戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  developed to predict the number of strongly overdominant alleles in a population of which the size v
2 ygous with other pl alleles; illustrating an overdominant allelic relationship.
3 ve, and we find statistical support for both overdominant and recombinant contributions to hybrid vig
4 nant contributions to heterosis to outnumber overdominant, and extensive pleiotropy.
5                 We report a hitherto unknown overdominant effect (allelic interaction) at this locus,
6 surrounding CHRNA4 region, supporting a true overdominant effect at rs1044396.
7  This inverted U-shaped relation reflects an overdominant effect; that is, allelic interaction (cumul
8 amples that have both classical dominant and overdominant effects.
9 ex than predicted from classical dominant or overdominant explanations of heterosis.
10 due to resistance being dominant rather than overdominant, i.e., heterozygotes were more resistant th
11 0.35-0.95; P < 0.05) under the recessive and overdominant inheritance models, respectively.
12 seven chromosomal segments were linked to an overdominant lethal factor.
13                       Overdominant or pseudo-overdominant lethal factors are a common component of th
14 ross the genome, but it is not clear whether overdominant lethal factors are rare or representative.
15 y occur within the embryo lethal system, (2) overdominant lethal factors are rarely detected because
16 t and display stage-specific expression, (3) overdominant lethal factors are rarely detected due to t
17 verdominance lethal factors were tested: (1) overdominant lethal factors rarely occur within the embr
18                                         Four overdominant lethal factors were linked to common and ra
19  both rs3217318 and rs10415893, following an overdominant model.
20 ions to heterosis and genetic variation from overdominant mutations are monotonic but not linearly pr
21 oefficient), biased downward when additional overdominant mutations are present.
22 gely on the magnitude of the contribution of overdominant mutations to heterosis or genetic variation
23                                              Overdominant or pseudo-overdominant lethal factors are a
24 quilibrium exists, (2) polymorphism requires overdominant or underdominant selection, and (3) a simpl
25                  In numerical analyses, only overdominant polymorphic equilibria are stable, and thes
26 homozygotes, csd should be subject to strong overdominant selection and negative frequency-dependent
27 ure from neutrality is noted and no signs of overdominant selection are observed.
28                   Further, we find that weak overdominant selection can increase, rather than decreas
29 se data suggest that directional rather than overdominant selection may predominate during periods of
30  is proposed for estimating the intensity of overdominant selection scaled by the effective populatio
31 leterious recessive alleles with selfing and overdominant selection with outcrossing can help explain
32 unt for this observation, these include: (1) overdominant selection, (2) fluctuating population size
33 is based on the assumption that, with strong overdominant selection, allele frequencies are nearly at
34 f V(H)1 polymorphism is apparently caused by overdominant selection, though the real mechanism is unc
35 ing to an additive, dominant, recessive, and overdominant trait model as well as a genotypic model wi
36 netic models such as recessive, dominant, or overdominant were considered only by very few studies.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。