareness reg

52 Intriguingly, the two groups of offenders did not differ significantly from the non-offe

53 Subjects were 1,130 male criminal offenders drawn from a birth cohort of all individuals b

54 isely how people assess the mental states of offenders, evaluate the harms they caused, and integrate

55 Offenders exhibited smaller right hand digit ratio measu

56 In this trial involving criminal justice offenders, extended-release naltrexone was associated wi

57 airness of the offender proposing the offer (offender-focused block, OB), the feeling of the victim r

58 In the violent offender group, striatal 5-HT1BR binding was positively

59 le young adult offenders and 43.6% of female offenders had a child psychiatric history.

60 Thirty-two percent of female and 38% of male offenders had a drug-use disorder, compared with 16% and

61 ystem and treatment of intellectual disabled offenders have also been explored.

62 Young offenders have high levels of morbidity in a number of a

63 Juvenile offenders have high rates of affective disorder.

64 A substantial number of young offenders have learning disabilities, which has implicat

65 opioid relapse among adult criminal justice offenders (i.e., persons involved in the U.S. criminal j

66 treatment in preventing recidivism of sexual offenders in general, a finding that has a high probabil

67 The literature shows that young offenders in North America and Europe have high levels o

68 rs did not differ significantly from the non-offenders in terms of their alteration of motor response

69 Young offenders in the community and those from ethnic minorit

70 im to reduce crime and keep alcohol-involved offenders in the community.

71 lly reactive" children and adolescent sexual offenders in the United States declined from more than o

72 , and psychiatric care for more than 145,000 offenders, incarcerated under the jurisdiction of the Te

73 d for either MAOA or CDH13 among non-violent offenders, indicating that findings were specific for vi

74 However, the peak age incidence for violent offenders is 18, well within the spectrum of the adolesc

75 onal Institute for Health Research, National Offender Management Service, and Department of Health.

76 tions is based on empirical evidence for how offenders move and mix with potential victims or targets

77 Drunk-driving offenders need assessment and treatment services not onl

78 out psychopathy (ASPD-P), and 21 healthy non-offenders on tasks assessing cool (verbal working memory

79 The performance of the two groups of offenders on the measures of cool and hot executive func

80 ded if they wanted to punish the first-party offender or help the second-party victim using their own

81 sly was replicated in a new group of Finnish offenders (P=.001, n=122).

82 h estimates ranging between 2 and 10% of the offender population having intellectual disabilities.

83 observation suggests that impulsivity in the offender population is a consequence of a delay in typic

84 but little is known about risk in the wider offender population.

85 nding or sexual behavior problems, and eight offenders presented themselves voluntarily to state atto

86 re asked to focus on the (un)fairness of the offender proposing the offer (offender-focused block, OB

87 Treating drug-involved offenders provides a unique opportunity to decrease subs

88 cords at 3 points in time and from state sex offender registries.

89 ive behaviors varied as a function of victim-offender relationship status.

90 ury did not vary as a function of the victim-offender relationship.

91 ount of missing information about the victim-offender relationship.

92 Adjustments to account for unknown victim-offender relationships generally increased the prevalenc

93 ighty-five percent of female and 91% of male offenders reported a lifetime alcohol-use disorder, comp

94 779C (L) allele to suicidality in impulsive offenders reported previously was replicated in a new gr

95 Providing services for young offenders requires investment from all the agencies in p

96 r-regarding attention (e.g., focusing on the offender's crime or the victim's situation especially in

97 Adult male and female offenders serving sentences of 2 or more years for a sex

98 Criminal offenders showed significantly reduced electrodermal fea

99 Both victims and offenders tended to be young (median ages, 16 and 17 yea

100 need to be measured include the fraction of offenders that illegally possess a gun, the degree of pr

101 new approaches for managing alcohol-involved offenders that might have public health implications.

102 ate to improve medical care for incarcerated offenders, the state of Texas implemented a novel correc

103 Primarily designed for male offenders, the US correctional system is struggling to m

104 years, thus increasing the sample of violent offenders threefold and allowing more detailed analyses

105 Excess mucus is induced by multiple airway offenders through nonspecific pathways and would explain

106 The index cases were 182 alcoholic criminal offenders, through which 258 relatives were ascertained

107 s with different propensities for sentencing offenders to prison.

108 al marketing campaign that encouraged sexual offenders to seek treatment.

109 rearm possession and also explicitly require offenders to surrender their firearms.

110 atric patients and other mentally disordered offenders together with the offer of monitored abstinenc

111 ve been a number of promising studies on sex offender treatment and on the treatment of issues relate

112 rticipating in residential or outpatient sex offender treatment programs were recruited to participat

113 ders (1,369 [11.0%]) were the most prevalent offender types; prevalence was highest in men aged 30 ye

114 As offenders varied in their number of previous convictions

115 In comparison to healthy non-offenders, violent offenders with ASPD+P and those with

116 rements significantly predicted criminality (offenders vs. nonoffenders).

117 children are uniquely at risk to become sex offenders was not supported by prospective empirical evi

118 ictims-and to a lesser extent, punishment of offenders-was uniquely driven by traits reflecting emoti

119 Homicide offenders were more likely than homicide victims to have

120 Recent evidence indicates that many sexual offenders were themselves molested and that lack of fami

121 among offenders (and lack thereof among non-offenders), which emphasise the importance of studying t

122 tinuous transdermal alcohol monitors with ex-offenders who recognise a link between their alcohol con

123 rrested were approximately double that of an offender with high activity in this region, holding cons

124 The odds that an offender with relatively low anterior cingulate activity

125 ement results in good outcome even for those offenders with a diagnosis of antisocial behavior.

126 For offenders with alcohol-use disorders, 50% of women and 3

127 pairments in executive function characterize offenders with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) an

128 Punishment prediction error signalling in offenders with antisocial personality disorder and psych

129 RI) study in 50 men, of whom 12 were violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder and psych

130 Offenders with antisocial personality disorder and psych

131 ty disorder and psychopathy, 20 were violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder but not p

132 This difference between violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder with and

133 The present study examined 17 violent offenders with ASPD and psychopathy (ASPD+P), 28 violent

134 th ASPD and psychopathy (ASPD+P), 28 violent offenders with ASPD without psychopathy (ASPD-P), and 21

135 comparison to healthy non-offenders, violent offenders with ASPD+P and those with ASPD-P showed simil

136 oral poles (Brodmann area 20/38) relative to offenders with ASPD-P and nonoffenders.

137 Offenders with ASPD-P exhibited GM volumes similar to th

138 Offenders with ASPDP displayed significantly reduced GM

139 across three matched groups of juveniles: CD offenders with CU traits (CD/CU+; n = 25), CD offenders

140 ssessment reviews and treatment programs for offenders with intellectual disabilities.

141 he impact of recent research on the field of offenders with intellectual disabilities.

142 th a clear policy and organized services for offenders with intellectual disabilities.

143 f the current research illustrates that even offenders with intellectual disability can be successful

144 o the literature, including predictors among offenders with intellectual disability, concurrent diagn

145 h antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and offenders with psychopathy.

146 les were physically assaulted by a lone male offender within the previous 6 months.

147 ly predicted subsequent rearrest among adult offenders within 4 y of release (N = 96).

148 ffenders with CU traits (CD/CU+; n = 25), CD offenders without CU traits (CD/CU-; n = 25), and health

149 This finding was in contrast to results for offenders without psychopathy and healthy non-offenders.