ライフサイエンスコーパス: operculum

1 tal cortices, and the contralateral parietal operculum.

2 s) possess a single hyoid arch ray-supported operculum.

3 ere observed in the left anterior insula and operculum.

4 n activity localized to the lateral parietal operculum.

5 ifference in the anterior insula and frontal operculum.

6 mary taste cortex consists of the insula and operculum.

7 ior temporal sulcus WM and the left parietal operculum.

8 s including the planum temporale and frontal operculum.

9 k of the lateral sulcus, continuing onto the operculum.

10 l performance were found in the left frontal operculum.

11 ng yogurt elicited higher CBF in the frontal operculum 30 and 120 min after a meal.

12 idiosyncratic scleritome, which comprises an operculum, a conical shell and, in some taxa, a pair of

13 and pain network including bilateral insula, operculum, ACC, and left S1/M1.

14 ork, namely the left anterior insula/frontal operculum (AI/FO) and the visual word form area (VWFA).

15 /msFC) and bilateral anterior insula/frontal operculum (aI/fO) showed reliable start-cue and sustaine

16 omes, these were centred on the left frontal operculum and caudate nucleus in non-fluent primary prog

17 ulcus, intraparietal sulcus, insula, frontal operculum and cerebellar vermis.

18 ation between two seed regions (left frontal operculum and hippocampus) and pain network including bi

19 ted to reduced perfusion in the left frontal operculum and insula, whereas fear symptoms were associa

20 ially to the drink, whereas the right insula/operculum and left orbitofrontal cortex respond to FO+ a

21 unched function leads to an expansion of the operculum and loss of the collar at its boundary.

22 e in gray matter volume in the right frontal operculum and right superior temporal lobe.

23 s learning recruited the left insula/frontal operculum and the left superior parietal lobe, among oth

24 the anterior centripetal FC that produce the operculum and the posterior columnar FC that produce the

25 d more posteriorly, in and near the parietal operculum and ventral postcentral gyrus.

26 rior frontal cortex, anterior insula/frontal operculum, and anterior prefrontal cortex.

27 processing, including the cingulate cortex, operculum, and frontal lobe, as well as in the temporal

28 greater activation in the caudate, parietal operculum, and frontal operculum in response to food int

29 nnections were found with PMd, SMA, anterior operculum, and posterior operculum/inferior parietal are

30 ivation in the putamen, mid-insula, Rolandic operculum, and precuneus to a cue signaling impending mi

31 th activity in the bilateral insula, frontal operculum, and secondary somatosensory cortex.

32 um, Heschl gyrus, precentral gyrus, rolandic operculum, and superior and inferior occipital lobes.

33 dial frontal cortex, anterior insula/frontal operculum, and thalamus, activity remained near baseline

34 ula extending into the putamen, the Rolandic operculum, and thalamus, which produced large activation

35 ncrease was present in the amygdala, frontal operculum-anterior insular cortex, ventromedial prefront

36 er in intrinsic activity of the left frontal operculum/anterior insula from the left frontoparietal n

37 in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, frontal operculum/anterior insula, and especially lateral anteri

38 inconsistently across cases in the anterior operculum (AO), posterior operculum/inferior parietal co

39 The anterior insula and the frontal operculum are regarded as the primary taste cortex.

40 lastic trait used to characterise body size, operculum area.

41 nd occipitotemporal cortex, the left frontal operculum, bilateral regions within the cerebellum, prim

42 he middle frontal gyrus bilaterally, frontal operculum bilaterally and in the cerebellar vermis.

43 Modulation of the frontal operculum by the yogurt containing the olive oil extract

44 hird and fourth ventricles, corpus callosum, operculum, cerebellum, and brain stem.

45 Parietal operculum, corona radiata, and internal capsule differen

46 greater independence of the jaws, hyoid and operculum during evolution and exhibit more varied morph

47 geny, our data suggest that the holocephalan operculum evolved in concert with gill arch appendage re

48 c responses were observed in anterior insula/operculum extending into the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC).

49 activity organizes a sharp boundary for the operculum fate.

50 izations including centripetal migration and operculum formation.

51 cluded the caudate, cuneus, frontal inferior operculum, Heschl gyrus, precentral gyrus, rolandic oper

52 l gyrus together with the bilateral parietal operculum (i.e. the anatomical site of the secondary som

53 ocated mostly in the anterior insula/frontal operculum in both healthy controls (8 out of 12) and LTL

54 sociated activity within the medial parietal operculum in response to feedforward visual or somatosen

55 the caudate, parietal operculum, and frontal operculum in response to food intake and in the caudate,

56 ngulate cortex, anterior insula, and frontal operculum in response to poorer speech intelligibility a

57 ivation in the bilateral insula and Rolandic operculum; increasing fat content did not elicit greater

58 PMd, SMA, anterior operculum, and posterior operculum/inferior parietal area.

59 es in the anterior operculum (AO), posterior operculum/inferior parietal cortex (PO/IP), and posterio

60 sylvian division supplied the frontoparietal operculum, insula and superior temporal gyrus.

61 Activity in the parietal operculum, insula, and inferior and superior frontal gyr

62 sensation and vision, in the frontoparietal operculum, insula, ventral bank/fundus of the superior t

63 ppocampus, parahippocampal gyrus and frontal operculum/insular cortex of the right hemisphere and, to

64 es found in the Heschl's gyrus, the parietal operculum, left Broca's area and the left arcuate fascic

65 of the supratemporal plane with the parietal operculum, located mainly in the posterior half of the p

66 or temporal gyrus; left frontal and parietal operculum, medial frontal gyrus, orbital prefrontal cort

67 the supplementary motor area (SMA), frontal operculum, middle frontal gyri, and inferior parietal lo

68 recruitment of the hippocampus, SMA, frontal operculum, middle frontal gyrus, and inferior parietal l

69 n in the follicle cells that will create the operculum of the eggshell.

70 somatic sensory-related areas in the frontal operculum (OPf) and dysgranular insular area (Id).

71 tions, including areas of the insula/frontal operculum, orbitofrontal cortex and striatum.

72 The parietal operculum, particularly the cytoarchitectonic area OP1 o

73 supplementary motor area (SMA) and parietal operculum (PO) predominantly activated before tic onset

74 in bilateral orbitofrontal cortex, thalamus, operculum, posterior and anterior (subgenual) cingulate

75 s (visual processing and attention), frontal operculum (primary gustatory cortex) when anticipating p

76 ulcus (RTPJ/pSTS), planum temporale/parietal operculum (PT/PO), and posterior lateral orbitofrontal c

77 g planum temporale (PT) and parieto-temporal operculum (PTO).

78 functional connectivity between the parietal operculum (related to speed) and postcentral gyrus (rela

79 In contrast, the left insula/operculum responds preferentially to the drink, whereas

80 e may reduce striatal, insular, and Rolandic operculum responsivity to food cues, which might decreas

81 e may reduce striatal, insular, and Rolandic operculum responsivity.

82 udomedial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), insula/operculum, striatum and midbrain] or whether they ate ch

83 te and nurse cell complex which patterns the operculum structure of the mature eggshell.

84 ispositioning of the oocyte, and a shortened operculum, suggesting that Cct1 plays multiple roles dur

85 or frontal gyrus, precentral gyrus, Rolandic operculum, superior parietal gyrus, angular gyrus, and m

86 oduced differential activation in the insula/operculum, thalamus, hippocampus, amygdala, and caudolat

87 region of the right anterior insula/frontal operculum than healthy controls (P = 0.02).

88 n were significantly weaker in the patient's operculum than in normal controls.

89 ater BOLD response to sounds in the parietal operculum, the location of secondary somatosensory corte

90 luster comprising the contralateral parietal operculum together with the anterior and posterior insul

91 tion, the activation of the right insula and operculum tracked online ratings of the aversiveness for

92 One area, the frontal operculum, was distinguished by selectively interacting

93 nsation did not evoke a BOLD response in the operculum, while sounds that produced strong somatosensa

94 , y, z = 7, 59, 12; F = 8.53), right frontal operculum (x, y, z = 23, 23, 12; F = 8.25), and right an