ライフサイエンスコーパス: peach

1 The highest ash content was 3.9% (melon and peach).

2 tent varied from 3% (Surinam cherry) to 39% (peach).

3 ulatory networks for fruit quality traits in peach.

4 ved clinical association between cypress and peach.

5 .3% of GB positive patients were positive to peach.

6 scale post-harvest physiological disorder in peach.

7 to environmental stresses in flower buds of peach.

8 and sorbitol accumulation in flower buds of peach.

9 tool to assist fruit quality improvement in peach.

10 hrimp, peanut, hazelnut, celeriac, apple and peach.

11 ergic subjects that tolerate both peanut and peach.

12 us Prunus, including cherries, apricots, and peaches.

13 o a dwarf phenotype similar to that of dw/dw peaches.

14 and the most common were to hazelnut (9.3%), peach (7.9%) and apple (6.5%).

15 nut allergy and tolerance to peach; Group 3, peach allergy and tolerance to peanut; Group 4, nonaller

16 Peach allergy is common too in Southern Europe.

17 Mediterranean patients: Group 1, peanut and peach allergy; Group 2, peanut allergy and tolerance to

18 Fruits of 'Suncrest' and 'Babygold 7' peach and 'Big Top' nectarine cultivars were irradiated

19 r, pepper, spinach, zucchini, grape, cherry, peach and apricot.

20 eta-cryptoxanthin and beta-carotene in kaki, peach and apricot.

21 the DORMANCY ASSOCIATED MADS-BOX genes from peach and hypothesize that it may play a direct role in

22 d carrying the nonautonomous mariner element peach and mRNA encoding the transposase.

23 yphenolic extracts and fractions of selected peach and plum genotypes were evaluated for cell viabili

24 created from cold-acclimated bark tissue of peach and selectively probed using an antibody directed

25 Whole genome sequences of apple, peach and strawberry are available to browse or download

26 y of enhancing phenolic compound contents in peaches and nectarines by post-harvest irradiation with

27 cal Exercise and Appetite in CHildren Study (PEACHES) and repeated by 113 mothers 3 y later.

28 sibling deciduous and evergreen genotypes of peach, and also inducible by water deficit in cv. Rio Os

29 strongly correlated with IgE against walnut, peach, and apple and against Chenopodium, plane tree, an

30 commercialized in Brazil (strawberry, mango, peach, and orange) were analyzed and indicated the absen

31 Apple, peach, and pear as non-citrus fruit fibres were examined

32 (eg, birch and alder) and foods (eg, apple, peach, and soy).

33 The green peach aphid (GPA) (Myzus persicae Sulzer) is an importan

34 Green peach aphid (GPA) Myzus persicae (Sulzer) is a phloem-fe

35 persicae Sulzer, commonly known as the green peach aphid (GPA), which is an important phloem sap-cons

36 rsicae (Sulzer), commonly known as the green peach aphid (GPA).

37 Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and green peach aphid (GPA; Myzus persicae Sulzer), we found that

38 PAD4) is essential for defense against green peach aphid (GPA; Myzus persicae) and the pathogens Pseu

39 Extract of the green peach aphid (GPA; Myzus persicae) triggers responses cha

40 ana shoots by the phloem sap-consuming green peach aphid (GPA; Myzus persicae), an agronomically impo

41 globally important economic pest - the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) - growing on 34 plant taxa,

42 8 also show enhanced resistance to the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) compared with wild-type con

43 se pathways was investigated following green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) feeding on Arabidopsis.

44 ays with the generalist phloem-feeding green peach aphid (Myzus persicae), and in weight-gain assays

45 se to feeding by its aphid vector, the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae), and increases aphid fecund

46 w (Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis) and green peach aphid (Myzus persicae), but retained susceptibilit

47 oEL displayed reduced fecundity of the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae), indicating enhanced resist

48 is gap we exposed four naive clones of green peach aphid (Myzus persicae), maintained on the model cr

49 e against a phloem-feeding insect, the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae).

50 gated in Arabidopsis infested with the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae).

51 system, also reduced potato aphid and green peach aphid fecundity, respectively.

52 in host plant physiology and increased green peach aphid reproduction.

53 the alarm pheromone in Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) and many other aphid species.

54 When Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) feeds on Arabidopsis aliphatic glucosinolat

55 ial diet both decrease Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) reproduction, suggesting a direct toxic or

56 Remarkably, the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, colonises plant species acr

57 eding herbivore-host plant system: the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, feeding on multiple brassic

58 ea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, and the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae.

59 ; parasitoid Aphidius colemani) of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae.

60 ssion of Arabidopsis resistance to the green peach aphid.

61 Although green peach aphids (Myzus persicae) are able to avoid most con

62 However, settling and survival of green peach aphids (Myzus persicae) were not affected.

63 sis (cotton mealybug), Myzus persicae (green peach aphids) and Bemisia tabaci (silver leaf whitefly).

64 with this hypothesis, Myzus persicae (green peach aphids) prefer to settle on Nicotiana benthamiana

65 context, the syntenic regions identified in peach, apple and strawberry might be useful to interpret

66 Carotenoids in orange, cherry, peach, apple, and kale were stable (except alpha-caroten

67 characterised by floral and fruity flavours (peach/apricot, Muscat, melon, banana and strawberry) whi

68 hod to small RNA sequence data from soybean, peach, Arabidopsis and rice and provide experimental val

69 gene for the br mutation in Prunus persica (peach) associated with vertically oriented growth of bra

70 In the extrafloral nectar of peach, B was present as a mixture of sorbitol-B-sorbitol

71 Peach-based intensification was pronounced (300-400%) an

72 It is demonstrated that LTPs from wheat and peach bind a range of lipids in a variety of conditions,

73 Fruit quality traits are essential peach breeding program objectives since they determine c

74 Fractionation of peach BY00P6653 extracts gave 4 fractions, with fraction

75 enbuconazole, propiconazole, or pyridaben in peaches; carbendazim, imazalil, terbutryn, and thiabenda

76 Since matrix effects were observed in the peach commodity, organic acids were quantified by the st

77 chains were more flexible in simulations of peach compared with barley LTP1.

78 mediate sorbitol synthesis in flower buds of peach concomitantly with specific chromatin modification

79 Pulp from peaches contained polygalacturonic acid and arabinogalac

80 677 and weaker Penta rootstock on 'Rich May' peach cultivar.

81 tionship between susceptibility of different peach cultivars (cvs) to the Mediterranean fruit fly (me

82 The volatile compounds of four peach cultivars (Prunus persica L.) were studied: Sudane

83 esults indicate that the phenolic extract of peach cultivars inhibits Abeta and alphaS fibril formati

84 ce' (850 h CR) and 'Springprince' (650 h CR) peach cultivars through winter 2008-2009.

85 We used peach cultivars with contrasting chilling requirements (

86 it quality, particularly for southern Europe peach cultivation conditions.

87 al dehydrins (V. riparia YSK2, 60 kilodalton peach dehydrin [PCA60], barley dehydrin5 [Dhn5], Thellun

88 The peach dehydrin gene encodes 472 amino acids with a predi

89 The capacity of peach DMSO extracts to inhibit Candida albicans growth w

90 Here, we report eight fossil peach endocarps from late Pliocene strata of Kunming Cit

91 The fossils are identical to modern peach endocarps, including size comparable to smaller mo

92 ow that China has been a critical region for peach evolution since long before human presence, much l

93 Peaches evolved their modern morphology under natural se

94 he enzymatic browning in minimally processed peaches for 8 days of storage.

95 ble (except alpha-carotene and zeaxanthin in peach) for 13, 9.7, 5.7, 2.5 and 7.5months, respectively

96 sfully applied to the analysis of samples of peach from two cultivars.

97 Several cultivars of peach fruit (Prunus persica L.) were investigated.

98 o analyse 238 kaki, cashew apple, guava, and peach fruit and pulp samples, which were also analysed f

99 MPG1 and MPG2 were closely related to peach fruit and tomato abscission zone PGs, and MPG3 was

100 Here we described the peach fruit as a system to link the phenotype of a slow

101 roperties, such as sweetness and acidity, in peach fruit by mid infrared spectroscopy is of interest

102 ic content and the antioxidant capacities of peach fruit extracts was found, indicating that phenolic

103 od for the determination of organic acids in peach fruit has been developed.

104 me that gluconic acid has been determined in peach fruit.

105 o increase the health-promoting potential of peach fruits and indirectly to ameliorate the aesthetic

106 Here, chemical biodiversity of peach fruits from fifteen varieties, at harvest and afte

107 -FTIR) was tested here on two populations of peach fruits issued from contrasting genitors providing

108 Peach fruits subjected to prolonged cold storage (CS) to

109 82, annotated as hypothetical protein in the peach genome sequence, was identified as a candidate gen

110 no acid sequence of LTP was identical in all peach genotypes but, for the first time, peel LTP was fo

111 gy; Group 2, peanut allergy and tolerance to peach; Group 3, peach allergy and tolerance to peanut; G

112 The oldest evidence for the peach has been Chinese archaeological records dating to

113 p 3 in vivo, a mouse model of anaphylaxis to peach has been produced and changes in the humoral and b

114 Allergic cross-reactions between cypress and peach have been reported, including an oral allergy synd

115 Among these, the peach HEC3-like gene FLESHY showed a strongly altered ex

116 on is very bright but shows subtle yellow to peach hues which probably arise from the production of c

117 Peach is widely thought to have origins in China, but it

118 Peach juices of distinct varieties, namely yellow- and r

119 sed analysis (PCA) proved useful to classify peach juices on the basis of variety.

120 IgE-immunoblotting with peach leaf extract revealed in six patient sera a pair o

121 The SBCT with peach leaf extract was positive in the asthmatic sensiti

122 pecific bronchial challenge test (SBCT) with peach leaf extract.

123 Those bands could be two isoforms of peach leaf lipid transfer proteins( LTP), so the recogni

124 nation of As, Cd, Hg and Pb in NIST SRM 1547 peach leaves and SRM 1573a tomato leaves reference mater

125 n NIST standard reference materials SRM 1547 Peach Leaves and SRM 1573a Tomato Leaves.

126 Sensitization to peach leaves was the cause of occupational respiratory s

127 dard reference materials for polluted water, peach leaves, and tomato leaves.

128 The allergen Pru p 3, a peach lipid transfer protein, has been well studied.

129 There, peach LTP (Pru p 3) seems to be the primary sensitizer,

130 Peach LTP was initially cleaved at Tyr79-Lys80 and then

131 onditions do not disrupt the 3D structure of peach LTP, explaining why LTPs retain their ability to b

132 KEY MESSAGE: Pru p 3, a peach LTP, is located in pollinated flower styles and se

133 cross-reactive allergen between cypress and peach might be responsible for the observed clinical ass

134 our physical and eight sensory properties of peach nectar were explored using the best-fit multiple l

135 d with aroma active compounds of PEF-treated peach nectar.

136 itized to peach were mainly positive for the peach-nonspecific lipid-transfer protein.

137 immunoblot inhibition using sera specific to peach or pellitory pollen.

138 h oranges (OR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.06-0.51) and peaches (OR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.13-0.67) had a decreased o

139 TP being more resistant to cleavage than its peach ortholog.

140 (P = .023), fresh oranges (P = .002), fresh peaches (P = .002), and collard greens/kale (P = .014).

141 rotenoid extracts from two Amazonian fruits, peach palm (7.83+/-0.21) and mamey (6.90+/-0.44).

142 portant family which includes apple, cherry, peach, pear, raspberry, rose and strawberry.

143 The peach physical map can be viewed using WebFPC/WebChrom,

144 able Rosaceae ESTs, the genetically anchored peach physical map, Rosaceae genetic maps and comprehens

145 mes, the children were offered fruit (apple, peach, pineapple, or all 3 types).

146 This suggests a new biological activity for peach polysaccharides.

147 The peach potato aphid, Myzus persicae, is one of the most i

148 Behavioural studies on peach-potato aphids showed that a reduced response to al

149 pression of the two GID1-like genes found in peach, PpeGID1c and PpeGID1b, was analyzed.

150 We have shown that peach PpeS6PDH gene is down-regulated in flower buds aft

151 se data define potential for improvements to peach production efficiency and fruit quality, particula

152 luate the allergenic properties of LTPs from peach (Pru p 3) and pellitory (Par j 1/Par j 2), major f

153 caused by lipid transfer protein (LTP) from peach (Pru p 3) is frequently associated with sensitizat

154 al of 1.8 cM corresponding to ~364 Kb in the peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) genome.

155 ivated in Tunisia: kaki (Diospyros kaki L.), peach (Prunus persica L.) and apricot (Prunus armeniaca

156 graveolens L.) and the extrafloral nectar of peach (Prunus persica L.).

157 Peach (Prunus persica) fruits from different varieties d

158 uence-based genotyping, and the high-quality peach (Prunus persica) genome reference sequence for sin

159 a recessive brachytic dwarfism trait (dw) in peach (Prunus persica) that has little or no effect on f

160 tein (LTP, Pru p 3) is the major allergen of peach (Prunus persica), and is in a greater abundance in

161 30% similar to an endopolygalacturonase from peach (Prunus persica).

162 Peach (Prunus persica, Rosaceae) is an extremely popular

163 esentative crops such as apple (Malus spp.), peach (Prunus spp.), and strawberry (Fragaria spp.).

164 ADS-box transcription factors (DAM genes) in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] as potential candidat

165 and nutritional homogeneity and quality with peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch].

166 d ripening stages in three climacteric (i.e. peach [Prunus persica] and two tomato [Solanum lycopersi

167 , blueberries, sweet cherries, table grapes, peaches, raspberries, and strawberries) in a postharvest

168 n blot analysis, indicating transposition of peach rather than random integration of the plasmid DNA.

169 wing two patterns: patients also allergic to peach, responding to Ara h 2 and Pru p 3, and patients a

170 in the extraction of pesticides from canned peach samples.

171 of this region, BES were mapped against the peach scaffold_3 and BACs were anchored to the apricot m

172 evelopment, DRO1 homologs in Arabidopsis and peach showed root-specific expression.

173 Much later, peach size and variety increased through domestication a

174 h event in the southwestern USA, the 18.8 Ma Peach Spring Tuff, were formed by pyroclastic flows that

175 ers of the dehydrin gene family may exist in peach that vary in their relation to ppdhn1.

176 reared to adulthood, and the transmission of peach to the F1 generation was tested by PCR.

177 Specific IgE to GB, peach, tomato and nut-mix was measured.

178 upational respiratory diseases in workers of peach tree crops have been reported punctually and have

179 ed with extracts from leaves and branches of peach tree.

180 Most patients suffered symptoms when peach trees had leaves, specifically during thinning and

181 symptoms related to occupational exposure to peach trees.

182 these SNPs on downstream products from the 'peach v1.0' genome sequence was carried out.

183 rification of LTP from peel and pulp of four peach varieties [Gladys (white flesh), California (necta

184 Peach varieties clustered into four groups: two groups o

185 nonspecific lipid transfer protein (LTP) of peach were compared with the homologous LTP1 of barley a

186 Patients sensitized to peach were mainly positive for the peach-nonspecific lip

187 rst shown to directly impact endodormancy in peach where a deletion of a series of DAM resulted in lo

188 r two highly homologous genes are present in peach, whereas an additional member was detected under l

189 Robustness was demonstrated using fresh peaches, which provided recovery values within acceptabl

190 rases encoded by mycobacteriophages Bxz2 and Peaches with unusual and unpredictable specificities.