ライフサイエンスコーパス: owl

1 represented with the Web Ontology Language (OWL).

2 only expressed in the Web Ontology Language (OWL).

3 ng optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy (OWLS).

4 vised Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl.

5 nd/or adaptation related changes in the barn owl.

6 es in the Semantic Web formats RDF, RDFS and OWL.

7 ntology development environment called Tawny-OWL.

8 is consistent with observations in the barn owl.

9 em that underlies sound localization in barn owls.

10 line in survival with age, observed in tawny owls.

11 perior colliculus in mammals), in awake barn owls.

12 y neurons responses recorded in vivo in barn owls.

13 e was studied in the auditory system of barn owls.

14 e detectors in the nucleus laminaris of barn owls.

15 ior colliculus of adult male and female barn owls.

16 cated inside the RF in nitrous oxide sedated owls.

17 ately, together and in combination with barn owls.

18 operties by northern spotted owls and barred owls.

19 , increases auditory map plasticity in adult owls.

20 d in the study of sound localization in barn owls.

21 frequently preserved in the fossil record of owls.

22 ed saliency in the optic tectum (OT) of barn owls.

23 s an open-source Web application for editing OWL 2 ontologies.

24 species ranging from naked mole rats [1] to owls [2], chimpanzees are the most accomplished tool use

25 We have developed an OWL-2 ontology to describe the intrinsic physical and bi

26 ng optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy (OWLS); a highly sensitive label-free biosensor technique

27 nally, we tested if the absence of the snowy owl, a dominant and irruptive species, triggered a compe

28 in auditory localization pathway of the barn owl, a map of auditory space is relayed from the externa

29 we estimate that effects of traffic noise on owls' ability to detect prey reach >120 m from a road, w

30 ts to examine the effect of traffic noise on owls' ability to detect prey.

31 rrelated with behavioral improvements in the owls' ability to strike and capture prey.

32 When using Aber-OWL, access to ontologies and data annotated with them i

33 In contrast, in owls adapting to prisms or readapting to normal conditio

34 s to be different between human "larks" and "owls" (also called "morningness/eveningness types" or "c

35 In the barn owl, an auditory specialist relying on sound localizatio

36 ears to be realized in the brain of the barn owl, an auditory specialist, and has been assumed to hol

37 The barn owl, an auditory specialist, is a classic model for stud

38 The snowy owl, an irruptive migrant, the rough-legged buzzard, wit

39 emantic utility, with PRO now represented in OWL and as a SPARQL endpoint.

40 Spotted owl and barred owl detection probabilities were signific

41 between the attentional systems of the barn owl and the rhesus macaque.

42 ce models and telemetry data from 41 spotted owls and 38 barred owls monitored during 2007-2009 and 2

43 ctural forest properties by northern spotted owls and barred owls.

44 ings compared to their availability although owls and jaegers consumed relatively more brown lemmings

45 tent with several behavioral observations in owls and may be relevant to other visual features and sp

46 f reproductive data from marked female tawny owls and natural variation in food availability (field v

47 sound source, may be very different to barn owls and to the model proposed by Jeffress.

48 a 27-year study of an avian predator (tawny owl) and its main prey (field vole) collected in Kielder

49 tion formats, such as Web Ontology Language (OWL) and Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies (OBO)

50 ng optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy (OWLS) and an indium tin oxide (ITO) substrate, we show t

51 ing exclusively of owls: the Tytonidae (barn owls) and the Strigidae (true owls), united by a suite o

52 es from OBO format to Web Ontology Language (OWL) (and vice versa) that can also be used as a Protege

53 ned in a reptile (gecko), birds (chicken and owl), and mammals (mouse, guinea pig, gerbil, and bat),

54 abolished all spreading activity measured by OWLS, and the number of attached cells was significantly

55 implemented in Java and JavaScript using the OWL API and the Google Web Toolkit.

56 he need to package a wide range of low-level OWL API functionality into a library of common higher-le

57 s using the Web Ontology Language (OWL), the OWL API Java library is the foundation for a range of so

58 conditions (fewer voles and more goshawks), owls appeared to breed more frequently, but allocated fe

59 Owls are widespread nocturnal top predators and use prey

60 We found that, in barn owls, at each location there is a frequency range where

61 g air temperature and aridity on a Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) population in the southwestern

62 ad collection of mammalian dung by burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia) and show that they use this du

63 d these predictions using EFPs from the barn owl auditory brainstem where we recorded in nucleus lami

64 ches in the mammalian neocortex and the barn owl auditory localization pathway provide some of the fi

65 ere, we exploit a unique feature of the barn owl auditory localization pathway that permits retrospec

66 oQuery software is fully compatible with all OWL-based ontologies and is available for download (CC-0

67 Owls became slightly more likely to breed as they aged,

68 In the barn owl, both ITD detection and processing in the midbrain a

69 ity reference genomes for the Eurasian eagle-owl (Bubo bubo), oriental scops owl (Otus sunia), easter

70 erus and Buteo brachyurus) and two nocturnal owls (Bubo virginianus and Strix varia).

71 the biomimetic device can supersede the barn owl by orders of magnitude.

72 ssible to infer the body mass of prehistoric owls by analysing tarsometatarsi, an element that is fre

73 ris (Ipc) from the optic tectum (OT) in barn owls by reversibly blocking excitatory transmission in t

74 re of competitive interactions in the Ipc of owls by using two complementary protocols: in the first

75 ndings give rise to the hypothesis that barn owls, by active scanning of the scene, can induce adapta

76 The owl can discriminate changes in the location of sound so

77 Owls can localize sounds by using either the isomorphic

78 ia)-a significant threat to northern spotted owls-can suppress northern spotted owl responsiveness to

79 e OT were recorded from lightly anesthetized owls confronted with arrays of bars in which one bar (th

80 Aber-OWL consists of an ontology repository, a set of web ser

81 We illustrate which OWL constructs and inferences are kept and lost followin

82 The optic tectum of the barn owl contains a map of auditory space.

83 The optic tectum (OT) of barn owls contains topographic maps of auditory and visual sp

84 Particularly, sound location in owls could be decoded from the relative firing rates of

85 the type locality of the upper Maastrichtian Owl Creek Formation, offering an excellent opportunity t

86 phenodiscid shells may have only reached the Owl Creek locality by drifting seaward after death.

87 elopment on a custom built setup enabled the OWLS cuvette to be operated as a 1.5 ml mini-incubator,

88 which has hitherto been generally applied in OWLS data interpretation for adsorbed protein films, fai

89 Anatomical results from these owls demonstrated that the topography of intrinsic OT co

90 were known to nest prior to 1997 and barred owl density was thought to be low.

91 Spotted owl and barred owl detection probabilities were significantly higher fo

92 In barn owls, early experience markedly influences sound localiz

93 work that transforms OWL ontologies into the OWL EL subset, thereby enabling the use of tractable rea

94 Compared with diurnal birds, owls exhibit striking adaptations to the nocturnal envir

95 (NCBO) (a joint effort of OBO developers and OWL experts) and offers options to ease the task of savi

96 On-wire lithography (OWL) fabricated nanogaps are used as a new testbed to co

97 This includes an OWL file that implements and defines the classes necessa

98 goshawk abundance appeared to interact with owl food availability to have a delayed effect on recrui

99 ns is stored in the Vaccine Ontology (VO) in OWL format and can also be exported to FASTA and Excel f

100 lized and made interoperable by adopting the OWL format, as well as its structure and term definition

101 any types of adsorbates, enabling the use of OWL-generated structures as bioactive probes for diagnos

102 g coexistence of four avian predators (snowy owls, glaucous gulls, rough-legged hawks and long-tailed

103 ation depended on the amount of resources an owl had already allocated towards reproduction (averagin

104 s (OBO) format to the Web Ontology Language (OWL) has been established.

105 For nanowires, on-wire lithography (OWL) has emerged as a powerful way of synthesizing a seg

106 When the owls hunted live prey, auditory maps shifted substantial

107 are the analytical goodness of the developed OWLS immunosenor with HPLC and enzyme-linked immunosorbe

108 above 0.94) indicating that the competitive OWLS immunosensor has a potential for quick determinatio

109 re measured with the developed and optimized OWLS immunosensor.

110 and/or time-of-day effects between larks and owls in decision-making tasks occur only in RNA-based ch

111 e demonstrate that the brainstem of the barn owl includes a stage of processing apparently devoted to

112 l and critically important behavior for barn owls, increases auditory map plasticity in adult owls.

113 Behavioral studies in barn owls indicate that both the optic tectum (OT) and the au

114 er in normal juveniles than in prism-adapted owls, indicative of declustering.

115 We have developed the Aber-OWL infrastructure that provides reasoning services for

116 The incubator-equipped OWLS is readily applicable for delicate and long-term st

117 ecting and OV-projecting neurons in the same owl, it was confirmed that neurons in IC project to eith

118 a downloadable tab-delimited file and as an OWL knowledge base.

119 ional map inside the auditory cortex of barn owl known for its exceptional hunting ability in complet

120 Owls laid larger clutches when food was more abundant.

121 and striking increases in the recruitment of owl limpets (Lottia gigantea) and volcano barnacles (Tet

122 mately, dampened prey cycles would drive our owl local population towards extinction, with winter cli

123 With sound pairs having only envelope cues, owls localized direct sounds preferentially, and neurons

124 It uses the OBO to OWL mapping provided by the National Center for Biomedic

125 in dendritic structure compared to chick and owl may indicate specialization for encoding ITDs at low

126 The barn owl midbrain contains mutually aligned maps of auditory

127 n of a single inhibitory circuit in the barn owl midbrain tegmentum, the nucleus isthmi pars magnocel

128 In the owl midbrain, a map of auditory space is synthesized in

129 alidated by neural responses measured in the owl midbrain.

130 acuity in the auditory space map in the barn owl midbrain.

131 etry data from 41 spotted owls and 38 barred owls monitored during 2007-2009 and 2012-2015.

132 t of primate taxa, including the Argentinean owl monkey (Aotus azarai).

133 er understand this restriction, we expressed owl monkey (Aotus nancymaae) CD4 and CXCR4 in the owl mo

134 stitutions render HIV-1 capable of infecting Owl monkey (OMK) cells that highly restrict HIV-1.

135 he CD4 receptor encoded by permissive Spix's owl monkey alleles.

136 Paradoxically, the barrier to HIV-1 in owl monkey cells is released by capsid mutants or drugs

137 ction of a wild type HIV-1 reporter virus in owl monkey cells.

138 We conclude that the owl monkey cellular restriction machinery recognizes a p

139 MV) species, squirrel monkey CMV (SMCMV) and owl monkey CMV (OMCMV), that infect New World monkeys.

140 Here we show that knockdown of owl monkey CypA by RNA interference (RNAi) correlates wi

141 ic arrangements made by M, P, and K axons in owl monkey exhibit more similarities than differences.

142 We also used an owl monkey kidney (OMK) cell assay that is based on time

143 onkey (Aotus nancymaae) CD4 and CXCR4 in the owl monkey kidney cell line, OMK.

144 al orientations than oblique orientations in owl monkey middle temporal visual area (MT), a visual ar

145 we found that some individuals from captive owl monkey populations harbor CD4 alleles that are compa

146 An HIV-1 variant modified to evade the owl monkey restriction factor TRIM-cyp replicated effici

147 similar analysis of restriction mediated by owl monkey TRIM-cyclophilin A (CypA) or human TRIM5alpha

148 n TRIM5alpha, rhesus macaque TRIM5alpha, and owl monkey TRIM-Cyp remained potent in cells depleted of

149 restriction, proteasome inhibition prevented owl monkey TRIM-CypA restriction of HIV-1 reverse transc

150 M5 (TRIM5alpha(rh)) or by the product of the owl monkey TRIM5-cyclophilin A gene fusion (TRIMCyp).

151 re, we demonstrate that heat shock perturbed owl monkey TRIMCyp and rhesus TRIM5alpha-mediated restri

152 s in the representation of central vision in owl monkey V1 was relatively small and inconsistent.

153 Other species (e.g., owl monkey) had a similar low density of OMP (+) VSNs as

154 previously described in the laboratory rat, owl monkey, and squirrel monkey.

155 The owl monkey, Aotus azarae, has developed a fully nocturna

156 re from two prosimian galagos, one New World owl monkey, one Old World macaque monkey, and one baboon

157 TRIM-CypA is an owl monkey-specific variant of the retrovirus restrictio

158 ong the same axis as observed in macaque and owl monkey.

159 rtion of a paralogous Alu Sq sequence in the owl monkey.

160 D4 receptors encoded by two other species of owl monkeys (Aotus azarae and Aotus nancymaae) also serv

161 me, but not all, CD4 alleles found in Spix's owl monkeys (Aotus vociferans) encode functional recepto

162 Remarkably, in Owl monkeys (omk), a cyclophilin A (CypA) cDNA has been

163 V2 organization in owl monkeys also appears similar to that of other simian

164 usion with TRIM5 that is unique to New World owl monkeys also targets HIV-1 CA, but this interaction

165 ounts for post-entry restriction of HIV-1 in owl monkeys and blocks HIV-1 infection when transferred

166 al CD4 alleles in a colony of captive Spix's owl monkeys and found that 88% of surveyed individuals a

167 ually evoked activity in MT in two primates, owl monkeys and galagos, where MT is exposed on the brai

168 visual area (MT) was determined in six adult owl monkeys and one adult marmoset 69 d to 10 months aft

169 ggests that, if AVPR1A modulates behavior in owl monkeys and other neotropical primates, it does so i

170 00-electrode array and compared results from owl monkeys and squirrel monkeys 5-10 weeks after lesion

171 IEGs, we not only revealed apparent ODCs in owl monkeys but also discovered a number of unique featu

172 M, P, and K axons were labeled in adult owl monkeys by means of injections of wheat germ aggluti

173 tes, the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of owl monkeys contains three anatomically and physiologica

174 Among New World primates, only owl monkeys exhibit post-entry restriction of HIV-1.

175 Our data indicate that HIV-1 replication in owl monkeys is not restricted at entry but can be limite

176 , we report a series of experiments in which owl monkeys performed reaching movements guided by spati

177 Finally, V3 of owl monkeys shows a compartmental organization for orien

178 Adult owl monkeys were trained to detect an increase in the en

179 ving branches (e.g. humans, macaque monkeys, owl monkeys) is difficult for several reasons.

180 and the dorsolateral posterior area (DLP) in owl monkeys, and represents the entire contralateral hem

181 eral sulcus and posterior parietal cortex of owl monkeys, galagos, and macaques help identify areas t

182 New World owl monkeys, Old World macaque monkeys, and galagos shar

183 brain sections from two macaque monkeys, two owl monkeys, two squirrel monkeys, and three galagos tha

184 VPR1A on the evolution of social behavior in owl monkeys, we sequenced this locus in a wild populatio

185 ion (MI) to identify ODCs in V1 of New World owl monkeys.

186 n one hemisphere of each of two anesthetized owl monkeys.

187 ary somatosensory cortex of two anesthetized owl monkeys.

188 al (PMD) and ventral (PMV) premotor areas of owl monkeys.

189 oding in the two cochlear nuclei of the barn owl, nucleus angularis (NA) and nucleus magnocellularis

190 Northern spotted owl occupancy is typically assessed by eliciting their r

191 etitive interactions within the Imc, in barn owls of both sexes.

192 valuate EL Vira, a framework that transforms OWL ontologies into the OWL EL subset, thereby enabling

193 The Protege-OWL ontology editing tool provides a query facility that

194 omic Ontology Knowledge Base) is based on an OWL ontology that represents current knowledge linking m

195 atterns of neural population activity in the owl optic tectum (OT) categorize stimuli based on their

196 In control owls or prism-adapted owls, which experience small instr

197 ontrol area on sensory responsiveness in the owl OT are strikingly similar to the space-specific regu

198 fossil cranium of the 'giant' extinct scops owl Otus murivorus from Rodrigues Island (Mascarene Isla

199 rasian eagle-owl (Bubo bubo), oriental scops owl (Otus sunia), eastern buzzard (Buteo japonicus), and

200 Detection dogs (Canis familiaris) located owl pellets accumulated under roost sites, within search

201 and compared with other chronotypes, 'night owls' (people who are habitually active or wakeful at ni

202 rticipants with advanced (larks) or delayed (owls) phases.

203 In juvenile owls, plasticity in the OT increased as plasticity in th

204 Owl population size and immigration were unrelated to go

205 The actual changes in owl population size and structure observed during goshaw

206 The overall impact on owl population size varied by up to 50%, depending on th

207 In the OWL protocol presented here, multisegmented nanowires ar

208 Aber-OWL provides a framework for automatically accessing inf

209 Space representation in owls provides a useful example for discussion of place a

210 The Web Ontology Language (OWL) provides a sophisticated language for building comp

211 Although juvenile owls readily acquire alternative maps of auditory space

212 sis of prelearned and postlearned circuitry: owls reared wearing prismatic spectacles develop an adap

213 Barn owls reared with horizontally displacing prismatic spect

214 e control circuitry in the forebrain of barn owls regulates the gain of midbrain auditory responses i

215 allows end users to work directly with this OWL representation of OBO format ontologies.

216 tor abundance) had the greatest influence on owl reproduction.

217 n extrinsic conditions, which indicates that owl reproductive decisions were shaped by a complex seri

218 (which accounted for 83% of the variation in owl reproductive success).

219 and intrinsic factors interact to influence owl reproductive traits (breeding propensity, clutch siz

220 ing of the position and overall width of the OWLS resonant peaks.

221 n spotted owls-can suppress northern spotted owl responsiveness to vocalization surveys and hence the

222 The owl roost fauna includes Rallus undescribed sp. (extinct

223 ledge in Sawmill Sink is a Late Pleistocene owl roost that features lizards (one species), snakes (t

224 Endangered Species Act, and nonnative barred owls (S. varia) in western Oregon, USA to explore the re

225 rocess in the auditory space map of the barn owl's (Tyto alba) inferior colliculus using two spatiall

226 We show that this change predicts the owl's ability to detect a change in source location.

227 one and noise stimuli in neurons of the barn owl's auditory arcopallium, a nucleus at the endpoint of

228 ences neuronal responses and behavior in the owl's auditory system.

229 yielded new information about the Rodrigues owl's evolution and ecology.

230 d wing reduction, make the extinct Rodrigues owl's evolution remarkable, and with multiple causes.

231 The owl's external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICx)

232 vestigated these questions in neurons of the owl's external nucleus of the inferior colliculus, where

233 , recent studies reveal ITD responses in the owl's forebrain and midbrain premotor area that are cons

234 microstimulating a gaze-control area in the owl's forebrain, the arcopallial gaze fields (AGFs), on

235 Space-specific neurons in the barn owl's inferior colliculus have spatial receptive fields

236 Auditory space-specific neurons in the owl's inferior colliculus selectively respond to the dir

237 A cholinergic nucleus in the owl's midbrain exhibits functional properties that sugge

238 Neurons in the owl's midbrain show shifting receptive fields for moving

239 ency tuning of space-specific neurons in the owl's midbrain varies with their preferred sound locatio

240 itivity and gain of sensory responses in the owl's optic tectum (OT).

241 t neurons in the retinotopic map of the barn owl's optic tectum specifically adapt to the common orie

242 In this study, we used the barn owl's sound localization system to address this question

243 encing the population readout commanding the owl's sound-orienting behavior.

244 Thus, frequency tuning in the owl's space-specific neurons reflects a higher-order fea

245 s appetitive (chick silhouette) to aversive (owl silhouette) cues.

246 In the barn owl, spatial auditory information is conveyed to the opt

247 arboreal and terrestrial prey taken by each owl species.

248 n a ventromedial to dorsolateral sequence in owl, squirrel, and macaque monkeys, but an altered arran

249 However, the owl stayed ahead, the buzzard stayed on, and the falcon

250 auditory nerve fiber responses for the barn owl strengthens the notion that most OAE delay can be at

251 d falcons (Falconiformes) hunting by day and owls (Strigiformes) hunting by night.

252 Owls (Strigiformes) represent a fascinating group of bir

253 federal actions to conserve northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) habitat are largely ini

254 Using recoveries of ringed tawny owls (Strix aluco) predated by 'superpredators', norther

255 urce selection by sympatric northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina), a threatened species

256 However, proximity of barred owls (Strix varia)-a significant threat to northern spot

257 vidence of their expansion in the absence of owls, suggesting that spatial distribution is caused by

258 ponses by gaze control circuitry in the barn owl suggests that the central nervous system uses a comm

259 f queries with the human-readable Manchester OWL syntax, with syntax checking and entity label lookup

260 , we demonstrate that OT neurons in the barn owl systematically encode the relative strengths of simu

261 Optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy (OWLS) technique has been applied to label-free detection

262 s consumed larger lemmings in the absence of owls than in their presence, suggestive of a short-term

263 file contains an instance-level prototype in OWL that demonstrates the feasibility of this approach t

264 elation analysis, we demonstrate in the barn owl that the relationship between the spectral tuning an

265 al time differences (ITDs), in juvenile barn owls that experience chronic abnormal hearing.

266 In owls that experienced prisms beginning late in the juven

267 Juvenile owls that learn new, abnormal associations between audit

268 We tested in barn owls the hypothesis that an ongoing delay, equivalent to

269 ontologies using the Web Ontology Language (OWL), the OWL API Java library is the foundation for a r

270 We found that, in the barn owl, the Ipc responds to auditory as well as to visual s

271 In the barn owl, the ITD is processed in a dedicated neural pathway

272 In this article, we describe our use of OWL, the Ontology Web Language, to generate a fully comp

273 sponses and a demonstration that in the barn owl, the result is that expected by theory.

274 D is detected in the auditory system of barn owls, the posterior part of the lateral lemniscus (LLDp)

275 of raptorial birds consisting exclusively of owls: the Tytonidae (barn owls) and the Strigidae (true

276 tical posture (head less upright) than other owls (this in part an allometric effect of size increase

277 For spotted owls, this difference increased with number of site visi

278 anatomy using an ontology language, such as OWL, thus enabling future work on reasoning about the Mo

279 In addition, we show that one can use OWL to rapidly characterize a MTJ and optimize gap size

280 onitoring; demonstrating the capabilities of OWLS to sensitively monitor the adhesion properties of i

281 mpare these results with those from the barn owl (Tyto alba) and the domestic chick (Gallus gallus).

282 OAE) otoacoustic emissions from a bird (barn owl, Tyto alba) and a lizard (green anole, Anolis caroli

283 ytonidae (barn owls) and the Strigidae (true owls), united by a suite of adaptations aiding a keen pr

284 The nocturnality of owls, unusual within birds, has favored an exceptional v

285 ern spotted and barred owl without requiring owl vocalization.

286 Mean detection probability for barred owls was 20.1% for dog surveys and 7.3% for vocal survey

287 Predation of juvenile owls was disproportionately high.

288 et/ultraviolet-sensitive opsin (SWS1) in all owls we studied, but two other color vision genes, the r

289 detection probabilities of northern spotted owls were 29% after session 1, 62% after session 2, and

290 When owls were breeding in territories less exposed to goshaw

291 Two groups of naive adult owls were fit with prisms.

292 Owls were fitted with prismatic or control spectacles an

293 iple times in an area where northern spotted owls were known to nest prior to 1997 and barred owl den

294 as more often than low canopy areas, spotted owls were more commonly found in areas with lower tree c

295 tive selection for low-light vision genes in owls, which contributes to their remarkable nocturnal vi

296 In control owls or prism-adapted owls, which experience small instructive signals, the fr

297 Raising young barn owls with a prismatic displacement of the visual field l

298 ed towards reproduction (averaging 87.7% for owls with clutches of 1-2 eggs compared to 97.5% for owl

299 h clutches of 1-2 eggs compared to 97.5% for owls with clutches of 4-6 eggs).

300 ccupancy of both northern spotted and barred owl without requiring owl vocalization.