戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 red to control groups (measured with the BBB open field test).
2 c knock-out (Hdc KO) mice was assessed in an open field test.
3 vated plus maze, the light/dark box, and the open field test.
4 ted to the tail suspension test (TST) and an open field test.
5 ion, locomotor activity was studied using an open field test.
6 avioral testing, including a protocol for an open field test.
7 lso was demonstrated to be anxiolytic in the open field test.
8 bic areas signal movement during the TST and open field test.
9 -GABAARs increased time in the center in the open-field test.
10 s, 60 min before the tail suspension test or open-field test.
11 e animals were tested in the forced swim and open field tests.
12 tified in all cohorts using the cylinder and open field tests.
13 ted with mouse hyperactivity in homecage and open field tests.
14 d place preference, pre-pulse inhibition and open-field tests.
15  less exploratory activity during Y-maze and open-field tests.
16  behaviors, tested by elevated plus-maze and open-field tests.
17 like behaviors in the elevated plus maze and open-field tests.
18 rcles for hours on end, both in cages and in open-field tests.
19 eference and increased locomotor activity in open-field testing.
20 assessed via 1) neurologic testing and 2) an open-field test 24 hours after subarachnoid hemorrhage,
21  We discovered significant alterations in an open field test, a novel object recognition test and in
22 e behaved similarly as wild-type mice in the open field test and in the elevated plus maze test of an
23 Behavioural performance was evaluated by the open field test and the elevated plus maze.
24 ime, ambulatory behavior, and rearing in the open-field test and decreased the number of entrances an
25 motor function tests including the rota-rod, open-field tests and hind-paw footprint analysis.
26                       In both weight-bearing open-field tests and nonweight-bearing swim tests, LM11A
27 eg, posture, bradykinesia) and behaviorally (open field test), and their brains were processed for im
28 reezing time and time spent in the center in open field test, and entries and duration in the novel a
29 anxiety, namely the elevated plus maze test, open field test, and food neophobia test.
30 phenotype in both the elevated plus maze and open field tests, and increased the startle response.
31 ogenic profile in the elevated plus-maze and open field tests, and reduced social exploration of unfa
32 e showed behavioral avoidance of light in an open-field test, and they could discriminate a light sti
33                                          The open field test can be adapted in several ways: to asses
34 sures of spontaneous movement and gait in an open-field test declined as expected in control lesioned
35                         Behavior analyses by open field test, elevated plus maze, Reciprocal Social I
36                                           In open field test Hdc KO mice showed impaired exploratory
37 exhibited fewer stereotypic movements in the open field test, higher baseline startle responses in th
38                                 In automated open-field test, IDUA(-/-) mice showed hypoactivity as e
39 normalities including hyperlocomotion in the open field test, impaired coordination and balance in th
40  comparable to that of wild-type mice in the open-field test, in which, however mSOD1 exhibited incre
41 tant mice had a hyperactive phenotype in the open field test, independent of sex, and were more sensi
42   No psychostimulant effect was shown in the open-field test, indicating that the effects in the tail
43                                          The open field test is a popular rodent test of novelty expl
44 mphetamine-stimulated hyperlocomotion in the open field test, it restored d-amphetamine-disrupted pre
45                                        In an open field test, lesioned rats showed enhanced locomotio
46 re conducted to assess exploratory activity (open field test, light-dark box test) and cognitive func
47                  No changes were observed in open field test measures.
48                                           In open field tests, Mfn2 mutants show severe, age-dependen
49       Such behavior can be assessed with the open field test (OFT), which is a well-established indic
50 , novelty suppressed feeding (NSF) test, and open field test (OFT).
51 nted motor impairment as demonstrated by the open field test, pole test, and rearing behavior.
52 he elevated plus maze and thigmotaxis in the open field test revealed increased anxiety-like behavior
53                                   Subsequent open-field testing revealed no effects of BLA lesions on
54                                       In the open field test, SERT-/- mice showed reduced vertical ex
55                                              Open-field tests show delayed exploratory activity, redu
56                                              Open-field testing showed no differences in spontaneous
57 he rats exhibited improved motor function as open-field tests showed higher activity scores for runne
58 poactive in a test for exploratory behavior (open-field test), showing markedly reduced locomotion an
59 agonist nor-BNI increased center time in the open field test, suggesting an anxiolytic effect.
60 ed locomotion in both elevated plus-maze and open field tests, suggesting heightened novelty-induced
61 mice developed greater locomotor deficits in open-field tests than wild-type mice following low oral
62 manifested by 4.5-mo-old Naglu-/- mice in an open field test; the hyperactivity that is characteristi
63 , locomotor activity of these animals in the open-field test was not affected by ODN treatments.
64 aze which provides a measure of anxiety, the open field test which provides a measure of anxiety and
65 est phenotypic differences were found in the open field test, which maximizes avoidance behavior.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。