ライフサイエンスコーパス: pairwise comparison

1 , and uninfected controls (P < 0.05 for each pairwise comparison).

2 iod 2 and 26.3% in period 3 (P<.001 for each pairwise comparison).

3 health care utilization (P < 0.001 for each pairwise comparison).

4 areas than in urban areas (p<0.0001 for each pairwise comparison).

5 for nonstone controls, P < or = .02 for each pairwise comparison).

6 b, and 8.3 with ranibizumab (P>0.50 for each pairwise comparison).

7 , 0.65; 95% CI, 0.63-0.66) (P < 0.01 for all pairwise comparisons).

8 324 452+/-30 152 pixels(2); P<0.0001 for all pairwise comparisons).

9 roups with much less overlap (P<0.01 for all pairwise comparisons).

10 e of genes (1.65-7.04 substitutions/10 kb in pairwise comparisons).

11 ) for artemether-lumefantrine (P<.05 for all pairwise comparisons).

12 combination, respectively (P<0.0001 for all pairwise comparisons).

13 mg, 71.4%; 30 mg, 61.9%; P> or =.72 for all pairwise comparisons).

14 FFS managed care patients (85%) (P<.001 for pairwise comparisons).

15 and 8.6 letters, respectively (P > 0.10, for pairwise comparisons).

16 verse remodeling (n = 296, 58%) (P < .001 in pairwise comparisons).

17 s one-way analysis of variance with post hoc pairwise comparisons).

18 aits according to their contribution to each pairwise comparison.

19 or PCR was higher than or equal to any other pairwise comparison.

20 year were determined by a one-way ANOVA and pairwise comparison.

21 pressed feature is up or down regulated in a pairwise comparison.

22 e observation of concerted evolution in some pairwise comparisons.

23 ely compared by using the overall F test and pairwise comparisons.

24 P = .05 and 99.2% CIs adjusted for multiple pairwise comparisons.

25 ial drug effects were determined by means of pairwise comparisons.

26 co and tested in vivo, predominantly through pairwise comparisons.

27 at the remaining hospitals and for selected pairwise comparisons.

28 soform switches exist and these are based on pairwise comparisons.

29 pretation and validity of studies relying on pairwise comparisons.

30 y means of logistic regression analysis with pairwise comparisons.

31 onymous substitutions, with dN/dS>14 in some pairwise comparisons.

32 (not including replicates) and over 100,000 pairwise comparisons.

33 no significant differences were detected in pairwise comparisons.

34 on the patterns of incongruence observed in pairwise comparisons.

35 ed-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise comparisons.

36 e selection and pairwise divergence using 21 pairwise comparisons.

37 ector-transduced samples were analyzed by 16 pairwise comparisons.

38 26.7% of nucleotide sites are polymorphic in pairwise comparisons.

39 osite trend, however, was seen in intraclass pairwise comparisons.

40 p<0.05) were followed up via Tukey-corrected pairwise comparisons.

41 with greater selectively than those that use pairwise comparisons.

42 hree assays, and each assay was subjected to pairwise comparisons.

43 rading bacteria were greater than 99% in all pairwise comparisons.

44 closely related, with 68-81% aa identity in pairwise comparisons.

45 cereus and B. mycoides from B. anthracis in pairwise comparisons.

46 sful, these approaches are mostly limited to pairwise comparisons.

47 7 to 9 months of follow-up data to 1 or more pairwise comparisons.

48 te matter indices was conducted, followed by pairwise comparisons.

49 ding a general framework for making multiple pairwise comparisons.

50 ay analysis of variance and Dunnett test for pairwise comparisons.

51 sed, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test for pairwise comparisons.

52 e-brain corrected), was followed by post hoc pairwise comparisons.

53 ve stool samples and kappa values for making pairwise comparisons.

54 rrelation and variability were assessed with pairwise comparisons across all reagent-platform combina

55 nt lesions were significant (P < .01 for all pairwise comparisons after adjusting for multiplicity).

56 Pairwise comparisons, age-related bone losses, and perce

57 Although performing pairwise comparisons alone can provide physiologically r

58 Whereas most pairwise comparisons among angiosperms differ by 2-3% in

59 By conducting three pairwise comparisons among European taurine, African tau

60 ogistic regression, analyzing all 7 possible pairwise comparisons among the subtypes, corresponding t

61 Pairwise comparison analyses identified 40 miRNAs and 31

62 No differences were found in primary pairwise comparison analyses of open-label augmentation

63 alysis of variance with Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparison and Pearson correlation were used fo

64 Both pairwise comparison and phylogenetic inference indicate

65 Using robust, pairwise comparisons and a global dataset, we show that

66 Results of all the pairwise comparisons and our combined functional classif

67 ne due to multiple testing involving several pairwise comparisons and the second due to falsely decla

68 Using pairwise comparisons and weighted gene coexpression netw

69 rather than O(NM(2)) as expected from naive pairwise comparison, and also a fast algorithm, empirica

70 tructurally conserved repeats that, based on pairwise comparisons, are unconserved at the sequence le

71 test recurrence score (ODxRS), and post hoc pairwise comparisons assessed ODxRS means by using imagi

72 ng ANCOVA F tests and Tukey-Kramer-corrected pairwise comparisons.At 24 mo, the LNS-LNS group had sig

73 ent qRT-PCR experiment using 2(-DeltaCT) and pairwise comparison-based (geNorm) analyses.

74 sliding window analysis and observed in two pairwise comparisons, better accounted for by localised

75 We performed pairwise comparison between concurrent measures of invas

76 g) and C (1.6 +/- 1.0 g) (p < 0.05 for each pairwise comparison between groups).

77 A pairwise comparison between patients treated with FU+LV

78 There was no difference in the pairwise comparison between patients who received FU+LV

79 nucleotide sequences is relatively small, a pairwise comparison between these sequences can provide

80 his process is investigated that is based on pairwise comparison between two individuals.

81 ficients > or =0.40; P values <.001) for all pairwise comparisons between beta-blocker use at admissi

82 CL) and navigating the space of all possible pairwise comparisons between cell types to find genes wh

83 ts by an approximate method that is based on pairwise comparisons between each single sequence and th

84 ourteen (p < 0.05) to 17 (p < 0.1) of the 28 pairwise comparisons between eight global regions are st

85 Pairwise comparisons between individual RFLP loci showed

86 Pairwise comparisons between Kunitz and amino-terminal d

87 ication that automates the process of making pairwise comparisons between large numbers of phylogenet

88 Pairwise comparisons between local and exotic germplasms

89 Our pairwise comparisons between numts suggest that most hum

90 The clustering is based on analysis of all pairwise comparisons between protein sequences.

91 Analysis of the 45 possible pairwise comparisons between samples found that 100% of

92 aviour and brain biochemistry frequently use pairwise comparisons between sham-treated and -untreated

93 Pairwise comparisons between the 3 treatment groups were

94 Pairwise comparisons between the four FHFs show between

95 Bonnferoni analysis was used to assess pairwise comparisons between the groups.

96 Pairwise comparisons between the metformin and nonmetfor

97 Interestingly, pairwise comparisons between these 2 patients' C2-V3 env

98 'contrasts', i.e. instances of differential pairwise comparisons between two sets of biological repl

99 rebral volumes (overall F(2,288) = 6.65; all pairwise comparisons Bonferroni corrected, -5.8%; P =.00

100 For multiple pairwise comparisons, Bonferroni correction was performe

101 Pairwise comparison by nodal status showed that when com

102 Pairwise comparisons demonstrated a significant differen

103 Pairwise comparisons demonstrated significant difference

104 nd two of the three were imitative, enabling pairwise comparisons designed to highlight commonalities

105 Pairwise comparisons did not reveal any statistically si

106 ntial expression for biologically meaningful pairwise comparisons-estimated using consistent methodol

107 te (r) is at least approximately 10(5), the "pairwise comparison estimator" of T(MRCA) that derives f

108 stimator" of T(MRCA) is more biased than the pairwise comparison estimator, having low bias only for

109 udy drugs, respectively (P< or =.008 for all pairwise comparisons, except amodiaquine plus artesunate

110 uernus, this snapper had several significant pairwise comparisons (F(ST)) clustered around the middle

111 propriate omnibus tests followed by post hoc pairwise comparisons; false discovery rate correction wa

112 polynomial in nature and thus faster, making pairwise comparisons feasible for significantly larger n

113 Pairwise comparison for each gene is not appropriate wit

114 (P = 0.036) and numerically greater for the pairwise comparison for ribavirin at 1200 mg/day (P = 0.

115 interferon alfa-2a (180 microg/week) for the pairwise comparison for ribavirin at 1600 mg/day (P = 0.

116 Pairwise comparisons for mean total overall clerkship gr

117 Using a transducer-based pairwise comparison function, we determine optimal phasi

118 sus group 1 and significant differences in a pairwise comparison (group 3 or group 4 versus group 1).

119 Single pairwise comparisons, however, allow the discovery of co

120 hing can uncover beyond that found by normal pairwise comparison (i.e. direct linkage).

121 ly more diverged than intronic INE-1 in both pairwise comparisons, implying the presence of either ne

122 expressed transcripts were detected based on pairwise comparison in the three libraries (0_DAP, 7_DAP

123 Pairwise comparisons in each category of nephronopenia i

124 ces were confirmed in cage studies where, in pairwise comparisons in the absence of other floral cues

125 Still, in all the direct pairwise comparisons in the same medium, the catalysts w

126 Pairwise comparisons in YGTSS total scores after Bonferr

127 The hazard ratios associated with all pairwise comparisons included 1 for all key cardiovascul

128 Pairwise comparisons indicated: (1) the mean melanopsin-

129 forces consistent structure information from pairwise comparisons into consensus structures.

130 ease, an efficient alternative is to cluster pairwise comparisons into groups and identify seeds for

131 This method, the PK distribution method of pairwise comparisons, is analogous to the mismatch distr

132 7; LF: -1.43 +/- 0.27; F = 4.616, P = 0.012; pairwise comparisons: LGI compared with HGI, P = 1.000;

133 ssion microarray profiles indicated that, in pairwise comparisons, low DLC1 expression occurred frequ

134 ct more subtle similarity relationships than pairwise comparison methods.

135 database bias, the results from such simple pairwise comparisons might be misleading.

136 A pairwise comparison of 2 signatures was performed using

137 Here, we perform a pairwise comparison of 90,000 putative binding pockets d

138 first constructed a novel gene network via a pairwise comparison of all yeast genes' Ontology Fingerp

139 erating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, pairwise comparison of areas under the ROC curves (A(z))

140 ificant difference test were used to perform pairwise comparison of brain regions in terms of each pe

141 Pairwise comparison of CTC subpopulations longitudinally

142 Pairwise comparison of data vectors represents a large p

143 d and standalone application that performs a pairwise comparison of each gene present in user-selecte

144 Pairwise comparison of hospital quality based on TMPM-IC

145 ion and quality of genome assemblies through pairwise comparison of k-mers present in both input read

146 ed of a matrix of cells, each representing a pairwise comparison of mapped probe data for two linkage

147 fraction of compounds as evidenced through a pairwise comparison of molecules that were otherwise ide

148 sequences, thus making it applicable for the pairwise comparison of more distantly related sequences.

149 A pairwise comparison of normal, adrenocortical adenomas a

150 otation analysis to carry out a quantitative pairwise comparison of PAS quaternary structures, which

151 Pairwise comparison of real-time PCR between multiplex a

152 veloped ParsEval, a software application for pairwise comparison of sets of gene structure annotation

153 In a pairwise comparison of seven closely related species pai

154 Diagrams for pairwise comparison of species can be produced that show

155 Mean pairwise comparison of the 14 alleles indicates moderate

156 Pairwise comparison of the 35 amino acids showed 61% seq

157 sed for visual differentiability by means of pairwise comparison of the attenuation- and phase-contra

158 Pairwise comparison of the DHPS sequences demonstrated 6

159 The web server provides pairwise comparison of the dynamics of all proteins incl

160 Pairwise comparison of the full-length S, M, and L genom

161 ce, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for pairwise comparison of the groups.

162 (*)1 and C(S)1, extensions of statistics for pairwise comparison of the joint k-tuple content of all

163 utility of the toolkit using annotation of a pairwise comparison of the mouse MHC class II and class

164 text "reuse" by researchers via a systematic pairwise comparison of the text content of all articles

165 However, a pairwise comparison of the TT2 arms suggested a lower in

166 The pairwise comparison of these modalities showed no statis

167 Pairwise comparison of whole plastid and draft nuclear g

168 Genome-scale evolutionary analyses based on pairwise comparisons of 1,197 orthologous sequences betw

169 istributions of nucleotide differences among pairwise comparisons of all DNA sequences in the sample.

170 egions (EBRs; N = 1064) were identified from pairwise comparisons of all genomes.

171 Pairwise comparisons of amino acid identities and phylog

172 Pairwise comparisons of amino acid sequences of the corr

173 For each dose of RVX-208, individual pairwise comparisons of apoA-I changes with placebo, the

174 Pairwise comparisons of areas under ROC curves (AUCs) fr

175 astric band groups, respectively (P < 0.005, pairwise comparisons of band groups with sham).

176 All pairwise comparisons of beta diversity values between gr

177 Pairwise comparisons of cardiovascular MR imaging measur

178 In pairwise comparisons of complete VP1 sequences, enterovi

179 Pairwise comparisons of density estimations at different

180 Through pairwise comparisons of different isolates we discovered

181 In pairwise comparisons of different tests in blood donor s

182 Pairwise comparisons of different treatment exposure gro

183 Pairwise comparisons of disagreement in phylogenetic dat

184 Nevertheless, pairwise comparisons of diversity of nontarget insects i

185 fourfold degenerate sites) in two different pairwise comparisons of Drosophila (D. melanogaster vs.

186 (baseline colonic transit as covariate) with pairwise comparisons of each dose vs placebo.

187 In pairwise comparisons of eight bz haplotypes, the percent

188 Using an analysis of complete pairwise comparisons of expression profiles among all of

189 In 33 pairwise comparisons of functional properties as influen

190 d 31.3%, respectively (P = 0.001, P = 0.381, pairwise comparisons of gastric band vs. sham and gastri

191 Classified on the basis of significant pairwise comparisons of genotype means, 181 of these 305

192 Pairwise comparisons of homologous mesophilic and thermo

193 Among 1809 participants, all pairwise comparisons of incidence of virologic failure o

194 es of exact agreement (for C & M values) for pairwise comparisons of individual patient values were 5

195 A systematic analysis of pairwise comparisons of intrapatient sequences, both wit

196 ncompatibilities were detected by performing pairwise comparisons of markers on different chromosomes

197 Pairwise comparisons of mean ADCs for each parameter (no

198 Pairwise comparisons of median price per ounce on the ba

199 The TER is fully supported by the pairwise comparisons of MERs using 106 manually segmente

200 Pairwise comparisons of nonsynonymous and synonymous dis

201 Therefore, datasets from 74 studies from pairwise comparisons of organic vs. nonorganic farming s

202 with one or more fast-evolving regions from pairwise comparisons of orthologous genes.

203 Pairwise comparisons of orthologous human and mouse gene

204 and SNAP (a parsimony-based NG86 model) made pairwise comparisons of orthologs in murids (rat and mou

205 In pairwise comparisons of photosynthetic angiosperms to Gl

206 we use co-evolution-based methods, involving pairwise comparisons of protein phylogenetic trees, to p

207 Pairwise comparisons of research versus control had 90%

208 analysed the substitution patterns by making pairwise comparisons of sequence variation at the putati

209 In comparative biology, pairwise comparisons of species or genes (terminal taxa)

210 Thus, pairwise comparisons of species sharing a recent common

211 Competition studies involved successive pairwise comparisons of substrates of increasing enzyme

212 Pairwise comparisons of the 44 partial L1 gene sequences

213 However, pairwise comparisons of the A-beta and G-beta sequences

214 In pairwise comparisons of the four genotypes, the number o

215 , for which the average sequence identity in pairwise comparisons of the known members of a class ran

216 ilcoxon signed rank test was used to perform pairwise comparisons of the MR angiographic techniques.

217 Pairwise comparisons of the predicted prosystemin protei

218 mega = dN/dS) and the sequence distance d in pairwise comparisons of the same gene from different spe

219 Through pairwise comparisons of the strains, we identified an av

220 Pairwise comparisons of their distribution in rat, mouse

221 These pairwise comparisons of wild-type versus mutant rootless

222 Statistical analysis (Tukey's pairwise comparisons) of the mean PI, GI, PD, RAL, ICI,

223 rarchical logistic regression modeling using pairwise comparisons (overweight, BMI: 25-29.9; mildly o

224 was significantly superior to phenytoin in a pairwise comparison (P=0.002).

225 roup when compared with the essential group (pairwise comparison, P = .002).

226 nd the controls (F6,160 = 2.4; P = .032; all pairwise comparisons, P < .002).

227 In the pairwise comparisons, PRN bevacizumab compared with mont

228 BD40-J relations that can be detected by the pairwise comparison procedures FASTA (17%) and GAP-BLAST

229 results are found for the Wright-Fisher and Pairwise Comparison processes.

230 en-population similarity values (Sb) for all pairwise comparisons ranged from 0.47 to 0.51.

231 patient gag nucleotide variation obtained by pairwise comparisons ranged from 0.55 to 2.86%.

232 Pairwise comparisons (ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, vs sham and l

233 Pairwise comparison revealed that dominants' AR mRNA exp

234 The use of statistical pairwise comparison revealed that there were trace impur

235 Pairwise comparisons revealed average numbers of nucleot

236 Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences be

237 Post hoc pairwise comparisons revealed statistically significant

238 Planned pairwise comparisons revealed that from months 4 to 12,

239 Post hoc log-rank pairwise comparisons revealed that lesions initially tre

240 Post hoc Tukey pairwise comparisons revealed that the short-short homoz

241 Pairwise comparisons revealed that the trackball was sig

242 Pairwise comparisons revealed the trackball to be signif

243 Pairwise comparison reveals a strong negative correlatio

244 ve game dynamics such as imitate-the-best or pairwise comparison rules, whereas moody conditional coo

245 Pairwise comparison showed a significant difference betw

246 Pairwise comparisons showed that the diagnostic performa

247 Adjusted pairwise comparisons showed that the relative annual inc

248 Pairwise comparisons showed that the scores from the 28-

249 (*)2, C(S)2 and C(geo)2, averages of sums of pairwise comparison statistics.

250 Pairwise comparisons suggested that coxsackie A11 and A1

251 significant difference test, and appropriate pairwise comparison tests for independent samples were c

252 bout recombination, and that when just those pairwise comparisons that are informative about recombin

253 In adjusted pairwise comparisons, the annual rate of increase was gr

254 In pairwise comparisons, the LNS group had greater mean bir

255 In pairwise comparisons, the risk of the primary outcome wa

256 ugh these statistics are well understood for pairwise comparisons, there has been little success deve

257 hput ranking of whole docking simulations by pairwise comparison to experimental outputs.

258 imary end point was OS and was determined by pairwise comparison to the reference arm, with a 90% cha

259 e evidently higher than v2- and v3-ARV (each pairwise comparison to v1-AVR yields P < 0.01); in contr

260 Pairwise comparisons to a close relative, the sibling sp

261 These cell lines will facilitate pairwise comparisons to identify FSHD-specific differenc

262 classification (classification ranking), by pairwise comparison using the Elo rating method (compari

263 Pairwise comparisons using conservative acceptance crite

264 A pairwise comparison was then performed to estimate the r

265 indicated that the estimated fold-change in pairwise comparisons was the same using either linear mi

266 Hazard ratios for the three pairwise comparisons were as follows: for low versus hig

267 All P values resulting from pairwise comparisons were corrected with the Bonferroni

268 Pairwise comparisons were fit using 2-sample t test.

269 Pairwise comparisons were made by using the Tukey-Kramer

270 When significant differences were detected, pairwise comparisons were made using Fisher's exact test

271 Pairwise comparisons were made using unadjusted Cox Prop

272 Pairwise comparisons were not significant, although the

273 Pairwise comparisons were performed between mice of the

274 atistics, for each of the outcome variables, pairwise comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon s

275 7; VI, 27.0; and STP, 28.8, P = 0.001; Tukey pairwise comparisons were statistically significant for

276 None of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant.

277 Pairwise comparison with each commercial system serving

278 eas of transcription factor-binding sites by pairwise comparison with shark or rat CPS promoter regio

279 placebo, with use of significance testing of pairwise comparisons with a cutoff of p=0.05.

280 The results were similar in pairwise comparisons with the plus CBT strategy being su

281 Pairwise comparisons with the Tukey honestly significant

282 ne plus zalcitabine (P<0.001 for each of the pairwise comparisons with zidovudine alone).

283 IV1s from humans and chimpanzees in 18 of 48 pairwise comparisons, with all 18 showing faster rates o

284 ient samples showed good correlation in most pairwise comparisons, with some showing poorer correlati

285 d from -0.286 to 0.478) was observed through pairwise comparison within different kits.

286 er DCGS rate than the three ACR groups (each pairwise comparison yields P<0.05).