ライフサイエンスコーパス: partial nephrectomy

1 edure: 9 open biopsies, 4 needle biopsies, 1 partial nephrectomy).

2 re similar to those of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy.

3 decreased morbidity when compared with open partial nephrectomy.

4 ar to be at least equivalent to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

5 r-specific survival rates comparable to open partial nephrectomy.

6 ave recently been published for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

7 renal cortical tumours undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy.

8 d for hemostatic control during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

9 the reference standard, open or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

10 al nephrectomy became an alternative to open partial nephrectomy.

11 ormal contralateral kidney will benefit from partial nephrectomy.

12 ive approach in selected patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.

13 rious effects of prolonged clamp time during partial nephrectomy.

14 drives ultimate postoperative function after partial nephrectomy.

15 a of functional outcomes after ischemia-free partial nephrectomy.

16 significant percentage of patients following partial nephrectomy.

17 nal clamp ischemia in 40 patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.

18 orts to minimize renal functional loss after partial nephrectomy.

19 plement to traditional laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy.

20 renal functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

21 emia' technique for laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy.

22 n to associate with complication rates after partial nephrectomy.

23 rular hypertrophy was induced by progressive partial nephrectomies.

24 ostatectomy; 20802, total nephrectomy; 8060, partial nephrectomy; 134985, hysterectomy; and 27445, oo

25 405 (6.8%) total nephrectomies, 2759 (34.2%) partial nephrectomies, 14 047 (10.4%) hysterectomies, an

26 lateral partial nephrectomy (48%), bilateral partial nephrectomy (35%), unilateral total nephrectomy

27 ateral total nephrectomy (10.5%), unilateral partial nephrectomy (4%), and bilateral total nephrectom

28 lateral total nephrectomy with contralateral partial nephrectomy (48%), bilateral partial nephrectomy

29 Recent evidence has demonstrated that partial nephrectomy also provides equivalent oncological

30 nt (stage 4 and higher) CKD after radical or partial nephrectomy among veterans treated for kidney ca

31 n per 1.73 m(2) was 80% (95% CI 73-85) after partial nephrectomy and 35% (28-43; p<0.0001) after radi

32 dentified 1925 patients (27.0%) treated with partial nephrectomy and 5213 patients (73.0%) treated wi

33 5%), and the use of nephron-sparing surgery (partial nephrectomy and ablation) increased (from 21.5%

34 The greater utilization of partial nephrectomy and ablative procedures has increase

35 tumors encompasses extirpative laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and ablative procedures such as cryo

36 database to identify patients who underwent partial nephrectomy and computed tomographic and/or magn

37 ong-term data are available for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and cryoablation.

38 In 2008, open partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

39 ent multicenter study comparing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy demonst

40 women) with renal masses underwent total or partial nephrectomy and preoperative renal CT.

41 successfully applied to radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy and pyeloplasty.

42 Standard robotic surgeries, such as partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy may soon i

43 t evidence and highlight emerging issues for partial nephrectomy and renal function.

44 of death for 37 patients (1.9%) treated with partial nephrectomy, and 222 patients (4.3%) treated wit

45 the factors that affect renal function after partial nephrectomy, and presents current information ab

46 Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy appears to be a safe and efficacious

47 ugh the preliminary results of zero ischemia partial nephrectomy are promising, further research is n

48 st recent oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy are reviewed.

49 yses demonstrate that the majority of T1b/T2 partial nephrectomy are still carried out by open surger

50 8, open partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy are the reference standards for trea

51 The most recent developments in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy are the subject of this review.

52 enal masses is transforming with adoption of partial nephrectomy as a safe and feasible surgical opti

53 described laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy as a safe management option for path

54 In propensity score-matched cohorts, partial nephrectomy associated with a significantly lowe

55 1997, 38 patients (41 lesions) who underwent partial nephrectomy at a single institution were preoper

56 on for select patients, wherein laparoscopic partial nephrectomy attempts to duplicate traditional, e

57 th small exophytic renal tumors laparoscopic partial nephrectomy became an alternative to open partia

58 lasty, ureteral reimplantation, complete and partial nephrectomy, bladder augmentation and creation o

59 The second (male) TSC patient had bilateral partial nephrectomies (both at age 36), with similar fin

60 iltration rate of less than 45 was 95% after partial nephrectomy, but only 64% following radical neph

61 Renal neoplasms amenable to partial nephrectomy can be identified and characterized

62 bility studies confirmed that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy can be performed safely.

63 Partial nephrectomy can now be safely performed without

64 After laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, collections are more frequently det

65 studies and systematic reviews suggest that partial nephrectomy decreases the risks of adverse renal

66 Comparisons between radical and partial nephrectomy demonstrate equivalent cancer contro

67 ng laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy demonstrated that equivalent cancer-

68 Early experience with robotic partial nephrectomy demonstrates good oncologic outcomes

69 Prevalence of findings 2-3 years after partial nephrectomy depends on the surgical approach.

70 term cancer control and renal function after partial nephrectomy equals the results of radical nephre

71 the initial reported experience with robotic partial nephrectomy, evaluating techniques, early outcom

72 al and oncologic outcomes comparable to open partial nephrectomy, even for complex tumors.

73 n the published series of minimally invasive partial nephrectomies for such renal masses.

74 There is a paucity of data for laparoscopic partial nephrectomies for this larger tumor size.

75 Partial nephrectomy for larger kidney tumors (T1b) has g

76 irmed, there is an increased push to perform partial nephrectomy for larger tumors.

77 Complex partial nephrectomy for multiple renal tumors, or multip

78 Elective partial nephrectomy for patients with a small (< or = 4

79 The feasibility of performing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4-7 cm in size has

80 clinical evidence and benefits of performing partial nephrectomy for renal tumors greater than 4 cm.

81 With clinical guidelines recommending partial nephrectomy for small renal masses, it is essent

82 In localised disease, partial nephrectomy for small tumours and radical nephre

83 The success of partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal can

84 To review current status of partial nephrectomy for treatment of T1b and T2 renal ma

85 Partial nephrectomy for tumors of 7 cm or less provides

86 unction over ischemia time in impacting post-partial nephrectomy function.

87 Patients treated with partial nephrectomy had a significantly lower risk of de

88 Finally, patients treated with a partial nephrectomy had reduced risk of mortality (hazar

89 Partial nephrectomy has become an effective method of tr

90 Partial nephrectomy has become the standard of treatment

91 , or zero-ischemia, approach to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has been a proposed means of preserv

92 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has been developed in an attempt to

93 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has been performed in 15 patients wi

94 NGS: A large breadth of data have shown that partial nephrectomy has equivalent oncologic outcomes co

95 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has lagged behind while laparoscopic

96 Partial nephrectomy has now emerged as an oncologically

97 g an off-clamp technique during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has variably shown increased intraop

98 e open counterpart, laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomies have equivalent operative time, de

99 Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy have been widely adopted for the man

100 nt radical prostatectomy, total nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, hysterectomy, or oophorectomy at 13

101 ith use of robotic-assisted surgery only for partial nephrectomy in facilities with medium-high (1.67

102 The role of partial nephrectomy in nonelective treatment of T2 tumor

103 ulti-institutional series indicate that open partial nephrectomy in patients with a solitary kidney c

104 t is essential to understand the benefits of partial nephrectomy in regards to renal function.

105 ribe the rationale for expanding the role of partial nephrectomy in the treatment of renal cortical t

106 ting the small renal mass, with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy increasingly becoming the preferred

107 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a technically challenging procedu

108 Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is a well tolerated and viable optio

109 Despite the mounting clinical evidence that partial nephrectomy is an effective and preferable appro

110 Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is an emerging technique for the tre

111 Partial nephrectomy is an essential surgical approach to

112 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is becoming a standard of care for s

113 al nephrectomy and renal functional benefit, partial nephrectomy is becoming an alternate standard to

114 Partial nephrectomy is effectively performed using both

115 Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is feasible with short-term results

116 Open partial nephrectomy is now recognized as the standard of

117 s indicate superior functional outcomes when partial nephrectomy is performed without global ischemia

118 Partial nephrectomy is successful for low risk unilatera

119 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is technically demanding; efforts di

120 Although partial nephrectomy is the preferred treatment for many

121 renal tumors less than 4-7 cm (T1 lesions), partial nephrectomy is the treatment of choice.

122 nal disease, including diabetic nephropathy, partial nephrectomy, ischemia, and anti-Thy1.1-induced n

123 Post-partial nephrectomy kidney quantity and quality are surg

124 34-78 years; 21 women, 37 men) underwent 62 partial nephrectomies (laparoscopic, 31; open, 31) to re

125 As familiarity with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has grown, application has exp

126 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) technique has continually evol

127 tcomes for RPN when compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), particularly in regards to de

128 Partial nephrectomy may be as effective as radical nephr

129 phrectomy, but under certain circumstances a partial nephrectomy may be done.

130 stage 4 or higher after radical (n=9759) or partial nephrectomy (n=4370) was 7.9% overall.

131 hosen, in part, to select tumors amenable to partial nephrectomy, newer data show that this may no lo

132 nded with a predicted survival increase with partial nephrectomy of 5.6 (95% CI, 1.9-9.3), 11.8 (95%

133 Partial nephrectomy of the left kidney was performed.

134 on model to estimate the treatment effect of partial nephrectomy on long-term survival.

135 lary renal cancer underwent CT and US before partial nephrectomy or enucleation; 205 renal masses wer

136 ere significantly higher with radical versus partial nephrectomy (P =.001).

137 trive towards improved kidney function after partial nephrectomy, particularly for larger tumors.

138 des an overview of outcomes for laparoscopic partial nephrectomies performed with or without hilar cl

139 Partial nephrectomy (PN) for SRMs is the standard treatm

140 A shift towards partial nephrectomy (PN) in the management of small rena

141 xperimental uremic cardiomyopathy induced by partial nephrectomy (PNx).

142 e with both contemporary and historical open partial nephrectomy pT1 controls.

143 Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is emerging as a viable compl

144 spite their evolution and promising results, partial nephrectomy remains the cornerstone of surgical

145 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after radical or partial nephrectomy remains unknown, and evidence to sup

146 tomy for multiple renal tumors, or multiplex partial nephrectomy, requires not only exceptional surgi

147 Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) is an option for patients desi

148 ly analyzed in the context of published open partial nephrectomy series.

149 patients with such masses minimally invasive partial nephrectomy should be considered for elective an

150 Partial nephrectomy should remain the standard of care f

151 y lacking, the early experience with robotic partial nephrectomy shows promise.

152 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Partial nephrectomy surgery typically requires clamping

153 d-arterial anatomy to allow even substantial partial nephrectomy surgery without clamping the main re

154 ization opens the door to more sophisticated partial nephrectomy surgery, wherein we can now tailor t

155 el technical refinements, such as anatomical partial nephrectomy surgery.

156 renal artery appears unnecessary during most partial nephrectomy surgery.

157 Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy techniques duplicate the open approa

158 the outcomes of unclamped and zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy techniques.

159 oncological outcomes are comparable to open partial nephrectomy, the gold standard.

160 scular instruments have allowed laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to become a viable option for select

161 However, studies comparing enucleation and partial nephrectomy to date have revealed equivalent onc

162 However, the application of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to larger, centrally located tumors

163 The comparative effectiveness of partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy to preser

164 y function (eGFR>/=60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)), partial nephrectomy was also associated with a significa

165 nclusion, compared with radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy was associated with a marked reducti

166 Partial nephrectomy was historically performed only for

167 s with T1 RCC treated with either radical or partial nephrectomy was noted (P =.219).

168 Partial nephrectomy was originally reserved for absolute

169 gs that could affect the decision to perform partial nephrectomy were retrospectively evaluated: tumo

170 ment of a reliable technique of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, which includes the ability to achie

171 Repeat and salvage partial nephrectomy, while challenging and potentially a

172 Widespread applicability of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy will only occur when oncologic outco