1 Gene expression,
paired Student'
s t test, and pathway analyses were perfo
2 Statistical analysis was performed using
paired student'
s t test.
3 tistical analysis was performed by using the
paired Student'
s t test.
4 Statistical significance was determined by
paired Student'
s t tests between tooth-implant pairs.
5 Paired Student'
s t tests revealed significant improvemen
6 es were compared by analysis of variance and
paired Student'
s t tests.
7 The
paired Student'
s t-test was used to detect significant d
8 establishment of NMB were compared by using
paired Student'
s t-test.
9 e analysis, and the results were analyzed by
paired Student'
s t-test.
10 e analysis, and the results were analyzed by
paired Student'
s t-test.
11 TIA significantly increased following LPI by
paired Student'
s t-tests (all P < 0.0001).
12 mber angle width parameters were compared by
paired Student'
s t-tests.
13 0 +/- 4.6 mmHg to 19 +/- 5.3 mmHg (p < 0.01;
paired Student'
s test).
14 Measurements were analyzed with the
paired Student t test and Bland-Altman test, where appro
15 ical differences were analyzed by means of a
paired Student t test and repeated two-way analysis of v
16 hanges were determined and analyzed by using
paired Student t test and Spearman correlation.
17 Statistical analysis included
paired Student t test and Wilcoxon signed rank test with
18 Data were analyzed by
paired Student t test comparing the effect of cell fract
19 s between groups were performed by using the
paired Student t test for continuous variables and the M
20 Follow-up analysis was performed with
paired Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test.
21 Paired Student t test was performed to compare the accur
22 The
paired Student t test was used for data analysis.
23 A two-sided
paired Student t test was used for statistical analysis.
24 each sequence in a blinded fashion, and the
paired Student t test was used to assess differences in
25 Paired Student t test was used to assess the significanc
26 A
paired Student t test was used to compare continuous var
27 A
paired Student t test was used to compare mean values in
28 A
paired Student t test was used to compare the signal-to-
29 A two-tailed,
paired Student t test was used to determine the effects
30 A
paired Student t test was utilized to evaluate differenc
31 A 2-tailed Fisher exact test and
paired Student t test were used for statistical analysis
32 reated tumors were analyzed with parametric (
paired Student t test) and nonparametric (Wilcoxon rank
33 than in controls (17.4 +/- 11.8) (P = .004,
paired Student t test).
34 vely compared between patients and controls (
paired Student t test).
35 Paired Student t test, chi(2) test, Pearson correlation
36 Paired Student t test, linear regression analysis, and P
37 h combination of power and time by using the
paired Student t test.
38 Differences were evaluated by using the
paired Student t test.
39 gion-of-interest analysis with the two-sided
paired Student t test.
40 titative analysis was performed by using the
paired Student t test.
41 gnificance by using a bootstrap method and a
paired Student t test.
42 mpared to pretreatment HCV RNA levels by the
paired Student t test.
43 Minimum distances were compared by using a
paired Student t test.
44 istical analyses were performed by using the
paired Student t test.
45 ed for the two respiratory phases by using a
paired Student t test.
46 week after delivery was evaluated by using a
paired Student t test.
47 s enhancement values, were compared by using
paired Student t tests and Bland-Altman plots.
48 Paired Student t tests were performed to compare results
49 Analysis of variance, Scheffe, and
paired Student t tests were used for data analysis.
50 fficients, multiple regression analysis, and
paired Student t tests were used for statistical analyse
51 Two-sided
paired Student t tests were used for statistical evaluat
52 Paired Student t tests were used to compare average SNRs
53 Paired Student t tests were used to compare the tumor re
54 ges in metabolite levels were evaluated with
paired Student t tests, cluster-based analyses, and mult
55 rostate cancer and PZ were compared by using
paired Student t tests.
56 erence from baseline, which was evaluated by
paired Student t tests.
57 l analyses were performed using unpaired and
paired Student t tests.
58 differences were statistically significant (
paired Student t-test, P = 0.0023).
59 ferences were not statistically significant (
paired Student t-test, P = 0.41).
60 mitral regurgitation were analyzed using the
paired Student t-test.
61 ir expression in the severe malaria episode (
paired Students t test, P < 0.05).