戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  for FEV(1), maximal midexpiratory flow, and peak expiratory flow rate.
2    The degree of obstruction was measured by peak expiratory flow rates.
3  a T(Low) was set to terminate at 75% of the peak expiratory flow rate (0.11-0.14 seconds), creating
4 1] yr, FEV(1), 1.06 [0.61] L) recorded daily peak expiratory flow rate and any increases in respirato
5                                              Peak expiratory flow rate and mean airway resistance wer
6                          Each agent improved peak expiratory flow rates and quality of life, reduced
7 ificant difference between the groups in the peak expiratory flow rate at six months (difference in m
8 e to ragweed kept daily diaries and recorded peak expiratory flow rates between July and October.
9  peak inspiratory pressure increased and the peak expiratory flow rate decreased with increasing leve
10                             The mean morning peak expiratory flow rate improved significantly in both
11                    Secondary end points were peak expiratory flow rates in the morning and evening, a
12 ing the observation phase, the mean (+/- SE) peak expiratory flow rate measured in the morning during
13  flow was assessed with self-recorded serial peak expiratory flow rate measurements (PEFR) using a mi
14 or patients with severe asthma (defined as a peak expiratory flow rate of <50 percent of the predicte
15 atients with moderate asthma (indicated by a peak expiratory flow rate of 50 to 70 percent of the pre
16   The primary outcomes were the mean morning peak expiratory flow rate over a four-week period during
17 , lung function (26 L/min difference in a.m. peak expiratory flow rate, p = 0.011), asthma control sc
18 3.91%), MMEF (-7.39%), FEF(75) (-8.12%), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (-4.65%) as compared wi
19  < 5.5 lb. had greater declines in morning % peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (1.8% versus 0.3% per 1
20 an: 0.75 versus 0.75 d, p = 0.57) or initial peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (51% versus 53% of pred
21         For 3 mo the children measured their peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) every morning and eveni
22                         In addition, morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) improved significantly
23 ion of peak expiratory flow rate (T-PEFR) to peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) of 10%, 25%, 50%, and 7
24                                We found that peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was significantly lower
25                                      Morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was the primary outcome
26                 This study hypothesized that peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) would increase with acu
27 low (MMEF); acid vapor with lower FVC, FEV1, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and MMEF; and O3 with
28 f the end-expiratory flow rate (EEFR) to the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR; from 10% to 25% to 50%
29                                              Peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) and signs and symptoms
30 lume in 1 second (FEV1), vital capacity, and peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) were also recorded.
31 ond [FEV1], forced vital capacity [FVC], and peak expiratory flow rate [PEFR]) normalized for subject
32         Patients measured and recorded their peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs) three times each day.
33 episodes on daily variations in symptoms and peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs) was examined in a stu
34  with recent patient-specific clinical data (peak expiratory flow rates [PEFRs], emergency department
35  was set to achieve ratios of termination of peak expiratory flow rate (T-PEFR) to peak expiratory fl
36 tored for daily symptoms, medication use and peak expiratory flow rate until baseline.
37     During the two treatment years, the mean peak expiratory flow rate was higher in the immunotherap
38 x, axial length/corneal curvature ratio, and peak expiratory flow rate were associated with center su
39                                      Sex and peak expiratory flow rate were associated with retinal t
40 ract surgery, ocular perfusion pressure, and peak expiratory flow rate were associated with retinal t
41                                              Peak expiratory flow rates were 6.4 L/s and 5.0 L/s; res
42 in the first second of expiration and/or the peak expiratory flow rate, which correlated with symptom

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。