ライフサイエンスコーパス: pathotype

1 effective against other strains of the same pathotype.

2 sistent with a recent origin of this E. coli pathotype.

3 g genomic differences that define chlamydial pathotype.

4 de a better understanding of the invasive K1 pathotype.

5 , and K-12-specific and common genes of each pathotype.

6 ther than an independent local origin of the pathotype.

7 r for resistance to all four S. endobioticum pathotypes.

8 y Shigella, Salmonella, and Escherichia coli pathotypes.

9 ureus, which correlate with different strain pathotypes.

10 sociated with intestinal and extraintestinal pathotypes.

11 be used to definitively differentiate these pathotypes.

12 uch lower infectious dose than other E. coli pathotypes.

13 with various diarrheagenic Escherichia coli pathotypes.

14 tly, that they are found in specific E. coli pathotypes.

15 , some of which may be unique to C. burnetii pathotypes.

16 s in response to avirulent, but not virulent pathotypes.

17 ere are two generally recognized pathotypes (pathotypes 1 and 2) of the fungus Entomophaga grylli whi

18 high levels of resistance to S. endobioticum pathotypes 1, 2, 6 and 18 in the analyzed genetic backgr

19 evaluated for resistance to S. endobioticum pathotypes 1, 2, 6 and 18 most relevant in Europe.

20 high levels of resistance to S. endobioticum pathotypes 1, 2, 6 and 18.

21 To develop a more sensitive model, we pathotyped 18 low-pathogenic non-mouse-adapted influenza

22 The frequency of pathotype 3 infection has declined to levels where its l

23 In 1993, pathotype 3 infections declined to 1.7%.

24 1994 grasshopper populations were low and no pathotype 3 infections were found.

25 e 55 primers pairs designed from clones from pathotype 3 of P. sorghi, 36 flanked microsatellite loci

26 Between 1989 and 1991 pathotype 3 was introduced at two field sites in North D

27 Pathotype 3, discovered in Australia, has a broader gras

28 ipodinae, and Gomphocerinae were infected by pathotype 3, with no infections > 1 km from the release

29 n-producing E. coli (STEC) O111 strains (DEC pathotype 8).

30 amework for aEPEC in the context of the EPEC pathotype and will facilitate further studies into the e

31 diagnostic tool for determination of E. coli pathotypes and could also have a significant impact on t

32 pecific metabolic capabilities correspond to pathotypes and environmental niches.

33 plasmids resulted in strains with different pathotypes and levels of virulence, reflecting the diver

34 ogenicity islands present in various E. coli pathotypes and other pathogenic members of the Enterobac

35 Overall the pathotypes, apart from cytolethal distending toxin-produ

36 Conversely, diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes appear to have substituted sucrose for d-seri

37 This new pathotyping assay has the potential to aid surveillance

38 a virulence genes revealed two H. influenzae pathotypes associated with otitis media.

39 virulence genes associated with each E. coli pathotype but also the O157-, CFT073-, and K-12-specific

40 Phylogenetic analysis and pathotyping confirmed that virulent viruses of different

41 rrespective of virulence characteristics and pathotype designation, the O26 strains show greater geno

42 Although microbial pathotype diversity is conventionally associated with ge

43 h diverse cellular and molecular signatures (pathotypes) emerging as potential taxonomic classifiers

44 her support for the hypothesis that the EPEC pathotype has evolved multiple times within E. coli thro

45 The different E. coli pathotypes have maintained a remarkable synteny of commo

46 Comparison of effector diversity between pathotypes highlights correlation with plant resistance-

47 sed pathotype-specific DNA probes to confirm pathotype identification in E. grylli-infected grasshopp

48 that facilitates survival of each bacterial pathotype in its preferred host microenvironment.

49 overy of both metalaxyl resistance and a new pathotype in the causal organism, Peronosclerospora sorg

50 stent with that of the traditional mesogenic pathotypes in cormorants.

51 33, and FDSC ET-gr, the most common clinical pathotypes in each group.

52 h reference and clinical isolates of E. coli pathotypes indicated that the array could differentiate

53 herichia coli (ExPEC), so named because this pathotype infects tissues distal to the intestinal tract

54 ent EPEC isolates has revealed that the EPEC pathotype is more diverse than previously appreciated.

55 i (EAEC) organisms belong to a diarrheagenic pathotype known to cause diarrhea and can be characteriz

56 The combination of the mPCR and the pathotyping model predicted the virulence of an isolate

57 , the results of which were entered into the pathotyping model to yield a prediction of virulence.

58 ment of a generalized linear model (termed a pathotyping model) to predict the potential virulence of

59 idate the relationship of different synovial pathotypes/molecular signatures with therapeutic respons

60 enome sequence of strain Z7 of the tangerine pathotype of A. alternata.

61 The tangerine pathotype of Alternaria alternata produces the A. citri

62 d be classified within the enteroaggregative pathotype of E. coli.

63 The phylogenetics of the various pathotypes of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli are not com

64 To accurately determine the pathotypes of Escherichia coli strains, a comprehensive

65 The emergence of new pathotypes of the fungus aggravate this agricultural pro

66 The Rpg1 gene confers resistance to many pathotypes of the stem rust fungus Puccinia graminis f.

67 , but not the OURT pigs, consistent with the pathotypes of these strains and the replication of GRG i

68 ly, PB2-E158G substitutions also altered the pathotypes of two avian H5 viruses in mice, indicating t

69 an to APEC O1, indicating that separation of pathotypes on the basis of their extraintestinal or diar

70 cated that the array could differentiate the pathotypes on the basis of their virulence and specific

71 h America there are two generally recognized pathotypes (pathotypes 1 and 2) of the fungus Entomophag

72 zed for their seedling infection response to pathotype Pgt-MCC of the stem rust fungus Puccinia grami

73 10 genes were present only in the tangerine pathotype, representing the most likely candidate genes

74 The genome sequences of Escherichia coli pathotypes reveal extensive genetic variability in the a

75 quality genome assembly for G. rostochiensis pathotype Ro1, identify putative effectors and horizonta

76 t parasitic nematode Globodera rostochiensis pathotype Ro1-Mierenbos.

77 presents the first assessment of any E. coli pathotype's transcriptome in vivo and provides specific

78 trategies to prevent colonization by a given pathotype should be effective against other strains of t

79 The entire E. coli pathotype showed reactivity to only 4 of the 81 Salmonel

80 ing the most likely candidate genes for this pathotype specialization.

81 indistinguishable among pathotypes, we used pathotype-specific DNA probes to confirm pathotype ident

82 We identified multiple mRNA targets for the pathotype-specific sRNA Esr41, which was shown to regula

83 These results suggest that ElpA is a pathotype-specific T4SS effector that influences ER func

84 t, whereas a dominant Salmonella Typhimurium pathotype, ST313, was primarily associated with invasive

85 zed as low pathogenicity by standard in vivo pathotyping tests.

86 infection with various diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes than with E. coli controls (P<.05).

87 oxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), an E. coli pathotype that inflicts an enormous global disease burde

88 Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKP) is an emerging pathotype that is capable of causing tissue-invasive and

89 nic commensal isolates and numerous virulent pathotypes, the PhoP virulence regulator has only been s

90 ause of stochastic loss of the most virulent pathotypes, through a process analogous to Muller's ratc

91 eight populations including four additional pathotypes to identify variation.

92 Recently, we reported that the APEC pathotype was characterized by possession of a set of ge

93 entification and characterization of E. coli pathotypes was developed by constructing gene-specific p

94 are morphologically indistinguishable among pathotypes, we used pathotype-specific DNA probes to con

95 ent of probiotics to target multiple E. coli pathotypes will be problematic, as the factors that gove

96 G. rostochiensis is classified into pathotypes with different plant resistance-breaking phen