ライフサイエンスコーパス: packed red blood cell

1 nd 3 patients (9.4%) received transfusion of packed red blood cells.

2 tcome was the transfusion of any quantity of packed red blood cells.

3 Transfusion threshold maintained with packed red blood cells.

4 ion >7 days after device insertion of 1 U of packed red blood cells.

5 lood replacement was 26.27 +/- 2.05 units of packed red blood cells.

6 nts received a single unit of whole blood or packed red blood cells.

7 more patients in the albumin group received packed red blood cells.

8 with transfusion of fresh frozen plasma and packed red blood cells.

9 ratio resembled that noted for each unit of packed red blood cells, 1.074 (1.043-1.106).

10 ischemia time 25 min, and blood transfused (packed red blood cells) 6 units.

11 transfusion requirements in HM II patients (packed red blood cells, 6.3 +/- 0.8 U vs. 3.8 +/- 0.5 U;

12 or surgical reexploration as well as risk of packed red blood cell and cryoprecipitate transfusions a

13 rauma registries who required 1 U or more of packed red blood cells and composed the following groups

14 Intraoperative transfusion requirements of packed red blood cells and cryoprecipitate was higher in

15 remental risk associated with transfusion of packed red blood cells and other blood components on mor

16 required a median of 2 units (range 2-5) of packed red blood cells, and a median of 16 days (range 0

17 uire a greater number of transfused units of packed red blood cells, and have longer hospital stays c

18 underwent 60 min of EVNP with an oxygenated packed red blood cell-based solution warmed to 35.2 degr

19 survived and received a mean of 14 units of packed red blood cells during their hospitalization.

20 ntation, with ABO-compatible warm oxygenated packed red blood cells for 1-2 h.

21 +/- 52 and 302 +/- 369 nm, respectively, and packed red blood cell free and esterified OA-NO2 was 59

22 ion strategies emphasizing administration of packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platele

23 6.1% decrease in the rate of transfusion of packed red blood cells from 2005 to 2013 (ie, from 32.8%

24 Transfusion of packed red blood cells increases the risk of developing

25 Transfusion of packed red blood cells is a lifesaving therapy for patie

26 Transfusion of packed red blood cells is associated with nosocomial inf

27 on in most patients transfused with 12-15 mL packed red-blood-cells kg(-1) month(-1), equivalent to 0

28 Liquid packed red blood cells (LPRBCs) have an abbreviated shel

29 methods, administration of a large volume of packed red blood cells (median >10 units), inability to

30 ney underwent EVNP with 1 unit of compatible packed red blood cells mixed with a priming solution at

31 pressure and mean arterial pressure targets, packed red blood cells or dobutamine should be considere

32 as evidenced by the units of blood products (packed red blood cells or platelets) transfused or the n

33 leeding necessitating transfusion of >4 U of packed red blood cells or whole blood.

34 47; P<0.01) and an increased need in overall packed red blood cell (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.94 to 3.60; P<

35 d the proportion of patients transfused with packed red blood cells over placebo.

36 on, blood loss (p = .140) and transfusion of packed red blood cells (p = .442) and fresh frozen plasm

37 reduction in CRCl: requirement for >/=5 U of packed red blood cells(P=0.0002; OR=2.1), </=800 mL of u

38 transfusion requirements (37 vs 13 units of packed red blood cells; P < .001); worse intraoperative

39 usion requirement (mean, 3.0 vs 2.8 units of packed red blood cells; P = .75), or mortality (9.8% vs

40 e source of sPLA2, the sPLA2 was measured in packed red blood cells, platelet concentrates, and fresh

41 To evaluate the impact of transfused packed red blood cell (PRBC) age on perioperative morbid

42 Time of transfusion for each packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfused was recorded, in

43 tion in the proportion of patients receiving packed red blood cell (PRBC) using a liberal trigger hem

44 e bleeding complications and transfusions of packed red blood cells (PRBC).

45 ngomyelinase in the aging of stored units of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) and subsequent lung infla

46 ngomyelinase in the aging of stored units of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) and subsequent lung infla

47 using a range of costs for a single unit of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) based on actual instituti

48 fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in a 1:1 ratio to packed red blood cells (PRBCs) has led many civilian tra

49 first event and the infusion of plasma from packed red blood cells (PRBCs) or antibodies (OX18 and O

50 The transfusion of more than 6 units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) within the first 12 hours

51 ed by PCs from whole blood, whole blood, and packed red blood cells (PRBCs).

52 assive transfusion (greater than 10 units of packed red blood cells [PRBCs] in less than 24 hrs) than

53 review to determine whether higher plasma to packed red blood cell ratios compared with lower plasma

54 :1 ratio but concluded that higher plasma to packed red blood cell ratios improved survival.

55 opathy through transfusion of high plasma to packed red blood cell ratios is gaining favor.

56 od cell ratios compared with lower plasma to packed red blood cell ratios were associated with a surv

57 not uniformly favor 1:1 or higher plasma to packed red blood cell ratios.

58 equate oxygen supply, typically delivered by packed red blood cells (RBC).

59 The amounts of packed red blood cells (RBCs) and fresh frozen plasma (F

60 Metabolomic investigations of packed red blood cells (RBCs) stored under refrigerated

61 es included total blood loss, transfusion of packed red blood cells, reexploration, mortality, stroke

62 ically compromising anemia, transfusion with packed red blood cells, renal insufficiency, dialysis, o

63 in total ischemia time, operative time, and packed red blood cells requirement but with shorter (P=0

64 Despite greater Injury Severity Scores and packed red blood cell requirements, mortality was lowest

65 tive risk (RR) for the intraoperative use of packed red blood cells (RR, 0.75; 95% confidence interva

66 nsfusion requirement of more than 6 units of packed red blood cells, significant comorbid diseases) t

67 requiring surgery or transfusion of >2 U of packed red blood cells, stroke (hemorrhagic and ischemic

68 mical changes during storage, transfusion of packed red blood cells that have been stored for prolong

69 tion of fluids, vasopressors, inotropes, and packed red blood cells titrated to hemodynamic goals; co

70 The mean packed red blood cells to fresh frozen plasma ratio chan

71 P = 0.039) and increasing number of units of packed red blood cells transfused intraoperatively (odds

72 s a dose-response pattern (the more units of packed red blood cells transfused, the greater the chanc

73 In addition, for each unit of packed red blood cells transfused, the odds of developin

74 scores, age, gender, and number of units of packed red blood cells transfused.

75 nificant difference was noted in the rate of packed red blood cell transfusion (6.9% vs 12.7%, respec

76 creased the percentage of patients receiving packed red blood cell transfusion (72.6 vs. 51.6%, p =.0

77 The HRS2 patients had greater intraoperative packed red blood cell transfusion (P = 0.002), and longe

78 than 45 years, intraoperative requirement of packed red blood cell transfusion greater than 30 units,

79 nd 4) use a 10 g/dL hemoglobin threshold for packed red blood cell transfusion in unstable patients (

80 ficacy are warranted before a high plasma to packed red blood cell transfusion ratio can be recommend

81 ound a survival benefit with a 1:1 plasma to packed red blood cell transfusion ratio compared with ei

82 ns concerning the effects of a 1:1 plasma to packed red blood cell transfusion ratio.

83 n (P=0.951), nor did it significantly reduce packed red blood cell transfusion requirements in either

84 rt a survival advantage with a 1:1 plasma to packed red blood cell transfusion strategy.

85 Packed red blood cell transfusion was associated with an

86 Packed red blood cell transfusion was associated with AR

87 om 57 centers, patients receiving at least 1 packed red blood cell transfusion were compared with tho

88 tcomes, including multiorgan system failure, packed red blood cell transfusion, respiratory outcomes,

89 Major gastrointestinal surgery and packed red blood cell transfusion.

90 tched patients who did and did not receive a packed red blood cell transfusion.

91 1.2 mg/dL), and 3) worse with intraoperative packed red blood cell transfusions (n = 385; 21.9%), in

92 amp time (P<0.007), RCP time (P<0.0001), and packed red blood cell transfusions (P=0.0001).

93 onary bypass time >120 minutes (P<0.04), and packed red blood cell transfusions (P=0.0002).

94 ed by the duration of CPB (TCPB) and on-pump packed red blood cell transfusions and 2) to quantify th

95 ed when CPB is prolonged with intraoperative packed red blood cell transfusions and in patients with

96 Avoiding the unnecessary use of packed red blood cell transfusions may decrease the occu

97 Patients with greater requirements for packed red blood cell transfusions or reduced urine prod

98 Packed red blood cell transfusions were associated with

99 [ANC] and 1 had more than a 50% reduction in packed red blood cell transfusions).

100 ation of anemia that orders were written for packed red blood cell transfusions, although only 6 pati

101 ty of illness, clinical grade of hemorrhage, packed red blood cell transfusions, and severe sepsis in

102 using erythropoietin to reduce the need for packed red blood cell transfusions.

103 In mice resuscitated with fresh packed red blood cells, treatment with haptoglobin, hemo

104 ion (72.6 vs. 51.6%, p =.007), the number of packed red blood cell units (3 vs. 1.6, p =0.0004), and

105 ; P < 0.001), operative blood loss (18 vs 14 packed red blood cell units; P = 0.001), and posttranspl

106 Transfusion of packed red blood cells was related to the occurrence of

107 transfusion greater than or equal to 5 units packed red blood cells within 24 hours, and Denver multi