戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 all success rate tended to be greater in the oronasal (65.7%) than the nasal group (48.6%), but the d
2 ideofluoroscopic images of the upper airway, oronasal airflow and respiratory inductance plethysmogra
3                                          The oronasal anatomy (premaxilla-palate-vomer architecture)
4 al sensitivity of the mucus membranes in the oronasal cavities and being perceived as pungency, irrit
5 swine, displaying reduced replication in the oronasal cavity and limited spread from the inoculation
6 se in the respiratory mucosa, triggered upon oronasal challenge and congruent with a memory B-cell re
7 nimals (n = 10) exhibited FMD symptoms after oronasal challenge at 30 dpv.
8 ion synchrotron to interpret features of the oronasal complex pertinent to facial growth.
9 sed greatly enlarged orbits and a haplorhine oronasal configuration by the time they are first docume
10 es (CTLs) in a group of naive cats following oronasal exposure to FeLV.
11 the i.v. group and from 10 to 56 dpi for the oronasal group.
12                                              Oronasal infection triggered an immune reaction compatib
13 mly received either a disposable nasal or an oronasal mask (Respironics, Pittsburgh, PA) when they me
14 s significantly higher in the nasal than the oronasal mask group (12 vs. 4, respectively, p=.023).
15 patients in the nasal (11.4%) and two in the oronasal mask group (5.7%) died later during the hospita
16  nasal mask was less well tolerated than the oronasal mask in patients with acute respiratory failure
17 ve mechanical ventilation using facial mask (oronasal mask) failed to reverse acute respiratory failu
18 bryonic development, palatal shelves display oronasal (O-N) and anteroposterior polarity before the o
19            The lesion scores were higher for oronasal (P=0.0008) and i.v. (P=0.0029) group birds than
20 s a chemosensory or tactile mechanism in the oronasal region of humans for detecting some aspect of t
21 0.05), unchanged maximum flow, and increased oronasal resistance (p < 0.05) in both groups.
22 h flow limitation, maximum inspiratory flow, oronasal resistance, genioglossus muscle activity, and a
23 chicken infectious doses of avian HEV by the oronasal route, group 2 chickens (n=29) were each inocul
24         Accumulating evidence indicates that oronasal sensory stimulation influences nutrient metabol
25 nasal ventilation might be advantageous over oronasal ventilation prior to induction.
26 our study was to assess patient tolerance of oronasal vs. nasal mask ventilation in acute respiratory

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。