ライフサイエンスコーパス: operative time

1 and increase mental focus without extending operative time.

2 ction, without a substantial increase in the operative time.

3 ltifactorial but may be related to prolonged operative time.

4 GD rate, test performance, success rate, and operative time.

5 erator benefits, and potential advantages in operative time.

6 and increase mental focus without extending operative time.

7 rence of inguinal hernia, complications, and operative time.

8 on of fundoplication, time to discharge, and operative time.

9 ffective in decreasing MAO and required more operative time.

10 ly obese patients and adds little additional operative time.

11 ion modeling, adjusting for risk factors and operative time.

12 ative sepsis, wound class III/IV, and longer operative time.

13 s or hernia repairs, hernia defect size, and operative time.

14 ons have better patient outcomes and shorter operative times.

15 patients with favorable results and shorter operative times.

16 s performed extracorporeally due to improved operative times.

17 nsfusions, but at the same time have shorter operative times.

18 ique made it easier to perform and decreased operative times.

19 the disadvantage of significantly increased operative times.

20 ex 40 kg/m or higher (OR = 1.81, P = 0.015), operative time 120 minutes or more (OR = 1.69, P = 0.027

21 Operative time (135 +/- 45 min vs. 133 +/- 56 min; P = 0

22 Median operative time (149 vs 120 min, P < 0.001) and mean hosp

23 loss (150 mL versus 250 mL, P = 0.034), and operative time (187 minutes versus 211 minutes, P = 0.02

24 oscopic colectomy patients had a longer mean operative time (195 +/- 76 vs. 178 +/- 80 minutes; P < 0

25 assisted technique significantly reduced the operative time (2.02+/-0.44 vs. 3.12+/-0.36 hr, P<0.05)

26 positive margin rates (8% vs. 7%, P = 0.8), operative times (216 vs. 230 minutes, P = 0.3), or leak

27 Operative time (219 minutes for LH vs 198 minutes for OH

28 tistically significant differences in median operative time (263 minutes), intraoperative blood loss

29 FOLFIRINOX resulted in significantly longer operative times (393 vs 300 minutes) and blood loss (600

30 Median results are as follows: operative time 4.5 hr, warm ischemia time 25 min, and bl

31 d a similar complication rate (30% vs. 29%), operative time (4.6 vs. 5.1 hours), and intraoperative b

32 NASH patients had significantly longer operative times (402 vs 322 minutes; P < 0.001), operati

33 red favorably with standard open techniques: operative times (99 vs. 182 minutes), blood loss (102 vs

34 There was no difference in median operative time (A/R: 280 minutes, BR: 282 minutes; P = .

35 ortion, less ecchymosis and edema, decreased operative times, a shortened recovery period, and improv

36 No differences were found in operative time, accidental parathyroidectomy, parathyroi

37 fter 40 cases (27.5% vs 14.4%; P = .04), and operative time after 80 cases (581 minutes vs 417 minute

38 Average operative time and blood loss were 169 minutes (range, 6

39 e of robotics for these procedures increases operative time and cost, but decreases estimated blood l

40 Increased operative time and decreased donor liver-to-recipient bo

41 fferences in operative parameters, including operative time and estimated blood loss, were reported b

42 Ob group showed longer operative time and higher blood losses.

43 cipating resident was associated with longer operative time and higher postoperative complications ra

44 rathyroidism while simultaneously decreasing operative time and hospital stays.

45 invasive to the conventional group, although operative time and ischemia time was higher in minimally

46 The learning curve is evident: operative time and leaks decreased with experience and i

47 f unresectable disease significantly reduced operative time and length of stay compared with patients

48 Operative time and length of stay in the intensive care

49 Operative time and postoperative complications were simi

50 eoperative organ dysfunction, blood loss, or operative time and postoperative organ dysfunction or mo

51 DCD LT, measures were taken to minimize CIT, operative time and recipient WIT along with the use of t

52 significantly increased phacoemulsification operative times and costs during the first half, but not

53 Ranges of operative times and estimated blood losses were 83 to 22

54 nefits of this technique outweigh its longer operative times and higher costs.

55 ng comorbidities, was associated with longer operative times and higher rates of conversion to open p

56 tages of increased patient comfort decreased operative times and improved postoperative astigmatism.

57 Prolonged cold ischemic and operative times and multiple or peripheral strictures pr

58 roach enables patients to experience shorter operative times and the benefits of laparoscopy, includi

59 odels of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (80-90 min operative time) and sleeve gastrectomy (30-45 min operat

60 en PTSD and intra-operative analgesia, intra-operative time, and anesthesia type for cataract surgery

61 High blood loss, long operative time, and arterial resections were independent

62 groups for age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, operative time, and blood loss.

63 transplants, shorter cold ischemic time and operative time, and less intraoperative transfusion requ

64 an increase (P>0.3) in total ischemia time, operative time, and packed red blood cells requirement b

65 nfection, intra-abdominal abscess formation, operative time, and postoperative hospital stay.

66 ed advantages of minimal dissection, shorter operative time, and use in ambulatory settings, compares

67 s, but a standard lesion set, improvement in operative times, and long-term results still need to be

68 rder reported higher pain scores, had longer operative times, and were more likely to have received a

69 s correlated with higher pain scores, longer operative times, and with having received a retrobulbar

70 sing a mathematical cost model incorporating operative time, anesthesia fees, consumables, and capita

71 Mean operative times as well as total hospital charges were s

72 Those in the "shave" group had a longer operative time at the initial surgery (median 76 vs 66 m

73 ality, complications, harvested lymph nodes, operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were compa

74 Operative time, blood loss, and length of stay have drop

75 perative chemoradiation results in increased operative time, blood loss, and pelvic abscess formation

76 Operative time, blood loss, and postoperative hematocrit

77 nor sex, related versus nonrelated donation, operative time, blood loss, length of stay, time out of

78 Other parameters, such as operative time, blood loss, postoperative renal function

79 nt differences in outcome parameters such as operative time, blood use, ventilation days, length of s

80 Study variables included operative times, blood loss, hospital stay, graft functi

81 tcome measures include operative techniques, operative times, blood loss, length of stay, conversion

82 open procedure was associated with a reduced operative time but increased donor length of stay in the

83 operative time, complications, postoperative gastro-esop

84 nificant differences in the morbidity rates, operative time, conversion rates, and postoperative reco

85 Secondary outcome measurements included operative time, conversion rates, morbidity rates, activ

86 gth of stay and secondary endpoints included operative time, conversion, complications and postoperat

87 Median operative time declined with operative experience (P<0.0

88 The operative time decreased significantly from 234 +/- 77 m

89 The median operative time decreased significantly over the decades,

90 al and partial nephrectomies have equivalent operative time, decreased blood loss, superior recovery,

91 Operative time, doses of narcotics, surgical difficultly

92 ssection would lead to substantial saving in operative time during pancreatic resection.

93 e that the rapid en bloc technique decreases operative time during the donor operation.

94 Operative times earlier in the year did not vary from th

95 , whereas the main disadvantage involves the operative times early in the learning curve.

96 Patients benefit with decreased operative time, edema, ecchymosis, and recovery times.

97 The operative time, estimated blood loss, and rate of pelvic

98 Operative time, estimated blood loss, and transfusion re

99 Main outcome measures included operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital

100 There was no effect of age, body mass index, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative comp

101 The average operative time for all cases with 2 assistants (both PGY

102 resident level was associated with increased operative time for both open and laparoscopic repair.

103 Median operative time for PD was 227 minutes (105 to 462) and D

104 these skills in the operating room; however, operative time for residents has decreased with duty hou

105 Mean operative time for the 2 most common procedures was 529

106 While operative time for the control group and the experimenta

107 Operative time for the laparoscopic group was longer (10

108 tes after FPTX in conjunction with decreased operative times for OPTX have led some groups to abandon

109 Operative times for SPLC were greater than CLC (88.5 min

110 There was no significant difference in operative times for this group of patients, but there wa

111 IPM increased operative time from 34 to 60 minutes (P < 0.0001).

112 nated wounds (OR = 2.1 [95% CI, 1.24-3.55]), operative time >/=2 hours (OR = 1.75 [95% CI, 1.01-3.04]

113 , postoperative hospital stay >/=3 days, and operative time >/=3 hours.

114 these patients, its complexity and increased operative time has precluded widespread application.

115 A simulation-based ML curriculum decreased operative time, improved trainee performance, and decrea

116 Operative time in strabismus surgery increased with PGY3

117 The mean operative time in the radical group was 6.4 hours, compa

118 The mean operative time in the radical group was 6.8 hours, compa

119 The mean operative time in the right nephrectomy group was signif

120 ent of resection, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, incidence and grade of complications, an

121 re costly than LP (2.7 times), due to longer operative time, increased consumables costs, and depreci

122 e of ipsilateral and contralateral stenosis, operative time, intraoperative EEG slowing, history of p

123 t per PGY3 assistant per year for additional operative time is $3141.95.

124 Operative outcomes included operative time, islet isolation time, warm ischemia time

125 Demographic data, operative time, length of stay, patient controlled analg

126 There were no differences in operative time, length of stay, perioperative mortality,

127 There was no difference in operative time, margin positivity, incidence of postoper

128 Operative time (mean +/- standard error of the mean) for

129 e were not significant differences for total operative time (mean 6.0+/-0.17 vs. 6.3+/-0.25 hr, P=1.0

130 red with OPD, RPD was associated with longer operative times [mean difference = 75.4 minutes, 95% con

131 The mean operative time, mean blood loss, and rate of conversion

132 tions, despite having a significantly longer operative time (median, 204 v 130 minutes, respectively;

133 botic liver surgery had significantly longer operative times (median: 253 vs 199 minutes) and overall

134 has and will lead to further improvements in operative times, morbidity rates, and functional results

135 -7.08); male gender (OR 2.08, CI 1.36-3.19); operative time more than 3 hours (OR 1.86, CI 1.07-3.24)

136 2.851, 95% CI: 2.067-3.935; P < 0.001), and operative time more than 6 hours (HR: 1.510, 95% CI: 1.1

137 Complex cases had longer operative times, more sedation, and higher pain scores.

138 One-way sensitivity analysis showed that LP operative time must increase to almost 6.5 hours for it

139 ritoneal approach has been shown to decrease operative times, narcotic need and permit quicker return

140 dds ratio, 2.549; 95% CI, 1.464-4.440), long operative time (odds ratio, 1.601; 95% CI, 1.186-2.160),

141 rnia during 2 years, with an additional mean operative time of 16 minutes.

142 Total operative time of 195 and 258 min, estimated blood loss

143 s beyond the learning curve) included a mean operative time of 417 minutes, median estimated blood lo

144 d 173 cases with a PGY5 assistant an average operative time of 59.0 minutes (SD, 14.7); the differenc

145 sts) score greater than 2, flap failure, and operative time of 6 hours or longer.

146 e 200 cases with a PGY3 assistant an average operative time of 62.5 minutes (standard deviation [SD],

147 by height in meters squared) of 31, and mean operative time of 65 minutes.

148 Primary stratification was by operative time of day (night, 7 PM-7 AM; day, 7 AM-7 PM)

149 there was no significant association between operative time of day and survival up to 1 year after or

150 The operative time of primary parathyroidectomy was reduced

151 m prostate-specific antigen, blood loss, and operative time, only gland volume was significantly and

152 oscopic assisted (HAL)], conversions (Conv), operative time (OR time), pathology (benign vs. malignan

153 Resource variables were operative time (OT), intraoperative transfusion, length

154 The main outcome variables were operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), and complicat

155 The expected reductions in operative time over the attending surgeon's career and t

156 for deep SSIs were bile leak (P < 0.001) and operative time (P < 0.001).

157 All 3 LDN modalities required a longer operative time (P < 0.001); robot-assisted-LDN took sign

158 ascular invasion, extent of hepatectomy, and operative time (P < 0.01).

159 d segmentectomy were associated with shorter operative time (P = 0.029), more numbers of lymph nodes

160 l trials were considered, there were shorter operative times (P = 0.002) for the open group but nonsi

161 nterior wound location (p<0.001) and shorter operative times (p<0.001).

162 ve complications (infection and recurrence), operative time, patient satisfaction, and intraoperative

163 Despite a longer operative time, patients undergoing laparoscopic GBP ben

164 Baseline operative time, performance, and demographics were simil

165 Operative time, performance, and patient outcomes adjust

166 n of the device at postoperative chest film, operative time, postoperative complications, and length

167 Transfusion requirement, operative time, postoperative length of stay, and overal

168 the use of tumescent anesthesia to decrease operative time, postoperative morbidity, and recovery ti

169 rioperative and postoperative complications, operative time, postoperative nausea, length of hospital

170 Operative times ranged from 53 to 126 minutes (mean, 72.

171 pic approach to appendectomy produces longer operative times resulting in greater charges.

172 s included intraoperative blood transfusion, operative time, return to the operating room, and the nu

173 rience, patient demographics, comorbidities, operative time, Roux limb pathway, intraoperative steroi

174 56; 95% CI 1.17-5.62; P=0.019) and increased operative time (RR 1.19 [1-hr increase]; 95% CI 1.03-1.3

175 enalectomy, after which conversion rates and operative times significantly decrease, is more than 20

176 Operative times (SIS 202 minutes vs. 1 degrees 183 minut

177 patients undergoing LPJ alone had a shorter operative time, slightly less transfusion requirement, s

178 eam familiarity contributed to reductions in operative time, suggesting potential benefits to maintai

179 y and individual PGY3 but not PGY5 assistant operative times suggests that efficiency in strabismus s

180 the financial and ethical concerns of using operative time to teach basic skills.

181 ephrectomy, single-port patients had similar operative times to cross clamp (2.8 vs 2.6 hours; P = 0.

182 Overall, mean total operative time (TOT) for all patients (n = 95) was 88.63

183 Operative time, total time in the operating room, operat

184 tive calcium and parathyroid hormone levels, operative time, total time in the operating room, time i

185 2 vs. LA: 23.6 +/- 0.7 kg/m2, P = 0.96) mean operative time (TVA: 44.4 +/- 4.5 minutes vs. LA: 39.8 +

186 re is a learning curve to the procedure with operative times varying between 30 and 120 min.

187 Participant teams were compensated for lost operative time via malpractice premium discounts, contin

188 Surgical demographics included operative time, warm ischemia time, and estimated blood

189 Operative time was 101 +/- 29 minutes, with 95% (109/115

190 Mean operative time was 123 minutes (range, 80-360 minutes),

191 he mean weight was 2.6 kg (+/-0.5), the mean operative time was 129.9 minutes (+/-55.5), the mean day

192 Mean operative time was 135 minutes (range, 49-295 minutes),

193 The mean operative time was 153 (SD = 38) minutes for teams with

194 The median operative time was 179 minutes.

195 Mean operative time was 190 min and mean estimated blood loss

196 The overall mean operative time was 2.8 hours and the mean postoperative

197 Mean operative time was 216 +/- 57 minutes, mean postoperativ

198 The mean operative time was 223.8 and 175.7 min (P=0.07) and the

199 Mean operative time was 252.9 +/- 55.7 minutes, estimated blo

200 Mean operative time was 266.0 min, mean hospital stay was 3.2

201 Mean operative time was 3.7 hours, and mean postoperative len

202 The total operative time was 318 minutes with an estimated blood l

203 The average operative time was 338 minutes.

204 The median operative time was 360 minutes (210-510).

205 Mean operative time was 38.7 +/- 14.9 minutes with suction on

206 ll units transfused was zero, and the median operative time was 4.3 hours.

207 Mean (SD) operative time was 493 (78) minutes, islet isolation tim

208 Also, the mean operative time was 5 minutes longer for the single site

209 ed cells transfused was zero, and the median operative time was 7 hours.

210 However, the mean operative time was 7.4 hours in the reoperative group, s

211 Mean total operative time was 7.5 hr.

212 The average operative time was 7.6 hours, with 15% of patients requi

213 With piggyback, the average operative time was 8.6+/-1.9 hr, median amount of blood

214 Mean operative time was 83 minutes (49-140 minutes).

215 Operative time was independently associated with the ope

216 The mean operative time was less for LSG than for LRYGB (87 +/- 5

217 However, operative time was longer during laparoscopy.

218 Mean operative time was longer for laparoscopic GBP than for

219 Median operative time was longer for the LAP-IPAA group (333 mi

220 Operative time was longer in the RES group [mean (SD) 12

221 Operative time was not associated with an increased pain

222 Operative time was not significantly longer in the lapar

223 The influence of these factors on operative time was quantified along with patient age, vo

224 The mean operative time was significantly decreased in the Rosset

225 Operative time was significantly longer for laparoscopic

226 Operative time was significantly longer in ObD 151+/-30

227 Mean (SD) operative time was significantly longer in the minimally

228 Mean operative time was significantly shorter for group III c

229 No statistically significant variation in operative times was demonstrated when comparing cases wi

230 Continuous improvement in operative times was observed over the course of the expe

231 MIPD was associated with prolonged operative times [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 74 min

232 ngs, resectability rate, length of stay, and operative time were analyzed.

233 greater than 2, flap failure, and prolonged operative time were associated with increased risk of SS

234 rates of recurrence, complications and mean operative time were compared.

235 Estimated blood loss was higher and operative times were longer during OLP.

236 Operative times were longer for HALDN (3.4+/-0.7 vs. 3.0

237 Mean operative times were shorter (123, 147 and 145 minutes;

238 Operative times were significantly different for individ

239 risk factors (cross-clamp time, blood loss, operative time) were assessed and compared with postoper

240 tive time) and sleeve gastrectomy (30-45 min operative time), which, to a high degree, resembles oper

241 ion as intracorporeal diversion takes a long operative time with associated morbidity and complicatio

242 st and last halves of the academic year, but operative times within individual quarters of the academ

243 LDG was associated with longer operative times (WMD 48.3 minutes; P < 0.001) and lower

244 s with minimal manipulation and within intra-operative time would provide significant advantages for