コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 there has been a rapid expansion of studies on this topic.
2 usly proposed in the widely cited literature on this topic.
3 some highlights of recent empirical studies on this topic.
4 e recent trials have attempted to shed light on this topic.
5 re limited data from non-Western populations on this topic.
6 his review highlights several recent studies on this topic.
7 a growing body of epidemiological literature on this topic.
8 Their study is unlikely to be the last word on this topic.
9 resulting in an educational position article on this topic.
10 eflected in the large number of publications on this topic.
11 iew summarizes the results of recent studies on this topic.
12 rther discussion despite much published work on this topic.
13 nal MC1R, thereby incrementing our knowledge on this topic.
14 similar to the general population literature on this topic.
15 ent clinical trials provide more information on this topic.
16 tent of stimulating additional investigation on this topic.
17 adults and updates the 1996 recommendations on this topic.
18 and updates the 1996 USPSTF recommendations on this topic.
19 diabetes mellitus and review the literature on this topic.
20 ough recent studies have begun to shed light on this topic.
21 cted based on the large amount of literature on this topic.
22 have failed to produce clear-cut conclusions on this topic.
23 o point the way forward for further research on this topic.
24 ystematic review of the published literature on this topic.
25 recently published an updated recommendation on this topic.
26 s; we are not aware of any previous research on this topic.
27 join the small but growing body of research on this topic.
28 d provide a review of the current literature on this topic.
29 erstand previously contradicting experiments on this topic.
30 e on HGIs and discuss the future of research on this topic.
31 omes should be considered for future studies on this topic.
32 e stimulus reconcile much of the controversy on this topic.
33 provide an overview of the recent literature on this topic.
34 ces from select research and review articles on this topic.
35 , which may improve further research studies on this topic.
36 No previous meta-analysis has been reported on this topic.
37 re is little experimental or conceptual data on this topic.
38 rway may clarify the many existing questions on this topic.
39 ents are needed to improve our understanding on this topic.
40 MIEC materials warrant systematic guidelines on this topic.
41 rize past and current work in our laboratory on this topic.
42 provides a critical review of the literature on this topic.
43 articular reference to what is already known on this topic.
44 While commentaries continue to proliferate on this topic, actual empirical research remains relativ
47 ut there is a dearth of longitudinal studies on this topic and a paucity of studies that have investi
48 of the rapidly expanding body of literature on this topic and argue that gold nanotechnology-enabled
51 ich we reviewed the epidemiologic literature on this topic and explored causal inference, bias, and h
56 the literature that shape current dialogues on this topic and provide implications for patient care.
57 ne previous meta-analysis has been published on this topic and supported an association between IL-1
59 esult of two separate international meetings on this topic, and provides recommendations for future a
60 t pathologists have a low level of agreement on this topic, and the terms "gastric atrophy" and "atro
61 ge, this is the largest study ever conducted on this topic, and using the best possible comprehensive
74 point supported by the cumulative literature on this topic as well as by emerging molecular data.
75 In this review, we return to seminal works on this topic before summarizing the changes that mass i
77 n interesting new study now sheds some light on this topic by examining the role of tropomyosin in st
78 e believe that a comprehensive understanding on this topic could significantly contribute towards the
80 though the articles that have been published on this topic did not consider patient-reported outcomes
81 eviews and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on this topic do not allow authors to answer those quest
83 s findings suggest a need for more education on this topic for ophthalmologists to be able to protect
84 dence review evaluating literature published on this topic from 1966 through April 2010 that was iden
85 e review evaluating the published literature on this topic from 1985 through November 2011 that was i
88 There is a surprising paucity of literature on this topic, given the millions that have undergone LA
101 Observations: Although no specific studies on this topic have led to formal recommendations, we sug
108 phrenia, with over 30 new articles published on this topic in the last 12 months, compared with 11 th
110 despite the wealth of information published on this topic in the past few years, some of the most fu
112 been synthesized since the previous reviews on this topic in this journal, the field has seen signif
114 Noteworthy publications from the past year on this topic include new guidelines for the interpretat
116 at the numbers of peer-reviewed publications on this topic increase during and immediately after rece
129 s modification, indicating that further work on this topic is still required, the developed predictor
131 a." In the 7 years since the first symposium on this topic, major advances have been made in our unde
133 The review not only highlights publications on this topic over the past 12-18 months but also refers
134 A prominent guiding framework for research on this topic over the past three decades has been the m
136 espite the vast amount of retrospective data on this topic, physicians generally have been unsure how
139 bMed database search for relevant literature on this topic published within the last 15 years was con
140 llustrate recent discoveries that shed light on this topic, relying when necessary on data from relat
145 s guideline is based on published literature on this topic that was identified by using MEDLINE (1946
146 s guideline is based on published literature on this topic that was identified by using MEDLINE (1966
147 s guideline is based on published literature on this topic that was identified by using MEDLINE, EMBA
148 s guideline is based on published literature on this topic that was identified using MEDLINE, the Coc
149 some of the many exciting talks and posters on this topic that were presented at the third Molecular
151 cause there have been several recent reviews on this topic, the present review takes a broader perspe
152 Despite a large number of articles published on this topic, there is no single predictive rule that c
169 issue and in the systematic evidence review on this topic, which can be obtained through the USPSTF
170 SPSTF recommendation and rationale statement on this topic, which includes a brief review of the supp
172 onale of this review is to present an update on this topic with focus on long-term consequences of in
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。