ライフサイエンスコーパス: parous

1 aegypti females collected in Tucson, AZ were parous.

2 pairs and in all children if the proband was parous.

3 ale (13%; P =.03) and when the recipient was parous (31%) than nulliparous (7%) or male (13%; P =.02)

4 sGVHD was more frequent when the donor was parous (32%) than nulliparous (9%) or male (13%; P =.03)

5 lliparous (1,612 breast cancers) and 204,270 parous (8,180 breast cancers) women to examine the hypot

6 al differences between the mammary glands of parous and nulliparous females.

7 Microarray expression profiling of parous and nulliparous mammary tissue from these four st

8 nerally agreed that the remodeled gland in a parous animal resembles that of a mature virgin at the m

9 rgin rats, respectively, and 0% in the twice-parous animals.

10 icantly different from the increase in women parous at baseline who had no further pregnancies (2.5 +

11 B2 similar to B1, no association among women parous at baseline).

12 iated with a lower risk of ovarian cancer in parous Chinese women.

13 sk of breast cancer is well recognized among parous compared with nulliparous women.

14 ected in banked whole blood DNA samples from parous female Golden Retrievers with at least one male p

15 We also compared these mothers with parous females receiving a kidney from nonoffspring dono

16 of mammary epithelia from nulliparous versus parous females to hormonal stimulation and carcinogenic

17 wever, in transplants from triple transgenic parous females, the WAP-TGF-beta1-positive PI-MEC did no

18 is abundant in nonlactating and nonpregnant, parous females.

19 with ANA in males, nulliparous females, and parous females; these estimates were adjusted for confou

20 l ductal lobular unit-like structures of the parous gland.

21 l ductal lobular unit-like structures of the parous mammary gland.

22 le loss at Apc was observed in adenomas from parous mice (line and backcrossed) carrying the line I M

23 Parous mice developed luminal mammary tumors in a cyclin

24 a population-based case-control study among parous Michigan women aged </=50 years using linked Mich

25 Compared with parous never smokers, women who had smoked for more than

26 Trichomonas infection was more common in parous non-Hispanic, black women, who reported low rates

27 Controls comprised 44,521 married parous nurses with no history of infertility and no preg

28 fection was increased in younger (OD = 7.9), parous (OD = 4.1) women born in high resources countries

29 All six patients were female, parous, of East Asian descent, and had disseminated infe

30 ink per week; P =.16), parity (nulliparous v parous; P =.45), history of benign breast disease (yes v

31 well as among nonwhites, obese patients, and parous patients.

32 c insults during this period than during the parous period.

33 This analysis included only data on parous postmenopausal women (3,633 cases and 3,790 contr

34 For White, parous premenopausal and postmenopausal women, those who

35 e nulliparous females, however, outperformed parous rats during the DLM visual cue test at 17 months

36 Parous rats exhibited improved spatial memory in the pro

37 and emotional modifications were observed in parous rats; the neurobiological mechanisms for these en

38 Of banked, parous samples, 36% yielded positive bands for the Y chr

39 Results for the parous showed a positive association between earlier par

40 f endometrial cancer (relative risk (RR) for parous versus nulliparous: 0.69, 95% confidence interval

41 by race and baseline parity (nulliparous or parous) were fully adjusted for study center, time, heig

42 Most were postmenopausal (66%), parous with a first full-term pregnancy <30y of age (79%

43 Women who were parous, with a history of previous breastfeeding, black,

44 ysis included all sibships with at least one parous woman and at least one other sibling.

45 em cell transplantations when the donor is a parous woman.

46 was donated from a living, 61-year-old, two-parous woman.

47 authors examined these questions among ever-parous women (1,310 cases and 1,385 controls) using mult

48 Among 704 parous women (620 non-GDM, 84 GDM), there were 120 incid

49 ated hazard ratio for nulliparous versus all parous women = 1.27 (95% confidence interval: 1.21, 1.34

50 from normal breast tissue of nulliparous and parous women and carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

51 n in the frequency of CD44(+)p27(+) cells in parous women and showed, using explant cultures, that pa

52 its major subtypes in a nationwide cohort of parous women and to assess their associations with chron

53 al cancer was diagnosed in 10.8% (n = 88) of parous women compared with 14.4% (n = 40) of nulliparous

54 In multivariable models, parous women had 40% lower PFOS (95% CI: -56 to -17%) an

55 Parous women had heavier fetuses than nulliparous women,

56 The lower risk of preeclampsia observed in parous women has prompted a hypothesis that cardiovascul

57 The 1785 parous women identified included 1212 women with bipolar

58 infant preterm (<37 weeks) and CVD in 70 182 parous women in the Nurses' Health Study II.

59 cted an observational cohort study of 55,636 parous women in the US Nurses' Health Study II.

60 iffer from those in a comparison group of 22 parous women not in the randomised trial.

61 Seronegative, parous women represent the highest risk population for c

62 Analyses among parous women showed that pregnancy timing was a stronger

63 here was a significantly lower risk of RA in parous women that was strongly correlated with the time

64 leles), a significant underrepresentation of parous women versus nulliparous women was observed (P =

65 e and other covariates, the risk ratio among parous women was 1.53 (95% confidence interval: 0.58, 4.

66 RA risk reduction in parous women was strongest among those who were younger.

67 Parous women were at reduced risk compared with nullipar

68 Sixty-eight parous women were studied for male DNA in PBMC and 20 fo

69 Parous women who change partners in a subsequent pregnan

70 For women who breast-fed (compared with parous women who did not breast-feed), the risk ratios (

71 ars (e.g., RR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.5, 5.5, among parous women who had breastfed > or =12 months, vs. 0-1

72 Parous women who worked with solvents before their first

73 fidence interval (CI): 2.0, 8.9, relative to parous women whose last birth was >5 years before the re

74 9% higher to 75% lower) lower incidence, and parous women with anorexia nervosa had a 76% (95% CI, 13

75 l psychosis occurred in 74% (N=20) of the 27 parous women with bipolar disorder who had a family hist

76 s followed 81 (26%) of 313 deliveries to 152 parous women with bipolar disorder, 58 (38%) of whom had

77 Parous women with no history of cancer were included in

78 g the cell-cycle regulator p27, are lower in parous women without BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations.

79 rous women), healthy controls (59 men and 80 parous women), 26 mothers of men with SSc, and 44 mother

80 DRB1 alleles of SSc patients (50 men and 36 parous women), healthy controls (59 men and 80 parous wo

81 Among parous women, the authors observed no association of can

82 s higher for nulliparous women compared with parous women, these results suggest that the association

83 Among parous women, those who had used lactation suppressants

84 al lactation per child, in a large cohort of parous women.

85 SSc was substantially greater in men than in parous women.

86 unrelated to walking in both nulliparous and parous women.

87 ancer associated with induced abortion among parous women.

88 hological changes that normally occur in the parous WT mouse.