ライフサイエンスコーパス: oral hygiene

1 dental disease easily prevented with better oral hygiene.

2 ients taking cyclosporin and those with poor oral hygiene.

3 ificant risk for GE in individuals with good oral hygiene.

4 tooth polishing and received instruction in oral hygiene.

5 entional therapy and improvement of personal oral hygiene.

6 focal presentation in the background of good oral hygiene.

7 as then performed coincident with 4 weeks of oral hygiene.

8 bacterial load on the teeth as mediated via oral hygiene.

9 y recur, especially in the patient with poor oral hygiene.

10 to the general public for use as adjuncts to oral hygiene.

11 sonal neglect may be diminished attention to oral hygiene.

12 eth immediately after patients had performed oral hygiene.

13 tive method for biofilm removal and improved oral hygiene.

14 erformance might help to explain deficits in oral hygiene.

15 rolonged learning effect, including improved oral hygiene.

16 f oral in contrast to written instruction of oral hygiene.

17 re collected after 1, 2, 4, and 7 days of no oral hygiene.

18 Subjects refrained from oral hygiene 24 hours before study visits.

19 ) plaque; 2) smoking; 3) adverse loading; 4) oral hygiene; 5) use of antimicrobial gel/mouthrinse; 6)

20 ase-2 immunoassay was 96% sensitive for poor oral hygiene, 95% sensitive for chronic periodontitis (d

21 quadrant while continuing to perform normal oral hygiene activities in the contralateral (control) q

22 The odds of having poor oral hygiene (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.26; 95% confi

23 ol is the most commonly recommended means of oral hygiene after periodontal surgery.

24 vitis levels would help to determine whether oral hygiene aids provide important health benefits.

25 l disease, which cannot be explained by poor oral hygiene alone and is related to changes in the immu

26 Saliva composition influences oral hygiene and disease states.

27 n health for at least 4 years; however, good oral hygiene and frequent recall visits as part of a com

28 n, but SES was also important for predicting oral hygiene and gingival bleeding.

29 GI = 0.65+/-0.303) indicated a high level of oral hygiene and gingival health.

30 gnificantly increased chances of having poor oral hygiene and gingivitis.

31 abit did not increase chances of having poor oral hygiene and gingivitis.

32 Patients with OSF had poorer oral hygiene and greater loss of attachment, probing dep

33 ntitis among patients who maintain excellent oral hygiene and low gingival bleeding scores.

34 (93.0%) children aged 1 to 5 years had poor oral hygiene and mild gingivitis, respectively.

35 (72.9%) children aged 6 to 12 years had poor oral hygiene and mild gingivitis, respectively.

36 nd gingivitis was conducted using simplified oral hygiene and modified Community Periodontal Indices,

37 ll the participants received instructions on oral hygiene and one session of dental prophylaxis at ba

38 Poor oral hygiene and periodontal disease may promote orophar

39 elated to other factors, such as compromised oral hygiene and prolonged oral clearance due to extensi

40 At day 21, participants reinstituted oral hygiene and were followed for 4 weeks.

41 Groups were matched for sex, oral hygiene, and implant distribution, and patients wer

42 marginal bone loss around the implants, poor oral hygiene, and low compliance.

43 marginal bone loss around the implants, poor oral hygiene, and low compliance.

44 immunoassay with bleeding on probing (BOP), oral hygiene, and periodontal probing depth.

45 Persistent oral lesions, lack of effective oral hygiene, and plaque accumulation may increase the r

46 y elimination of local irritants, meticulous oral hygiene, and regular periodontal recall.

47 e sites for regeneration, were instructed in oral hygiene, and were prescribed systemic ciprofloxacin

48 ; interventions such as fluorides, sealants, oral hygiene, antimicrobials, and dental fillings became

49 tobacco usage, alcohol consumption, and poor oral hygiene are established risk factors.

50 ck-drawing test score indicates the need for oral hygiene assistance, but it is not suitable as a sin

51 assessment tool for determining the need for oral hygiene assistance.

52 s), we measured the following variables: (a) oral hygiene, (b) gingival inflammation, (c) caries stat

53 sychological theory, would improve patients' oral hygiene behavior.

54 udy aims to identify predictors of performed oral hygiene behaviors (OHBs) based on the Theory of Pla

55 living in families with lower SES had worse oral hygiene (beta = -0.101; P = 0.01) and gingival blee

56 ntly grouped into "good," "fair," and "poor" oral hygiene categories based on a simplified oral hygie

57 4 weeks after completion of initial therapy (oral hygiene counseling, and scaling and root planing);

58 ch as gingival enlargement, gingivitis, poor oral hygiene, dental hypoplasia, and caries.

59 ach was given instructions in the use of the oral hygiene device and examined 2, 6, and 12 weeks foll

60 ase can be categorized as those which affect oral hygiene, diagnosis, gingival and oral mucosa, and a

61 these often painful oral lesions may hinder oral hygiene efforts resulting in increased plaque accum

62 r periodontal disease, such as smoking, poor oral hygiene, etc., this study provides some evidence th

63 After 8 weeks of normal oral hygiene following an oral prophylaxis, a second com

64 ization, participants individually performed oral hygiene for 6 weeks (T2) with the provided oral hyg

65 bridement, but one that simplifies home-care oral hygiene for the patient.

66 in saliva and urine and to determine whether oral hygiene, gingival inflammation, and tooth loss are

67 Oral hygiene habits were recorded using a self-administe

68 r controlling for age, sex, education level, oral hygiene habits, and hyperlipidemia (P = 0.049).

69 hogens regarding background characteristics, oral hygiene habits, and recent dental procedures, but n

70 uenced by confounding factors, such as diet, oral hygiene habits, fluoride exposure, and access to de

71 We aimed to compare oral hygiene habits, orodental status, and dental proced

72 -OS questionnaire (n = 259; 26.6%) had worse oral hygiene habits, periodontal disease risk factors, a

73 At our follow-up visit, the patient's oral hygiene had improved, he has removed the jewelry, a

74 In conclusion, FA patients that showed poor oral hygiene harbored higher proportions of the genera o

75 d recession defects in individuals with good oral hygiene have a high probability of progressing duri

76 led trials that interventions, which improve oral hygiene have positive effects on the prevention of

77 Dietary intake, oral hygiene, high bacterial load, and decreased salivar

78 nd superior in effect to placebo control and oral hygiene in reducing the clinical signs of adult per

79 Also the effectiveness of oral hygiene in untreated sites of the mouth could be ev

80 neumonia, and to investigate its relation to oral hygiene in using quantitative bronchial sampling.

81 y flow, insufficient fluoride exposure, poor oral hygiene, inappropriate methods of feeding infants,

82 with adjustment for: 1) age; 2) sex; and 3) oral hygiene index (OHI).

83 following five indices: 1) plaque index; 2) oral hygiene index (OHI); 3) gingival index (GI); 4) pro

84 The University of Mississippi Oral Hygiene Index (UM-OHI) was recorded for times 1 and

85 severity of gingivitis using the simplified oral hygiene index and the gingival index, respectively.

86 O'Leary index) appears to be a commonly used oral hygiene index for assessing oral health skills.

87 A new oral hygiene index was developed based on the concepts o

88 s indices and clinical parameters, including oral hygiene index-simplified (OHI-S) score, gingival in

89 laque index (PI); 2) gingival index (GI); 3) oral hygiene index-simplified (OHI-S); and 4) microbiolo

90 The periodontal parameters assessed were oral hygiene index-simplified, gingival index, mean prob

91 ral hygiene categories based on a simplified oral hygiene index.

92 Despite having excellent oral hygiene, individuals with Sjogren's syndrome have e

93 Each patient received oral hygiene instruction and initial therapy prior to su

94 ts, with established periodontitis, received oral hygiene instruction and mechanical periodontal ther

95 red prior to initial therapy, which involved oral hygiene instruction and scaling and root planing.

96 py, which included scaling and root planing, oral hygiene instruction, and an occlusal adjustment whe

97 n was treated with scaling and root planing, oral hygiene instruction, and antimicrobial mouthrinses.

98 Initial treatment with mechanical therapy, oral hygiene instruction, frequent recalls, and systemic

99 manual brush even in subjects with no formal oral hygiene instruction.

100 of a self-regulation manual, and individual oral hygiene instruction.

101 received individual lifestyle counseling and oral hygiene instruction.

102 women received scaling and root planing plus oral hygiene instruction.

103 ive either doxycycline treatment (n = 23) or oral hygiene instruction/reinforcement (n = 22).

104 dontal therapy with scaling/root planing and oral hygiene instructions (n = 20) or no periodontal the

105 group received only mechanical cleansing and oral hygiene instructions (Treatment 2).

106 The first phase of treatment included oral hygiene instructions and local corticosteroid admin

107 with tobacco-cessation counseling as well as oral hygiene instructions and professional dental prophy

108 ontitis received subgingival debridement and oral hygiene instructions each week for 4 weeks, plus 6

109 1), which included mechanical cleansing and oral hygiene instructions supplemented by the local irri

110 dontal therapy (scaling and root planing and oral hygiene instructions).

111 curettage of the mandibular anterior region, oral hygiene instructions, and removal of the tongue stu

112 a treatment plan was developed that included oral hygiene instructions, mechanical debridement, and p

113 eline and 2 and 6 months after completion of oral hygiene instructions, motivation, and subgingival d

114 One to 3 months after cause-related therapy (oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing), th

115 ients received initial therapy consisting of oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing, and

116 ll-mouth scaling and root planing as well as oral hygiene instructions.

117 were seen after scaling and root planing and oral hygiene instructions.

118 control group was treated with MI and given oral hygiene instructions.

119 l hygiene for 6 weeks (T2) with the provided oral hygiene kits.

120 We hypothesized that better oral hygiene leads to increased tooth retention.

121 predictors of caries risk typically include oral hygiene level, counts of cariogenic micro-organisms

122 OH)D quintiles among individuals with a good oral hygiene level.

123 ertheless, concerning patients with DM, poor oral hygiene, male sex, and PON-1 phenotype were found t

124 All participants were instructed on strict oral hygiene measures and were advised to use 0.2% chlor

125 tive against biofilms on tooth surfaces, and oral hygiene measures such as brushing and flossing are

126 ing a 6-day trial period with out mechanical oral hygiene measures was used to compare dental plaque

127 a professional prophylaxis, suspended normal oral hygiene measures, and rinsed twice daily for 1 minu

128 After 36 hours (T1), without mechanical oral hygiene measures, plaque and gingival indices were

129 egories as follows: behavioral alteration of oral hygiene methods, alteration of plaque composition,

130 Even with good oral hygiene, microbial communities accumulate on teeth

131 at days 7, 14, and 21, during stent-mediated oral hygiene (OH) abstention; and at day 42, after resum

132 r (DH) was compared to placebo control (VC), oral hygiene (OH), and scaling and root planing (SRP) in

133 udies have noted a relationship between poor oral hygiene or periodontal bone loss and chronic obstru

134 s phase; the second phase (5 months) was the oral hygiene phase, which included rinsing.

135 ehavioral and environmental factors, such as oral hygiene practice and smoking.

136 with diabetes, but the relationship between oral hygiene practices and A1c among youth with diabetes

137 We studied the relationship between oral hygiene practices and periodontitis, controlling fo

138 viewed about demographic characteristics and oral hygiene practices and were given a full-mouth perio

139 nited States which have inquired about their oral hygiene practices and whether they have professiona

140 Oral hygiene practices ceased for 21 days to induce ging

141 People who reported better oral hygiene practices did not report less periodontitis

142 or not taking (n = 16) OC refrained from all oral hygiene practices in one maxillary (test) quadrant

143 Although the improvement in oral hygiene practices in recent decades correlates with

144 Few studies have assessed oral hygiene practices related to periodontitis.

145 Oral hygiene practices were determined by questionnaire,

146 Oral hygiene practices were not associated with periodon

147 ing a 28-day recovery phase, in which normal oral hygiene practices were resumed, subjects entered th

148 ite similar smoking histories, self-reported oral hygiene practices, and antibiotic use in the twin g

149 ernal self-report of oral symptoms/problems, oral hygiene practices, and/or dental service use before

150 Self-reported oral health symptoms/problems, oral hygiene practices, or dental service use before or

151 Oral hygiene practices, socioeconomic and education stat

152 model) in which subjects refrained from all oral hygiene practices, thus permitting the accumulation

153 nflammatory parameters after refraining from oral hygiene practices.

154 l phase but with subjects maintaining normal oral hygiene practices.

155 hat children with diabetes tend to have poor oral hygiene practices.

156 ts and evaluate socioeconomic conditions and oral hygiene practices.

157 isease were treated with initial scaling and oral hygiene procedures in a private practice.

158 With oral hygiene procedures suspended, one barrier of each t

159 and the animals were allowed to heal without oral hygiene procedures.

160 Oral hygiene products were provided, together with instr

161 fresher education campaign, 2) chlorhexidine oral hygiene program, 3) chlorhexidine bathing, 4) cathe

162 tutes an effective adjunct to the simplified oral hygiene regimen that does not require unrealistic l

163 ebred beagle dogs were subjected to a 14-day oral hygiene regimen, consisting of manual scaling and d

164 patient was treated with antibiotics and an oral hygiene regimen.

165 limited on the potential effect of intensive oral hygiene regimens and periodontal therapy during pre

166 in stable provided that patients comply with oral hygiene regimens and regular supportive periodontal

167 or dental caries and thus require aggressive oral hygiene regimens and routine dental surveillance.

168 patients were seen quarterly for scaling and oral hygiene reinforcement.

169 iofilm lysine and cadaverine contents before oral hygiene restriction (OHR) and their association wit

170 During oral hygiene restriction (OHR), lysine decarboxylase (LD

171 tial treatment consisted of reinforcement of oral hygiene, scaling and root planing, chlorhexidine ri

172 were tentatively significant with respect to oral hygiene skills.

173 lyze intervention effects on oral health and oral hygiene skills.

174 periodontal disease to provide education on oral hygiene, smoking, and DM.

175 Clinical recordings included oral hygiene standards and gingival health, recession de

176 arenting practices) had a negative effect on oral hygiene status (beta = 0.044; P = 0.07), and also h

177 ic status, presence of digit-sucking habits, oral hygiene status (OHS), and gingivitis among a group

178 Clinical examination of oral hygiene status and gingivitis was conducted using s

179 the extent of gingival bleeding via a worse oral hygiene status of children, but SES was also import

180 Oral hygiene status was positively associated with the e

181 ated to periodontal disease independently of oral hygiene status.

182 plaque index was measured monthly to verify oral hygiene status.

183 l roles of oral health-related behaviors and oral hygiene status.

184 ble risk factors for pneumonia (ie, impaired oral hygiene, swallowing difficulty) were enrolled.

185 After patients demonstrated acceptable oral hygiene, the lesions were surgically treated with c

186 Controlling for age, dietary intake, and oral hygiene, there was no association between GER sympt

187 hier lifestyle and continued improvements in oral hygiene throughout life appear to be the public hea

188 n and 5 months after treatment, and after no oral hygiene, tissue blocks of the mandible were taken f

189 erferes with function, speech, esthetics, or oral hygiene, tissue reduction can be accomplished by gi

190 oot planing, and diminished effectiveness of oral hygiene to alter the subgingival microbiota.

191 KSL may be a useful adjunct for conventional oral hygiene to prevent plaque-mediated dental diseases.

192 ely after patients had been asked to perform oral hygiene to the best of their abilities.

193 the oral microbiome were observed with poor oral hygiene, tobacco smoking, and oral cancer.

194 influence of factors, such as smoking, poor oral hygiene, tooth mobility, and defect morphology, on

195 extraction, given the greater frequency for oral hygiene, toothbrushing may be a greater threat for

196 When coupled with aggressive oral hygiene treatment, this drug may provide a reasonab

197 periodontal health, superior effect of MI on oral hygiene was found in five trials and was absent in

198 Postoperative oral hygiene was obtained by spraying a 0.12% chlorhexid

199 of some of the defects and the fact that no oral hygiene was performed over the 5-month healing peri

200 ing, duration and treatment of diabetes, and oral hygiene was recorded using a questionnaire.

201 The patient's oral hygiene was similar for right and left sides of the

202 teeth only and when only patients with good oral hygiene were considered.

203 redictors of presence of gingivitis and poor oral hygiene were determined using multivariate logistic

204 4 weeks at which time recession and level of oral hygiene were measured.

205 nd capable of maintaining a high standard of oral hygiene were randomly allocated to one of four trea

206 gival interface [BGI] groups) abstained from oral hygiene while using an acrylic stent.

207 ts were instructed to supplement their daily oral hygiene with chlorohexidine oral rinse during the s

208 dult lifestyle and continued improvements in oral hygiene would appear to be the public health interv