ライフサイエンスコーパス: osseointegration

1 rmation and were biocompatible with enhanced osseointegration.

2 bone formation in support of dental implant osseointegration.

3 ing technique and sequence on dental implant osseointegration.

4 ion, and against different levels of implant osseointegration.

5 e been used to improve implant retention and osseointegration.

6 ntrol its growth and healing and can enhance osseointegration.

7 gnals associated with corrosion might affect osseointegration.

8 opographic alterations that may affect early osseointegration.

9 plants that support local bone formation and osseointegration.

10 ess, and that osterix (Osx) promotes implant osseointegration.

11 ion, and that Osx overexpression accelerates osseointegration.

12 e that biology and mechanics play in implant osseointegration.

13 ose undertaking normal bone healing regulate osseointegration.

14 ntrol strongly associated with the nature of osseointegration.

15 aration and, in doing so, facilitate implant osseointegration.

16 s was induced following the establishment of osseointegration.

17 ion and differentiation, bone formation, and osseointegration.

18 ration of doxycycline only slightly enhances osseointegration.

19 ting implant stability and the percentage of osseointegration.

20 s that early loading produces more favorable osseointegration.

21 ors should provide a better understanding of osseointegration.

22 l surfaces to kill organisms while fostering osseointegration.

23 do such tissues or materials interfere with osseointegration?

24 y, 31.8% +/- 1.6% versus 35.6% +/- 2.5%; and osseointegration, 32.9% +/- 7.4% versus 33.7% +/- 8.1%)

25 uded that exogenous BMSCs participate in the osseointegration after implantation, and that Osx overex

26 ulation and participate in wound healing and osseointegration after implantation.

27 The advent of osseointegration and advances in biomaterials and techni

28 eoconductive and resulted in high degrees of osseointegration and biomechanical fixation.

29 e, the purpose of this study was to evaluate osseointegration and bone regeneration around nonsubmerg

30 ty to provide initial stability required for osseointegration and proper implant location and paralle

31 thread design on the quality and percent of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the

32 cific locations where they might best aid in osseointegration and soft tissue remodeling.

33 ical analysis indicated osseous ingrowth and osseointegration around nonsubmerged and submerged impla

34 firm previous reports that diabetes inhibits osseointegration, as defined by MBIC.

35 ti-FGF23 antibody treatment, the strength of osseointegration, as evidenced by a biomechanical push-i

36 Cellular and molecular events in osseointegration at the dental implant surface remain la

37 greatest regeneration of bone and degree of osseointegration: barrier membrane therapy plus deminera

38 one type of bone healed faster and supported osseointegration better than another.

39 yapatite (HA) has been suggested to increase osseointegration by stimulating early osteoblast functio

40 implant push-in test assesses the degree of osseointegration by the breakpoint load at the implant-t

41 that the detrimental effects of diabetes on osseointegration can be modified using aminoguanidine sy

42 itanium, which is critical to the process of osseointegration, changes over time before its use.

43 the body, whether it be to encourage better osseointegration, combat possible infection or stem the

44 This study explores the potential for osseointegration engineering with dental pulp cells (DPC

45 s and oculoplastic surgeons with the role of osseointegration for oculofacial prosthesis retention in

46 dental implants which follows the concept of osseointegration has become an accepted treatment modali

47 abetes on bone-to-implant contact (BIC) once osseointegration has been established is still unknown.

48 The biophysiology of osseointegration has been well established by our dentis

49 t-mediated bone resorption in the process of osseointegration has not been widely considered.

50 Advances in osseointegration have also enhanced the ability to achie

51 ePTFE membranes produced significantly more osseointegration histologically than other treatment opt

52 s of controlled surface alterations in early osseointegration in an animal model.

53 t modality is important in obtaining optimum osseointegration in large size defects.

54 m implants provided radiographic evidence of osseointegration in loaded bridges.

55 new loading protocols with no expectation of osseointegration in patients usually not receiving conco

56 of a balanced block design study to examine osseointegration in root- and plate-form implants prepar

57 grated to the machined titanium, both at the osseointegration interface and at the inner area of the

58 ntify sites in the oral cavity where implant osseointegration is likely to be successful.

59 tings on bone cell activity and bone-implant osseointegration is not well-established.

60 ations were peri-implantitis (six cases) and osseointegration losses (13 cases).

61 mplant failure (peri-implantitis and loss of osseointegration), marginal bone resorption, and biologi

62 ned implant surface microtopographies during osseointegration of dental implants.

63 zation effectively improves bone quality and osseointegration of titanium implants in CKD mice, sugge

64 ization was able to improve bone quality and osseointegration of titanium implants.

65 production are pivotal processes for implant osseointegration or bone tissue engineering.

66 teoid matrix that is responsible for implant osseointegration originates from Wnt-responsive cells an

67 lyses at multiple time points throughout the osseointegration period demonstrated that condensation c

68 of speeding up biology, thereby reducing the osseointegration period.

69 itive biomechanical assay system for implant osseointegration research.

70 emain stable and exhibit clinically relevant osseointegration similar to when implants are placed wit

71 dules produced 3.1 times greater strength of osseointegration than those with an acid-etched surface

72 of osteoblasts exert a synergistic effect on osseointegration that is likely to support the hypothesi

73 vivo models of osteotomy healing and implant osseointegration to determine if one type of bone healed

74 The osseointegration-unfavorable condition created by gonada

75 the temporary was placed, it remained until osseointegration was complete.

76 tistically significant differences in defect osseointegration were seen between treatment groups (P <

77 hesize that there would be no differences in osseointegration when reducing the number of drills for

78 Osseointegration with rare earth magnetic coupling provi

79 HA-coated implants had significantly greater osseointegration within the defect than Ti implants (P <