ライフサイエンスコーパス: opinion

1 ts with systemic cancer or formulated expert opinion.

2 sing) or both (in variable) commitment to an opinion.

3 cation and propensity for receiving a second opinion.

4 ommendations are largely derived from expert opinion.

5 introduction of nodes committed to a single opinion.

6 at are based on studies in adults and expert opinion.

7 rajectories are largely influenced by public opinion.

8 a week and referred for a radiation oncology opinion.

9 ll series, registries, databases, and expert opinion.

10 ata Sources: Published literature and expert opinion.

11 dence in the literature and expert consensus opinion.

12 is broadly supported by lay and professional opinion.

13 erent radiologists (interobserver) for their opinion.

14 relationship between elite behavior and mass opinion.

15 However recent data have challenged this opinion.

16 thma might be lower than estimated by expert opinion.

17 nce-based risk scores complemented by expert opinion.

18 inion when it is inconsistent with their own opinion.

19 literature review and elicitation of expert opinion.

20 and level of positive affect influenced this opinion.

21 bservational studies in children, and expert opinion.

22 ne whether another was presenting their true opinion.

23 debate and thus the formation of the public opinion.

24 damental role on the evolution of the public opinion.

25 40/90 mm Hg for those groups based on expert opinion.

26 ure, previously published models, and expert opinion.

27 use local protocols that are based on expert opinion.

28 ve process involving surveillance and expert opinion.

29 e, and performance recommendations by expert opinion.

30 n effective data-driven supplement to expert opinion.

31 nged the way we consume information and form opinions.

32 knowledge graph and against expert physician opinions.

33 e used per case and without access to second opinions.

34 he donor's family, this study examines their opinions.

35 ce literature and based on multiple experts' opinions.

36 g scientific facts and influencing political opinions.

37 by the group, even when there are dissenting opinions.

38 have used maps drawn from historical expert opinions.

39 st CPM were not more likely to seek a second opinion (17.1% among patients with recommendation agains

40 develop statements based upon panel members' opinions; (3) hold a panel meeting during the 2012 IDWee

41 provisional diagnosis seeking expert second opinion (37.8%) than for patients sent with a formal dia

42 d is not a product of aggregating individual opinions (a "wisdom-of-crowds" effect) or of altering re

43 one's own personality traits and of others' opinion about one's own personality traits.

44 th of patients (20.6%; n = 304) had a second opinion about surgical options and 9.8% (n = 158) had su

45 tified knowledge gaps on the basis of expert opinion about their importance and relevance.

46 survey-based model estimates of county-level opinion about whether global warming is happening.

47 Subjective opinions about pain and objective physical variables (in

48 In spite of existing opinions about the anticancer actions of a ketogenic die

49 Current opinions about the effect of intensive blood pressure (B

50 here are few data, but diametrically opposed opinions, about the impacts of forest logging on soil or

51 re reviewed by four radiologists, with final opinion achieved by means of consensus.

52 We increase complexity from simple opinion adaptation processes studied in earlier research

53 instruct, check procedures, ask for and give opinions,agree and disagree.

54 recommendations were on the basis of expert opinion alone.

55 nformation sharing emphasize consent, public opinion also emphasizes purpose, which suggests a need t

56 hat 168 (9.8%) (SE, 0.74%) received a second opinion and 54 (3.2%) (SE, 0.47%) received chemotherapy

57 assessed was the association between second opinion and chemotherapy use, adjusting for chemotherapy

58 rent in rural water development using expert opinion and indicates the need for future research in ru

59 ne is based on evidence as well as on expert opinion and is aimed at both adult physicians and paedia

60 outlined in this review are based on expert opinion and on relevant publications from PubMed and EMb

61 outlined in this review are based on expert opinion and on relevant publications from PubMed, EMbase

62 which, despite being based largely on expert opinion and plausible assumptions, suggested that AIT fo

63 t between the scores derived with the expert opinion and principal component analysis weighting schem

64 es were selected through a process of expert opinion and statistical analysis.

65 ased on aggregated secondary data and expert opinion and suggest less extreme deterioration in tropic

66 gate whether inconsistency between one's own opinion and the stated opinion of another impairs judgme

67 f these studies, and we surveyed clinicians' opinion and usual practice for the selected intervention

68 are based on the current evidence and expert opinion and will require an update as new evidence and/o

69 rms were completed; one asking the patients' opinions and another referring to their main carer.

70 The expert opinions and experience of the members of the consensus

71 (eight recommendations, 10 expert consensus opinions and three no recommendations) were established.

72 The opinions and what factors might influence PLB use within

73 Exposure to news, opinion, and civic information increasingly occurs throu

74 ences, a process that shapes public beliefs, opinion, and policy.

75 with surgery decisions, receipt of a second opinion, and receipt of surgery by a second surgeon.

76 decision making, receipt of second surgical opinion, and surgery from a second surgeon.

77 endorsement; and 3) to assess the knowledge, opinions, and future plans of dental journal editors in

78 n of ideas and innovations, the formation of opinions, and the evolution of cooperative behavior.

79 actice update, available evidence and expert opinion are used to generate best practice recommendatio

80 Opinions are divided on whether word reading processes o

81 This study explored opinions around the use of EEN and alternative novel, so

82 This opinion article explores the question of how the active

83 This Opinion article provides an overview of arguments as to

84 This Opinion article provides an overview of the various type

85 This Opinion article reviews the importance and challenges of

86 In this Opinion article we analyze the relationship among differ

87 In this Opinion article we briefly review recent work on the dev

88 In this opinion article we consider how recent proteomics and tr

89 In this Opinion article we review recent progress in tracking th

90 In this Opinion article we review the prospects for achieving LF

91 In a recent Opinion article, Brienen et al. (2016) raise doubts abou

92 In this opinion article, novel actions of mu-opioid peptides in

93 In this opinion article, we briefly introduce the anatomical and

94 In this Opinion article, we discuss some new applications for pl

95 In this opinion article, we discuss the currently available tiss

96 In this opinion article, we focus on salient features of schisto

97 In this opinion article, we identify a 12-step guideline for red

98 In this opinion article, we outline interconnections between IG

99 In this Opinion article, we present a general scenario for the o

100 In this opinion article, we propose also considering organs as d

101 In this brief opinion article, we provide a short primer on the epidem

102 In the present opinion article, we review and discuss the putative role

103 In this opinion article, we review this mechanism as well as dat

104 In this opinion article, we suggest three thalamic sub-regions r

105 imitive: there are many different legitimate opinions as to its value, and none should receive a priv

106 Q/N) rich domains, and there are conflicting opinions as to the role of primary sequence in their con

107 praise available evidence and practice-based opinion, as well as to provide updated recommendations f

108 were derived with empirical data and expert opinion, as were markers of hemodynamic vulnerability.

109 Attempts at modifying public opinions, attitudes, and beliefs range from advertising

110 ature infants require the best practices and opinions available, taking into account the totality of

111 visional clinical opinion presents a revised opinion based on American Society of Clinical Oncology p

112 sponses based on the available evidence, and opinions based on our experience.

113 phoblastic leukaemia treatment, these expert opinion-based definitions will allow reliable comparison

114 They include evidence and opinion-based recommendations for the diagnosis and mana

115 terpretation in athletes and provides expert opinion-based recommendations linking specific ECG abnor

116 commendations, however, were based on expert opinion because rigorous clinical data are not available

117 mity determines a progressive convergence of opinions but differing opinions result in agents moving

118 This statement represents current opinion by the ASHG on the ethical, legal, and social is

119 e emergence of echo chambers where different opinions coexist also within the same group.

120 on cardio-oncology services, practices, and opinions, conducted among chiefs of cardiology and progr

121 was to provide an evidence-based and expert-opinion consensus on proposed modifications to MRI crite

122 in the surgical management of glaucoma, and opinions differ among surgeons regarding the preferred p

123 patients, 144 (89%) did not know that their opinions differed from that of their oncologists and nea

124 determined whether patients knew that their opinions differed from those of their oncologists by ask

125 s common and patients rarely knew that their opinions differed from those of their oncologists.

126 This Opinion discusses the materials, tools, and building met

127 m may affect collective debates and thus the opinions' distribution.

128 Opinions diverge on how natural diversity is generated a

129 ubt about the existence of such streams, but opinions diverge on whether information travels along do

130 nvestigate the impact of committed agents on opinion domains and find the scaling of consensus time.

131 Game has proven to be an important model of opinion dynamics in complex networks.

132 s still simple but captures core concepts of opinion dynamics in networks.

133 ased on a master equation description of the opinion dynamics occurring in a three-state model of coo

134 at a general model in the network science on opinion dynamics substantially clarifies how truth wins

135 oduce a sophisticated computational model of opinion dynamics which accounts for the coexistence of m

136 We propose an activation model of opinion dynamics with interaction rules based on the exi

137 and biological contagion, or upon models of opinion dynamics.

138 ase spreading, and influence maximization in opinion dynamics.

139 In our opinion, evidence of the effectiveness of these actions

140 Differences in opinion exist as to the feasibility of establishing sust

141 hat produced exciting but uncertain results, opinion favored the former despite researchers' belief i

142 Provisional Clinical Opinion For men with CRPC, a castrate state should be ma

143 s committed nodes that can stick to a single opinion for some time without losing their flexibility t

144 provide specific guidelines, through expert opinion, for choosing reliable and reproducible assays f

145 lyzed regarding average information entropy, opinion fragmentation, and the range of rumor spread.

146 A second opinion from a medical oncologist may facilitate decisio

147 In this Commission, we summarise expert opinion from key stakeholders-patients, caregivers, and

148 In this Commission, expert opinion from primary care and public health professional

149 ant Society, local transplant societies, and opinions from local transplant experts.

150 asis of a collaborative effort that included opinions gathered from researchers, clinicians, policy m

151 ere asked to choose the patient who in their opinion had more severe complication.

152 years and over 35 transplants later, public opinion has become accustomed to the concept of "face re

153 se who have shown accuracy when the majority opinion has been in error.

154 In this Opinion, I highlight possibilities for the bioprinting s

155 In this Opinion, I propose an epigenetic clock model that outlin

156 ded in metapopulations, or in the ecology of opinions, i.e. partitioned in echo chambers.

157 lly available alerts, and including end user opinion in alert selection.

158 c Practice had previously issued a committee opinion in August 2012 on the need for annual examinatio

159 is survey offers insight into current expert opinion in the treatment of DED.

160 mized controlled trials and expert consensus opinion inform this PCO.

161 This updated provisional clinical opinion introduces a risk-adaptive strategy to identify

162 The E rating for expert opinion is assigned to recommendations based on expert c

163 Opinion is divided between the annelid and the enteropne

164 because knowingly expressing differences of opinion is important for shared decision making, whereas

165 ence of anthropogenic climate change, public opinion is polarized along religious and political lines

166 Current opinion is that chloride anions control the Boltzmann ch

167 Our unanimous opinion is that the existence of CDI is questionable in

168 Our opinion is that there is not yet strong evidence that su

169 Expert opinion is valuable in highlighting relevant missing ite

170 nd mostly consensual assessments of informed opinion, it appears that the historical candidate gene l

171 In my opinion, it is incumbent on us in the invisible army to

172 e of biochemical processes including, in our opinion, killing of bacteria by protozoa.

173 are) to the intervention, which consisted of opinion-leader-led training and coaching of front-line h

174 rs and audit feedback and targeting of local opinion leaders carried out between April 2009 and April

175 Key opinion leaders have recently made calls to the field to

176 nt, generated from an international panel of opinion leaders on childhood tuberculosis and incorporat

177 dence-based approach provided reassurance to opinion leaders, health workers, and professional societ

178 e 9 sets of scenarios, experienced surgeons' opinion matched with CSS alone in six, CSS as well as CC

179 Patient demand for second opinions may increase as more complex genomic tests are

180 In our opinion, modern CT imaging with the use of dose reductio

181 aftment for an 80-year-old patient is in our opinion more than acceptable.

182 view of the published data and on the expert opinion of a multidisciplinary consensus panel consistin

183 .001), MCAT score (0.6 [0.2-1.0]; P = .003), opinion of ABSITE significance (9.2 [6.9-11.6]; P < .001

184 int increase, 1.2 [1.3-2.0]; P = .002), high opinion of ABSITE significance (P < .001), surgical text

185 ncy between one's own opinion and the stated opinion of another impairs judgment of the veracity of t

186 As little is known about the opinion of Dutch liver transplant recipients on anonymit

187 The CSS more often matched the opinion of experienced senior surgeons but requires furt

188 monograph in 2016 and reflect a consensus of opinion of hematopathologists, hematologists, oncologist

189 rch of the medical literature and the expert opinion of members of the Fleischner Society.

190 showed enhanced compliance to the erroneous opinion of others.

191 ld, the current document provides an updated opinion of selected North American experts from the Unit

192 idity or laboratory abnormality that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the results

193 Based on the expert opinion of the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis F

194 e evidence reviewed in this study and expert opinion of the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis F

195 Observation Tool and the nurse's subjective opinion of the presence or absence of pain when compared

196 Contrary to the prevailing opinion of the previous two decades that biodiversity wo

197 y and Clinical Immunology guidelines and the opinions of 14 pediatric allergists.

198 toxicology compiled from the experience and opinions of 889 certified practicing professional toxico

199 The differences in the opinions of different domain experts and in the terminol

200 , and friends developed strong and divergent opinions of him.

201 le of wine or a new film, is affected by the opinions of others.

202 ore often were more likely to have favorable opinions of safety and pathologist availability, and mor

203 d by this method strongly correlate with the opinions of subject matter experts in biomedical researc

204 This opinion offers a very different hypothesis: purifying se

205 explain the coexistence of two stable final opinions, often observed in reality.

206 to treat a future flare (EEN repeat); their opinion on how difficult EEN would be compared to an exa

207 e estimates, empirical cost data, and expert opinion on implementation strategies.

208 ed Delphi process, termed the Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations and Evidence (CORE) process.

209 uly 2015 published a solicitation for expert opinion on reimbursing office-based cataract surgery.

210 Finally, we provide our opinion on the current challenges and the future researc

211 The review presents an expert opinion on the current state-of-the-art in these various

212 We present a consensus opinion on the diagnosis, clinical consequences, and tre

213 Finally, we provide an in-depth opinion on the importance of exploiting the tumor microe

214 interactions with patients, and share their opinions on radiologist-patient communication.

215 ts completed a questionnaire regarding their opinions on the degree of realism and the feasibility of

216 dedicated to this topic, generating multiple opinions on the nature of such states and motions, their

217 cumspective piece, RLC-H and GMG share their opinions on the promises and pitfalls of renewed psyched

218 urvey was to assess cardiothoracic surgeons' opinions on the topic, with the aim of guiding future de

219 e, Dr Sanacora and Dr Schatzberg share their opinions on these issues and discuss paths to move the f

220 Here, we offer our opinions on this emerging material with the goal of moti

221 We take this opportunity to pitch in our opinions on tool benchmarking, in light of two correspon

222 tter than metrics based on aggregated expert opinions or large population surveys.

223 ined by clinicians disclosing their personal opinions or predictions about trial outcomes, based on t

224 rease patient dissatisfaction, use of second opinions, or loss of the patient to a second surgeon.

225 ale) or did not (4.4 [0.03]) obtain a second opinion (P = .29).

226 This opinion paper provides a perspective on the contribution

227 ty of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion (PCO) offers timely clinical direction after pub

228 linical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (PCO) on the integration of palliative care into

229 Purpose ASCO provisional clinical opinions (PCOs) offer direction to the ASCO membership a

230 g the time leading up to the 2014 ABSITE and opinions pertaining to the importance of the ABSITE was

231 Based primarily on expert consensus opinion, PH is defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressu

232 It is the assertion of this opinion piece that microglial polarization has not been

233 In this opinion piece, I review the evidence arising from transc

234 In this opinion piece, we evidence 10 reasons why artificial lig

235 In this opinion piece, we reflect on the long and distinguished

236 with the literature dominated by essays and opinion pieces.

237 ings question the usefulness of results from opinion polls as a motivation for creating public policy

238 In this analysis of data from 27 public opinion polls, the authors examine the role of the Affor

239 them into a lead compound makes them, in our opinion, poor scaffolds for fragment libraries.

240 This is the core opinion presented, and I discuss it fully.

241 This updated provisional clinical opinion presents a revised opinion based on American Soc

242 ification tools are seen as promising second opinion providers in reducing such errors.

243 However, guidelines are based on consensus opinion rather than evidence, and do not specify risk fa

244 rrent recommendations largely rely on expert opinion rather than on properly designed studies.

245 Despite the 2010 provisional clinical opinion recommendation, there is still evidence of subop

246 ne recommends against and the ACOG committee opinion recommends in favor of routine annual pelvic exa

247 ncreasing in incidence, and expert consensus opinion recommends surgical excision for therapeutic man

248 Differences of opinion regarding whether there may, or may not, have be

249 ram directors in general surgery about their opinions regarding resident education and attrition.

250 of mast cells and introduce new concepts and opinions regarding their role in human diseases beyond I

251 ical work in political communication, public opinion research, and communication research about the d

252 essive convergence of opinions but differing opinions result in agents moving away from each others.

253 has been based on literature review, expert opinion, rounds of testing and iteration, and feedback f

254 Opinions run strongly on both sides, and evidence may be

255 Of these, nine articles were expert opinion, seven were original research, three were review

256 eam media signed interaction might shape the opinion space.

257 es, clinical practice guidelines, and expert opinion/statements to summarize existing evidence and to

258 reviews, non-human subjects, reports, expert opinions, subject age less than 65, papers that were the

259 Current opinion suggests that this is because the cell lines and

260 This Opinion summarizes the advantages of using simple viruse

261 Fifty-one percent of respondents reported an opinion that current HPB Surgeon production was excessiv

262 ents' knowingly vs unknowingly expressing an opinion that differs from that of their oncologist.

263 Despite the common opinion that it is safer than femoral access, it has the

264 It is our opinion that the ubiquitous presence of this bacterium i

265 brings its unique perspective and differing opinions that add to controversies in the management of

266 ed as the tendency of an individual to favor opinions that match his own, leads to the emergence of e

267 In my opinion the GM debate, on both sides, continues to hampe

268 According to previous opinion, the derivation of neurons and glia from the cen

269 e authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first 2 authors should be regarded as joint

270 In our opinion, the proposed causal relationship between OV inf

271 findings are serious and contrary to expert opinion, the results need to be validated in other popul

272 idence, the inclusion or exclusion of expert opinion, the suggested ASCVD risk assessment tool, the l

273 ishes that, in contrast to the commonly held opinion, there exists a large class of systems that exhi

274 In our opinion, there is a strong need for a consensus on unive

275 In our opinion, this information is relevant to improve photosy

276 We investigate the emergence of extreme opinion trends in society by employing statistical physi

277 tigate the patterns and correlates of second opinion use and the effect on chemotherapy decisions.

278 Predictors of second opinion use included college education vs less education

279 h decision satisfaction regardless of second opinion use suggests little unmet demand.

280 Second opinion use was low (<10%) among patients with early-sta

281 or patient and tumor characteristics, second opinion use was not associated with chemotherapy receipt

282 Factors associated with second opinion use were evaluated using logistic regression.

283 results on genomic testing predicted second opinion use.

284 ast cancer, yet little is known about second opinion use.

285 l of mobile agents endowed with a continuous opinion variable.

286 r lies less often when the other's expressed opinion was inconsistent with their own (experiment 1).

287 In case of disagreement, the final opinion was made by the third rater.

288 In this Opinion, we discuss recent successful attempts to genera

289 ivities differ among biomes, based on expert opinion, we expect forests to exhibit the largest net ef

290 In our opinion, we highlight that, without new diagnostic metho

291 best available published evidence and expert opinion, we recommend the most appropriate strategies fo

292 Anonymized votes and opinions were compiled and discussed.

293 Their opinions were examined in relation to demographic, trans

294 tions, based on literature review and expert opinion, were agreed upon.

295 urate when judging the veracity of another's opinion when it is inconsistent with their own opinion.

296 upplementary literature and consensus expert opinions when the published literature was insufficient.

297 ons, including systematic reviews and expert opinion (when applicable).

298 es Agency and received a positive scientific opinion; WHO subsequently recommended pilot implementati

299 the treatment of IA as well as the authors' opinion with respect to its use.

300 rebral hemorrhage (sICH) are based on expert opinion, with limited data available on efficacy.