ライフサイエンスコーパス: pea

1 ions of secondary symbionts carried by 1,104 pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum.

2 pped reads from the re-sequencing data of 33 pea aphid genomes from individuals specialized on differ

3 +/- 1.2 (Chironomidae larvae), 107 +/- 4.5 (pea clams Pisidium sp.), 131 +/- 105 (three-spined stick

4 enome of R. leguminosarum bv. viciae 3841, a pea-nodulating endosymbiont, encodes a sensor histidine

5 odextrin (M) and carboxymethylcellulose at a pea protein:carbohydrate ratio of 3:1.

6 abenula is a tiny brain region the size of a pea in humans.

7 Insertion of a 12-aa pea aphid gut-binding peptide by adding to or replacing

8 cells pulsed with the main peanut allergens [pea-T10 cells]).

9 Furthermore, Plsp1 in Arabidopsis and pea thylakoids migrated faster under non-reducing condit

10 e) to salt and alkaline-extracted canola and pea proteins and commercial wheat gluten were studied us

11 sates derived from tilapia mince, casein and pea protein, were investigated.

12 sion compared with non-hydrolyzed casein and pea protein.

13 was observed in casein hydrolysate (CH) and pea protein hydrolysate (PPH) by attenuating lipopolysac

14 igated cross-reactivity between chickpea and pea/lentil/soybean/hazelnut.

15 cross-reactivity exists between chickpea and pea/lentil/soybean/hazelnut.

16 gE-binding profiles of chickpea globulin and pea/lentil/soybean/hazelnut extracts were analyzed by im

17 (KAMUT(R) khorasan wheat, emmer, lupine and pea) were hydrolyzed with commercial enzymes and Lactoba

18 (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici) and pea (Fusarium 'solani' f. sp. pisi).

19 go truncatula nodule root (noot) mutants and pea (Pisum sativum) cochleata (coch) mutants, which are

20 structural differences between B. napus and pea root cap arabinogalactan proteins and (2) a cross-li

21 when chitosan was used for wheat, potato and pea extract.

22 digestion kinetics for purified starches and pea flours.

23 tensive crops, such as wheat, sunflower, and pea; semi-intensive crops, such as pear, chickpea, cotto

24 on in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and pea (Pisum sativum).

25 concentration factors (RCFs) for tomato and pea were independent of PFAA chain length, while radish

26 r upon nodulation in Medicago truncatula and pea (Pisum sativum) that form indeterminate nodules.

27 velopment are conserved in M. truncatula and pea.

28 of azoxystrobin residues in green beans and peas using HPLC-UV and the results confirmed by GC-MS.

29 6% and 80.77% to 100.91% for green beans and peas, respectively.

30 8% and 81.99% to 107.85% for green beans and peas, respectively.

31 of azoxystrobin residues in green beans and peas.

32 luded potential apparent competition with AR pea aphids.

33 ss on clover race (CR) and alfalfa race (AR) pea aphids on broad bean, red clover and alfalfa alone.

34 fferent steps of ABA biosynthesis as well as pea (Pisum sativum) wilty and tomato (Solanum lycopersic

35 nd autoclaving, of Polish cultivars of bean, pea and lentil seeds on the chemical composition and sta

36 g, termed ELF3b Genetic interactions between pea ELF3 genes suggest that loss of PPD function does no

37 an expression of cross-reactivity, caused by pea and/or lentil as the "primary" allergen.

38 Plants fed upon by pea aphids release volatiles that attract parasitic wasp

39 of settling and survival on dodder vines by pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) were reduced significan

40 , spelt and rye) and four gluten-free (chick pea, lupin, buckwheat, amaranth) flours were used to mak

41 y immobilise a beta-galactosidase from chick pea onto alkylamine glass using Box-Behnken experimental

42 nfirmed with LC-MS/MS, indicating that Chick pea beta-galactosidase (CpGAL) is a heterodimer.

43 ioxidant properties were determined in chick-pea, green and red lentils and sweet chestnut flours, in

44 es, which include lentils, beans, chickpeas, peas, and soybeans, provide an important source of prote

45 an) in red and green colour morphs of clonal pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum.

46 es at concentration of 5%(w/w) of commercial pea and rice protein isolates in the ratio of 2:1(w/w) a

47 were investigated and compared to commercial pea protein concentrate (PPC).

48 We compared pea aphid gene expression between bacteriocytes and othe

49 In conclusion, pea dextrin is suitable for masking off-flavour resultin

50 le compounds in an aqueous system containing pea protein and maltodextrins was followed under thermod

51 ntake of starchy vegetables, including corn, peas, and potatoes, was associated with weight gain.

52 Defatted cowpea flour was prepared from cow pea beans and the protein isolate was prepared (CPI) and

53 e, sorghum, oil palm, beans, sugar cane, cow peas, wheat and cassava.

54 CR pea aphids always had fitness losses when on broad bean

55 ant species of the coffee, violet, cucurbit, pea, potato, and grass families.

56 ion thread formation, as a null SL-deficient pea (Pisum sativum) mutant forms significantly fewer inf

57 centrations were also lower in the different pea/whey protein blend ratios than in pure pea or whey p

58 frost tolerance was conducted on 672 diverse pea accessions at three locations in Northern China in t

59 eriod response between wild and domesticated pea, and show that one of these, high response to photop

60 ns of two progenitor species of domesticated pea in the Mediterranean Basin and in the Fertile Cresce

61 s such as beans, lentils, chickpeas, and dry peas) are well positioned to aid in weight control, the

62 clarify the role of GA3ox expression during pea (Pisum sativum) plant growth and development, we gen

63 and their relatives, including, for example, pea, bean, barley, oat, rye, rice and maize.

64 ses of flavour compounds with salt-extracted pea protein isolates (PPIs) were determined using variou

65 followed by wheat gluten and salt-extracted pea protein isolates (PPIs), while binding of ketone fla

66 Black-eyed pea (Vigna unguiculata) is a legume species widely grown

67 analyse transcript expression in black-eyed pea organs and to compare data with other legume species

68 The black-eyed pea reference genotype has been used to generate a gene

69 ature raw seeds of chickpea type Desi, field pea and common vetch.

70 and flour characteristics of different field pea (FP) accessions were evaluated.

71 acid profile from the oil of harvested field pea (Pisum sativum) varieties as part of a research proj

72 s profile suggests that the species of field pea investigated might have the potential to be used as

73 uld be a good option for biofortifying field peas.

74 re predominant compounds in chickpeas, field peas and common vetch compared to flavonoids, whereas th

75 ties of grain legume seeds (chickpeas, field peas, faba beans, common vetch and lupins) produced in E

76 To evaluate the potential of cooked field peas to be used in Zn biofortification programs, all com

77 ties of recently released cultivars of field peas [CDC Golden (CDCG), Abarth (ABAR), CDC Patrick (CDC

78 nyl aminopeptidase N (APN) as a receptor for pea enation mosaic virus (PEMV) coat protein (CP) in the

79 A fourth pea locus, PHOTOPERIOD (PPD), also contributes to the ph

80 10 proteins, CaARP from chickpea, ABR17 from pea and the major pollen allergen Bet v1 from silver bir

81 /MS and the sequence of peptide derived from pea proteins was determined as KEDDEEEEQGEEE.

82 strate specificity of LSMT-like enzymes from pea and Arabidopsis concerns only Rubisco.

83 r, the arabinogalactan protein fraction from pea attracts zoospores far more effectively than that fr

84 The seed oils from pea samples contained palmitic and stearic acids as majo

85 tive aromatic aminotransferase (PsArAT) from pea that may function in the PAA synthesis pathway.

86 II and IV of the AUX/IAA protein PsIAA4 from pea (Pisum sativum) revealed a globular ubiquitin-like b

87 berries were investigated in this study from pea size to harvest during 2012.

88 trate specificity of two AMADH isoforms from peas (PsAMADHs).

89 andard broccoli, 400 g HG broccoli, or 400 g peas each week for 12 wk, with no other dietary restrict

90 estimation in spinach, capsicum, and garden pea and demonstrated that this method offers a versatile

91 nships for their hormonal activity in garden pea (Pisum sativum).

92 rs, orthologous to Mendel's A gene of garden pea, whose loss of function is associated invariantly wi

93 t this type of learning occurs in the garden pea, Pisum sativum.

94 ortion of flowering time variation in global pea germplasm is controlled by HR, with a single, widesp

95 ate pre-veraison growth stages (bloom, grain-pea size, and bunch closure) and maintained leaf free un

96 content and NPQ were observed in grapevine, pea and sunflower, and were effectively captured by WABI

97 The seeds of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.), a drought tolerant crop, were

98 unds varied from around 130 mg kg(-1) (green pea) to around 930 mg kg(-1) (spinach).

99 ed for 5-day-old stored sprouts; 75.17-green pea, 83.18-lentil and 89.87-mung bean.

100 In green pea and mung bean sprouts a slight increase of chemicall

101 Storage of green pea sprouts decreased reducing power and increased the a

102 ds in glass jar and metal cans such as green peas, garniture, corn, tomato paste, pepper paste, pickl

103 in marker-assisted breeding for winter-hardy pea cultivar.

104 In pea (Pisum sativum L.), source to sink partitioning of a

105 In pea (Pisum sativum), the protein-lysine methyltransferas

106 In pea (Pisum sativum), the reverse reaction, phenylpyruvat

107 In pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum), several inherited endo

108 nd previously that FMN hydrolase activity in pea chloroplasts is Mg(2+)-dependent, suggesting an enzy

109 Our results suggest that feeding behavior in pea aphids is neither simple nor highly polygenic.

110 The inheritance of flower color in pea (Pisum sativum) has been studied for more than a cen

111 h (SDS) and resistant starch (RS) content in pea bread were investigated.

112 trains leaf expansion during deetiolation in pea and provide further evidence that down-regulation of

113 rlying compound inflorescence development in pea and may have wider implications for future manipulat

114 abeling of endogenous Toc75 POTRA domains in pea (Pisum sativum) and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thalian

115 Here, we show that this dwarfism in pea (Pisum sativum) is not attributable to the strong br

116 sor and Tha4 and disulfide bond formation in pea (Pisum sativum).

117 g/g) in celery shoot, and PFBA (150 ng/g) in pea fruit.

118 Among a set of genes in pea (Pisum sativum L.) that were induced under drought-s

119 ce of vicilin, a sulfur-poor 7S globulin, in pea seeds.

120 The Tic20 protein was identified in pea (Pisum sativum) as a component of the chloroplast pr

121 CD49b(+)LAG3(+) TR1 cells were induced in pea-T10 cells at comparable percentages from HC subjects

122 mutant at the LATE BLOOMER2 (LATE2) locus in pea (Pisum sativum) that is late-flowering with a reduce

123 The STERILE NODES (SN) locus in pea (Pisum sativum) was one of the first photoperiod res

124 erize mutants at the Crispoid (Crd) locus in pea (Pisum sativum), which have altered auxin homeostasi

125 , several ramosus (rms) branching mutants in pea (Pisum sativum) have SL defects, perturbed xylem CK

126 ing to IAA and PAA, evidence from mutants in pea and maize (Zea mays) indicate that IAA biosynthetic

127 rization of loss-of-function abi5 mutants in pea uncovered a role for ABI5 in controlling the relativ

128 equired or regulated during bud outgrowth in pea (Pisum sativum).

129 nd SL coordinately regulate bud outgrowth in pea (Pisum sativum).

130 e stem is not important for bud outgrowth in pea.

131 cid, is synthesized by a parallel pathway in pea.

132 ization of genes involved in pigmentation in pea provides valuable anchor markers for comparative leg

133 Anthocyanins are the main flower pigments in pea.

134 Here, we show that in pea (Pisum sativum) seeds, 4-chloroindole-3-acetic acid

135 vide a novel mechanism of frost tolerance in pea.

136 tarch were present in significant amounts in peas and kidney beans.

137 for cotyledon color (yellow versus green) in peas.

138 strain Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5 inhabiting pea seed surfaces were revealed using a whole-genome oli

139 matrix was investigated, and an interesting pea-pod-like segregation of Au nanoparticles in PS domai

140 oteins in Arabidopsis and other species like pea suggests a role of protein lysine methylation in car

141 uch as chickpea, common bean, lentil, lupin, pea, and soybean, by using the same experimental procedu

142 reenhouse in soils preceded by either maize, pea, soybean or sunflower.

143 However, in maturing pea (Pisum sativum) seeds, the level of the chlorinated

144 as different as giant squid and microscopic pea clams.

145 on transport chain, we overexpressed a minor pea (Pisum sativum) Fd isoform (PsFd1) in tobacco (Nicot

146 during illumination confirmed that the minor pea Fd isoform promotes enhanced cyclic flow around phot

147 ning up to 37.5% of encapsulated roasted MPS pea starch not only provided high SDS and RS fractions (

148 orthologs from other legume species, namely pea (Pisum sativum) and Lotus japonicus, we show that th

149 ostructures, including mesoporous nanotubes, pea-like nanotubes and continuous nanowires.

150 Nevertheless, pea products are underused as a protein source in human

151 RU2307 nodulated peas and bacteria grew down infection threads, but bacte

152 ration resistance against another nonadapted pea powdery mildew fungus, Erysiphe pisi.

153 o (Pst) DC3000 hrcC(-) and to the nonadapted pea (Pisum sativum) powdery mildew Erysiphe pisi However

154 ion of pea flour and starch to produce novel pea ingredients for enrichment of slowly digestible star

155 undertook a systematic, detailed analysis of pea (Pisum sativum) root tip cell walls.

156 cterized the binding site on the V-ATPase of pea albumin 1b (PA1b), a small cystine knot protein that

157 er-like cells." Whereas root border cells of pea (Pisum sativum) are clearly involved in defense agai

158 rops, as well as in the fruit compartment of pea.

159 n ten varied wall systems (WS) consisting of pea protein isolate or pea protein concentrate (PPC) alo

160 owave roasting and alginate encapsulation of pea flour and starch to produce novel pea ingredients fo

161 The expression of pea BRANCHED1, a TCP transcription factor expressed stro

162 ed on the assumption that the off-flavour of pea proteins might be decreased using the retention of v

163 Subcellular fractionation of pea (Pisum sativum) leaf protoplasts indicated that 30%

164 fects of alkali on structure and function of pea starch are explained on the basis of limited gelatin

165 investigated to enhance the functionality of pea-rice protein isolate blends (PR).

166 sults showed that the thermal co-gelation of pea/whey proteins blended in ratio of 2:8 in NaCl soluti

167 us proposal that the Clariroseus (B) gene of pea controls hydroxylation at the 5' position of the B r

168 ly support our hypothesis that the B gene of pea corresponds to a F3'5'H gene.

169 lf-matings between two parental genotypes of pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) differing in virulence o

170 ivery of fused proteins into the hemocoel of pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum, without virion assembly

171 tant out-competed wild-type for infection of pea nodules in mixed inoculations.

172 Inoculation of pea aphid Armet protein into tobacco leaves induced a tr

173 of bacterial cultures before inoculation of pea roots increases the number of nodules per plant and

174 tramolecular transglutaminase cross-links of pea proteins, based on protein size determination, were

175 tive method to extract volatile molecules of pea flour.

176 tified in the supernodulating nod3 mutant of pea (Pisum sativum).

177 on phenotype, similar to the clv2 mutants of pea and Lotus japonicus.

178 the identified AON component, NODULATION3 of pea, might act downstream from or beside the CLE peptide

179 sory representativity of the global odour of pea flour.

180 nomyces euteiches, an oomycetous pathogen of pea roots.

181 The wing polyphenism of pea aphids is a compelling laboratory model with which t

182 valuate the off-flavour masking potential of pea dextrin (PD) in emulsions rich in omega-3 and omega-

183 the structural and functional properties of pea starch granules was studied using a range of charact

184 cross-reacts with the allergenic proteins of pea and lentil.

185 Host-associated races of pea aphid discriminate between plant species in race-spe

186 Studies of pea sgrL mutants revealed that plants had significantly

187 n the reproductive and associated tissues of pea during the developmental phase that sets the stage f

188 lated in the floral/fruit/pedicel tissues of pea.

189 ons on the Toc159 GTPase domain (Toc159G) of pea (Pisum sativum) using cleavage by bound preproteins

190 To improve the frost tolerance of pea, field evaluation of frost tolerance was conducted o

191 d no effect of LATE2 on the transcription of pea CO-LIKE genes, nor on genes in any other families pr

192 ary biomarkers related to the consumption of peas (N-methyl nicotinic acid), apples (rhamnitol), and

193 eae leaves develop differently from those of peas, as both LFY/FLO and STM are expressed in developin

194 at increased amino acid uptake fixed N(2) on pea plants.

195 that mutation of praR increased biofilms on pea roots.

196 predation in complex agricultural mosaic on pea aphid clover and alfalfa races.

197 pea allergy is associated with lentil and/or pea allergy, but evidently may not present independently

198 c areas and is associated with lentil and/or pea allergy.

199 ms (WS) consisting of pea protein isolate or pea protein concentrate (PPC) alone at varied core:WS ra

200 ings grown in soils preceded by sunflower or pea had greater vigor.

201 than interventions with standard broccoli or peas.

202 hloem loading exerts regulatory control over pea biomass production and seed yield, and that import o

203 The ability of PPARgamma to affect ped/pea-15 expression was also lost in cells and in C57BL/6J

204 ke in L6 cells expressing the endogenous ped/pea-15 gene but not in cells expressing ped/pea-15 under

205 d in C57BL/6J transgenic mice expressing ped/pea-15 under the control of an exogenous promoter, sugge

206 /pea-15 gene but not in cells expressing ped/pea-15 under the control of an exogenous promoter.

207 showed insulin resistance and increased ped/pea-15 levels, although these effects were reduced by ro

208 ion, c-jun silencing in L6 cells lowered ped/pea-15 expression and caused nonresponsiveness to rosigl

209 Repression of ped/pea-15 transcription might contribute to the PPARgamma r

210 esults indicate that PPARgamma regulates ped/pea-15 transcription by inhibiting c-JUN binding at the

211 f an exogenous promoter, suggesting that ped/pea-15 repression may contribute to rosiglitazone action

212 PARgamma) represses transcription of the ped/pea-15 gene, whose increased activity impairs glucose to

213 erexpression enhanced the binding to the ped/pea-15 promoter and blocked the rosiglitazone effect.

214 ption by inhibiting c-JUN binding at the ped/pea-15 promoter.

215 Thus, ped/pea-15 is downstream of a major PPARgamma-regulated infl

216 NOFOLIA (STF), and its orthologs in Petunia, pea, and Nicotiana sylvestris are required for leaf blad

217 (pigeon pea) and Lablab purpureus L.

218 ietinum (chickpea) and Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea) and two outgroup reference species: Arabidopsis tha

219 (Fissurella latimarginata), and pinnotherid pea crab parasites for a sea urchin (Loxechinus albus).

220 ) were found to differ in ability to protect pea aphids attacked by the parasitoid Aphidius ervi.

221 t pea/whey protein blend ratios than in pure pea or whey proteins, when dissolved in 1.0% or 2.5% (w/

222 Dual import assays with purified pea (Pisum sativum) chloroplasts and mitochondria, and s

223 Dual-import assays with purified pea (Pisum sativum) mitochondria and chloroplasts, and s

224 asuring root growth allocation by split-root pea plants, we show that they favor variability when mea

225 The complex was purified from Pisum sativum (pea) chloroplast envelopes by native gel electrophoresis

226 nd carries a nonsense mutation in the single pea (Pisum sativum) ortholog of the ethylene signaling g

227 served on children's toothbrushes with small pea-size heads.

228 (Lycopersicon lycopersicum), and sugar snap pea (Pisum sativum var. macrocarpon) from an industriall

229 hermal gelation properties when salt-soluble pea proteins were co-gelated with whey proteins in NaCl

230 matic hydrolysis of proteins from rice, soy, pea and wheat, with both chymotrypsin and thermolysin, r

231 rces such as milk, egg, fish, rice, soybean, pea, chlorella, spirulina, oyster and mussel.

232 of abi5 mutants in a second legume species, pea (Pisum sativum), confirmed a role for ABI5 in the re

233 he cell wall of the root cap in two species: pea (Pisum sativum), which makes border cells, and Brass

234 Despite their antigen specificity, pea-T10 cells of patients with PA with or without OIT, a

235 rformed on three different days for spinach, peas, apples, banana, and beetroot.

236 ted designation of origin (PDO) yellow split pea species growing only in the island of Santorini in G

237 te "Fava Santorinis" from other yellow split peas, four classification methods utilising rare earth e

238 rone to adulteration with other yellow split peas.

239 In this study, pea (Pisum sativum) plants overexpressing AMINO ACID PER

240 discovery of "partial coupling" in the sweet pea (later "linkage") and to the diagram known as Punnet

241 se results extend previous work to show that pea orthologs of all three Arabidopsis evening complex g

242 The pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, maintains extreme variat

243 The pea Psbrc1 mutant displays an increased shoot-branching

244 The pea rms1 SL-deficient mutant was used in a SL bioassay b

245 atiles that attract parasitic wasps, and the pea aphid can carry facultative endosymbiotic bacteria t

246 al candidate approach, we identify SN as the pea ortholog of LUX ARRHYTHMO, a GARP transcription fact

247 f a mutually obligate symbiosis, between the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) and its maternally trans

248 e wines relies on a fine balance between the pea pod, capsicum character of MPs and the passion fruit

249 hanced binding and toxicity against both the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, and the green peach aphi

250 in which transcript levels of BRANCHED1, the pea homolog of the maize TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 gene were qu

251 cies, and in this study, we characterize the pea VEGETATIVE2 (VEG2) locus, showing that it is critica

252 oval (0%, 50%, 100%) were imposed during the pea-size stage of development from the cluster zone.

253 nsa, increase the fitness of their host, the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum), under natural condition

254 lycosylated receptor aminopeptidase N in the pea aphid gut and is transcytosed across the gut epithel

255 Armet, namely as an effector protein in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum.

256 In the pea aphid, some of the seven known species of facultativ

257 as a major effect on feeding behavior in the pea aphid.

258 lant virus pea enation mosaic virus into the pea aphid vector.

259 cid permease PsAAP1 were introduced into the pea genome and expression of the transporter was targete

260 anscriptomic and metabolomic analyses of the pea (Pisum sativum) rhizosphere, a suite of bioreporters

261 Additional copies of the pea amino acid permease PsAAP1 were introduced into the

262 s (PEMV) coat protein (CP) in the gut of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, using a far-Western blot

263 oles during each stage of development of the pea compound inflorescence.

264 cular motion within the glassy matrix of the pea cotyledon.

265 results reveal an important component of the pea photoperiod response pathway and support the view th

266 rate of in vitro enzymatic breakdown of the pea starch.

267 The function of PsBRC1, the pea (Pisum sativum) homolog of the maize (Zea mays) TEOS

268 l for the study of incipient speciation, the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum).

269 olyphenism is transgenerational, in that the pea aphid mother experiences the environmental signals,

270 ants are also compromised in immunity to the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum), for which Arabidopsis i

271 miting to efficient nitrogen delivery to the pea embryo, we manipulated both simultaneously.

272 with predicted topological similarity to the pea protein (psTic20).

273 We use the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) to address this problem.

274 of these complexes by the embryo, using the pea (Pisum sativum) as a model species.

275 Three pea (Pisum sativum) loci controlling photoperiod sensiti

276 When oven roasting was applied to pea starch, SDS content increased triply compared to the

277 tion of branching at these nodes specific to pea.

278 e important crops - grapevine, corn, tomato, pea and sunflower - were evaluated under water deficit c

279 wth and development, we generated transgenic pea lines (in a lele background) with cauliflower mosaic

280 The transgenic pea plants showed increased phloem loading and embryo lo

281 mpact of crop genetics and processing in two pea lines (Pisum sativum L.) on starch digestion kinetic

282 We placed experimental populations of two pea aphid lines, each with and without symbionts, in fiv

283 rences still existed between r and wild type pea lines.

284 in the progenitor purple-flowered wild-type pea.

285 and performing a protein import assay using pea chloroplasts.

286 is responsible for entry of the plant virus pea enation mosaic virus into the pea aphid vector.

287 minase-treated low concentration (0.01% w/w) pea albumin samples, compared to the untreated one (cont

288 the best sources of total dietary fibre were peas and kidney beans (more than 11 g/serving).

289 tinases and HT29 migration and growth, while pea seeds showed no effect.

290 The genetic diversity of wild pea may be driven by Miocene-Pliocene events, while the

291 seedling death and yield reduction in winter pea.

292 An in vitro assay with pea (Pisum sativum) chloroplasts was developed to conduc

293 Inhibition-assay with pea/lentil completely suppressed IgE-binding to chickpea

294 Import assays with pea (Pisum sativum) chloroplasts showed that PyrR and Py

295 lin variations were then cross-compared with pea (Pisum sativum), leading to the identification of ca

296 bean, tepary bean, velvet bean, and wrinkled pea) and hylon VII starches towards in vitro hydrolysis

297 n at the rugosus (r) locus leads to wrinkled pea seeds, a reduction in starch content and a lower ext

298 will be randomized to either a 15 g/d yellow pea fibre supplemented group or isocaloric placebo group

299 objective is to assess the effects of yellow pea fibre supplementation on weight loss and gut microbi

300 project will assess the potential of yellow pea fibre to improve weight control via gut-mediated cha